logo
South Korea's snap presidential election 2025: All you need to know

South Korea's snap presidential election 2025: All you need to know

Al Jazeera2 days ago

Voters in South Korea are choosing a new president to replace Yoon Suk-yeol who was impeached and removed from office over his brief and ill-fated martial law bid in December.
The snap election on June 3 is pivotal, with implications for South Korea's democratic future, as well as its ties with China, the United States and its nuclear armed neighbour, North Korea.
The winner – who will serve a single term of five-years – faces the task of addressing the fallout from the martial law decree, which lasted six hours but unleashed political chaos, including mass protests, a riot at a court and three caretaker leaders in six months.
The new president will also have to tackle a deepening economic downturn and manage tariff negotiations with the US, which has imposed a 25 percent levy on key exports such as steel, aluminium and automobiles.
Here's what you need to know about the June 3 poll:
There are six candidates on the ballot, but the main contenders are Lee Jae-myung of the opposition Democratic Party of Korea (DP), and Kim Moon-soo of the governing conservative People Power Party (PPP).
Lee, 61, a human rights lawyer-turned-politician, is the clear frontrunner.
A Gallup Korea poll on May 28 showed 49 percent of respondents favoured the liberal candidate, while 36 percent said they would vote for Kim, 73, a staunch conservative who served as labour minister in Yoon's government.
Trailing in third place is Lee Jun-seok of the conservative New Reform Party, at 9 percent.Yoon's botched martial law bid has cast a shadow over the race.
It put Lee, who lost the last election to Yoon in 2022, back on track for the presidency.
The leader of the opposition was instrumental in foiling the president's plan. On December 3, when Yoon declared martial law – in a bid to quash the Democratic Party-dominated parliament, which he portrayed as 'anti-state' and a 'den of criminals' – Lee rushed to the National Assembly and climbed the walls of the building to avoid the hundreds of armed troops deployed there. He livestreamed his exploit, urging supporters to come to the parliament and prevent the arrest of legislators.
Despite the troop blockades, enough legislators managed to make it to the parliament and vote to end martial law. The assembly went on to impeach Yoon on December 14.
'This election would not have happened if not for the declaration of martial law by Yoon Suk-yeol and his impeachment,' said Youngshik Bong, research fellow at Yonsei University in Seoul. 'These issues have sucked in all others like a vortex. Everything else is marginal.'
On the campaign trail, Lee has pledged to bring to justice anyone involved in Yoon's failed bid and has also promised to introduce tighter controls on the president's ability to declare martial law.Lee, the opposition leader, has also proposed constitutional changes to introduce a four-year, two-term presidency – at the moment, South Korean presidents are only allowed a single term of five years. Lee has also argued for a run-off system for presidential elections, whereby if no candidate secures 50 percent of the popular vote, the top two candidates take on each other in a second round.
'A four-year, two-term presidency would allow for a midterm evaluation of the administration, reinforcing responsibility,' he wrote on Facebook, calling for a constitutional amendment to enable the change. 'Meanwhile, adopting a run-off election system would enhance the legitimacy of democratic governance and help reduce unnecessary social conflict.'
The PPP's Kim has accepted Lee's proposals for a constitutional amendment to allow a two-term presidency, but has suggested shortening each term to three years.Yoon's martial law bid, however, has left the PPP in crisis and disarray.
Infighting plagued the embattled party as it tried to choose the impeached president's successor. Although Kim won the party primary, its leaders tried to replace him with former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo. On the eve of the party's campaign launch, they cancelled Kim's candidacy, only to reinstate him after party members opposed the move.
Bong, at Yonsei University, said the infighting as well as divisions in the conservative camp over Yoon's decree has cost it support.
'Kim Moon-soo has not set his position clearly on the martial law declaration,' Bong said. 'He has not distanced himself from the legacy of Yoon, but at the same time, he has not made it clear whether he believes the declaration of martial law was a violation of the constitution. So the PPP has not really had enough energy to mobilise its support bases.'
Still, Kim appears to have eroded what was a more than 20 percent point gap with Lee at the start of the campaign.
But he has failed to convince the third placed contender – Lee Jun-seok – to abandon his bid and back the PPP to improve its chances. The New Reform Party's Lee, who is 40 years old, said on Tuesday there would be 'no candidate merger' with 'those responsible for the emergency martial law'.
Although policy debates have taken a backseat, the outcome of the election could reorient South Korea's approach towards North Korea. The two neighbours are technically in a state of war as the Korean War of 1950-1953 ended in an armistice rather than a peace treaty, and ties between them are at a new low.
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has called for rewriting his country's constitution to scrap the longstanding goal of unifying the war-divided nations and described Seoul as an 'invariable principal enemy'. Pyongyang has also severed communication lines, and the two countries have clashed over balloons and drones carrying rubbish and propaganda.
Lee of the Democratic Party has promised to ease tensions if elected, including by restoring a military hotline, and committed to maintaining the goal of eliminating nuclear weapons from the Korean Peninsula.
Kim, however, has backed Yoon's hardline approach, promising to secure 'pre-emptive deterrence' through tools such as ballistic missiles and the redeployment of US tactical nuclear weapons. He has said he would also seek a path for the country to pursue nuclear armament by securing the right to reprocess nuclear fuel, a key step towards building atomic weapons.
The two candidates also differ in their approach to the US, the country's most important security ally, and to China, its biggest trading partner.
Lee, who espouses what he calls a pragmatic foreign policy, has said it is crucial to maintain South Korea's alliance with the US and pursue security cooperation with Japan. However, he has pledged to prioritise 'national interests' and said there's 'no need to unnecessarily antagonise China or Russia'.Kim, meanwhile, has questioned Lee's commitment to the US-South Korea alliance, and has promised to hold an immediate summit meeting with US President Donald Trump if elected to discuss tariffs.
'I have a very friendly and trusting relationship,' with the US leader, Kim has said.
He has also indicated a willingness to discuss sharing more of the cost of stationing US troops in the country, something Trump has demanded for years.
Lee Sung-yoon, board member of the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea, described the policy differences between the rival camps as 'immutable' and referred to earlier comments by the Democratic Party's Lee, because of which some view him as being soft on China and Russia.
'In the past, Lee has said South Korea should not get involved in China's posture towards Taiwan, and just say thank you to both Beijing and Taiwan and stay out of the conflict. He has said of the trilateral defensive drills among US, Japan and South Korea as 'a defence disaster' and an 'extremely pro-Japanese act'. And more than once he has said that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy incited Russia to invade because he was a political novice who said unfortunate things.'
The analyst said Lee has – over the course of the election campaign – tried to walk back some of his statements in a bid to appeal to more moderate voters.
However, 'I would venture to guess that people sitting in the councils of power in Washington, DC, or Tokyo or in Kyiv, Ukraine, are not overly jubilant at the prospect of a Lee administration,' he said.
Koreans overseas have already cast their ballots, and early voting took place on Thursday and Friday. Large numbers of people turned out for the early vote, including the two frontrunners.
According to the National Election Commission, some 44.4 million people in the country of 52 million are eligible to vote. On election day, which is a public holiday, polling stations will open at 6am (22:00 GMT) and close at 8pm (20:00 GMT).
Counting will begin immediately and the winner will be known that evening or in the early hours of the following day. The candidate who receives the most votes will be deemed the winner, even if they don't win 50 percent of the votes.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

South Korea snap election live: Lee Jae-myung, Kim Moon-soo face off
South Korea snap election live: Lee Jae-myung, Kim Moon-soo face off

Al Jazeera

time4 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

South Korea snap election live: Lee Jae-myung, Kim Moon-soo face off

It all boils down to one thing – Yoon Suk-yeol's botched martial law decree. The former president, who narrowly won the last presidential election in 2022, was supposed to serve for five years. But his declaration of martial law on December 3 – which brought armed soldiers onto Seoul's streets, evoking traumatic memories of past military rule – prompted the opposition-controlled National Assembly to impeach him that same month. The Constitutional Court upheld the decision on April 4 in a move that obliged the country's caretaker leaders to call a presidential election within 60 days. Yoon has steadfastly denied any wrongdoing. He has described his decree as a legitimate act of governance meant to raise public awareness of the danger of the opposition-controlled National Assembly, which obstructed his agenda and impeached top officials. The decree lasted only six hours as enough legislators, including from Yoon's party, managed to enter the parliament house and vote it down. It unleashed political chaos, however, including mass protests, a riot at a courthouse and three caretaker leaders in six months.

Poland election results: Who won, who lost, what's next
Poland election results: Who won, who lost, what's next

Al Jazeera

time9 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Poland election results: Who won, who lost, what's next

Karol Nawrocki, Poland's right-wing opposition candidate, narrowly won the second round of voting in the country's presidential election on Sunday, according to the National Electoral Commission (NEC). Here is all you need to know about the results: Nawrocki won with 50.89 percent of the votes, the NEC website updated early on Monday. He defeated liberal Warsaw Mayor Rafal Trzaskowski, who secured 49.11 percent of the vote. The outcome was a surprise because exit polls had projected a narrow loss for first round took place on May 18, where, as expected, none of the 13 presidential candidates could manage to reach a 50 percent threshold. Trzaskowski won 31.4 percent of the vote, while Nawrocki got 29.5 percent. As the top two candidates, Nawrocki and Trzaskowski proceeded to the run-off. Nawrocki, 42, is a conservative historian and amateur boxer. He contested as an independent candidate, backed by the outgoing president, Andrzej Duda's Law and Justice (PiS), Poland's main opposition party. The newly elected president's academic work, as a historian, centred on anti-communist resistance. At the moment, he runs the Institute of National Remembrance, a Warsaw-based government-funded research institute that studies the history of Poland during World War II and the period of communism until 1990. At the institute, Nawrocki has removed Soviet memorials, upsetting Russia. He administered the Museum of the Second World War in the Polish city of Gdansk from 2017 to 2021. Nawrocki has had his share of controversies. In 2018, he published a book about a notorious gangster under the pseudonym 'Tadeusz Batyr'. In public comments, Nawrocki and Batyr praised each other, without revealing they were the same person. United States President Donald Trump's administration threw its weight behind Nawrocki in the Polish election. The US group Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) held its first meeting in Poland on May 27. 'We need you to elect the right leader,' US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said during the CPAC event. Calling Trzaskowski 'an absolute train wreck of a leader', Noem said, 'I just had the opportunity to meet with Karol and listen: he needs to be the next president of Poland. Do you understand me?' Experts say the consistency of Nawrocki's messaging on the campaign trail may have earned him his win. 'People choose someone they see as strong, clear, and consistent,' Liliana Smiech, chairwoman of the Foundation Council at Warsaw Institute, a Polish nonprofit think tank specialising in geopolitics and international affairs, told Al Jazeera. 'Even with the accusations against him, voters preferred his firmness over Trzaskowski's constant rebranding. Trzaskowski tried to be everything to everyone and ended up convincing no one. Nawrocki looks like someone who can handle pressure. He became the president for difficult times.' Unlike Trzaskowski, Smiech said, Nawrocki 'didn't try to please everyone'. Yet he managed to please enough voters to win. Most of the power in Poland rests in the hands of the prime minister. The incumbent, Donald Tusk, leads a centre-right coalition government, and Trzaskowski was the ruling alliance's candidate. Nawrocki has been deeply critical of the Tusk administration. The president has the ability to veto legislation and influence military and foreign policy decisions. On the campaign trail, Nawrocki promised to lower taxes and pull Poland out of the European Union's Pact on Migration and Asylum, an agreement on new rules for managing migration and setting a common asylum system; and the European Green Deal, which sets benchmarks for environmental protection for the EU, such as the complete cessation of net emissions of greenhouse gases by 2050. Like other candidates, including Trzaskowski, Nawrocki called for Poland to spend up to 5 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on defence. Poland spent 3.8 percent of its GDP on military expenditure in 2023, according to World Bank data. 'Some expected a wave of support for the left or liberal side, especially among young people. That didn't happen. Nawrocki won in the 18-39 age group,' Smiech said. 'It's a clear message: people still care about sovereignty, tradition, and strong leadership. Even younger voters are not buying into the idea of a 'new progressive Poland'.' The Russia-Ukraine war, which began in February 2022, is a concerning issue for the Poles, who are fearful of a spillover of Russian aggression to Poland due to its proximity to Ukraine. While Poland initially threw its full support behind Ukraine, tensions have grown between Poland and Ukraine. Nawrocki is opposed to Ukraine joining NATO and the EU. Yet, at the same time, Poland and Nawrocki remain deeply suspicious of Russia. On May 12, the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs said an investigation had revealed that Russian intelligence agencies had orchestrated a massive fire at a shopping centre in Warsaw in May 2024. This is why multiple candidates in this election proposed raising the defence budget to 5 percent of the GDP. Abortion is a key issue in Poland, which has some of the strictest abortion laws in Europe. In August 2024, Prime Minister Tusk acknowledged that he did not have enough backing from parliament to deliver on one of his key campaign promises and change the abortion law. PiS, which backed Nawrocki, is opposed to any legalisation of abortion. Other issues included economic concerns about taxes, housing costs and the state of public is expected to be sworn in on August 6. Smeich said Nawrocki will need to prove that he is not just good at campaigning, but also at governing. 'Expectations are high. People want someone who will defend Poland's interests, stay firm under pressure, and not give in to media or foreign influence. He's starting his term in a tough moment — exactly the kind of moment he was elected for.'

‘Restricted': Nearly 7 billion people worldwide lack full civil rights
‘Restricted': Nearly 7 billion people worldwide lack full civil rights

Al Jazeera

time9 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

‘Restricted': Nearly 7 billion people worldwide lack full civil rights

Just 40 countries representing 3.5 percent of the world's population respect all civil liberties, a new study has found, warning that 'democracy and human rights are under attack worldwide in a way we have not seen for decades.' The Atlas of Civil Society report published by the German relief organisation Brot fur die Welt (Bread for the World) on Monday said only 284 million people living in 'open' countries – including Austria, Estonia, the Scandinavian countries, New Zealand and Jamaica – enjoy protection of unrestricted civil rights and liberties. The nongovernmental organisation defines a country as 'open' if it allows people to form associations 'without legal or practical barriers, demonstrate in public spaces, receive information and are allowed to disseminate it'. Forty-two countries making up 11.1 percent of the world's population are listed in a second category in which civil rights are classified as 'impaired'. These include Germany, Slovakia, Argentina and the United States. In these countries, the rights to freedom of assembly and expression are largely respected, but there are recorded violations. 'In contrast, 85 percent of the world's population lives in countries where civil society is restricted, suppressed, or closed. This affects almost seven billion people,' the report found. 'Their governments severely restrict civil liberties and harass, arrest, or kill critical voices. This applies to 115 of 197 countries,' it added. Several European countries appear in the 'restricted' category, including Greece, the United Kingdom, Hungary and Ukraine. Civil society is considered 'oppressed' in 51 countries, including Algeria, Mexico and Turkey. In these countries, governments monitor, imprison or kill critics, and exercise censorship, according to the data. Finally, Russia and 28 other countries are classified as 'closed' and characterised by an 'atmosphere of fear'. Criticism of the government or regime in these countries is severely punished. Brot fur die Welt drew on data collected by the Civicus network of civil society organisations worldwide for its annual report covering 197 countries and territories. Nine countries improved their freedom of expression ratings last year, including Jamaica, Japan, Slovenia, Trinidad and Tobago, Botswana, Fiji, Liberia, Poland and Bangladesh. However, nine countries were downgraded from the previous year, including Georgia, Burkina Faso, Kenya, Peru, Ethiopia, Eswatini, the Netherlands, Mongolia and the Palestinian territory. Dagmar Pruin, president of Brot fur die Welt, warned that 'the rule of law, the separation of powers and protection against state arbitrariness are under threat or no longer exist in more and more countries.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store