
Trump's FDA just changed COVID vaccine rules for 2025 — will you still qualify for boosters under the new guidelines?
What does the new FDA policy mean for younger, healthy people?
Live Events
Will COVID-19 vaccines be updated for fall 2025?
Who decides what strain the COVID vaccine should target?
Will there be enough time to study new COVID-19 vaccines?
What will the CDC recommend for fall vaccinations?
FAQs:
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
As the United States prepares for another COVID-19 season, the story surrounding updated COVID vaccines is taking a sharp turn. On Thursday, the FDA's independent vaccine advisers met to discuss whether this fall's COVID-19 booster shots should be reformulated — but the conversation is now clouded by a major shift in federal policy.Just two days before the meeting, the Food and Drug Administration changed course on who should routinely receive COVID-19 boosters. Instead of recommending annual boosters for everyone aged 6 months and older, the FDA now says that only seniors and high-risk younger individuals will be routinely eligible. That sudden change is leaving health experts and families with more questions than answers.The FDA's updated stance means that healthy people under 65 may not automatically be approved to get a COVID-19 booster this fall. Under the new rules, vaccine makers will need to run additional studies to prove that new versions of the shot are still helpful for people who aren't at high risk.'This is a mess,' said Dr. Michael Osterholm, an infectious disease expert at the University of Minnesota. 'The one thing we don't want to do is put a barrier in place that prevents parents from getting their children vaccinated if they want to.'The concern now is access: Even if people want a booster, will they be allowed to get one? And will their insurance pay for it if it's no longer officially recommended?That's what Thursday's FDA advisory meeting was really about — deciding whether the current COVID-19 vaccines should be changed to better match the virus variants expected this fall and winter. The shots used last year targeted omicron subvariants in the JN.1 family. Moderna and Pfizer used a version called KP.2, while Novavax based theirs on the parent JN.1 strain.Although the JN.1 family is still the most common, the virus keeps changing. The most dominant strain right now is LP.8.1. The big question: is the current vaccine still protective enough, or should drugmakers switch to target LP.8.1 directly?Dr. Vinay Prasad, head of the FDA's vaccine office, said during the meeting that they want to give people time to understand the new policy shift, but still need to decide quickly which variant the new shots should target. 'We are asking for guidance to help the FDA decide what strain to select for COVID-19 vaccines going forward,' Prasad said.Every year, the FDA brings together outside experts to assess whether the current vaccine formula still matches the circulating strains. These advisers weigh virus data, vaccine performance, and public health trends to suggest whether the shots should be updated. Their recommendation influences what Pfizer, Moderna, and Novavax produce for the fall.Interestingly, there's no global consensus. The World Health Organization recently said that last year's JN.1-based vaccines were still acceptable. However, the European Medicines Agency has already recommended switching to match the LP.8.1 strain.The FDA hasn't made its position clear yet — though it's leaning toward letting science dictate the timing of updates, not the calendar. 'Instead of having a COVID-19 strategy that's year-to-year where we change things every single year, why don't we let the science tell us when to change?' said Prasad.If vaccine makers decide to change the strain, the FDA wants them to conduct studies to prove the new shot works well — especially for lower-risk individuals. But those studies could take up to six months, making it hard to get new vaccines ready in time for fall.Experts warn that requiring large clinical trials for updated vaccines could delay access or even discourage companies from making changes. If manufacturers stick with last year's strain, those extra studies wouldn't be needed — making it easier to get the shots approved for broader use.But that could also mean that the shots are less effective against the latest virus variants, depending on how much the virus has changed.Even if the FDA makes a decision on the strain, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will make the final call onho should get the COVID vaccine this fall. The CDC's advisory committee is expected to meet in June to finalize those guidelines.Among the options: continuing to offer the booster to everyone, or limiting it to high-risk groups while still allowing lower-risk people to opt in if they want.Much of the uncertainty also stems from the people now running the FDA's vaccine division. Both Dr. Prasad and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary have publicly criticized the government's broad approach to COVID-19 shots in the past — especially for children and young, healthy adults. Before joining the agency, they were praised by vaccine skeptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who now leads Health and Human Services.In a recent editorial, Prasad and Makary argued that the U.S. has been too aggressive with its vaccine recommendations, unlike countries in Europe that take a more targeted approach. 'The one-size-fits-all booster strategy no longer makes sense,' they wrote.Only seniors and high-risk individuals are eligible for routine COVID boosters.FDA is considering a formula change to match the LP.8.1 variant.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Covid volunteers' union holdsprotest, seeks government jobs
The Covid Medical and Paramedical Volunteers' Union held a protest demanding government jobs here on Tuesday. The volunteers include doctors, nursing staff, pharmacist, lab technician and ward boys who were first roped in by the state government in 2020 to cater to the high load of Covid patients. 'During the first two Covid waves, the government turned some schools into level-1 Covid care centres. They hired us as there was a shortage of staff. We were aware of the dangers of working with Covid patients and still chipped in as we wanted jobs and we were promised on different levels that our jobs would continue even after the pandemic,' said union president Rajwinder Singh, who also worked as a ward boy during the pandemic in these centres. The volunteers were called for duty on three occasions. First for up to eight months in 2020, then six months in 2021 and finally six months in 2022. They, Rajwinder said, were then laid off and were told that they will be called in when there is a need later. 'We had been hired after the government, under the National Health Mission, issued a notification asking for volunteers in March 2020. We went through the complete selection process and were told about the dangers of working with Covid patients. But the idea of working for the government promised regularisation later down the road, so we kept working in the tough Covid period,' he added. 'We met the chief minister in October 2023 and we were promised regular jobs, but to no avail. We were hailed as Covid warriors and worked in testing conditions. The government should think about us,' he added.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Ludhiana: Health advisory goes for a toss in rallies amid rise in Covid-19 cases
With the district seeing a steady rise in Covid-19 cases, the local health department has been asking the people to wear masks in crowded areas, but this advisory is not being followed during the election campaign for the Ludhiana West by-poll which is picking up steam with each passing day. Ludhiana has been witnessing around 2-3 cases every day. People turning up at public meetings and other political campaigns can be seen sans masks. Even the candidates, who are busy wooing the voters, are seen without masks. The district has so far recorded 26 cases of Covid with two deaths. Ludhiana is also the leading district in the state in Covid cases. Out of the 26 Covid positive cases, most of the patients, including those who died, were vaccinated. State Covid nodal officer Dr Rajesh Bhaskar expressed concern over the lack of Covid-appropriate behaviour during political campaigns amid the steady rise in cases. 'This is a concern as Covid cases are surfacing regularly not just in Ludhiana but across the state. We have been asking people to mandatorily wear masks in crowded places. This also includes election rallies,' said Dr Bhaskar. He said the health department was considering urging the state government to issue an advisory to ensure adherence to Covid-appropriate behaviour to prevent the spread of infection. Deputy commissioner Himanshu Jain said the district administration had not issued any such advisory for campaigns as there had been no such order from higher-ups. 'We are following the advisories being issued by the health department and the Election Commission,' he added. Meanwhile, three new Covid cases were reported in the district on Tuesday, taking the tally to 26 cases so far. The new cases include three men aged 16, 30 and 38 years. Two of them — the 16-year-old and the 30-year-old — are asymptomatic while the 38-year-old is mildly symptomatic. Besides the new cases, one of the cases earlier reported positive recovered on Tuesday. Of the total 26 cases reported so far, only 14 are positive at present. Of them, 13 are mildly symptomatic and in home isolation. Ten people have recovered so far. Two people, one 40-year-old man and another 69-year-old lady, both suffering from comorbid conditions, have died of the infection. All the people reported positive so far have been vaccinated for Covid, except an 18-year-old.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
US restores some medical research grants, says top Trump official
Washington: A senior US health official on Tuesday admitted President Donald Trump's administration had gone too far in slashing biomedical research grants worth billions of dollars, and said efforts were underway to restore some of the funding. Jay Bhattacharya , director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), made the remarks during a Senate committee hearing examining both recent cuts to his agency and deeper reductions proposed by the White House in next year's budget. Bhattachartya said he had created an appeals process for scientists and laboratories whose research was impacted, and that the NIH had already "reversed many" of the cuts. "I didn't take this job to terminate grants," said the physician and health economist who left a professorship at Stanford University to join the Trump administration. "I took this job to make sure that we do the research that advances the health needs of the American people." The hearing came a day after more than 60 NIH employees sent an open letter to Bhattacharya condemning policies they said undermined the agency's mission and the health of Americans. They dubbed it the " Bethesda Declaration " -- a nod both to the NIH's suburban Washington headquarters and to Bhattacharya's role as a prominent signatory of the 2020 "Great Barrington Declaration," which opposed Covid lockdowns. Since Trump's January 20 inauguration, the NIH has terminated 2,100 research grants totaling around $9.5 billion and $2.6 billion in contracts, according to an independent database called Grant Watch. Affected projects include studies on gender, the health effects of global warming, Alzheimer's disease, and cancer. Trump has launched a sweeping overhaul of the US scientific establishment early in his second term -- cutting billions in funding, attacking universities, and overseeing mass layoffs of scientists across federal agencies.