
‘Recreational weed' passes in Pa. House; Dems and GOP split
State House Democrats voted in favor of a bill that would legalize cannabis in Pennsylvania this week.
On Wednesday, H.B. 1200 was passed by the state House of Representatives. The vote advances the bill to the state Senate.
All 101 Republicans in the House voted against the bill, which would allow Pennsylvanians age 21 and older to legally purchase and use recreational cannabis in the commonwealth.
One-hundred-and-two Democrats argued that five of the six states that border Pennsylvania have legalized recreational cannabis, sending residents to New Jersey, New York, Maryland, Delaware and Ohio to shop for it. They hope Pennsylvania will set up a state-monitored chain of stores for cannabis, similar to how state-sanctioned stores currently sell alcohol.
*
Rep. Kyle Donahue, D-113, of Scranton, co-sponsored and voted for legislation aimed to legalize recreational cannabis use and purchase in Pennsylvania. (PA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES / SUBMITTED)
*
State Rep. Bridget M. Kosierowski, D-114, Waverly Twp., supported a bill on Wednesday to move the discussion of legalization of recreational cannabis in Pennsylvania forward. (PA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES / SUBMITTED)
*
Rep. Eddie Day Pashinski voted yes to support ongoing conversation for the legalization of recreational cannabis in Pennsylvania, arguing that surrounding states have legalized cannabis, and now it's time for Pennsylvania to consider the potential benefits. (FILE PHOTO)
*
Tim Twardzik, R-123, Frackville, voted against H.B. 1200, supporting legalization of recreational cannabis in Pennsylvania. (PA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES)
*
State Rep. Brenda Pugh is concerned that making recreational cannabis legal for adult use in the Commonwealth could hurt children. (Submitted)
Show Caption
1 of 5
Rep. Kyle Donahue, D-113, of Scranton, co-sponsored and voted for legislation aimed to legalize recreational cannabis use and purchase in Pennsylvania. (PA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES / SUBMITTED)
Expand
State Rep. Eddie Day Pashinski, D-121, Wilkes-Barre, said sending residents out of state to buy cannabis is costing Pennsylvania in a big way.
'Just like gambling before we got our casinos, Pennsylvania residents took all their money and gave it to New Jersey,' he said. 'They brought in about $6 billion, of which nearly $3 billion comes back to the taxpayer in one form or another.'
Pashinski said taxes on cannabis sales could be used for rehabilitation services, child care, to help senior citizens and more.
'There's a lot of good things that you could use those dollars for,' Pashinski said. 'It's not going away. All the states around us have it. Why should people go out of state?' he asked.
The bill memo, co-sponsored by state Reps. Kyle Donahue, D-113, Scranton, and Maureen Madden D-115, Coolbaugh Twp., says Pennsylvanians are still consuming cannabis, legal or not, and are buying unregulated cannabis and 'hemp loophole products' at gas stations, vape shops or via the 'illicit market.'
State Rep. Brenda Pugh, R-120, of Dallas Twp., said she believes the bill will hurt children, and cited the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's literature on the damage it can cause.
'For me, it's for our children, it's for the THC that's in marijuana,' she said, explaining why she voted 'no' on the bill 'the way it stands' in its current phase, adding that neighboring states that have legalized are no reason for Pennsylvania to follow suit.
'My dad used to say, 'If so and so jumped off the bridge, would you jump off the bridge? Probably not,' Pugh said. 'I don't feel a child's life or health is worth any amount of money.' Pugh added that Pennsylvania should invest in natural gas versus cannabis.
State Rep. Bridget Kosierowski, D-114, Waverly Twp., agrees that children should be considered with the legislation, but accentuated that this bill does not suggest child use by any means.
'This is for adult usage,' Kosierowski said, arguing that without the legislation in place, children are actually at greater risk. 'Right now, they're marketing to children in vape stores,' she said, calling the bill a conversation starter aimed at 'safety, regulation and taxation' in the industry.
'As a health care provider, I understand the concerns that people have about legalizing cannabis,' she said. 'But we have to remember that cannabis is being used now in the commonwealth.'
Kosierowski said the bill will regulate, make safe and tax cannabis, citing that legal cannabis is projected to bring in more than $1.3 billion in revenue over five years, and calling it 'a big move for the commonwealth.'
'The proposal to legalize adult-use cannabis is about catching up with our neighbors, regulating a market that already exists, and reinvesting in Pennsylvania communities,' Kosierowski said.
The bill's memo called cannabis prohibition a 'failed policy,' blaming it for ruining lives over minor cannabis offenses, which disproportionately affect black and brown communities, increased purchases of 'dangerous products,' and a loss of millions in public revenue that communities need. The bill also aims to learn from what sister states have done wrong — namely 'poorly structured cannabis' programs that bring in 'out-of-state corporations.'
State Rep. Tim Twardzik, R-123, Frackville, said it's off-base to think about profits that could come from the legislation.
'The promise of money from this project is absolutely wrong,' Twardzik said, calling it 'blood money' and lamenting that it will cost upwards of $350 million to get the system in place in Pennsylvania. Twardzik further called the legislation 'bad policy' and stated that 'law enforcement were never asked' to weigh in on the bill.
'Absolute solid no,' he said, reflecting his vote on the bill. 'I am heartbroken,' he added, lamenting that the bill will 'normalize' cannabis use and that the proposed fine for underage use isn't a big-enough deterrent.
'From a youth standpoint, they decided it'll be a $25 fine if you buy marijuana in a state store, but that doesn't match liquor in a state store,' he said.
While the bill isn't perfect, it's 'long overdue,' said Donahue, citing issues relating to criminal justice, equity and revenue, among others.
'I voted to move the conversation forward, see what ideas come out of the Senate. So now it's in their hands,' he said. Donahue added that it's important to get the bill as close to right as possible, and consider arguments arising for Democrats and Republicans alike so that it will pass in both houses.
'I wouldn't expect the Senate to pass it as is, but I'm hoping they send something back so, as we move closer to our budget season, we can come to a compromise,' Donahue said.
Gov. Josh Shapiro requested a bill that addressed legal recreational cannabis use in his 2025-2026 budget address.
'Like skill games, there's another issue that's long overdue to regulate and tax — and that is adult-use cannabis,' said Shapiro, adding, 'Letting this business operate in the shadows doesn't make sense.'
June 30 is the deadline for the state budget.
Donahue explained that while there are many dense issues to bear in mind in regard to the legislation, the time to move ahead is now.
'We've been working on this issue for a long time,' Donahue said, adding that representatives had the benefit of information from six health committee hearings and multiple policy hearings in helping them prepare to vote for or against H.B. 1200.
He said that one of his favorite parts of the bill is centered on 'social equity' — making sure that the revenue 'doesn't just go to big corporations.'
'This allows small businesses to get in the game,' Donahue said. 'Pennsylvania agriculture could play a huge part in this industry moving forward, if we set up an infrastructure to help them get in the game.'
He stressed that the program needs to be set up safely and responsibly.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
29 minutes ago
- New York Post
Ted Cruz was with president when Musk's barrage of attacks started: ‘Trump was pissed'
Sen. Ted Cruz was with a fuming President Trump as Elon Musk viciously attacked his former ally online Thursday — with the Texas Republican saying the spat made him feel like he was a kid in the middle of a divorce. 'I was sitting in the Oval as this unfolded. Trump was pissed. He was venting,' the Republican senator revealed on his podcast 'Verdict with Ted Cruz' Friday. 'I was sitting there, and the tweets were coming…. Elon was saying some really harsh things.' The SpaceX and Tesla billionaire went on a multi-day social media offensive against Trump, panning the president's 'big, beautiful' reconciliation bill 'disgusting' and urging Congress to kill it. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk fumed after Trump spoke out about the simmering feud. Cruz, who's friends with both former bros, called their very public break-up this week 'incredibly painful.' 'These are two men whom I know very well, they're both good friends of mine,' he said. 3 President Trump and Tesla billionaire Elon Musk came to blows on social media this week, ending their bromance. AFP via Getty Images 'I feel like the kids of a bitter divorce where you're just saying, 'I really wish mommy and daddy would stop screaming.'' 3 Ted Cruz talked about the break-up this Friday on his podcast 'Verdict with Ted Cruz.' Verdict with Ted Cruz/Facebook Trump and Musk's tiff escalated later in the week — with Trump threatening to cancel billions of dollars in government contracts to Musk's companies and Musk claiming Trump was holding out on making the Jeffrey Epstein files public because he's in them. 3 Trump and Musk's tiff escalated later in the week. Getty Images 'It just went from zero to 11 instantaneously,' said Cruz. 'These are two alpha males who are pissed off. And unfortunately, they're unloading on each other … They're angry, it's not complicated.' Cruz and his co-host commented that they thought both men are right — Trump's big beautiful budget bill has to get passed but the government has to tackle the deficit more as Musk argued. 'Unfortunately, Elon is working under the assumption that Congress actually wants to do the job and save our country,' said podcast co-host Ben Ferguson. 'And I think Trump is working under the reality that there's a lot of people in Congress that actually aren't looking out for the American people.' Musk on Saturday deleted his post about the Epstein files in a sign he was ready to throw in the towel. But Trump made it clear he wasn't interested in kissing and making up anytime soon. 'I have no intention of speaking to him,' he told NBC News.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump warns Musk will face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats
President Donald Trump vowed his former friend Elon Musk will face 'very serious consequences' should he choose to support the Democratic party following their very public feud. Trump delivered the warning in an interview with NBC News, during which he also said he had 'no intention of speaking to' the tech billionaire any time in the near future, citing the online threats and insults he hurled in recent days. 'I'm too busy doing other things,' Trump said Saturday. 'I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful,' he added. 'You could not disrespect the office of the president.' Asked directly whether he believes their relationship to be permanently over, Trump replied: 'I would assume so, yeah.' The world's richest man backed Trump and Vice President JD Vance in the 2024 election, shelling out nearly $300 million in a bid to land them in the White House. In the months following their win, Musk cemented himself by Trump's side, appearing at press conferences, parties and public events, while professing his 'love' for the president. But relations ruptured between the pair on Tuesday, when Musk ripped into the Republicans' 'Big, Beautiful' budget bill aimed at enacting much of Trump's agenda. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on his X social media platform. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' He said the bill would undermine much of his efforts to trim federal spending during his brief period with Trump's Department of Government Efficiency. On Thursday, he then blasted the president and accused him of being an ingrate, saying, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Mere hours later, the SpaceX founder dropped the 'really big bomb' when he alleged Trump appeared in the 'Epstein files,' referring to a trove of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sex trafficking crimes, including those who were involved. That post was deleted Friday night. 'That's called 'old news,' that's been old news, that has been talked about for years,' Trump said Saturday when asked about his reaction to Musk's allegation. 'Even Epstein's lawyer said I had nothing to do with it. It's old news.' The president also fired back in a series of press appearances and social media posts. He threatened to not only terminate Musk's government contracts, but to get rid of his Tesla as well. Sources told NBC News the electronic vehicle is still parked outside of the White House. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote on Truth Social, referring to federal contracts with SpaceX. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' As for his budget bill, Trump believes his feud with Musk has actually been positive, telling NBC the Tesla CEO helped bring it to the public's attention. 'I think, actually, Elon brought out the strengths of the bill because people that weren't as focused started focusing on it, and they see how good it is,' Trump said. 'So in that sense, there was a big favor. But I think Elon, really, I think it's a shame that he's so depressed and so heartbroken.'


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
White House slams LA ‘insurrection' as protests erupt over deportation raids
The White House slammed protests in Los Angeles on Saturday after some residents expressed outrage over raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff, described demonstrations at the city's federal building as an 'insurrection.' 'An insurrection against the laws and sovereignty of the United States,' Miller wrote in a Saturday post online. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin said more than 800 protesters gathered to challenge the arrest of dozens of individuals by 'assaulting ICE enforcement officers, slashing tires, defacing buildings' on Friday. Demonstrations continued near the sites of raids on Saturday, with authorities also conducting a raid in the nearby Paramount. McLaughlin said Los Angeles Police did not respond to the incident on Friday. 'A message to the LA rioters: you will not stop us or slow us down. @ICEgov will continue to enforce the law,' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem wrote on the social media platform X Saturday. 'And if you lay a hand on a law enforcement officer, you will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,' she added. McLaughlin said there's been an uptick in assault on law enforcement officers across the country. 'Our ICE enforcement officers are facing a 413% increase in assaults against them. And we have seen, in recent days, their family members being doxxed and targeted, as well,' she wrote on Saturday. 'Make no mistake, politicians like @RepJeffries, @AOC, and @Tim_Walz are contributing to the assaults of our officers through vilification and demonization—calling ICE the modern day Nazi gestapo and calling for their doxxing,' she added. Some California Democrats said the arrests were illegal and condemned the detainment led by Trump administration officials as an 'abuse of power.' They said they were denied access to the ICE facility where immigrants were being held amid concerns about the welfare of detainees. 'That's not a misunderstanding—it's a violation of federal law,' Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.) wrote in a Saturday post on X. 'I'm demanding @Sec_Noem launch an immediate investigation. If her agency won't follow the law, she needs to answer for it,' he added.