Nearly half of Americans back Israeli airstrikes on Iran, poll shows
EXCLUSIVE: More Americans support rather than oppose Israeli airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, according to a new national poll conducted before Israel's Friday attack on Iran.
But the survey, released by the Ronald Reagan Institute, indicates that most Democrats and Republicans don't see eye-to-eye on the issue.
According to the poll, which was first shared with Fox News on Friday, 45% of those questioned said they would support Israel conducting targeted airstrikes against Iran's nuclear facilities if diplomatic efforts between the U.S. and Iran fail.
Thirty-seven percent said they opposed Israeli airstrikes, with 18% unsure.
But the poll indicates a partisan divide.
Six in 10 Republicans said they support the airstrikes, but that backing dropped to 35% among independents and 32% among Democrats.
Twenty-seven percent of Republicans opposed the Israeli airstrikes, with a third of independents and just over half of Democrats opposed.
The poll of adult Americans was conducted, May 22-June 2, before Israel's unprecedented attack on Iran, named "Operation Rising Lion," which included strikes on both the Islamic State's nuclear program and military leaders.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
11 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Protests Nationwide as Trump Stages Military Parade: Live Coverage
The U.S. military holds its largest parade in decades today, a date that marks the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army— and the 79th birthday of President Trump. Events are planned throughout the day in the nation's capital city and counterprotests are scheduled nationwide. Here's what to know: "No Kings" protests are planned in over 2,000 cities, in which organizers aim to present a peaceful 'split screen' between Trump's military parade and what they call his presidential overreach. In the week before the parade, demonstrations across the country, beginning in Los Angeles, were sparked by aggressive raids by immigration agents. The parade is set to begin at 6:30 p.m. ET in Washington--despite concerns that storms could lead organizers to cancel. A concert and fireworks are follow. WSJ will livestream the events. On display: Vintage tanks and other military equipment representing major U.S. wars. Republican and Democratic lawmakers have fretted over the cost, whilch the Pentagon has said could reach $45 million. See the latest updates below
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Twin federal proposals threaten provider taxes, key source of Medicaid funding for states
Republican efforts to restrict taxes on hospitals, health plans, and other providers that states use to help fund their Medicaid programs could strip them of tens of billions of dollars. The move could shrink access to health care for some of the nation's poorest and most vulnerable people, warn analysts, patient advocates, and Democratic political leaders. No state has more to lose than California, whose Medicaid program, called Medi-Cal, covers nearly 15 million residents with low incomes and disabilities. That's twice as many as New York and three times as many as Texas. A proposed rule by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, echoed in the Republicans' House reconciliation bill, could significantly curtail the federal dollars many states draw in matching funds from what are known as provider taxes. Although it's unclear how much states could lose, the revenue up for grabs is big. For instance, California has netted an estimated $8.8 billion this fiscal year from its tax on managed care plans and took in about $5.9 billion last year from hospitals. California Democrats are already facing a $12 billion deficit, and they have drawn political fire for scaling back some key health care policies, including full Medi-Cal coverage for immigrants without permanent legal status. And a loss of provider tax revenue could add billions to the current deficit, forcing state lawmakers to make even more unpopular cuts to Medi-Cal benefits. 'If Republicans move this extreme MAGA proposal forward, millions will lose coverage, hospitals will close, and safety nets could collapse under the weight,' Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, said in a statement, referring to President Donald Trump's 'Make America Great Again' movement. The proposals are also a threat to Proposition 35, a ballot initiative California voters approved last November to make permanent the tax on managed care organizations, or MCOs, and dedicate some of its proceeds to raise the pay of doctors and other providers who treat Medi-Cal patients. All states except Alaska have at least one provider tax on managed care plans, hospitals, nursing homes, emergency ground transportation, or other types of health care businesses. The federal government spends billions of dollars a year matching these taxes, which generally lead to more money for providers, helping them balance lower Medicaid reimbursement rates while allowing states to protect against economic downturns and budget constraints. New York, Massachusetts, and Michigan would also be among the states hit hard by Republicans' drive to scale back provider taxes, which allow states to boost their share of Medicaid spending to receive increased federal Medicaid funds. In a May 12 statement announcing its proposed rule, CMS described a 'loophole' as 'money laundering,' and said California had financed coverage for over 1.6 million 'illegal immigrants' with the proceeds from its MCO tax. CMS said its proposal would save more than $30 billion over five years. 'This proposed rule stops the shell game and ensures federal Medicaid dollars go where they're needed most — to pay for health care for vulnerable Americans who rely on this program, not to plug state budget holes or bankroll benefits for noncitizens,' Mehmet Oz, the CMS administrator, said in the statement. Medicaid allows coverage for noncitizens who are legally present and have been in the country for at least five years. And California uses state money to pay for almost all of the Medi-Cal coverage for immigrants who are not in the country legally. California, New York, Michigan, and Massachusetts together account for more than 95% of the 'federal taxpayer losses' from the loophole in provider taxes, CMS said. But nearly every state would feel some impact, especially under the provisions in the reconciliation bill, which are more restrictive than the CMS proposal. None of it is a done deal. The CMS proposal, published May 15, has not been adopted yet, and the reconciliation bill is likely to be altered significantly in the Senate. But the restrictions being contemplated would be far-reaching. A report by Michigan's Department of Health and Human Services, ordered by Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, found that a reduction of revenue from the state's hospital tax could 'destabilize hospital finances, particularly in rural and safety-net facilities, and increase the risk of service cuts or closures.' Losing revenue from the state's MCO tax 'would likely require substantial cuts, tax increases, or reductions in coverage and access to care,' it said. CMS declined to respond to questions about its proposed rule. The Republicans' House-passed reconciliation bill, though not the CMS proposal, also prohibits any new provider taxes or increases to existing ones. The American Hospital Association, which represents nearly 5,000 hospitals and health systems nationwide, said the proposed moratorium on new or increased provider taxes could force states 'to make significant cuts to Medicaid to balance their budgets, including reducing eligibility, eliminating or limiting benefits, and reducing already low payment rates for providers.' Because provider taxes draw matching federal dollars, Washington has a say in how they are implemented. And the Republicans who run the federal government are looking to spend far fewer of those dollars. In California, the insurers that pay the MCO tax are reimbursed for the portion levied on their Medi-Cal enrollment. That helps explain why the tax rate on Medi-Cal enrollment is sharply higher than on commercial enrollment. Over 99% of the tax money the insurers pay comes from their Medi-Cal business, which means most of the state's insurers get back almost all the tax they pay. That imbalance, which CMS describes as a loophole, is one of the main things Republicans are trying to change. If either the CMS rule or the corresponding provisions in the House reconciliation bill were enacted, states would be required to levy provider taxes equally on Medicaid and commercial business to draw federal dollars. California would likely be unable to raise the commercial rates to the level of the Medi-Cal ones, because state law constrains the legislature's ability to do so. The only way to comply with the rule would be to lower the tax rate on Medi-Cal enrollment, which would sharply reduce revenue. CMS has warned California and other states for years, including under the Biden administration, that it was considering significant changes to MCO and other provider taxes. Those warnings were never realized. But the risk may be greater this time, some observers say, because the proposed changes are echoed in the House-passed reconciliation bill and intertwined with a broader Republican strategy — and set of proposals — to cut Medicaid spending by close to $800 billion. 'All of these proposals move in the same direction: fewer people enrolled, less generous Medicaid programs over time,' said Edwin Park, a research professor at Georgetown University's McCourt School of Public Policy. California's MCO tax is expected to net California $13.9 billion over the next two fiscal years, according to January estimates. The state's hospital tax is expected to bring in an estimated $9 billion this year, up sharply from last year, according to the Department of Health Care Services, which runs Medi-Cal. Losing a significant slice of that revenue on top of other Medicaid cuts in the House reconciliation bill 'all adds up to be potentially a super serious impact on Medi-Cal and the California state budget overall,' said Kayla Kitson, a senior policy fellow at the California Budget & Policy Center. And it's not only California that will feel the pain. 'All states are going to be hurt by this," Park said. Wolfson writes for KFF Health News, a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism. Sign up for our Wide Shot newsletter to get the latest entertainment business news, analysis and insights. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Travel Weekly
13 minutes ago
- Travel Weekly
Why Juneteenth matters to all of us
In the 2025 Telly Award-winning episode of "Traveling With Denella," I took a deeply personal journey to Galveston, Texas -- the birthplace of Juneteenth. Denella Ri'chard has been the host of the TV show "Traveling With Denella" since 2020. She is a former executive of Holland America Line, Norwegian Cruise Line and Hilton and is also a con-sultant and industry speaker. There, I sat down with renowned local historian Sam Collins, whose insight and passion brought new depth to a story I thought I already understood. But what I learned transformed how I view not only this holiday but American history itself. The Juneteenth backstory On June 19, 1865, more than two years after President Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation, Union Gen. Gordon Granger arrived in Galveston with a message that would forever change the course of American history. He read General Order No. 3, announcing that "all slaves are free." For the more than 250,000 enslaved Black people in Texas, this was the first official word of their freedom. Why did it take so long? As Collins explained it, Texas -- geographically remote and politically resistant -- became a final refuge for slavery as the Confederacy crumbled. Some enslavers intentionally withheld the news. Others fled to Texas specifically to avoid emancipation. Juneteenth marks the delayed but determined dawn of freedom for the last enslaved people in the U.S. Reasons we celebrate Juneteenth isn't just a Black story. It's an American story: a narrative of hope, resilience and triumph against unimaginable odds. It's the story of a nation struggling to live up to its founding ideals, that all are created equal. To celebrate Juneteenth is to acknowledge our shared history honestly, to reflect on how far we've come and to recommit ourselves to justice and equality for all. And yet, Juneteenth is not just about the past. It's a reminder that freedom and equality are not static achievements; they are ongoing pursuits. Juneteenth calls us to action. It's a day that invites education, service, conversation and unity. Related forum: Tracing Juneteenth's roots and meaning Across the country, communities are now using this day to host cultural festivals, educational workshops and commemorative ceremonies that foster progress and community fellowship. It's an opportunity for all Americans to take part in building a better, more inclusive future. This is why it's so meaningful that Juneteenth became a federal holiday. President Biden signed the Juneteenth National Independence Day Act into law on June 17, 2021, after decades of advocacy from community leaders, historians and everyday Americans who understood the importance of remembrance and recognition. It was a moment of national acknowledgment -- long overdue but deeply powerful. A personal reflection Walking through Galveston's historical districts, I felt the weight of history and the spirit of those who waited for freedom to reach them. I thought about the strength it took not just to survive slavery but to build lives, communities and futures in its aftermath. During the episode, Sam showed me Galveston's Freedom Walk, which included the Middle Passage marker, which commemorates enslaved people in Galveston; Reedy Chapel, where General Order No. 3 was read; and a Juneteenth mural that Sam said "helped expand the narrative" by, among other things, including images of Black Union troops. This episode of "Traveling With Denella" wasn't just about documenting a destination. It was about uncovering truths, elevating voices and honoring the past in a way that empowers the present. For me, celebrating Juneteenth is not optional -- it's essential. A call to celebrate Juneteenth teaches us that freedom delayed is still freedom worth fighting for. It invites every American to join in reflection and celebration, not just of emancipation but of the enduring belief that justice will prevail. As we mark Juneteenth each year, let's move beyond barbecues and picnics. Let's tell the stories. Let's teach the history. Let's recognize that this moment in time belongs to all of us. Because Juneteenth is not just Black history. It's American history. The "Juneteenth" special episode airs in 50-plus cities through June, including NBC affiliates in New York, Chicago, Dallas and Seattle. Check local listings or stream at _____________________________________ Travel Weekly accepts opinion pieces on subjects of interest to the travel industry and, most importantly, to travel advisors. Forums should be 550 words and must be exclusive to Travel Weekly; no part of the writing can have been published anywhere else. Forums must not be self-promotional and should be submitted with the understanding that Travel Weekly reserves the right to edit the content for length, style, spelling, clarity, structure, etc. Submissions, along with a high-resolution headshot and a short bio, should be emailed to editor in chief Arnie Weissmann and deputy managing editor Gerry Bourbeau.
