Trump administration sues 4 New Jersey cities over 'sanctuary' policies
TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — The Trump administration sued four New Jersey cities over their so-called sanctuary city policies aimed at prohibiting police from cooperating with immigration officials, saying the local governments are standing in the way of federal enforcement.
The Justice Department filed the suit Thursday against Newark, Jersey City, Paterson and Hoboken in New Jersey federal court. The lawsuit seeks a judgment against the cities and an injunction to halt them from enacting the so-called sanctuary city policies.
'While states and local governments are free to stand aside as the United States performs this important work, they cannot stand in the way,' the suit says.
It's the latest case from Republican President Donald Trump's administration against sanctuary policies. The administration also sued Chicago, Denver, the state of Colorado, and Rochester, New York.
There is no official definition for sanctuary policies or sanctuary cities. The terms generally describe limited local cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. ICE enforces U.S. immigration laws nationwide but sometimes seeks state and local help.
Messages seeking comment were left Friday with the affected cities.
Paterson Mayor Andre Sayegh said his city would fight the suit, calling it an 'egregious attempt to score political points at Paterson's expense.'
'We will not be intimidated,' he said in a text message.
Hoboken Mayor Ravi Bhalla said in a statement the city prides itself on its inclusivity.
'The City of Hoboken will vigorously work to defend our rights, have our day in court, and defeat the Trump Administration's lawlessness. To be clear: we will not back down,' he said.
The mayors of all four cities are Democrats.
New Jersey's attorney general adopted a statewide Immigrant Trust Directive in 2018, which bars local police from cooperation with federal officials conducting immigration enforcement. The policies adopted by the four cities are similar.
The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with a lower court that New Jersey's statewide policy could stand, but it's unclear how that court's order might affect the government's case against the four cities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
27 minutes ago
- Washington Post
As disasters loom, emergency managers say they aren't counting on FEMA
Preparation for the unknown was always in Alan Harris's job description as emergency manager for Seminole County, Florida, where thousands of homes suffered flood damage during Hurricane Ian in 2022. But as hurricane season begins this year, there is a fresh layer of uncertainty to contend with. The Trump administration has declared a desire to reshape a federal disaster response system widely considered to be too complicated and winding, and has already taken steps to upend it.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A New Social Security Garnishment Is Set to Begin This Summer -- but There Are 2 Legal Ways Most Retirees Can Avoid It
Getting as much as possible out of Social Security isn't a luxury for most retirees -- it's an absolute necessity. This summer, the Trump administration will begin garnishing up to 15% of Social Security benefits for delinquent federal student loan borrowers. Two perfectly legal solutions exist that may allow a majority of tardy federal student loan borrowers to avoid having their Social Security checks garnished. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › For most retirees, Social Security isn't just income that's deposited into their checking or savings account on a monthly basis. It represents a financial lifeline that many would likely struggle to make do without. In 2023, Social Security was responsible for lifting 22 million people above the federal poverty line, some 16.3 million of whom were adults aged 65 and above. Meanwhile, 23 years of annual surveys from national pollster Gallup find that up to 90% of retirees require their monthly benefit, to some degree, to make ends meet. Getting as much out of Social Security isn't a luxury -- it's often a necessity. But beginning sometime this summer, select retirees can expect their Social Security checks to shrink by up to 15%. For some of these beneficiaries, it's income they simply can't afford to lose. For well over six decades, the federal government has played a role in subsidizing and guaranteeing student loans. As of April 2025, the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) notes that 42.7 million Americans had a cumulative $1.6 trillion in federal student loans outstanding. However, the collection of federal student loan repayments was halted during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020) and was simply never lifted. According to the DOE, more than 5 million borrowers haven't made a payment in 360 days, and another 4 million are between 91 and 180 days late on their monthly payments. While higher education student loans may sound like something that affects relatively younger Americans, they've become a prominent issue for retirees. Whereas the aggregate number of student loan borrowers under the age of 62 has declined by 1% from 2017 to 2023, the number of student loan borrowers aged 62 and above has surged 59% to approximately 2.7 million over the same period, based on data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Per the CFPB, an estimated 452,000 of these senior borrowers have defaulted on their federal student loans and are likely receiving Social Security benefits. Since President Donald Trump took office in January, his administration has targeted perceived government fraud and is aiming to make federal operations more efficient. One of the many changes under Trump, vis-à-vis the Social Security Administration (SSA), is the reimplementation of Social Security garnishments for delinquent federal student loan borrowers. Beginning "sometime this summer," per Trump's administration, tardy borrowers receiving a Social Security benefit -- this applies to all types of beneficiaries (retired workers, survivors of deceased workers, and workers with disabilities) -- could see their payouts garnished by up to 15%. The one caveat to this garnishment is that recipients must be left with at least a $750 monthly Social Security benefit. Thus, if your normal payout is $825 per month, the maximum garnishment would be $75 per month instead of the flat 15%. Additionally, the Trump administration isn't planning to offer delinquent federal student loan borrowers a 65-day warning prior to potential garnishment, as has been customary in the past. Rather, communications sent out provide just 30 days' notice that garnishments are possible if borrowers are still in default. According to the CFPB, 37% of the Social Security beneficiaries who have a federal student loan outstanding (delinquent or not) currently rely on their monthly check from America's leading retirement program for 90% (or more) of their income. Even a 15% garnishment for defaulted borrowers in this category has the potential to be financially devastating. It goes without saying that the easiest way to avoid this new garnishment by the Trump administration is to not be in default on your federal student loan(s). But for the roughly 452,000 Social Security retirees set to be impacted by this change in policy, there are two under-the-radar yet perfectly legal solutions that should allow a majority to avoid having their payouts garnished. To begin with, some of these defaulted borrowers may qualify for the Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) discharge program, which cancels federal student loans and stops forced collections. As the CFPB pointed out in a January research report, the DOE entered into a data-matching agreement with the SSA in 2021 to automate the TPD eligibility and federal student loan cancellation processes for beneficiaries who become disabled prior to reaching full retirement age (currently age 67 for anyone born in or after 1960). However, this TPD application process is failing Social Security beneficiaries who become permanently disabled after they reach full retirement age. The CFPB notes that the onus of applying for a TPD discharge of their federal student loans and/or garnishment falls onto aged beneficiaries. Census survey data shows that approximately 22% of Social Security recipients with federal student loans report having a permanent disability, per the CFPB's report. Social Security retirees currently in default on their federal student loan(s) can also potentially avoid having their monthly check garnished by applying for a financial hardship with the DOE. Defaulted borrowers will be required to provide documentation of their income and qualifying expenses to the DOE. If an individual's qualifying expenses are larger than their documented income -- especially pertaining to a possible 15% garnishment of their Social Security payout -- the DOE will likely grant a financial hardship exemption. Based on data from the Federal Reserve Board's Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking, the CFPB estimates that a whopping 82% of Social Security beneficiaries currently in default on their federal student loans would qualify for the hardship exemption -- in other words, their qualified expenses would exceed their documented income. Yet, a 2015 Government Accountability Office report found that fewer than 10% of Social Security recipients with forced federal student loan collections applied for a hardship exemption. If delinquent borrowers were to simply apply for this financial hardship with the DOE, a majority would likely be granted it. If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. A New Social Security Garnishment Is Set to Begin This Summer -- but There Are 2 Legal Ways Most Retirees Can Avoid It was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
What else is on the June 10 NJ primary ballot? Assembly races
While the top of the June 10 primary ballot is often the most discussed, all 80 seats in the New Jersey General Assembly are also up for reelection and there are more candidates in this year's primary than there have been in decades. Antoinette Miles, state director for New Jersey Working Families, said she attributes this year's Assembly races to the end of the county line system. 'We've been in a reform wave in New Jersey buoyed by the candidacy of now Sen. Andy Kim and continues to be buoyed throughout this election and I don't think you get that without the end of the county line,' she said. 'Even if you look back to two years ago, 2023, we saw a number of legislators leave the state Legislature either due to retirement or similar turnover in that effect, yet we know it was only 11% of legislative seats actually contested.' Miles said that it's exciting the state is 'no longer in era of choiceless primaries' and that 'voters actually get to choose.' She also said that the end of the line will impact incumbents as well because they may use it as an opportunity to 'find their independent footing' because there are some that 'do want to be independent from the political machine or their party boss but haven't had the opportunity to do that.' Ben Dworkin, founding director of the Rowan Institute for Public Policy & Citizenship, agreed that the elimination of the line has made it easier to run. 'Every county of New Jersey's 21 counties had their own way of determining who was on the line,' he said. 'Some were more democratic than others, but with its elimination, it just made it easier for people to run.' This is the first primary in which all 21 counties will use the block ballot design as opposed to the county line design. The line traditionally gave candidates endorsed by the county party preferred ballot placement, and an edge in their efforts, but it was dismantled by a federal judge last year. There are 24 competitive districts on the Democratic side of the aisle while Republicans will see contested races in seven. NJ Primary Election 2025: Our complete guide to voting, governor candidates, local races Campaign finance: How are candidates for NJ governor spending in the last days of the primary campaign? Dworkin also said there is the Fulop factor, referring to the slate of candidates that have joined with Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop under his 'Democrats for Change' effort. He said Fulop entered the gubernatorial primary trying to take the progressive lane but after Newark Mayor Ras Baraka jumped in and 'took that lane away,' Fulop pivoted to a more reform focused candidacy, which Dworkin said has helped him in terms of finding support. 'He's trying to capture the lightning in a bottle that Andy Kim caught last year. He's trying to duplicate that,' Dworkin said. 'Part of his strategy has been to try and take advantage of the fact that there is no line, no ballot geography that automatically hampers one candidate in their effort to take on another and because they're all going to be grouped together he's running his own candidates as the Fulop political reform team.' Miles said there's a 'lot of weight in New Jersey politically that's put in a six-word slogan' but that at the end of the day that's not how voters choose candidates and that in cases of a 'slate effect,' voters will choose who is best for their district. Dworkin said it's still the beginning of this new era so it will take time to see how elections post-line will play out, but candidates that are ambitious or inspired by a local issue may be more inclined to jump into the fray. That doesn't mean actual organization and support with a base willing to do campaign legwork like door knocking and cold calls isn't important. The members in District 15, Assemblywoman Verlina Reynolds-Jackson and Assemblyman Anthony Verrelli aren't facing any challenges during the primary and the district hasn't had any Republicans file to run in the fall. There are also four members of the Assembly who are not seeking reelection: Assemblymen Reginald Atkins, John Allen, Julio Marenco and Assemblywoman Shavonda Sumter. Katie Sobko covers the New Jersey Statehouse. Email: sobko@ This article originally appeared on NJ primary election Assembly races
