
OPINION: Which celebrities are actually considered A-list and which aren't?
Because in 2025, the term 'A-list' is thrown around online to describe anyone who has appeared on more than one episode of Shortland Street, features in at least two early 2000s hip-hop music videos, or is an Instagram-famous cat with a following of more than 10,000.
If you've been photographed attending a real estate awards ceremony or a fusion restaurant opening, you might just find yourself on the 2025 'A-list'.
A quick Google reveals to me the latest news on apparent 'A-list' actors, including Taylor Kitsch, Celia Imrie, Jonathan Ross, Damian Lewis, Ronda Rousey, Ralph Fiennes, Sigrid Thornton, Miles Teller and Anya Taylor-Joy.
While the average person might recognise a name or a face on that list, or maybe even something they starred in, none of that constitutes A-list status.
The term has been widely used in popular culture since at least 1890 and in Hollywood reporting dating back to the 1950s. It's been changed and misused through the years, just like the term 'blockbuster' or the word 'slaps' by Gen Z.
But the 'real' Hollywood A-list is quite literally a list ranking stars' bankability using something called the Ulmer Scale, created by entertainment journalist James Ulmer and widely used across Hollywood.
The Ulmer Scale provides a comprehensive view of an actor's value to a film project. It factors in box office numbers, attracting investment and ultimately generating success for a project.
If you're top of the list, your name alone is a strong guarantee that the film will make money. Your name alone means that no matter how terrible the movie's plot sounds, you will likely be the defining feature of its success. Your name means it gets funding. You are the golden ticket.
The perfect example of this was the influence of Marilyn Monroe - a top-billed actress for a decade, with her films grossing the equivalent of $2 billion in today's money. She was a sure-fire drawcard with charm and endless studio hype surrounding her. People were clambering to see what she was in next. The plot was secondary; Monroe was primary.
Don't get me wrong, there are exceptions to the rule. Even Taylor Swift, Judi Dench and Idris Elba couldn't unsink the film Cats. And Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez's combined star power couldn't resuscitate Gigli.
To put it simply, an A-list actor is a rare combination of talent, influence, marketability, cultural impact, global household recognition and most importantly, bankability.
However, the Ulmer Scale hasn't been updated since his 2009-2010 list, when the top-ranking actors were Will Smith and Johnny Depp. So, how do we decide who is A-list in 2025?
Taking into account the Ulmer Scale, recognised global influence, and a hearty debate with fellow entertainment writer Mitch Hageman, here's who I think is justified in being called A-list and who simply isn't.
A-list
These stars alone can trigger financing for a film and strong ticket sales. Over 90% of adults in Western countries could recognise their names and faces without having to do that finger clicky thing while thinking.
Examples: Tom Cruise, Jennifer Aniston, Al Pacino, Samuel L. Jackson, Leonardo DiCaprio, Meryl Streep, Denzel Washington, Brad Pitt, Harrison Ford, Jason Momoa, Keanu Reeves, Will Smith (pre-slap), Julia Roberts, Johnny Depp and Tom Hanks.
A-minus list
This group is highly acclaimed, hugely successful, and bankable, but it lacks just one thing - Gary in Ashburton has no idea who they are.
Examples: Emma Stone, Jamie Foxx, Timothée Chalamet, Ariana Grande, Chris Hemsworth, Emily Blunt, Andrew Garfield, Simu Liu and Jonah Hill.
The B-list
These celebs are household names, but those houses are likely damp flats. They are still highly bankable, but less experienced, appeal to a younger demo, and have less notoriety in the global market. Essentially, this crew are tomorrow's A-list.
Examples: Florence Pugh, Glen Powell, Sydney Sweeney, Barry Keoghan, Zendaya, Jenna Ortega, Ayo Edebiri and Austin Butler.
C-list
You know their face and loved that show or movie they were a part of - but you couldn't pinpoint their latest project, and have to stop and quickly Google if they've been cancelled for something. A lot of sitcom stars and comedians bulk out this category.
Examples: Lisa Kudrow, Rob McElhenney, Hilary Duff, Ellen DeGeneres, Eugene Levy, Pete Davidson, Lindsay Lohan, Eva Mendes, and half the cast of The Big Bang Theory.
D-F list
Anyone who does Hallmark Christmas movies, actors turned podcasters, purely reality TV stars, or influencers having a crack at acting.
Examples: Oprah's friend Gayle, the cast of The Hills, Joe Rogan (before you send me your complaints, name the last acting project he was part of), anyone on Vanderpump Rules, Addison Rae, and the other half of the cast of The Big Bang Theory.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

1News
a day ago
- 1News
Pop singer Jessie J says she's been diagnosed with breast cancer
The English pop singer Jessie J says she has been diagnosed with breast cancer and will undergo surgery after her performance at the London music festival Capital's Summertime Ball next weekend. Jessie J, 37, shared the news in an Instagram video. 'I was diagnosed with early breast cancer,' she said in the clip. 'Cancer sucks in any form, but I'm holding onto the word 'early'." 'It's a very dramatic way to get a boob job. I am going to disappear for a bit after Summertime Ball to have my surgery, and I will come back with massive (expletive) and more music.' The annual Summertime Ball will be held at Wembley Stadium on Sunday, June 15. ADVERTISEMENT She told her social media audience that she felt compelled to share her diagnosis. Cold coming, PM's press secretary scandal, science of sleep (Source: 1News) 'I just wanted to be open and share it,' she said. 'One, because, selfishly, I do not talk about it enough. I'm not processing it because I'm working so hard. I also know how much sharing in the past has helped me with other people giving me their love and support and also their own stories. I'm an open book. It breaks my heart that so many people are going through so much similar and worse – that's the bit that kills me.' The Grammy-nominated Jessie J has long been celebrated for her robust soprano and R&B-informed pop hits, like the 2014 collaboration with Nicki Minaj and Ariana Grande, Bang Bang, and 2011's Domino. She has released five albums across her career, most recently, 2018's Christmas album, This Christmas Day. She has been releasing new music in 2025, including the singles Living My Best Life and No Secrets. A new album is expected later this year. ADVERTISEMENT She has a son, Sky Safir Cornish Colman, born in 2023.


Scoop
4 days ago
- Scoop
Thieves In The Kitchen: The Stealing Of Recipes
Recipe author Nagi Maehashi, unmoved by her own numbing banality, is peeved. Her target: Penguin books and author Brooke Bellamy. Her accusation: the apparent copying of recipes for caramel slice and baklava from Maehashi's RecipeTin Eats website, released in Bellamy's Bake with Brooki, published in October last year. 'Profiting from plagiarised recipes is unethical,' she huffed, 'even if it is not copyright infringement – and undermines the integrity of the entire book.' Rather indulgently, Maehashi goes on to decry this as a 'slap in the face to every author who puts in the hard work to create original content rather than cutting corners.' The question left begging is whether this is ever possible for a cookbook. Bellamy, who has the combined weight of 3 million followers on TikTok and Instagram, has flatly denied the accusation. 'I did not plagiarise any recipes in my book which consists of 100 recipes I have created over many years,' she claims on Instagram. 'In 2016, I opened my first bakery. I have been creating my recipes and selling them commercially since October 2016.' The social media figure is candid in admitting that she did not invent any of the recipes listed in her book dealing with cookies, cupcakes, brownies or cakes. On the issue of the caramel slice, Bellamy merely observes that the RecipeTin Eats recipe, published in March 2020, 'uses the same ingredients as my recipe, which I have been making and selling since four years prior.' Evidently not a pugilist, Bellamy has even offered to remove the caramel slice and baklava recipes from any future reprints of her book, a point 'communicated to Nagi swiftly through discussions'. Another author from cookbook land, Adam Liaw, abandons his kitchen implements briefly to explain the finer points of intellectual property in light of this dispute. As an intellectual property lawyer in his previous non-cooking life, he suggests that the copyright 'doesn't protect the recipe itself. It protects the publication of the exact same written form of that recipe. None of the recipes written in the world would reach the standards necessary to obtain patent protection.' A closer look at the claim is one of plagiarism. This is an interesting point, given the multitude of borrowings, replications and, along the way, adjustments, that come along with the use of recipes. Professor John Swinson from the University of Queensland adds insult to injury to Maehashi's case by simply stating that the steps involved in making the recipe were 'not very expressive'. When looking at a comparison between the two recipes in question, one is left with a similar impression. 'You can't protect a cake or cookie,' Swinson clarifies. 'You can only protect how it\s expressed, not the end result, and most recipes are just factual instructions'. A sticking point here is the issue of attribution. Under the Australian Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), there are various described moral rights, as distinct from economic rights. These include the right of attribution (that the author be identified and named as the author of that work); the right against false attribution (the right of the author to prevent someone else from being credited as the author of their work; and the right of integrity (the right of an author to ensure that the work is not subjected to derogatory treatment harmful to the author's honour or reputation). Historically speaking, the publication of recipes drawn from the vast archive of cookery is more than standard. We find Isabella Beeton in October 1861, a co-editor of the Englishwoman's Domestic Magazine pillaging at will any number of recipes for The Book of Household Management. As food boffin and author Helana Brigman points out, this book of revelation for Victorian readers, one that allayed fears about 'how much should a family of five spend on groceries', had nothing that was her own. In writing her book, Beeton made generous use of readers' submissions. The fact remains that, however murky one might assume the laws on copyright were on the subject, neither US nor British copyright laws (ditto Australia's equivalent) protect a listing of ingredients, even those found in formulas, compounds, or prescriptions. Broadly speaking, claiming some ownership over a dish is much like asserting control over the air and its vapours. An iconoclastic Jonathan Meades takes the torch to such proprietary assertions in his The Plagiarist in the Kitchen: A Lifetime of Culinary Thefts. His work eschews 'culinary originality', being an 'anti-cookbook' favouring 'the daylight robbery of recipes, to hijacking techniques and methods, to the notion that in the kitchen there is nothing new and nor can there be anything new.' Meades rightly notes that the pathology of originality arises from the emergence of the cult chef, the God creator in the kitchen. In an interview, he notes how it began 'in upscale restaurants in Spain and then in Britain with Heston Blumenthal.' The entire grievance on Maehashi's part has given Bellamy even more oxygen for her enterprise, with the latter preferring to repair back to the bakery. Two new stores are set to open in Queensland in July. An international pop-up store in the United Arab Emirates is planned to open by the end of the year, adding to existing ones in the Middle East. If Bellamy was ever a thief in the kitchen, the enterprise is doing quite nicely.


Otago Daily Times
29-05-2025
- Otago Daily Times
'It's rough': Kath and Kim star has cancer
Prominent Australians are backing much-loved comedian Magda Szubanski after she revealed her diagnosis with an "obscure" cancer. The Kath and Kim star announced she had stage-four mantle cell lymphoma, describing it as a "rare and fast-moving blood cancer". Szubanski went public with the diagnosis in an Instagram post today in which her head was shaved, saying it was in preparation for her treatment in which it would fall out. In her typical, positive style, the 64-year-old smiled and laughed throughout her video, at one point cackling as she exclaimed "what are you gonna do?" "I won't sugar-coat it, it's rough," she wrote of her diagnosis. "But I'm hopeful. I'm being lovingly cared for by friends and family, my medical team is brilliant, and I've never felt more held by the people around me." According to the Leukemia Foundation, mantle cell lymphoma affects the outer-edge - or mantle zone - of B-cells in the lymph node follicle. It accounts for about five to 10% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas, with the average age at diagnosis between 60 and 65 years. Former Australian of the Year Grace Tame led a string of well-wishers in comments on Szubanski's post. "Sending you all the love in the world and warm, immuno-safe virtual hugs," she wrote. Television presenter Lisa Wilkinson said all of Australia was behind the comedian in her fight. "Sending love, strength and every ounce of joy you have given all of us over the decades, to help see you through these difficult times darling Magda," she wrote. Others sending love included New Zealand actor Sir Sam Neill, entertainers Rove McManus, Peter Helliar and Julia Zemiro along with model Megan Gale and singer Dannii Minogue. Szubanski said she would be lying low while her immune system "takes a hammering". "I've been feeling pretty rats*** for ages. So I asked for extra bloods and - voila," she wrote. "So the takeaway is, get tested and listen to your body." Szubanski is best known for winning the hearts of Australians as the sporty, unlucky-in-love Sharon Strzelecki in sitcom Kath and Kim . That sparked character roles in the smash-hit movies Babe and Happy Feet (and both sequels) among others. She first burst onto Australian screens in the mid-1980s after being picked up by ABC talent scouts watching her perform in a university revue. Her credits include sketch shows Fast Forward and critically acclaimed Big Girl's Blouse , alongside Kath and Kim co-writers Gina Riley and Jane Turner. The comedian was a prominent marriage equality campaigner after coming out as gay in 2012. She used her profile to push for a yes vote in the 2017 Australian referendum on same sex marriage, including a pivotal appearance on the ABC's Q&A programme and an address to the National Press Club.