logo
New West Lothian railway station plans 'imminent' amid hope it could open by 2030

New West Lothian railway station plans 'imminent' amid hope it could open by 2030

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
Plans for the new Winchburgh railway station will come before West Lothian councillors within months.
The business case for development of the station is near completion and designs are ready to go to planning consent.
A report to councillors, set to go before a meeting of West Lothian's Executive on Tuesday, says: 'It is anticipated that a planning application (likely to be an application for matters specified in conditions) is expected to be submitted to the council as planning authority imminently.'
That means the principle of the station has already been accepted; only details have to be agreed. The station could be operational by the end of the decade.
The report said: 'On 6 May the First Minister set out the Scottish Government's Programme for Government for 2025-26. The programme makes specific reference to a railway station at Winchburgh in the section on A Safe Sustainable Transport System for Scotland.'
That says funding should be considered for the new station.
Network Rail is set to lodge the planning application. The station cost is estimated at between £20.5 million and £22 million.
The report details: 'An additional stop at Winchburgh has already been incorporated within the timetable for the Edinburgh – Dunblane service and this has no timetabling impacts on the Edinburgh- Falkirk High – Glasgow timetable.'
The design will incorporate an initial 100 space car park with room for expansion.
The reports adds: 'Modelling of the station forecasts around 625 passengers boarding per day at Winchburgh in 2030, increasing to 768 in 2045.
'In the morning peak hour there will be around 80 passengers travelling towards Edinburgh and an estimated 50 towards Stirling. This will equate to an increase of around 10% in rail usage on the Stirling to Edinburgh rail service.
'Winchburgh passenger demand is forecast to grow by around 20% between 2030-45. There is likely to be a 20-25% reduction in bus patronage when the station opens but this loss will be recovered as the housing development is built out.'
As a comparison passenger usage at nearby railway stations shows Linlithgow has 1,400 passengers a day and Uphall with 650. Only Falkirk High, with 1,100 passengers comes close to Linlithgow, with passenger numbers in the hundreds at Polmost and Falkirk Grahamston.
A steering group, which includes the lead developer, Winchburgh Developments, Transport Scotland, Network Rail, SEStran, ScotRail, the City Region Deal and the council, has been meeting monthly for around a year now and 'good progress is being made'.
The steering group reports to a stakeholder group comprising MSPs and elected members from the council together with members of the steering group. The next meeting of the stakeholder group has been confirmed for later this month.
With the business case complete and designs ready funding has to be secured. Current costs are based on 2027 estimates.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Higher costs and fewer journeys: these ferries make no sense
Higher costs and fewer journeys: these ferries make no sense

The Herald Scotland

time13 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Higher costs and fewer journeys: these ferries make no sense

Further, the current Type 23 will be in service for many years to come supporting and protecting our aircraft carriers. Today, Business Editor Ian McConnell editor sets out to laud the Glen Sannox and her boost to the Arran economy ("Does 'ferry fiasco' vessel offer hope for Arran?", The Herald, May 30). The Caledonian Isles will return from Brigadoon soon, so we are told, and run from Ardrossan and so we have two mainland ports serving Arran with all the associated costs. Her design capacity is 1,000 passengers and 110 cars, and with five return journeys per day allows 10,000 and 1,110 passenger and vehicle journeys respectively. When augmented by the MV Isle of Arran, whose design capacity is 448 passengers and 76 cars, this allows an additional 4,480 and 760 journeys respectively and a total of 14,480 passenger and 1,870 car journeys per day from Ardrossan. The Glen Sannox is limited to 852 passengers with 127 cars. The higher capacity is not available in service because it can only do three of the longer Troon return journeys per day, allowing 5,112 and 762 respective journeys per day along with a 40 per cent increase in fuel burn, increased maintenance and running costs and the cost of an additional port giving massive and unnecessary overheads, all for the same capacity as the MV Isle of Arran. As and when or if the MV Glen Rosa comes on service, those overheads double and 4,256 passenger and 346 vehicle journeys will be lost per day, as will the popular day trips for tourism or necessary mainland visits. Apparently that is good business. Peter Wright, West Kilbride. • Stan Grodynski unfortunately continues to fail to understand the basic facts behind the Type 26 frigates, and the comparison to Arran's ferries, in his ongoing deflection from the SNP's total mishandling of Ferguson Marine. Of course the Type 26 programme did begin in 1998 – with an evaluation phase. Unlike CalMac and the Scottish Government, the Ministry of Defence makes plans decades ahead to assess ship replacement programmes, with current plans under way for the Type 83 destroyer as replacement for the Type 45 and provisionally planned for around 2040. From 1998, the extensive planning stage led to a contract being awarded for the design of the Type 26 – itself a lengthy process –at the same time evaluating future overall fleet requirements, with the actual construction contract then awarded in 2017. The design of a complex warship understandably takes a little longer than that of a ferry. From construction contract award to delivery, it remains the simple fact that the Type 26 budget excess is 5% against Ferguson Marine's 670%. Additionally, the Global Combat Ship's design has also been sold to Australia and Canada for their construction of a further 24 vessels. I don't recall any other countries rushing to order 24 "Glen" ferries. With regard to the aircraft carriers, HMS Queen Elizabeth was ordered in 2007 with delivery due in 2015. Being commissioned in 2017 – two years late – her overrun is still five years fewer than that of the Glen Sannox. Her contract was initially costed at £4.1 billion, eventually rising to £6.2bn, an increase of around 50% in part attributable to delays caused by the global financial crisis, and including changes to the planned aircraft to be deployed – still considerably less than Ferguson Marine's 670%. Unlike the Glen Sannox, HMS Queen Elizabeth also has the added benefit of being able to fit into her home port. Perhaps Mr Grodynski would acknowledge that an 80,000 tonne state of the art warship is a rather more complex build than a 1,200-tonne ferry. Steph Johnson, Glasgow. Read more letters Prized strengths of our MSPs The supposed controversy over Scottish Labour's Hamilton candidate, Davy Russell, following a low profile ("Labour's by-election candidate denies he has hindered campaign", The Herald, May 29), rather raises the question: what do we want from our MSPs? Which strengths do we prize? Perhaps we should not expect individuals to be proficient in every dimension? While the Scottish Parliament is about laying down well-worded and structured laws, there is clearly much more for MSPs than that. Serving the needs and tackling the problems of individuals and communities, for one. Organising a small team to respond to constituents, for two. Being open to ideas across party boundaries, influencing colleague MSPs and aware of what's going on in the country, for three. Contributing that knowledge and previous experience to debate whether in the chamber or on the 16 committees, also important. Increasingly, it feels that being grounded in the constituency can add great value to representation. Appearing on television and speaking in public seem to me to be rather less important. And of course, the modern way – good regular use of social media – is an attribute. I provided radio snippets on BBC Radio Scotland for 20 years and much preferred that medium to television because I could have my notes laid out in front of me, unseen. Could I have spoken well without notes on television? Possibly. Did I want to? No. Philip Gaskell (Dr), Drymen. • Question Time from Cheltenham (BBC1, May 29) had a distinctly cautious air about it. With the exception of politics blogger Ava Santina-Evans who tried (and failed) to stir controversy with bizarre remarks and facial expressions, the three politicians – Heidi Alexander (Lab), David Simmonds (Con) and Jess Brown-Fuller (Lib Dem) – and political commentator/journalist Tim Montgomerie all acquitted themselves well. Their responses were waffle-free and well delivered. No talking over one another. It was as if a pre-arranged consensus had been agreed. Perhaps with the newly-arrived "spectre on the block" represented here by the loquacious Tim Montgomerie "own goals" were to be carefully avoided. Apart from one impassioned tirade on the deteriorating Gaza conflict the panel were given an easy ride by a polite Cheltenham audience. Overall, not a memorable session. It does however confirm that political opponents can and should work for the common wealth of all. That augurs well in these troubled times. Allan C Steele, Giffnock. A penny for our NHS Our NHS hits the headlines once again ("One in nine Scots face long waits for planned treatments on NHS", The Herald, May 28) and yet opposition parties jump up and down and engage in political point-scoring. Those same parties have been in charge of the NHS in other parts of the UK and have failed to come up with a solution to long waiting are no constructive ideas, no examples of better practice, only criticism which demoralises loyal and dedicated NHS staff. There is no magic wand. We all need to take some responsibility for the system, for instance, by not missing appointments, using the fully-joined-up approach of considering a visit to the pharmacy first, taking pressure off other services further down the line. NHS nurses and doctors in Scotland are the best-paid in the UK. The Scottish Government's latest accepted pay offer continues this theme with staff, including nurses, midwives, paramedics and porters, receiving a 4.25% pay rise this year, backdated to April 1, and a further 3.75% increase in 2026/27. This is the SNP recognising their dedication. The Government has invested massive amounts in our NHS, yet services still demand more. Perhaps a tax increase of 1p in the pound ring-fenced for the health service is one to put on the table. This option would be more palatable here than UK Labour's approach of back door privatisation. Catriona C Clark, Falkirk. Trans question was valid In his reply to Jane Lax's letter of May 29, Tim Hopkins, LGBTI campaigner and former CEO of Equality Network, seems to backhandedly accuse her of specifically transphobic discrimination (Letters, May 30). Why? Because, in essence, she asks a valid question about the use of debating time in the chamber of the Scottish Parliament and expresses criticism of the Presiding Officer's decision to allow a topic which many fellow voters in Scotland may deem not as pressing as, for example, issues around policing, transport, taxes and more. Whether Mr Hopkins likes it or not, in a democracy this kind of questioning, expressed publicly, is not only allowed but also desirable. His whataboutism about disabled wheelchair users doesn't distract from that. Regina Erich, Stonehaven. • Tim Hopkins is always very keen to speak on behalf of the trans community, so I wonder if he could answer a simple question. He writes to these columns claiming that toilet arrangements mean that trans people cannot visit or work in the Scottish Parliament with dignity and privacy, so can he please tell us what is undignified or non-private about using one of the gender-neutral toilets in that building? (I would also point out that using a toilet is not a very dignified process for any of us, necessity that it is.) Peter Russell, Glasgow. Davy Russell, Labour's candidate in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by election, campaigning with Angela Rayner on Thursday (Image: PA) Digital hang-ups I was amused to see BT's full-page advertisements in The Herald this week. Our village has been connected to the fibre network so in November I called BT asking to be upgraded to Full Fibre. Although I called BT, I was advised that I would be going with EE as BT was becoming EE – are you following me so far? There was a period of four weeks when our 01786-numbered landline was now a 01360 number. When the 01786 number was reinstated, I could not call numbers within my area code for a week or so. Four months and over seven hours of phone calls later, during which time I was speaking to either BT or EE all over the country, we are finally sorted. BT's advertisement states that we'll get protection from scams and nuisance calls although I haven't found that to be the case. Steve Barnet, Gargunnock. The Flying South African Your photograph of the post-war resumption of the non-stop run of the Flying Scotsman train from Edinburgh to London ("Remember when … the Flying Scotsman went back into active service', The Herald, May 29) evokes memories of the age of steam-hauled rail travel. In this instance, the Flying Scotsman train was not hauled by the eponymous Gresley Class A3 Pacific which operated for British Railways under the number 60103. As the photograph depicts, the engine was number 60009, a Gresley Class A4 Pacific named Union of South Africa. Following withdrawal by British Railways in the 1960s, both engines were preserved. Richard Dent, Bearsden.

‘We need a multi-year budget': NI housing group warns funding uncertainty could hinder efforts to address crisis
‘We need a multi-year budget': NI housing group warns funding uncertainty could hinder efforts to address crisis

Belfast Telegraph

timea day ago

  • Belfast Telegraph

‘We need a multi-year budget': NI housing group warns funding uncertainty could hinder efforts to address crisis

According to NIFHA, a total of 1,410 new-build homes were completed by housing associations across the region in 2024/25. It added that the completed homes, all of which are already tenanted, exceeded the target of 1,400. Construction, meanwhile, has begun on 1,504 new homes. It comes after a challenging year for housing associations, which began with projections that just 500 new-starts would be possible due to budget constraints. Chief Executive of NIFHA Seamus Leheny said: 'It is far from ideal for housing associations to operate in an environment where they do not know their budget allocation until well past the midpoint of the financial year. 'At one stage it looked like only about 500 homes would be budgeted for, but housing associations have been working hard on the ground, actively building for the future, continuing to find sites and build new homes. 'Their commitment has been instrumental in reaching this year's targets, despite the many obstacles they face.' The more recent statistics show that the number of households with homelessness status in NI continues to rise On March 31, there were 49,083 households on the social housing waiting list, with 31,719 of those households having homelessness status. Mr Leheny said that in order to address the current housing crisis, a multi-year budget is required. The Programme for Government includes a target of 5,850 new social homes by 2027, meaning more than 2,000 new-starts each year. However, officials have warned the target is unlikely to be met under current budget constraints. Current projections suggest as few as 1,000 new-starts next year without additional funding. Mr Leheny said that current budgets 'fall far short of what we need to be building to address the huge housing waiting list'. 'We need a multi-year housing budget, which gives [NIFHA] the ability to plan and construct around 2,200 homes every year,' he added. 'We have seen the NI Executive give commitment to housing in the Programme for Government, but unless we see direct support in the social housing budget and action on the wastewater issue, this commitment means little. 'There is still a lot of uncertainty ahead, including seeing how the wastewater issues are resolved, the ongoing impact of inflation on the price of materials, and the increased national insurance costs on labour.' Nicola McCrudden, CEO of Homeless Connect, said that the provision of social housing is 'fundamentally important' to public policy. 'Social housing is central to achieving so many people's main aspirations and is centrally important to addressing homelessness,' she said. 'Simply put, you cannot prevent homelessness without an adequate supply of social housing. 'Failure over several years to properly invest in new social housing, and the infrastructure required to support it, is leaving many households struggling to find an affordable home or having to stay for lengthy periods in temporary accommodation.' Ms McCrudden added that meeting the target set out in the Programme for Government will require a higher number of new housing starts each year. 'The Department for Communities has recently indicated that the initial capital allocations provided to it will only allow for up to 1,000 new social homes' she added. 'This is not enough to turn the curve on the rising need for temporary accommodation. 'We will continue to advocate for the Executive to live up to the commitment it has made to this society in the Programme for Government.' A spokesperson for the Department for Communities (DfC) said that minister Gordon Lyons 'supports the need for multi-year budgets, which would allow some clarity of funding'. They added: 'DfC received an allocation of £100m specifically for the Social Housing Development Programme. 'This is being used to fund commitments carried into the 2025/26 financial year, of £105m from schemes that commenced in previous years. 'In addition, the minister has allocated over 80% of his remaining available capital funding to new-builds, with a further allocation of £63m.'

Plans for Winchburgh station to be ‘lodged imminently'
Plans for Winchburgh station to be ‘lodged imminently'

Edinburgh Reporter

timea day ago

  • Edinburgh Reporter

Plans for Winchburgh station to be ‘lodged imminently'

Plans for the new Winchburgh Railway station will come before West Lothian councillors within months. The business case for development of the station is near completion and designs are ready to go to planning consent. A report to councillors, set to go before a meeting of West Lothian's Executive on Tuesday, says: 'It is anticipated that a planning application (likely to be an application for matters specified in conditions) is expected to be submitted to the council as planning authority imminently.' That means the principle of the station has already been accepted; only details have to be agreed. The station could be operational by the end of the decade. The report said: 'On 6 May the First Minister set out the Scottish Government's Programme for Government for 2025-26. The programme makes specific reference to a railway station at Winchburgh in the section on A Safe Sustainable Transport System for Scotland.' That says funding should be considered for the new station. Network Rail is set to lodge the planning application. The station cost is estimated at between £20.5 million and £22 million. The report details: 'An additional stop at Winchburgh has already been incorporated within the timetable for the Edinburgh – Dunblane service and this has no timetabling impacts on the Edinburgh- Falkirk High – Glasgow timetable.' The design will incorporate an initial 100 space car park with room for expansion. The reports adds: 'Modelling of the station forecasts around 625 passengers boarding per day at Winchburgh in 2030, increasing to 768 in 2045. 'In the morning peak hour there will be around 80 passengers travelling towards Edinburgh and an estimated 50 towards Stirling. This will equate to an increase of around 10% in rail usage on the Stirling to Edinburgh rail service. 'Winchburgh passenger demand is forecast to grow by around 20% between 2030-45. There is likely to be a 20-25% reduction in bus patronage when the station opens but this loss will be recovered as the housing development is built out.' As a comparison passenger usage at nearby railway stations shows Linlithgow has 1,400 passengers a day and Uphall with 650. Only Falkirk High, with 1,100 passengers comes close to Linlithgow, with passenger numbers in the hundreds at Polmost and Falkirk Grahamston. A steering group, which includes the lead developer, Winchburgh Developments, Transport Scotland, Network Rail, SEStran, ScotRail, the City Region Deal and the council, has been meeting monthly for around a year now and 'good progress is being made'. The steering group reports to a stakeholder group comprising MSPs and elected members from the council together with members of the steering group. The next meeting of the stakeholder group has been confirmed for later this month. With the business case complete and designs ready funding has to be secured. Current costs are based on 2027 estimates. By Stuart Sommerville, Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store