Can't let probe agencies directly summon counsel: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on Wednesday said that
law enforcement agencies
can't be permitted to directly summon lawyers regarding their clients' matters, as this would undermine
administration of justice
. During a hearing of a petition from a Gujarat-based lawyer who received police summons concerning a client's case, Justices KV Viswanathan and N Kotiswar Singh began suo motu proceedings, stating that such actions were prima facie unsustainable.
This order follows a recent incident where the Enforcement Directorate (ED) called prominent lawyers Arvind Datar and Pratap Venugopal for questioning regarding their legal opinions to Care Health Insurance. The ED later withdrew these summons after Bar associations across India condemned the actions. It then issued internal guidelines requiring director approval before summoning advocates.
While providing interim protection to the Gujarat advocate, the court considered the broader implications.
The bench said: "Permitting investigating agency/prosecuting agency/police to directly summon defence counsel or advocates, who advise parties in a given case would seriously undermine the autonomy of the legal provision and would even constitute a direct threat to the independence of the administration of justice." It added: "This is a matter directly impinging on the administration of justice. Hence, subjecting the counsel in a case to the beck and call of the investigating agency prima facie appears to be completely untenable." The court indicated its intention to seek guidance from senior legal officials, including attorney general R Venkataramani, solicitor general Tushar Mehta, Bar Council of India chairman Manan Kumar Mishra, Supreme Court Bar Association president Vikas Singh and Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association president Vipin Nair.
The apex court outlined two primary questions for consideration: whether enforcement authorities should be permitted to directly summon lawyers who are purely providing legal advice to clients, and in cases where involvement exceeds legal representation, whether direct summons should be allowed or if judicial oversight should be established. Considering the matter's importance, the court ordered that it be referred to the Chief Justice of India for further directions.
Live Events
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Can't summon lawyers for legal advice: SC
Direct summons by investigating agencies or the police to lawyers for advising their clients can 'shatter the core of legal independence' and constitute a 'serious interference with the administration of justice', the Supreme Court said on Wednesday, as it initiated suo motu proceedings to address the issue and formulate safeguards to protect the legal profession. The development comes just days after the Enforcement Directorate (ED) issued, and subsequently withdrew, summons to two senior Supreme Court advocates, triggering widespread outrage over the perceived breach of lawyer-client privilege and professional independence. (HT Photo) 'The legal profession is an integral component of the process of administration of justice. Counsels who are engaged in their legal practice have certain rights and privileges guaranteed because of the fact that they are legal professionals, and also due to statutory provisions. Permitting investigating agencies or police to directly summon defence counsel or advocates who advise parties in a given case would seriously undermine the autonomy of the legal profession and would even constitute a direct threat to the independence of the administration of justice,' said a bench of justices KV Viswanathan and N Kotiswar Singh. The development comes just days after the Enforcement Directorate (ED) issued, and subsequently withdrew, summons to two senior Supreme Court advocates, triggering widespread outrage over the perceived breach of lawyer-client privilege and professional independence. The court made strong observations during a hearing involving a Gujarat-based lawyer who was summoned by the police merely for securing bail for his client in a loan dispute case. The police summons, issued under Section 179 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) by the SC/ST Cell in Ahmedabad, was upheld by the Gujarat high court, prompting the top court to stay the order and protect the lawyer from further coercive action. 'Summoning lawyers for advising clients can shatter the core of legal independence,' maintained the bench, adding that such practices, if allowed to persist, would have a chilling effect on legal professionals and impair the justice delivery system. 'This is not just about one lawyer. It is about protecting the spine of the legal system,' it emphasised. Justice Viswanathan remarked that it was essential to address this issue comprehensively, not just as a one-off incident, but to safeguard the legal profession and preserve the integrity of the justice system. 'Lawyers must be able to advise and represent clients without fear of being summoned or harassed. We are dealing with the very heart of judicial independence and the administration of justice,' the court said. It went on to frame two critical questions -- one, can the police summon a lawyer who has only advised a party in a case; and two, if there is more than advisory involvement, should judicial oversight be a precondition. To ensure a comprehensive and principled resolution, the court sought assistance from the attorney general, solicitor general, chairman of the Bar Council of India (BCI), and presidents of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA). The matter has also been referred to Chief Justice of India Bhushan R Gavai for appropriate orders on further listing. 'It is a matter which directly impinges the administration of justice,' the court noted. The top court's intervention comes just days after ED withdrew its summons to senior advocate Pratap Venugopal in a separate case. The move followed an urgent representation by SCAORA to the CJI on June 20, flagging the ED's summons as a grave infringement on the independence of the legal profession and the sanctity of lawyer-client privilege. Venugopal, who was summoned to appear before ED on June 24 under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, received a text message from the agency on the afternoon of June 20, informing him that the notice 'stands withdrawn with immediate effect.' The summons pertained to ED's probe into the allotment of Employee Stock Option Plans (ESOPs) by Care Health Insurance to Rashmi Saluja, former chairperson of Religare Enterprises. Venugopal, in this instance, was the advocate-on-record for a legal opinion rendered by senior counsel Arvind Datar. ED had also summoned Datar earlier, but withdrew that notice too amid widespread criticism from the legal fraternity. In its letter to the CJI, SCAORA president Vipin Nair described the summons as 'a deeply disquieting development' and warned that coercive measures against lawyers for professional legal opinions strike at the core of the rule of law and the constitutionally protected sphere of legal advice. 'The role of an advocate in offering legal advice is both privileged and protected. Interference by investigative agencies, particularly in respect of opinions rendered in a professional capacity—strikes at the core of the rule of law,' the letter stated, urging the CJI to frame clear guidelines. The concern was echoed across the legal community. The Delhi High Court Bar Association passed a resolution on June 17 condemning ED's actions as a direct threat to the constitutional right to legal representation and fair trial. The Gujarat High Court Advocates Association also held an emergency meeting, with its president Brijesh Trivedi calling for urgent amendments to the Indian Evidence Act and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 to safeguard lawyer-client privilege. In a press statement issued on the evening of June 20, ED clarified that the summons had been issued in Venugopal's capacity as an independent director of Care Health Insurance Ltd (CHIL), not as a legal counsel, and said any further information would be sought through email. Crucially, ED also issued a circular directing all its field offices not to issue summons to advocates in violation of Section 132 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. It mandated that in exceptional cases where the proviso to Section 132 may apply, prior approval from the ED director would be necessary before issuing such summons.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
US sanctions three Mexico-based financial institutions linked to fentanyl trade
The US Treasury Department on Wednesday took a significant step in its fight against fentanyl trafficking, prohibiting certain financial transactions with three Mexico-based institutions, CIBanco, Intercam Banco, and Vector Casa de Bolsa. The move, led by the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), marks the first use of new sanctions under the Fentanyl Sanctions Act and the FEND Off Fentanyl designated the three financial firms as 'primary money laundering concerns,' a classification that restricts US entities from conducting transactions with their Mexican branches. While the sanctions don't involve freezing assets or fully severing global access to US dollars—as is typical with more severe measures—they effectively isolate the institutions from the US financial these are not the largest players in Mexico's financial sector, the Treasury's action could have far-reaching implications due to the deeply interwoven nature of Mexican and US banking systems. Sanctions against individual actors tied to organized crime are relatively common, but such measures against financial institutions are rare. The inclusion of these three firms, particularly Vector, a top-10 Mexican brokerage managing nearly USD 11 billion in assets, signals a new level of enforcement. Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender emphasized the gravity of the action, calling it a clear message about US intent to crack down on financial channels used by drug is a bold move. Being cut off from the US financial system is a death blow. It's enormously impactful,' said Vanda Felbab-Brown, a Brookings Institution expert on organized crime. While she noted the institutions are not among Mexico's largest, she characterized them as mid-sized players and stressed that the consequences would be substantial, even if the broader impact on cartel finances remains to the Treasury, the three institutions have for years facilitated the laundering of millions of dollars for Mexican cartels and enabled payments for chemicals used to manufacture institutions pushed back on the accusations. Vector 'categorically rejected' the claims, affirming its commitment to cooperate with authorities. Intercam also denied any involvement in illicit activity. CIBanco has not yet issued a Finance Ministry stated it had requested evidence from the US Treasury to support the allegations but received no conclusive expert Luis Manuel Perez de Acha described the move as a 'bombshell,' noting that being excluded from US financial networks could leave these firms effectively sanctions may further strain trade relations between the US and Mexico, already tense due to ongoing US efforts, including the use of steep tariffs, to compel Mexico to curb fentanyl flows across the border.- EndsWith inputs from ReutersTune InMust Watch
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Tribals in Kotia to take up potato cultivation
Koraput: In a significant move aimed at strengthening the tribal economy in Kotia panchayat under Pottangi block, the Koraput administration has decided to introduce potato cultivation in the ongoing kharif season. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The initiative is expected to enhance livelihood opportunities for tribal communities residing in the remote border area. According to officials, the administration has set an ambitious target of cultivating potatoes over at least 100 hectares in Kotia out of the 5,000 hectares identified for potato cultivation in the district. Beneficiaries enrolled under the initiative will receive substantial subsidies, with the govt covering Rs 30,000 of the estimated Rs 40,000 required per acre, while the remaining cost will be borne by the cultivator. "Introducing potato cultivation in Kotia is part of our broader efforts to uplift the tribal economy and ensure sustained development in the region. Kotia's climate is well-suited for potato farming, which informed our decision to implement this project," said Keerthi Vasan V, collector of Koraput. The scheme is open to any resident with cultivable land in the region. Officials stated that depending on the results of first phase, the cultivation programme may be expanded to other areas in future. "The beneficiaries will be provided with technical guidance by the horticulture department to ensure a bumper harvest," the collector said. The move follows the successful launch of strawberry farming in Kotia, which already showed promising results in terms of income generation and community participation. The administration's decision follows the constitution of a 16-member high-level committee, led by revenue and disaster management minister Suresh Pujari, to accelerate development activities in Kotia last month. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In line with this, the district administration began drafting a comprehensive roadmap focused on infrastructure, health, education and livelihood. "Our priority is holistic development. All departments have been directed to design and implement projects aligned with these goals to ensure meaningful impact in Kotia," the collector added. Kotia, comprising 28 villages, remains at the heart of a long-standing border dispute between Odisha and Andhra Pradesh as 21 villages are claimed by both states. The matter has been pending before Supreme Court since 1968.
