Columbia University deserves to lose its accreditation

Al Jazeera

2 days ago

On June 4, the United States Department of Education notified the Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) accrediting agency that its member institution Columbia University deserves to have its accreditation pulled. It accused the university of ostensibly being 'in violation of federal antidiscrimination laws' for supposedly failing 'to meaningfully protect Jewish students against severe and pervasive harassment'.
This claim is, of course, wrong. It is a blatant mischaracterisation of the events that have taken place on campus over the last 19 months.
Yet, it is also true that during that time Columbia violated the terms of its accreditation: by violently abrogating the academic freedom and viewpoint diversity of antigenocide protesters via institutional sanction and the deployment of police on campus. In this sense, Columbia does deserve to lose its accreditation.
MSCHE's accreditation policy, which is standard across the industry, states that an 'accredited institution' must possess and demonstrate both 'a commitment to academic freedom, intellectual freedom, freedom of expression' and 'a climate that fosters respect among students, faculty, staff, and administration from a range of diverse backgrounds, ideas, and perspectives'.
It is stunningly evident that since October 7, 2023, Columbia University has egregiously and repeatedly failed to satisfy the MSCHE's fundamental requirements due to its response to antigenocide protests on campus concerning Gaza and Palestine. The violent removal, suspension, and arrest of peaceful student protesters and faculty critics should be understood to constitute a violation of the institution's obligation to protect freedom of expression and academic freedom.
On November 10, 2023, Columbia suspended Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and Jewish Voices for Peace (JVP) after they organised a peaceful protest for Palestinian rights. The administration justified the suspension by claiming the groups used 'threatening rhetoric and intimidation'.
However, media reports, witnesses and university insiders revealed that the suspension was based on an incident involving an unaffiliated individual whose actions were condemned by the organisers and that no formal disciplinary process or appeals process was allowed by the university.
It was later uncovered that Columbia administrators had unilaterally altered language in its official policies on student groups just before suspending the SJP and JVP.
In January, Katherine Franke, a tenured law professor, retired and said she was 'effectively terminated' by Columbia after facing public and congressional criticism for a media interview criticising students who formerly served in the Israeli army.
Similarly, the university has recently acknowledged doling out 'multi-year suspensions, temporary degree revocation and expulsions' to dozens of students who participated in 2024 antigenocide protests. One of those expelled, Jewish PhD student Grant Miner, president of the Student Workers of Columbia, noted that all of the students censured by the university 'had been cleared of any criminal wrongdoing'.
Perhaps worst of all, Columbia has, on repeated occasions, invited the New York Police Department (NYPD) onto campus to intervene against student expression. On April 30, 2024, according to the university's own report, the NYPD arrested 44 students and individuals with apparent associations with the university.
Likewise, in early May this year, about 70 students were arrested after participating in an 'occupation' of the university's library. The NYPD explicitly acknowledged that the presence of its officers on campus was 'at the direct request of Columbia University'.
There is little question each of these incidents constitutes blatant stifling of academic freedom and viewpoint diversity. The disproportionate targeting of Arab, Muslim, Palestinian and Jewish students and allies can be viewed as discriminatory, undermining the institution's commitment to equitable treatment and inclusive learning environments, in clear violation of MSCHE's guiding principles on equity, diversity and inclusion.
These decisions to suppress protests were made unilaterally by senior administration at Columbia – without input from faculty, students or shared governance bodies – clearly signalling a lack of adherence to MSCHE's accreditation policy standard on governance, leadership and administration. By failing to show 'a commitment to shared governance' with 'administrative decision-making that reflects fairness and transparency', Columbia has failed to meet the standards of accreditation outlined by the MSCHE.
But Columbia University is not alone in failing to abide by guiding principles of its accreditation. At Muhlenberg College in Pennsylvania, Jewish Associate Professor Maura Finkelstein was summarily fired for engaging in social media critiques of Israel's genocide in Gaza.
Similarly, at Northwestern University, Assistant Professor Steven Thrasher was subjected to multiple investigations in relation to his support of the student antigenocide encampment on campus and was ultimately denied tenure in a decision he characterised as an effort designed to not just silence him but also to bully him so that 'students, journalists, faculty, staff and activists across campus and throughout the country [may be intimidated] into silencing themselves'.
Students too have faced repression across the United States. Indeed, it has been estimated that by July 2024, at least 3,100 students had been arrested for participation in campus antigenocide protests. On November 6, 2023, Brandeis University became the first private university in the US to ban its student chapter of the SJP, for 'conduct that supports Hamas'. In April 2024, Cornell University suspended several students involved in pro-Palestinian encampment protests, citing violations of campus policies.
Then in May, police brutalised students with pepper spray at George Washington University while arresting 33 people in the violent clearing-out of its student encampment. At Vanderbilt University, students were arrested and expelled for occupying an administration building.
In the most recent news, it has become clear that the University of Michigan has spent at least $800,000 hiring dozens of private investigators to surveil antigenocide student protesters on and off campus in Ann Arbor.
These examples are merely a small sample of what has occurred across the US, Canada and Europe since long before October 7, 2023. This is a broader existential crisis in higher education in which the free expression of students is being suppressed at the cost of the values these universities purport to espouse.
Despite appearances, this crisis has very little to do with the heavy-handed Trump administration. It is, rather, the self-inflicted consequence of the decisions of university administrators whose allegiances are now first and foremost to donors and corporate stakeholders rather than to their educational missions.
If universities are to exist in any plausible and practical sense as institutions devoted to genuine knowledge production and pedagogical development, it is essential that they robustly fulfil accreditation requirements for academic and intellectual freedom, diversity, and fair and transparent administration and governance.
There can be no Palestine exception to that.
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.