Signal war-chat leak: Pentagon watchdog probes if orders given to Hegseth's aides to delete messages
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth (File photo)
The Pentagon's watchdog is investigating whether any of Secretary
Pete Hegseth
's staff were instructed to delete Signal messages that possibly communicated sensitive military details to a journalist, based on documents and information from two sources familiar with the inquiry, quoted by the Associated Press.
The investigation centres on the dissemination of information via the messaging platform regarding the March 15 strikes against Houthi positions in Yemen.
The timing is significant as Hegseth prepares for his first congressional testimony since confirmation, where he will likely address concerns about his information management practices, recent senior staff departures, and internal leak investigations.
Previous scrutiny has focused on Hegseth's installation of an non-secure internet connection bypassing security protocols, and his sharing of military operation details in multiple Signal conversations.
The communications included separate chats with his family members and senior national security officials, with The Atlantic's editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg accidentally included in one group.
The investigation scope includes identifying who posted information and had access to Hegseth's device, according to AP sources and documents.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Click Here - This Might Save You From Losing Money
Expertinspector
Click Here
Undo
The sources spoke anonymously due to restrictions on discussing the matter.
Some lawmakers from both parties have criticised Hegseth's sharing of operational details before mission completion, suggesting such actions could have endangered pilots and would typically result in dismissal for lower-ranking personnel.
Whilst Hegseth maintains the shared information was unclassified, multiple defence experts assert that such specific pre-strike details would not normally be permitted on unsecured devices.
"I said repeatedly, nobody is texting war plans," Hegseth told Fox News Channel in April after reporting emerged about the chat that included his family members. "I look at war plans every day. What was shared over Signal then and now, however you characterize it, was informal, unclassified coordinations, for media coordinations and other things. That's what I've said from the beginning."
President
Donald Trump
has maintained support for Hegseth, acknowledging his challenges during a Memorial Day address at Arlington National Cemetery.
Since the Signal controversy, Hegseth has reduced media interactions, avoiding Pentagon press briefings, with his spokesperson conducting only one such session.
The investigation was initiated at the request of Senate Armed Services Committee leadership, including Chairman Senator Roger Wicker and ranking Democrat Senator Jack Reed.
While Signal offers encrypted communications, it remains vulnerable to hacking and lacks approval for classified information transmission.
The Defence Department highlighted these vulnerabilities on March 14, one day before the Houthi strikes.
Trump justified the Houthi operations citing their "unrelenting campaign of piracy, violence and terrorism" and their disruption of vital shipping routes.
Between November 2023 and January, Houthi forces attacked over 100 vessels, causing two sinkings and four fatalities. Their leadership linked these actions to opposing Israel's Gaza operations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Trump, Musk and a split foretold
It has been less than six months (of a 48-month tenure) since Donald J Trump assumed the office of the President of the United States for a second time. In that time, he has upended the US's relationship with its Western allies and engaged in a start-stop tariff regime based on questionable assumptions. He has also injected elements of uncertainty into the US's ties with countries, including India, that have been growing and deepening steadily for nearly three decades. The public spat between President Trump and Elon Musk — beyond the barbs and the almost reality TV style of the 'breakup' — must be seen in this context. Drama and uncertainty mark both US domestic politics and how the superpower engages with the world. The world's richest man played a significant part in the Trump campaign and the administration. Musk contributed about $250 million to Trump's election fund and, after the election, led the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The differences over the Trump administration's 'One Big Beautiful Bill', emerging a day after Musk left DOGE, quickly spiralled into an all-out social-media war between the two billionaires, replete with name-calling. While Musk claimed that he won Trump the election and echoed conspiracy theories about his connections with deceased financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, the President raised questions about government contracts for the Tesla and SpaceX founder's companies. Given their egos, perhaps it was a split foretold. That said, the Trump-Musk spat sends out the message that it is not necessarily institutions and interests that determine the course of politics and policy in Washington. Till recently, the 'bromance' between the two men made Musk's companies all but de facto national champions and the tech entrepreneur was seen across capitals as an extension of the White House. SpaceX, for example, has deep ties to NASA and its vessels ferry US astronauts to the International Space Station. The uncertainty around the future of that collaboration will make things more complicated for Delhi as it tries to deepen cooperation in space with the US. Deals with Tesla and Starlink, while made by private players, may take on a different colour. The Trump administration's domestic policies have already had reverberations in India, especially its attitude to visas for foreign students and workers. The immature insistence that the White House mediated the ceasefire after Operation Sindoor went against the grain of 30 years of the bilateral relationship — through Republican and Democrat administrations — of de-hyphenating India and Pakistan. As India tries to manage the US relationship over the next three years, it must keep in mind that it is working with a partner that is much more temperamental — today's Trump loyalist might be tomorrow's persona non grata.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
'Fake news': Amid legal setbacks, Trump wins 'Gulf of America' battle against AP
The AP sued in February after the White House restricted the news outlet's access over its decision to continue referring to the Gulf of Mexico in its coverage despite Trump renaming the body of water the Gulf of America read more President Donald Trump is free to bar The Associated Press from some White House media events for now, after a U.S. appeals court on Friday paused a lower court ruling mandating that AP journalists be given access. The divided ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit temporarily blocks an order by US District Judge Trevor McFadden, who ruled on April 8 that the Trump administration must allow AP journalists access to the Oval Office, Air Force One and White House events while the news agency's lawsuit moves forward. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The 2-1 ruling was written by US Circuit Judge Neomi Rao, joined by fellow Trump appointee U.S. Circuit Judge Gregory Katsas. Rao wrote that the lower court injunction 'impinges on the President's independence and control over his private workspaces' and that the White House was likely to ultimately defeat the Associated Press' lawsuit. The Associated Press in a statement said it was disappointed by the decision and weighing its options. A White House spokesperson, Taylor Budowich, in a statement on the social media platform X said the Associated Press has no 'right to unfettered access to limited spaces, like the Oval Office and Air Force One.' In a dissent, Circuit Judge Cornelia Pillard, an appointee of President Barack Obama, said her two colleagues' ruling cannot be squared with 'any sensible understanding of the role of a free press in our constitutional democracy.' The AP sued in February after the White House restricted the news outlet's access over its decision to continue referring to the Gulf of Mexico in its coverage despite Trump renaming the body of water the Gulf of America. The AP's lawyers argued the new policy violated the First Amendment of the Constitution, which protects free speech rights. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD McFadden, who was appointed by Trump during his first term, said in his ruling that if the White House opens its doors to some journalists it cannot exclude others based on their viewpoints. Trump administration lawyers said the president has absolute discretion over media access to the White House and that McFadden's ruling infringed on his ability to decide whom to admit to sensitive spaces. 'The Constitution does not prohibit the President from considering a journalist's prior coverage in evaluating how much access he will grant that journalist,' lawyers for the administration said in a court filing. On April 16, the AP accused the Trump administration of defying the court order by continuing to exclude its journalists from some events and then limiting access to Trump for all news wires, including Reuters and Bloomberg. Reuters and the AP both issued statements denouncing the new policy, which puts wire services in a larger rotation with about 30 other newspaper and print outlets. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Other media customers, including local news organizations that have no presence in Washington, rely on the wire services' real-time reports of presidential statements as do global financial markets. The AP says in its stylebook that the Gulf of Mexico has carried that name for more than 400 years and, as a global news agency, the AP will refer to it by its original name while acknowledging the new name Trump has chosen.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump vs AP: US Court rules Trump can exclude AP from key White House events for now; President celebrates victory in legal battle
US President Donald Trump US President Donald Trump is free to restrict the Associated Press from attending some White House media events for now, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled. The decision overturns US District Judge Trevor McFadden's April 8 ruling, which had mandated AP journalists' access to the Oval Office, Air Force One, and White House events during ongoing legal proceedings, Reuters reprted. U.S. Circuit Judge Neomi Rao, supported by US Circuit Judge Gregory Katsas, authored the majority opinion. Rao stated that the previous injunction interfered with presidential authority over private workspaces and indicated the White House would likely prevail in the AP lawsuit. Big win over AP today: Trump celebrates ruling Calling AP a "fake news," Trump celebrated the legal ruling after US Curt announced the verdict in his favour. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said, "Big WIN over AP today. They refused to state the facts or the Truth on the GULF OF AMERICA. FAKE NEWS!!!" Donald Trump celebrates victory over AP It all started after AP didn't comply with the Trump's directive to call the Gulf of Mexico the "Gulf of America." Furious about the same, the Trump administration in February barred the AP from covering events in the Oval Office, aboard Air Force One and other restricted areas. The AP filed a lawsuit in response, saying that the administration violated the First and Fifth amendments by retaliating against the outlet for its editorial decisions.
