
Meet the kaiāwhina who volunteer to keep protesters safe
Since the first rally in support of the people of Gaza in 2023, seasoned activists knew there would be counter-protesters. They formed a group, Kaiāwhina Tāmaki, to de-escalate disruptions and keep people safe.
'Our first week, we were like a fruit salad,' says Bianca Ranson (Ngāpuhi, Ngāti Kahu ki Whangaroa), a long-time community organiser and activist. At the very first rally in support of Palestine at Auckland's Aotea Square on October 21, 2023, about 20 seasoned activists wore mismatched hi-vis vests – blue, orange, yellow, pink, green. They were what each had lying around at home or had borrowed to marshal the event.
Thousands of people turned up wearing red, green, black and white, waving Palestine flags and bearing placards. On the edges of the crowd, a handful of counter-protesters appeared with Israel's white and blue flag, megaphones and their own placards. The marshals focused on de-escalation, but the counter-protesters were disruptive, and Ranson knew that they'd continue to appear at any future rallies. They needed to be more organised.
A year and a half later, all the rally marshals wear fluro green vests with two reflective strips, a Tino Rangatira flag patch and the word 'Kaiāwhina' (helper, assistant, contributor, counsel, advocate) stencilled in black along the back. Some have radios with headsets, others have megaphones. When counter-protesters come, as they do every week, they're quickly blocked off from the main protesters with banners – some plain white, others painted with messages like 'nothing to see here' or 'Zionist here'. People attending the rallies are told to move along and not give the disruptors any energy.
After that first rally, the group's formation 'happened very quickly,' says Ranson. The core group already knew each other thanks to years of intertwined kaupapa. But as their ability to deal with counter-protesters is growing, so are the threats they face.
A community security or marshalling service isn't a new idea. Māori Wardens are one of the longest standing volunteer institutions in the country, established in the late 1800s to help maintain order within Māori communities and protect the rights and safety of Māori people. Today, they're regulars at large events including protests, visible in uniforms which include black ties, silver-button blazers and sometimes hats or hi-vis vests. Māori Wardens are known to watch out for people and de-escalate situations with an understanding of tikanga to resolve conflicts and steer away from violence.
'We kind of see them as our tuākana,' says Ranson. The newly forming Kaiāwhina group turned to them for advice and training. 'They've been very supportive and willing to share their knowledge and experiences with us.' When Kaiāwhina are asked to help at one-off events, they encourage the organisers to also reach out to the Māori Wardens for support. With the Palestine rallies, 'we can't expect Māori Wardens to be down there every single week for 18 months. We just wanted to be able to organise ourselves.'
There are more than 120 Kaiāwhina from different activist groups and communities who volunteer their time, and their services aren't restricted to Palestine events. They have marshalled the Auckland stretch of Hīkoi mō te Tiriti, the New Zealand Nurses Organisation strike in December 2024 and the Pride Parade march earlier this year as well as the weekly Palestine rallies. They run social media accounts that give people advice on how to stay safe at protests. Currently, they're fundraising for radios and getting ready for self-defence workshops. There's one belief that ties the Kaiāwhina together – that people have the right to be safe while protesting and that the police do not provide that safety. Their un-official motto is: 'We keep us safe'.
As the conflict in Gaza continues, so do the weekly rallies. Over the 18 months the political moment has 'heightened' and 'people are feeling a little bit more emboldened,' says Ranson. In recent months, there's been increasing awareness that Kaiāwhina need to keep themselves safe as well as others. Starting this month, self-defence is being incorporated in their regular training, and while they extend their marshalling services beyond Palestine rallies, they won't marshal events where they don't believe they'll be safe – because of the kaupapa or because organisation is lacking.
A core belief guiding the Kaiāwhina is that everyone should be able to protest safely as long as they aren't harming others. Ranson tentatively stretches this out to the counter-protesters. 'Hold your own event, if you want to hold your own protest,' she says, 'don't consistently come and intentionally enter into our space to create harm.' Ranson says that at first the Kaiāwhina wondered, 'Whoa, who's this guy? Who are these guys?' but now they recognise most of them, know their names and can trace which groups or ideologies they're associated with. Many, she says, are members of Destiny Church, though they don't usually turn up with the same force or visibility as they did in October last year outside TVNZ.
When members of Destiny Church's group Man Up gathered outside the rainbow story time event at Te Atatū Community Centre on February 15, Kaiāwhina were alerted. Trav Mischewski, who is also a member of the Tāmaki Street Medics collective, says that a message pinged on his screen saying 'there's a shit ton of Destiny Church people here. It's feeling really tense. We would love for some Kaiāwhina to turn up'. He put his first aid kit in the car and began the half-hour drive there.
Another message came shortly after saying to hold off because there were concerns that the presence of Kaiāwhina could escalate tensions. Mischewski waited in a carpark around the corner for a few minutes before popping into the library 'incognito' without his kit or hi-vis. He remembers that a librarian was on the phone trying to get police officers to come, and then the violent entry. 'I've protested in front of all sorts of scary, ugly, tough people, and I didn't think it was gonna affect me that much,' he says. 'It still affects me'.
In late March, seven people who were arrested following the event appeared at Waitākere District Court. They were charged with assault, indecent assault and injuries with intent. While an application for interim name suppression was denied for six of them, it was immediately appealed, meaning the defendants cannot yet be named. All defendants were remanded on bail. They are not to threaten or use violence, not be within 100m of the Te Atatū Library or have contact with the complainants.
'They're [Destiny Church counter protesters] extremely dangerous,' says Ranson. 'People need to understand they're not just annoying, they've proven that they will use violence.' She says that at the weekly Palestine rallies, the counter-protesters yell 'all of their usual Destiny Church kind of things about terrorists and Islam and immigrants that is just completely abhorrent'.
Ranson believes that the counter-protesters are trying to provoke reactions to create content for social media. 'It's pretty much all about content.' In response, Kaiāwhina run safety briefings at the beginning of rallies asking people to ignore counter-protests. Kaiāwhina have noticed that where once disruptions would be livestreamed onto Facebook, now only snippets are uploaded.
The police are part of the equation too. Mischewski says the police are contacted in advance to advise about protests as a sort of olive branch. He says while police are 'not allies', the relationship has improved as the weekly Palestine protests have gone on. 'They are generally way more inclined to listen to us and respect our wishes and acknowledge that we too want to keep the peace.' Mischewski knows that they will step in if things 'get really out of hand' but Kaiāwhina aim to diffuse and prevent harm much before that. 'Ultimately we want the police to not be needed.'
Being a Kaiāwhina is showing Mischewski glimmers of something bigger. 'Kaiāwhina has been a really beautiful sort of meeting point,' he says. He's seeing people from different organisations and kaupapa turn up to support each other, he's seeing skills and knowledge shared and spread, he's seeing the building of alternative structures and people attuning themselves to question, 'How can we look after each other in a way that is meaningful and matters?'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Recognising the strength and resilience of community
Hundreds of people turned out to the hīkoi along Kaikohe's main street. Photo / Jenny Ling Opinion by Hūhana Lyndon Hūhana Lyndon is a Green Party list MP based in Whangārei, Te Tai Tokerau. Lyndon's portfolios include health, Māori development, Whānau Ora and forestry. She is a proud descendant of Ngāti Hine, Ngātiwai, Ngāti Whātua, Waikato Tainui and Hauraki. It's been galling to watch on as the death of 3-year-old mokopuna Catalya Remana Tangimetua Pepene, when her body is hardly cold, is being used as a political patu against the people of Ngāpuhi. It's not something that should be used for media clickbait. He Taonga Te Mokopuna. I


Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Supermarkets Slammed For Bad Behaviour
Another day, another report that reveals how badly the duopoly supermarkets of Woolworths and Foodstuffs are treating their customers and suppliers to benefit themselves. 'Kiwi consumers deserve so much better than this. We are still paying some of the highest prices on the planet to put food on the table and we have known this for more than three years,' said Grocery Action Group chair Sue Chetwin. Today's report from the Commerce Commission slams the supermarket duopoly sector for the way it treats its suppliers by making unrealistic demands of them and asking them to wear costs the supermarkets should be covering. The Commission also says this is a significant issue for any potential competitors who face an insurmountable battle to get wholesale groceries at a reasonable price. 'The report reveals the supermarkets suppliers are being subsidised by around $5 billion in rebates, discounts and promotional payments. Competitors just cannot compete with that power inbalance. 'It doesn't work for consumers either because prices bounce around so much they no longer know what a fair price might be,' Chetwin said. 'The report shows once again that despite the Commission and the Government calling out this appalling behavour the incumbents continue to treat consumers and suppliers as if they own them,' Chetwin said. 'In many respects they do. Foodstuffs and Woolworths hold more than 80% of the market. This lack of competition means consumers have no to little choice about where they shop.' Grocery Action also notes the large suppliers are complicit in this play because the lack of competition also helps keep their prices high. GAG is concerned improvements to the supply and wholesale codes proposed by the Commission, including prohibiting retaliation against suppliers who assert their rights will not be enough. 'The Commission is asking the duopoly to 'voluntarily' change the wholesale code over the next 12 months – that's like politely asking the greedy to stop being greedy. It won't work. 'We have already seen the duopoly play by its own rules. The industry has been on notice since the Commission released its Supermarket Study in 2022, which said supermarkets were making excessive profits and that a lack of competition meant we were paying some of the highest prices in the world for food, but nothing has changed. 'Hopefully this latest report will assist the Grocery Minister Nicola Willis, to conclude that forced divestment of the supermarkets to allow more competition needs to happen now, not in some distant future. Consumers will thank her.' Grocery Action background The Grocery Action Group was formed to bring down the prices of groceries for all Kiwis. Our vision is to influence government, the regulators and other parties to deliver a competitive and consumer-focused grocery sector in New Zealand. Our board is made up of consumer, industry, supplier and Māori interest experts. For more info visit


Otago Daily Times
5 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
What is the future for the Waitangi Tribunal?
Now that the Treaty Principles Bill has been consigned to the bin some who want to keep up the conversation about sovereignty and rangatiratanga (Māori self-determination), are refocusing on the Waitangi Tribunal. On the one hand are those who believe the tribunal should be remade to have the power to make decisions which are binding on the government. This would make the tribunal the highest power in New Zealand, above Parliament. (Incidentally, King Charles may well have concerns if Parliament attempts to cede its authority). On the other hand there are those who say the tribunal has done its job and should be dismantled. One of the earliest documents in our history was the Treaty. This document was intended to provide for a peaceful society by, among other things, describing Queen Victoria as in charge, reserving to each tribe their lands, other possessions and their rangatiratanga. This was interpreted for many years as leaving each Māori tribe authority over their own affairs and assets and that Queen Victoria was generally in charge over all. The Waitangi Tribunal came into being in 1975. Its purpose was to make recommendations on claims relating to the application of the principles of the Treaty. For that purpose it is to determine what the Treaty means and whether certain matters are inconsistent with these principles. It costs around $21 million per annum to run. For most of us this tribunal was set up to right the wrongs perpetrated on Māori by the Crown confiscating lands and other possessions. For many years it has had widespread support from New Zealanders. The law establishing the tribunal specifically denies jurisdiction in regard to any Bill that has been introduced to Parliament, unless Parliament has resolved to refer it to the tribunal. As historical land claims are coming to an end, the publicised work of the tribunal has been taken up with making comment about a wide variety of issues, with a focus on the choices government might make. For example the tribunal has spent some years looking into health. The tribunal made a finding that "the health system has not addressed Māori health inequities in a Treaty-compliant way, and this is in part why Māori health inequities have persisted". When the government disestablished the recently established Māori Health Authority the tribunal found that the Crown prejudiced Māori by not engaging with them over the scrapping of the authority. The Waitangi Tribunal has also been conducting a long-standing inquiry into a variety of claims relating to freshwater. Giving evidence to this inquiry The New Zealand Māori Council in 2018 pushed for a water commission to be appointed (rather than elected) made up of 50% Māori to control all water in New Zealand. A lawyer representing over a dozen hapu and iwi said the way the Crown had managed freshwater and left Māori out of the process was similar to theft. This year the tribunal has found that the Treaty Principles Bill breached Treaty principles by failing to guarantee rangatiratanga. When it looked into the proposed Regulatory Standards Bill it found that, if it were enacted, this Bill would be of constitutional significance, as it seeks to influence the way Parliament makes law and therefore it is inherently relevant to Māori. A potted version of the history could be described as thus. In 1840 the Treaty of Waitangi was signed between the Crown and various Māori tribes in New Zealand. This gave Queen Victoria overall control of New Zealand. Each tribe was guaranteed to keep ownership of their own land and possessions and to have internal control of their own affairs. Every citizen in New Zealand had the protection of the Crown. In 1975 the Waitangi Tribunal was set up to deal with legitimate grievances over confiscation of land and other possessions. It was expanded in 1985 in relation to historical claims. The tribunal has now interpreted its role as making pronouncements over any proposed legislation. It seems to have decided that all legislation can and would affect Māori, and if Māori could become part of a group who become or remain disadvantaged the law proposed is a breach of Treaty obligations. In our society, which now has many more than just British and Māori subjects, how can we best move forward? Will we continue with the tribunal with a focus on Māori to the exclusion of other priorities for government support hoping this will remain viable? Will we elevate the Waitangi Tribunal to make it the supreme decision-maker in New Zealand over all things which could possibly touch on the lives of Māori? Or might it be better to decide once the tribunal finishes its historic claims it is time to close it down, possibly replacing its role of critiquing government policies as they may affect Māori with a cheaper option? The challenge we have is to try to weave the Treaty and whatever arrangements we have around it with the primary duty of a stable democratic country to look after its most vulnerable without fear or favour. One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, One ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them. Like Tolkien said. hcalvert@ • Hilary Calvert is a former Otago regional councillor, MP and Dunedin city councillor.