Waiting for help: More than 21K of Floridians with developmental disabilities stuck in backlog
The Brief
Over 21,000 of Florida's most vulnerable citizens have been waitlisted despite needing critical care.
Many with developmental disabilities qualify for home support services through a program called the iBudget Waiver.
The agency that runs the service blames the backlog on a lack of funds.
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - More than 21,000 of Florida's most vulnerable citizens need help but do not receive it due to a backlog in the state government.
The backstory
They have developmental disabilities and qualify for home support services through Medicaid under a program called the iBudget Waiver.
It currently serves more than 35,000 enrollees but has a waitlist of more than 21,000 others. The average wait has been eight and a half years.
Florida's Agency for Persons with Disabilities (APD) manages the backlog, tying it to a lack of funds.
READ: Pasco County Animal Services suspends dog adoptions after respiratory disease outbreak
It would cost around $1.2 billion to get everyone off the waitlist. Families on the waitlist note they have waited for help as the state received large surpluses in revenue and placed billions of dollars in reserve.
At the same time, the legislature specifically allocated millions to APD to reduce the waitlist. However, it has not gone down and APD did not spend much of the money it received.
What they're saying
"$360 million is being recommended to revert reappropriate this year when we've appropriated an average of $88 million over the past four years to pull people off the waitlist," said Escambia State Rep. Alex Andrade during a Florida House subcommittee hearing on March 12.
READ: Controversial gun bill moves through Florida legislature following deadly FSU shooting
APD did not spend $360 million, and it was allocated to reduce the backlog because managers say that people already being served may have growing needs and they don't want to run out of money.
Dig deeper
Former APD leader Jim DeBeaugrine said APD should not be concerned about that because the state projects the needs of current enrollees for the future and accordingly budgets for those needs.
If APD had spent the $360 million as lawmakers intended, there would also have been a larger share of matching federal funds, totaling more than $800 million.
"At some point, you need some services to help you, and I'm doing the job of a lot of people," said Yasmina Halim.
CLICK HERE:>>>Follow FOX 13 on YouTube
Her 12-year-old daughter Lily is developmentally disabled and terminally ill. Struggling as she waited, Halim made the painful decision to give up her place in line and place her daughter in institutional care (which could cost taxpayers more than the home-based support she was waiting for).
However, due to the complexity of Lily's health, the scale of her disabilities and a shortage of service providers, they were unable to find an institution that would accept her.
Big picture view
The state then agreed to provide home-based services based on her crisis.
Other families with pressing needs fail to get out of the queue due to the crisis.
The Source
FOX 13 Chief Political Investigator Craig Patrick collected the information in this story.
WATCH FOX 13 NEWS:
STAY CONNECTED WITH FOX 13 TAMPA:
Download the FOX Local app for your smart TV
Download FOX Local mobile app: Apple | Android
Download the FOX 13 News app for breaking news alerts, latest headlines
Download the SkyTower Radar app
Sign up for FOX 13's daily newsletter
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Performative Austerity Vanishes As GOP Flees Town Before Trump's Dictator-Style Parade
Hardly any Republicans in the Senate want to be caught dead at President Trump's big boy parade this weekend. The two most powerful Republicans in Congress — House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) — are not going to come. Johnson's office claims he has other plans, Thune's office says he's engaged with constituents back home on Saturday. Reporters from HuffPost, Politico, the Wall Street Journal and others all tried to pin a handful of Republicans down on this issue in pieces published this week. Many said they weren't coming, offering shrugs of excuses for their absence. Most refused to even touch questions surrounding the price tag on the whole spectacle: $45 million in taxpayer funds for Trump to roll out a bunch of military tanks and show off America's lavishly unmatched spending on weaponry, all in honor of Trump's 79th birthday (and the 250th anniversary of the Army). It, of course, all comes on a week of growing public pushback, not just to Trump's mass deportation agenda but to his use of the military as a prop, escalating mostly peaceful protests and infringing on the power of politicians who lead cities he doesn't like. Bookending the week of overreach on state sovereignty with a garish military parade — which will involve rolling out 150 military vehicles and more than 50 aircraft into the streets of the capital — has at least one Republican comparing it to a scene out of North Korea. Most of the Republicans who spoke to the media about their planned absence suggested they had other plans, or indicated that their decision to not RSVP had nothing to do with the outlandish cost of the event designed specifically for Trump's ego. 'I don't like spending on anything, but if you're going to splurge on something, this is probably not a bad thing,' Johnson told WSJ this week, while avoiding questions about what he's doing on Saturday instead. Ironically, Johnson is the Republican in the Senate most vocally opposed to the sweeping reconciliation package that'll fund much of Trump's fiscal agenda if it passes the upper chamber in coming weeks — primarily due to his belief that it doesn't do enough to cut federal spending on social safety net programs like Medicaid, which are, as I get into below, already on the chopping block. For those observing at home for at least the past two decades, austerity matters most, to this group of politicians, when a Democrat is in the White House. And it matters the least when the wannabe dictator head of the Republican Party decides to throw himself a multi-million dollar bday bash. As they have for decades, Republicans in recent months have attempted to spin their devastating proposed cuts to Medicaid and supplemental nutrition programs like SNAP as necessary 'reforms' to cut out the amorphous 'waste, fraud and abuse' supposedly baked in to these programs. They've also championed the implementation of so-called common sense 'work requirements' in order to be eligible for the coverage (which conveniently ignores the fact that a significant number of those on Medicaid are either people with disabilities or children). This spin is, of course, spin, as TPM has reported, and all the changes listed as provisions in the House's reconciliation package will result in some 16 million Americans losing their health care. By other estimates (from researchers at Yale University and University of Pennsylvania) 51,000 people may die annually as a direct result of proposed cuts to the program. It's real and devastating stuff. Republicans have historically, famously spun their efforts to gut social safety net programs under the same guise of 'reforms' that House Republicans are using now. They promise to never touch Medicare or Social Security, while salivating for the very types of 'reforms' to the social safety net that may soon become law, that are stuffed into the House's latest reconciliation package. In one of his last truly eloquent moments as president, Biden was able to back Republicans into a corner during his 2023 State of the Union address, and got the Republican conference to agree, on live TV, to drop their at-the-time-latest effort to sunset Medicare and Social Security every five years. New polling from Quinnipiac University today shows that Republican efforts to obscure what exactly it is they're doing to Medicaid may not have been as successful as it has been in the past — or perhaps the opposition party's telegraphing of the horrors to voters actually broke through this time. Per Quinnipiac: As the Senate debates the GOP tax and spending bill titled One Big Beautiful Bill Act and President Donald Trump pushes for a July 4 deadline to sign it, voters 53 – 27 percent oppose the legislation, with 20 percent not offering an opinion, according to a Quinnipiac University national poll of registered voters released today. I mean, who among us doesn't do a little self deprecative soul searching at such an hour. According to some reports, Trump and the world's richest man actually spoke on the phone late on Monday night after their messy, public breakup last week. Musk posted the tweet early Wednesday. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) on Tuesday night succinctly articulated the longstanding punditry norms that have Democrats policing the largely organic Los Angeles protests: 'It is 100% carrying water for the opposition to participate in this collective delusion that Dems for some reason need to answer for every teen who throws a rock rather than hold the Trump admin accountable for intentionally creating chaos and breaking the law to stoke violence.' One of the most dependable formulations in political commentary is that Democrats are responsible for everyone vaguely, even just aesthetically, associated with the left, while Republican politicians can directly fraternize with neo-Nazis and still claim ideological distance. — Kate Riga How Some Very Bad Luck Has Made It Even Harder To Rein In Trump Passing Big Beautiful Bill Would Mean 'Effectively Dismantling' Obamacare, Gutting Inflation Reduction Act New episode of the Josh Marshall Podcast: Ep. 377: Protest Politics Stephen Miller Demanded ICE Target Home Depots Judge Bars Trump Administration From Detaining Mahmoud Khalil National Guard troops have temporarily detained civilians in LA protests, commander says Texas Gov. Greg Abbott to deploy National Guard across the state in response to protests
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Group protests Congressman Rulli's stance on issues and bill
AUSTINTOWN, Ohio (WKBN) – Protesters gathered at a Valley grocery store Wednesday, demonstrating about Congressman Michael Rulli's votes on some issues and President Trump's Big Beautiful Bill. It was one of many protests being held by constituents outside Rulli Brothers grocery stores. This time, the protest is in Austintown. About 40 people have been outside the store since about 3 p.m. They're calling for Congressman Rulli to hold a town hall meeting with constituents while he is in town, and are also concerned with his stance on some issues. Among their concerns are cuts being made in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, especially to Medicare and Medicaid. This protest comes on the same day that Congressman Rulli introduced the Gambler Act in Congress to address the border crisis, which seeks to allocate money from the US Treasury towards ICE operations. The money will specifically come from gambling tax revenue The act would receive a $300 million fund each year from the treasury. Rulli says the act will strengthen immigration enforcement without raising taxes on citizens. Rulli Brothers issued a statement about the protests: For 108 years Rulli Bros has proudly served the Mahoning Valley as a retailer of groceries and Italian specialties. During that history we have contributed to the local community and economy by providing customers with goods at competitive prices, creating countless jobs, procuring goods from local vendors, and generating local tax revenues that directly benefit the community. We greatly appreciate all our customers, vendors, and employees who represent the political diversity of the Valley. All are welcome at Rulli Bros., left, right, and center as we continue to serve the Valley to the best of our ability. Rulli Bros. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Poll: Americans Really, Really Hate Trump's Big Beautiful Bill
A new Quinippiac poll shows that a majority of Americans are opposed to Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, confirming public aversion to a budget bill expected to add $2.4 trillion to the deficit, give a tax break to wealthy people and corporations, and slash critical Medicaid and food stamp programs. Almost half of all voters think Medicaid funding should be increased, not decreased. Only 67 percent of Republicans are in favor of the bill, a byproduct of the conflict between Trump and more conservative, deficit hawk Republicans who are threatening to tank it. 89 percent of Democrats oppose the bill, as well as 57 percent of independents. The same poll found that majorities disapproved of Trump's handling of a number of other issues as well, including immigration and deportations—once his strongest issue, only 43 percent approve of his handling of the former and 40 percent of the latter. Only 40 percent of voters think he's doing a good job on the economy, another area he was recently dominant in. His worst issue by far, however, was his handling of Russia's invasion of Ukraine—where only 34 percent of voters think he's doing a good job. That is hardly surprising, however, given that Trump had promised repeatedly on the campaign trail that he would end the war immediately upon retaking office. That obviously hasn't happened; indeed, peace seems further away than ever. Immigration (54/43 disapprove) The economy (56/40 disapprove) Israel/Hamas conflict (52/35 disapprove) Russia/Ukraine war (57/34 disapprove) Trade (57/38 disapprove) Deportations (56/40 disapprove) Universities
