Kent business leaders to sleep in replica trenches for charity
A Kent-based veterans' charity is set to host a sleep-out for business leaders in replica World War One trenches. The Great Tommy Sleep Out supports Royal British Legion Industries (RBLI) work with homeless veterans.On Thursday, as part of the UK-wide event, the sixth annual Chairman's Sleep Out will host more than 80 senior managers from major businesses for the first time in specially-constructed trenches at Detling Showground. A RBLI spokesperson said they will "spend a night under the stars in support of those who have served their country but who later in life can find themselves without a home".
The Great Tommy Sleep Out raised £1.2m in 2024 and won Fundraising Campaign of the Year at the Third Sector Awards.RBLI said it was encouraging "more people than ever" to take part in 2025 and hopes this year's event will be its "biggest and best yet".The charity said it was targeting a figure of £80,000 from the trenches event in Kent alone. Steve Rowbotham, RBLI chairperson, said: "The Great Tommy Sleep Out is a time when we send a message of unity to those who have served our nation. "We hope to raise awareness of the serious national issue of veteran homelessness, and play our part in giving something back."RBLI's wide range of services includes providing housing, welfare and employment support for Armed Forces veterans.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Fears Trump could sink US-UK nuclear subs deal after President ordered review into pact intended to secure the Pacific against Chinese aggression
Royal Navy chiefs voiced concerns last night after Donald Trump ordered a review of the nuclear submarine pact between the UK, the US and Australia. Aukus, as the joint project is known, is intended to secure the Pacific against Chinese aggression and involves multi-billion-pound commitments to build new nuclear-powered submarines. The Ministry of Defence announced its intention to build up to 12 submarines for Aukus and other operations as part of last week's Strategic Defence Review. But these plans have been thrown into doubt after the US defence department announced a review to ensure Aukus meets the President's 'America First' agenda. Relations between the US and Australia have soured over tariffs. America has also demanded Australia increase defence spending and wants to sell older submarines to Australia on favourable terms. Another cause for concern is the review is being led by Aukus sceptic Elbridge Colby, who is close to President Trump. Last night former head of the Royal Navy, Admiral Lord West said: 'Aukus is extremely important for the strategic situation in the Pacific and very important for Britain as a way of us moving into our next generation of submarines. 'The US had had concerns about selling its submarines to Australia, so it is not entirely unexpected that President Trump would want to look at this. Hopefully this can be resolved and we all move on together as part of the alliance.' The deal is regarded as a pillar of security co-operation. But concerns have been raised in the US over the rate of submarine production and Australia's reluctance to commit to a 'no holds barred' response to a Chinese attack on Taiwan. The US is committed to selling up to five boats to Australia, vessels which many in the US believe should be retained by the US Navy.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EDEN CONFIDENTIAL: Anger as Middletons' friend and former Reading FC chairman Sir John Madejski's name is stripped from school he gave £3million to
His life and career have followed an epic trajectory, from a grim start – illegitimate and taken into foster care – to a knighthood, immense riches and an invitation to a royal wedding in 2011, when Prince William married Kate Middleton, whose parents were by then among his closest friends. But, for all his commercial success and his extraordinary acts of philanthropy, which earned him the name 'Mr Reading' in his Berkshire hometown – not to mention his transformation of the fortunes of Reading FC – Sir John Madejski has reflected that 'the greatest accomplishment' of his life was financing and creating The John Madejski Academy. Yet I can disclose that his name is now to be erased from the school, opened by Tony Blair in 2008, after Sir John had donated what insiders tell me was as much as £3million for its new building, which was shortlisted for an award at that year's World Architecture Festival. The decision – taken after a 'consultation' by the Greenshaw Learning Trust which assumed control of the Academy earlier this year– has caused dismay and disgust among Sir John's friends, including Judy, Lady McAlpine, who tells me that she's 'not upset but livid'. Insiders are similarly appalled by the treatment of Reading's greatest living benefactor and by what they allege is a lack of transparency. 'The local governing body was asked for its opinion but the ultimate decision was taken by the Greenshaw Trust's governing body for all the 50 or so schools it controls,' one tells me. 'It's lamentable and disrespectful. He's been a great friend to Reading and to education. 'He was asked to build a school in London, but he wanted to build it in Reading, where his heart is.' The change of name – due in September – will not, adds the insider, 'have a remarkable beneficial effect', and flies in the face of Reading's history, where many schools bear benefactors' names, such as George Palmer School – 'named after George Palmer, of the famous biscuit factory'. 'Sir John's name is written in stone on the outside of the school. Taking it off will be expensive. And the change of uniform will be an expense to the Trust, which I understand will be paying, not parents.' The Greenshaw Trust does not respond to inquiries, but Sir John, 84, tells me that he wishes it and all at the school – teachers and students alike – 'every success for the future'. He adds: 'I personally believe that the resources spent on the name change could have been directed toward more impactful initiatives for the school.' Might be worth listening to. He did, after all, go from being an encyclopaedia salesman to an entrepreneur with a fortune of a few hundred million. Joanna: My battles with 'vile' Mitford Actress Joanna Vanderham was left lost for words while playing Diana Mitford, the socialite who married Fascist leader Sir Oswald Mosley, in forthcoming television drama Outrageous. The six-part UKTV series is based on the lives of the six aristocratic and rebellious Mitford sisters. Vanderham, 34, says she was uncomfortable at having to use the 'vile' language of Diana (pictured below). 'It was very difficult to deliver those lines,' Vanderham tells me at the show's premiere at Picturehouse Central in London. 'I usually try and get myself into the headspace of why someone does something. That's why I love my job, the psychology of it. 'But, with this, it was like I couldn't get the lines out. We had to do take after take after take, because it was like my brain had a mental block of, like, this is horrible.' Stone me! Jo bumps into ex Ronnie in Bahamas Rolling stones star Ronnie Wood divorced his wife, Jo, back in 2009, but it's proving hard to escape her. Former Strictly contestant Jo, 70, tells me that she had a shock when she went on a recent holiday to the Bahamas – and ended up staying in the same hotel as the guitarist, 78. 'I'd only been there a day and I walked into the hotel restaurant and there was Ronnie with his wife and kids,' she says. 'You should have seen his face when he saw me.' Ronnie is now married to theatre producer Sally Humphreys, 31 years his junior, with whom he has twin daughters. Jo adds: 'I'm no stalker.' Predatory men in showbusiness have a new method of targeting attractive young women, claims The Inbetweeners Movie star Jessica Knappett. 'I really worry about podcasting now,' the actress says. 'A man can say, 'Come and record my podcast with me', and you turn up and it can just be you and him.' Knappett, 40, adds: 'That's happened to me, not in a violent way, but I was recording someone's podcast the other day, in his flat, just me and him, and I thought, 'If you're a predator, this isn't a safe space for women'. It's the wild west.' Love is a friend with benefits for Courtney At the age of 60, Courtney Love has settled for a 'friend with benefits'. The widow of Nirvana star Kurt Cobain says: 'I'm a libertine, and the person that I most do my romantic crap with is also a libertine, so we are really more friends with benefits.' Singer Courtney won't name her famous lover. 'I don't like talking about them because there's jealousy around that person.' She has lived in London for five years and admits to previously finding herself in a love triangle from which she was eventually rejected. The Fast Show star Paul Whitehouse says married friends are jealous that he and his wife have separate houses. The comic, 67, and academic Dr Mine Conkbayir, who's 22 years his junior, choose to live near each other in London. 'A lot of married people go, 'What? You live in separate houses?' The gleam in their eye. 'If only,'' he says. 'It works for us.' However, Whitehouse's man pad has been disrupted because Mine, with whom he has a daughter, is currently living with him. He explains: 'She's having some work done so she's living with me.' Hollywood's Loo rule Bake Off judge Paul Hollywood is approached in the strangest places. 'I was using the loo in Switzerland and a Brazilian bloke came in and recognised me straight away,' says the 59-year-old baker from Wallasey, Merseyside. 'He asked if I would speak to his wife. I said I would, but could I just finish what I was doing.' At least he didn't ask for a Hollywood handshake.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Reeves's review was a sobering experience for hard-pressed taxpayers
SIR – Listening to the Chancellor's long list of extra government spending pledges, I thought to myself: 'Some poor sods are going to have to pay for all this.' Then I realised that I shall be one of them. J Alan Smith Epping, Essex SIR – After the promises announced by Labour in the spending review, the alleged inherited £22 billion black hole looks like a drop in the ocean. Roger Gentry Weavering, Kent SIR – Labour is forever trotting out that its aim is to help 'working people', with policies designed to improve their quality of life. In the past, the phrase covered manual workers, such as miners and steelworkers, but those industries no longer exist. So who are modern-day working people? Arguably, everyone who works, but Labour's definition is probably much narrower: any workers who vote Labour. Sandy Pratt Storrington, West Sussex SIR – The Chancellor's ambitions have numbers and dates attached, but there is no evidence that she has carried out any logistical analysis. Building requires trained personnel, materials and space. Schools need qualified teachers. The health service needs experienced medics. Power plants and grids must have thriving industries to supply and maintain them. Merely allocating money does not fulfil the ambition. Michael Marks Leominster, Herefordshire SIR – Rachel Reeves clearly lacks confidence in her plans, as throughout the spending review she took shots at opposition parties, using their alleged failings to justify her decisions. She should let her proposals speak for themselves. Given the poor state of the economy and its dismal growth on her watch, it was striking that the Chancellor did not fully explain how she will pay for her commitments. She said about her policies: 'These are my choices. These are this Government's choices. These are the British people's choices.' I don't think this claim would stand up if a general election were held today. Peter Williman Chatteris, Cambridgeshire SIR – When the next general election comes along, the only thing opposition parties will have to do to relieve the present administration of its responsibilities is remind the electorate of the Chagos and winter fuel fiascos. These offer sufficient evidence of incompetence – though plenty more is likely to be provided over the next four years. John Firrell Litton Cheney, Dorset Covered faces SIR – Reform UK and Kemi Badenoch are right to trigger a debate rather than campaign for a ban on all face coverings, including the burka. Jack Straw, as a Cabinet minister in Tony Blair's government, did the same thing in 2006. Both Mr Straw and Mrs Badenoch have said that they were not comfortable speaking to people whose faces were covered, and expressions therefore obscured, in their constituency offices. Surely the same concerns apply to teachers and students, judges and witnesses in court, and to medical professionals and patients, where it is essential to see each other properly. This should not be an outright ban, nor confined to religious apparel. B Brodkin Edgware, Middlesex SIR – I write to plead for open faces for men, women and children on behalf of the millions who, to a greater or lesser degree, rely on reading faces to grasp people's communications. I cannot talk with anyone of any background who has even a partially closed-off face. That's not rudeness – it's a practicality. And there are many millions like me, as nature is remarkably casual with hearing. Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne (Con) London SW1 Why we need nuclear SIR – Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, and Labour deserve credit for deciding to build Sizewell C and invest in small modular reactors (report, June 10). We need these to provide clean, reliable energy and help us move away from fossil fuels, and to tackle climate change. More nuclear power will lead to well-paid jobs and greater energy security. Many environmentalists oppose nuclear power, but this is naive and unrealistic. Germany showed how closing nuclear plants and investing solely in renewables leads to burning more fossil fuels, as well as more expensive energy. Nuclear has high energy density and so requires less land and fewer materials. It is very good news that Labour stood up to the environmentalists, and, by investing in nuclear power, it is doing what is best for the country as well as the climate. Mark Dawes London E11 Space to remember SIR – Charles Moore (Notebook, June 10) writes about Holocaust Memorial Day and the risk of the concept being watered down. In January this year, I was surprised to see that this day was not printed on my calendar, so I emailed the company concerned to ask why. The reply stated that it wasn't able to include every important date, and this was partly so that there would be enough space in the boxes for customers to write in. Not only was another single entry printed for that date (Holiday, Australia), but room had also been found elsewhere in the calendar for Waitangi Day, Juneteenth and Presidents' Day. Priorities? Sue Thomas Monmouth Brotherly love SIR – My nephew, the second of my sister's three sons, sent his mother a card for Mother's Day (Letters, June 11) with the caption: 'If at first you don't succeed, try again. Love from your second son.' His older brother's reaction was not recorded. Prep school closures SIR – The announcement that two more private schools, in Putney and Kingston, are to close (report, June 7) following the Government's imposition of VAT on fees must be hugely upsetting for the children and parents involved. There are also 11,000 fewer pupils in private schools compared with a year ago. It has become obvious just how unpleasant this policy is. It highlights how the Left simply does not understand ambition, or parents' desire to do the best for their children. Which is the 'nasty party' now? Richard Allison Edinburgh Exasperating NHS SIR – I received an envelope from the NHS containing two sheets of paper. One said: 'This envelope contains a letter.' The other had details of an important appointment. It also told me that, if I needed to change the appointment, I would have to telephone the number provided, or I would be deleted from the list. But there was no number. About 20 minutes later, on my fourth try, I got to speak to a person. He didn't know that the number was not on the letter. Roger Hart Sheffield, South Yorkshire SIR – I am a blood donor (Features, June 7). We used to be able to book our next session on the same day we gave blood. Now we have to do it later online. It was so easy before. This is probably why donors don't always rebook and donations are wider apart. George Martin Warmington, Northamptonshire Lunch with Freddie SIR – I read Simon Heffer's article about his friend Freddie Forsyth (Features, June 11) with some sadness. In the early 1980s I was working in Hong Kong in Sutherland House, opposite the Hong Kong Club. One day I returned from lunch and, entering the lift to the 10th floor, I recognised Freddie, who was obviously going to the Foreign Correspondents' Club on the 11th floor. I had often been jealous of its members, as they invariably staggered out in the late afternoon, after a boozy lunch with colleagues, just as I was leaving the office. Each time I read his letters to The Telegraph, I found myself agreeing with his views. I would have given anything to have had lunch with him and put the world to rights. Neville Dickinson Morpeth, Northumberland Keeping churchyards trim – with a little help SIR – Grass and weeds in churchyards need controlling, but what is the best way of doing this? Strimmers and motorised mowers require energy and produce unattractive heaps of cut grass, and strimmers can damage gravestones. In theory, the parson can use the grass for hay-making, but that is probably uneconomic. Goats and sheep (Letters, June 11) require fenced churchyards, which must be properly managed. Helpfully, they consume wreaths and cut flowers, which have a finite life and need removing before they become unsightly. Grazing at regular and stated times is ideal. David J Critchley Buckingham The fundamental flaw in ID card proposals SIR – Robin Nonhebel (Letters, June 10) believes that identity cards should be introduced to help curb illegal immigration and abuse of the benefits system. However, for an ID card scheme to be appealing, voters would have to trust the state. Along with millions of others, I don't. Anyhow, I have an ID card already – it's called a passport or driving licence. William Rusbridge Tregony, Cornwall SIR– Robin Nonhebel is quite correct. You have to ask why migrants want to come to the UK, bypassing Germany, France and other European countries. Could it be because those countries have national ID cards? These let holders use government services, and are required to obtain work and access healthcare and other state benefits. ID cards would improve government efficiency, removing the need for multiple other forms of identification. Yet we think we know best, and so the debate continues ad infinitum. R Jones Northwood, Middlesex SIR – An ID card scheme would surely offer an opportunity for people-traffickers to enhance their income further by selling forged cards. Carole Doggett Milford, Hampshire SIR – The idea of having to prove yourself to the state day in, day out is objectionable. Why should I – a private citizen – have to verify who I am to a policeman, when the policeman should rightly show his warrant card to me? Letters to the Editor We accept letters by email and post. Please include name, address, work and home telephone numbers. ADDRESS: 111 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1W 0DT EMAIL: dtletters@ FOLLOW: Telegraph Letters @LettersDesk
