'All U.S Bases Will Be Bombed': Trump Orders Evacuation Of Diplomats & Families From Arab Countries
The State Department is preparing to order the departure of all nonessential personnel from the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad due to the potential for regional unrest, two U.S. officials said Wednesday. The department, however, also is authorizing the departure of nonessential personnel and family members from Bahrain and Kuwait. That gives them an option on whether to leave the country. The Pentagon is standing by to support a potential evacuation of U.S. personnel from U.S. Embassy Baghdad, another U.S. official said. Earlier, Iran tested ballistic missile with two-tonne warhead, according to Iranian defense ministry. Watch.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Israel ready for military strike on Iran without US support: Report
Israel is reportedly weighing a military strike against Tehran's nuclear facilities without US support. According to a report by NBC News, Israel has become increasingly serious about taking military action amid concerns that Washington may be nearing a deal with Iran — one that Jerusalem views as dangerously lenient on uranium enrichment."Israel is considering taking military action against Iran -- most likely without US support -- even as US President Donald Trump is in advanced discussions with Tehran,' the report told NBC that Israel is particularly alarmed by framework provisions under discussion, which appear to allow Iran to retain enrichment capabilities deemed unacceptable by the Israeli government. US President Donald Trump acknowledged the growing risk of conflict while still pushing for a diplomatic resolution. "I don't want to say imminent, but it looks like it's something that could very well happen," he told reporters on Thursday, adding, "Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon."The escalating tension has put the US military and diplomatic corps in the region on high alert. The State Department ordered the departure of nonessential personnel from the US Embassy in Baghdad, and authorised similar exits from Bahrain and Kuwait."I don't want to be the one that didn't give any warning, and missiles are flying into their buildings," Trump said, explaining his decision to evacuate staff from Middle Eastern posts. "It's possible. So I had to do it."advertisementDefence Secretary Pete Hegseth also greenlit the voluntary departure of military dependents across US Central Command's area of operations. CENTCOM noted it was "monitoring the developing tension in the Middle East."Meanwhile, Iran is digging in. Hours after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) issued its first formal censure of Tehran in two decades, Iran announced it has built. It will soon activate a third uranium enrichment site. Iran has two underground sites, at Fordo and Natanz, and it has been building tunnels in the mountains near Natanz since suspected Israeli sabotage attacks targeted that facility."The Islamic Republic of Iran has no choice but to respond to this political resolution," Iran's Foreign Ministry and Atomic Energy Organisation said in a joint WILL REBUILD IF ISRAEL STRIKESPresident Masoud Pezeshkian warned that any Israeli attempt to bomb Iranian nuclear sites would be futile. "It is not the case that if they destroy our facilities with bombs, everything will be lost," he told state media. "These capabilities exist in our minds we will rebuild again."Revolutionary Guard Corps commander Hossein Salami echoed that sentiment, promising Iran's retaliation would be "more forceful and destructive" than ever these warnings, Trump expressed cautious optimism that diplomacy could still prevail. "As long as I think there is a chance for an agreement, I don't want (Israel) going in because I think it would blow it," he said.A sixth round of US-Iran talks will begin on Sunday in inputs from Associated PressMust Watch
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
We have contingency plans: Hegseth hints Pentagon could invade Greenland, Panama
Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared to confirm on Thursday that the Pentagon has drawn up contingency plans to seize control of Greenland and Panama by force, sparking outrage and disbelief during a congressional repeatedly by Democrats on the House Armed Services Committee about his handling of classified military discussions on Signal chats, Hegseth declined to give direct answers -- but one remark stunned job at the Defence Department is to have plans for any contingency," Hegseth said in response to Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., who had pointedly asked whether the Pentagon had plans to forcibly take Greenland or Panama. Though it's standard for the Pentagon to prepare for hypothetical global conflicts, the defence secretary's phrasing -- and his refusal to clarify -- escalated tension in the Mike Turner, R-Ohio, asked directly: "It is not your testimony today that there are plans at the Pentagon for taking by force or invading Greenland, correct?"But Hegseth repeated his line about contingency planning, prompting Turner to respond: "I sure as hell hope that is not your testimony."Hegseth responded, 'We look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats.' The session, already fraught after days of stonewalling from Hegseth on various topics, quickly turned confrontational. Lawmakers pressed him on why he had used encrypted messaging apps like Signal to discuss military operations — a move some said sidestepped an embarrassment to this country. You're unfit to lead," shouted Rep. Salud Carbajal, D-Calif., his voice rising. "You should just get the hell out."Republican lawmakers pushed back on the tone of the hearing. Several apologized to Hegseth on behalf of their colleagues, condemning what they called "flagrant disrespect."But Hegseth brushed off the criticism. "I'm happy to take the arrows," he said. "We're here to make tough calls and do what's best for national security."The Pentagon has not formally commented on whether operational plans exist for such inputs from Associated PressMust Watch
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
‘You're unfit to lead': Hegseth grilled over Signal chats, Greenland invasion plan; House hearing erupts over Pentagon chief's evasive responses
Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth faced intense scrutiny at a combative House Armed Services Committee hearing on Thursday, after appearing to confirm that the Pentagon has contingency plans to invade Greenland and Panama if necessary. He also refused to provide direct answers about his use of encrypted Signal chats to discuss military operations — a move that triggered bipartisan concern over potential breaches of protocol. 'Our job at the Defense Department is to have plans for any contingency,' Hegseth said in response to Rep. Adam Smith's (D-Wash.) pointed question about whether the Pentagon had invasion plans for Greenland or Panama. While it's standard for the Pentagon to prepare contingency strategies, Hegseth's vague responses prompted a sharp rebuke from Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio): 'I sure as hell hope that is not your testimony.' Hegseth attempted to defuse the moment by saying, 'We look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats.' The session grew heated as Hegseth evaded repeated questions about his alleged disclosure of operational details — including strike times and munitions — during U.S. attacks on Houthi rebels in Yemen, shared via Signal with both military officials and family members. Lawmakers pressed him on whether he had revealed classified material, but he avoided directly answering. 'What's not classified is that it was an incredible, successful mission,' Hegseth said, sparking more backlash. Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.), a Marine veteran, challenged Hegseth on his accountability: 'Would you hold yourself accountable if the Inspector General finds that you leaked classified information?' Hegseth only replied that he serves 'at the pleasure of the president.' In one of the most charged moments of the hearing, Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-Calif.) told Hegseth, 'You're an embarrassment to this country. You're unfit to lead. You should just get the hell out.' Republican lawmakers defended Hegseth, criticising what they called 'flagrant disrespect,' while Hegseth responded, 'I'm happy to take the arrows' in pursuit of what he called difficult decisions. Lawmakers also questioned the politicisation of the military following a recent campaign-style speech by former President Donald Trump at Fort Bragg, where uniformed troops were seen cheering and booing political opponents, with MAGA merchandise sold nearby. Gen. Dan Caine, chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the committee he was unaware of any violations, reaffirming that service members must remain apolitical. Hegseth was further grilled on his stance regarding women and transgender troops. He defended cutting diversity programs and asserted he wants the 'most capable troops,' but avoided clear answers on gender equality in combat roles. 'It depends on the context,' he said, arguing that women 'carry a rucksack differently.'
