logo
Utah wants to review a key challenge in downtown Salt Lake City plans, but will bill do more than that?

Utah wants to review a key challenge in downtown Salt Lake City plans, but will bill do more than that?

Yahoo24-02-2025

Utah legislators say they are preparing to tackle one of the largest logistical hurdles tied to a grand vision to revitalize downtown Salt Lake City.
However, a bill that seeks to advance a transportation study of 300 West, which passed the Senate on Thursday, has also led to confusion about what it means for other projects in Utah's capital city.
Utah Senate members voted 19-6 to pass SB195, which outlines many transportation changes, after it was amended a third time. Senate President Stuart Adams clarified to reporters on Friday that a section in the bill about Salt Lake City is intended to describe 300 West, which serves as U.S. 89 in Salt Lake City through 400 South, passing by the arena. It eventually continues down Salt Lake County via State Street.
The section calls for a "mobility and environmental impact analysis" to address highway reduction strategies, such as "the impacts of the highway reduction strategy on state highways, local highways, mobility, traffic flow, pedestrian and nonmotorized vehicle flow, the economy, public health, quality of life, air quality, maintenance and operations."
It adds there would be a moratorium period from May 7, the date the section goes into effect, and March 6, 2026, barring the city from implementing a "highway reduction strategy or execute an existing highway reduction strategy, including the reduction or narrowing of traffic lanes."
Adams explained that that pause would take place to ensure no construction begins to affect 300 West so traffic impacts can be further studied this year.
Smith Entertainment Group's renovation plans, which are expected to ramp up this year, call for a retrofit of the Delta Center so it can fit both the Utah Jazz and Utah Hockey Club. Its plans also call for a plaza east of the stadium linking it to a renovated Salt Palace Convention Center, while 300 West would be tunneled underneath.
All of it is part of a "sports, entertainment, culture and convention" district that would surround the arena. The Smith Entertainment Group reached a partnership agreement with Salt Lake City in October 2024, creating a new 0.5% sales tax increase that began this year.
Harper declined to a request for comment on the bill, but Adams said the study — to be led by the Utah Department of Transportation — would figure out how that would affect not just U.S. 89 but other downtown roads near it. It could review alternate routes for U.S. 89 should 300 West be closed off, which could take it to neighboring roads.
"There's work trying to figure out how to handle 3rd West, and how 3rd West actually fits into that process," he said. "If we affect 3rd West, how does it affect other roads in the city? And how do we do the Delta Center hockey stadium rebuild without looking at the road structure downtown? ... It's a kind of a mess in that area."
However, the section also sparked confusion over different interpretations.
A spokesperson for Salt Lake City confirmed to KSL.com that the city met with the bill's sponsors on Friday to clear the air on the terms, which begin at the 2,868th line of the omnibus bill. The language stoked concerns that it could target other projects in the city that seek to improve roadway safety and green space, such as the Main Street promenade and Green Loop.
The latter would cross U.S. 89 along either North Temple, South Temple or 100 South, depending on a final design, while the 9-Line Trail — its existing backend — already crosses the highway at 900 South and State Street. Those projects could be impacted if there's a major change in U.S. 89.
"We are currently working with the bill sponsor to try to address the broad implications of this provision," the Salt Lake City Mayor's Office said in a statement.
While he declined to comment on his bill, Harper said — in a statement to KSL.com — that it was a "very productive initial meeting" with the city and "other stakeholders" to understand their concerns.
"I look forward to continuing these productive discussions next week to determine the best path forward," he added.
Those who represent the city in the Utah Legislature say they are also reviewing the bill as it moves to the Utah House of Representatives.
Sen. Jen Plumb, D-Salt Lake City, who was among the group that ultimately voted against it, said she plans to meet with Salt Lake City over concerns. However, she said the state should be able to step in at some level since the highway component complicates 300 West.
"I do think there needs to be thoughtfulness, and I do think the state has a role to weigh in on this," she said.
Contributing: Bridger Beal-Cvetko

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reactions to Padilla incident fall mostly along party lines
Reactions to Padilla incident fall mostly along party lines

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Reactions to Padilla incident fall mostly along party lines

A day after federal agents forcibly restrained and handcuffed U.S. Sen Alex Padilla at a Los Angeles news conference, leaders of the country's two political parties responded in what has become a predictable fashion — with diametrically opposed takes on the incident. Padilla's fellow Democrats called for an investigation and perhaps even the resignation of the senator's nemesis, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, for what they described as the unprecedented manhandling of a U.S. senator who was merely attempting to ask a question of a fellow public official. Noem and fellow Republicans continued to depict Padilla as a grandstander, whose unexpected appearance at Noem's news conference seemed to her security detail to represent a threat, as she tried to speak to reporters at the Federal Building in Westwood. Republicans continued Friday to chastise Padilla, using words like 'launch,' 'lunge' and 'bum rush' to describe Padilla's behavior as he began to try to pose a question to Noem at Thursday's news conference. The Trump administration official was just a few minutes into her meeting with reporters when Padilla moved assertively from the side of the room, pushing past a Times photographer as he moved to more directly address Noem. He did not lunge at Noem and was still paces away from her when her security detail grabbed the senator. Read more: Arellano: Sen. Alex Padilla's crime? Being Mexican in MAGA America Padilla and his staff described how the veteran lawmaker went through security and was escorted by an FBI employee to the room where the press conference was held, saying it was absurd to suggest he presented a threat. Padilla spoke out after the secretary asserted that her homeland security agents had come to L.A. to "liberate the city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that the governor and the mayor have placed on this country.' The former South Dakota governor would have some reason to recognize Padilla, since he questioned her during her Senate confirmation hearing. A spokesperson at the Homeland Security Department did not respond to a question of whether Noem recognized Padilla when he arrived at her press conference. As has become the norm in the nation's political discourse, Republicans and Democrats spoke about the confrontation Friday as if they had observed two entirely separate incidents. Sen. Ben Ray Lujan (D-N.M.) said Noem 'should step down,' adding: 'This is ridiculous. And she continues to lie about this incident. This is wrong.' Lujan urged his Republican colleagues to support Democrats in asking for 'a full investigation.' 'This is bad. This is precedent-setting,' Lujan told MSNBC. 'And I certainly hope that the leadership of the Senate, my Republican leaders, my friends, that they just look within. Pray on it. That's what I told a couple of them last night. Pray on this and do the right thing.' Members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus went to Speaker Mike Johnson's office to protest Padilla's treatment. Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) spoke out on X and on the floor of the Senate. He said the episode fit into 'a pattern of behavior by the Trump administration. There is simply no justification for this abuse of authority …. There can be no justification of seeing a senator forced to their knees.' Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) went on X to repeat the call for an investigation and to say that 'Republican leadership is complicit in enabling the growing authoritarianism in this country.' Most Republicans remained silent, or accused Padilla of being a provocateur. 'I think the senator's actions, my view is, it was wildly inappropriate,' said Johnson, the House speaker. 'You don't charge a sitting Cabinet secretary.' Johnson added that it was Padilla, who should face some sanction. 'At a minimum … [it] rises to the level of a censure. … I think there needs to be a message sent by the body as a whole that that is not what we are going to do, that's not how we're going to act.' Rep. Tom McClintock, (R-Elk Grove) zinged Padilla on X, with some 'helpful tips.' '1. Don't disrupt other people's press conferences. Hold your own instead. 2. Don't bum-rush a podium with no visible identification. ... 3. Don't resist or assault the Secret Service. It won't end well.' Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-Big Bear Lake) also sought to reinforce the notion that agents protecting Noem sensed a real threat, having no way of knowing that Padilla was who he said he was. The congressman said on Fox Business that Padilla had obtained "the outcome that they wanted. Now they have a talking point.' Read more: L.A. braces for multiple 'No Kings' demonstrations across the city Saturday None of the officials in the room, several of whom know Padilla, intervened to prevent the action by the agents, who eventually pushed the senator, face down, onto the ground, before handcuffing him. Noem did not back off her earlier statement that Padilla had 'burst' into the room. "Senator Padilla chose disrespectful political theatre and interrupted a live press conference without identifying himself or having his Senate security pin on as he lunged toward Secretary Noem,' Tricia McLaughlin, an assistant Homeland Security secretary, said in a statement Friday. McLaughlin also said that Padilla 'was told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers' repeated commands,' though video made public by Friday did not show such warnings, in advance of Padilla's first statement. The senator's staff members said he privately had received messages of concern from several Republican colleagues, including Sen. Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) Speaking publicly only one Republican lawmaker sounded a note of distress about the episode. 'I've seen that one clip. It's horrible,' said Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). 'It is shocking at every level. It's not the America I know.' Padilla told Tommy Vietor of the "Pod Save America" podcast that Trump's aggressive immigration crackdown is an attempt to distract from many other failures — continued instability with the economy, a lack of peace in Ukraine and Gaza and a federal budget plan that is proving unpopular with many Americans. 'He always finds a distraction," Padilla said, "and, when all else fails, he goes back to demonizing and scapegoating immigrants. … He creates a crisis to get us all talking about something else." Padilla said repeatedly that Americans should be concerned about how everyday citizens will be treated, if forces working for the Trump administration are allowed to "tackle" a U.S. senator asking questions in a public building. On Friday afternoon, he sent a mass email urging his constituents to sign up for the protests planned for Saturday, to counter the military parade Trump is holding in Washington. "PLEASE show up and speak out against what is happening," Padilla wrote. "We cannot allow the Trump administration to intimidate us into silence." Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Judge blocks NYC mayor's office from bringing ICE agents onto Rikers Island
Judge blocks NYC mayor's office from bringing ICE agents onto Rikers Island

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Judge blocks NYC mayor's office from bringing ICE agents onto Rikers Island

NEW YORK — A Manhattan Supreme Court justice on Friday blocked the Adams administration from bringing federal immigration officers onto Rikers Island. The preliminary injunction will prevent agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal agencies from setting up shop at the jail complex until the case, filed by the New York City Council against the mayor and his administration, is resolved. 'New York City, which thrives as a global hub due in large part to its reputation as being a welcoming home for immigrant communities from around the world, risks having this goodwill and invaluable reputation irreparably damaged as a result of an Executive Order borne out of Mayor Adams' alleged conflict of interest,' Justice Mary Rosado wrote in her decision. The mayor's top deputy, Randy Mastro, signed an executive order in April to give the green light to federal agents to operate offices on Rikers. The Council filed the suit challenging it a week later, arguing that the order was unlawful and the 'poisoned fruit' of a corrupt deal with the Trump administration. Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, who is currently running for mayor, said in a statement that the decision was a 'victory' that would protect New Yorkers from Trump's immigration 'overreach.' 'New Yorkers are counting on our city to protect their civil rights, and yet, Mayor Adams has attempted to betray this obligation by handing power over our city to Trump's ICE because he is compromised,' she said. 'This attempted corrupt bargain to allow ICE to set up a center on Rikers would only make our city, and all New Yorkers, less safe.' 'We disagree with the judge's decision, and we remain confident we will ultimately prevail in this case,' Mastro said in a statement. 'At no point does the judge dispute that the substance of our executive order fully complies with local law — that's because it does. Furthermore, there is no actual conflict of interest here, and the mayor responded to the appearance of a conflict by delegating this issue to me as his first deputy mayor — whom the judge herself described as an 'accomplished and highly educated attorney' — and I acted entirely independently of the mayor.' Trump's deportation efforts in New York have ramped up in recent weeks, with agents lurking in the city's immigration courthouses to arrest immigrants checking in for routine court proceedings in their asylum cases. The mayor's attorneys have argued that any risks of imminent harm are no more than speculation. The judge wrote that she found that argument 'disingenuous.' 'It is akin to the police telling a 911 caller that they will not assist a victim who calls while a burglar attempts to enter her house but will be helped once the burglar enters her house,' Rosado wrote. The judge also wrote that the Council was likely to succeed in showing that, at the very least, the mayor appeared to be executing a corrupt deal with the Trump administration by agreeing to bring ICE back onto Rikers. The mayor was indicted on bribery charges in September, and was set to go on trial in April until President Trump's Department of Justice ordered the charges dropped, in part because they impeded Adams' ability to help carry out the president's hardline immigration agenda. That directive prompted waves of resignations within Manhattan Federal Court, including that of then-U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon — who alleged there was a quid pro quo between Adams and Trump. Murad Awawdeh, the president of the New York Immigration Coalition, said that the ruling would prevent 'thousands' of those in pretrial detention at Rikers from being deported: 'New York City should not be in the business of carrying out Donald Trump's mass disappearance agenda, which is in fact illegal under our local laws,' Awawdeh said. ________

Lawmakers, media dinged for blaming Trump or ripping Israel on Iran: 'You think Kamala could've stopped them?'
Lawmakers, media dinged for blaming Trump or ripping Israel on Iran: 'You think Kamala could've stopped them?'

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Lawmakers, media dinged for blaming Trump or ripping Israel on Iran: 'You think Kamala could've stopped them?'

Lawmakers and mainstream media figures were blasted online Friday morning over some of their responses to the development that Israel executed a widespread bombing campaign against key Iranian targets. Sen. Chris Murphy, D-CT., wrote on X that Israel's attack was "clearly intended to scuttle the Trump administration's negotiations with Tehran," and is "further evidence of how little respect world powers - including our own allies - have for President Trump." Murphy, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Europe, was later mocked for using the situation to slam Trump: "Do you think Israel respected Biden, Obama, or Bush? Now is not the time for a partisan bromide," one critic replied. "You think Kamala could've stopped them?" riffed another. Former Ohio State Sen. Nina Turner, D-Cleveland, an occasional media figure and former campaign staffer for Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., replied to Murphy's critics, saying that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has "always wanted a broader war." Read On The Fox News App "This was inevitable, given the U.S. foreign policy towards Israel. Arms embargo now," Turner added. Left-wing former ESPN and MSNBC host Keith Olbermann informed Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., on X that "your soul is lost" after the lawmaker celebrated Iran being attacked. "Game on, pray for Israel," Graham originally wrote. The oft-profane pundit did, however, receive some backhanded support from the right for the remarks, with one respondent saying, "you know society is about to collapse when I agree with Keith" – while another shared a "holy s---" meme featuring actor Keegan Michael Key. Former Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., who has become one of President Donald Trump's loudest critics, went after Trump's supporters following the bombings. "Yesterday: Trump scared to death of action against Iran." On X, several pro-Trump ripped Kinzinger, saying he "lives in a bottle," "was too scared to run for reelection" in his swing Kankakee district because of his break with Trump, and should "cry harder." Kinzinger, however, did appear to celebrate Israel's killing of Iranian military commander Hossein Salami -- sharing a grinning GIF of the late Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain in response to a news alert. Global Calls To Avoid Escalation Pour In After Israel Strikes On Iran Several "Squad" members also got in on the action Friday, including Rep. Gregorio Casar of Texas. Casar said Netanyahu's "reckless strike risks provoking a wider war and pulling in the United States." He called on Trump to oppose Netanyahu's escalation and "not violate the Constitution" by involving U.S. troops without congressional approval. Reaction to Casar was mixed, with some respondents asking what his own strategy would be, while one defender of the Austin lawmaker shared a meme of Trump dressed as a chambermaid standing aside Netanyahu in his office. Meanwhile, Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., actively sparred with critics of her statement that "regardless of what Trump thinks, Israel knows America will do whatever they want and feels confident about their ability to get into war and have the American government back them up." "Everyone in America should prepare themselves to either see their tax dollars being spent on weapon supplies to Israel or be dragged into war with Iran if this escalates." "Somalians belong in Somalia," one critic responded. "And in Congress," Omar shot back. Olbermann Leads Liberal Meltdown Against Cnn, Calling To 'Burn It Down' After Biden's Performance When another critic said she should focus more on issues in her Minneapolis district, the congresswoman replied, "I am focusing on my district and we don't believe our tax dollars should go to war. Thank for your input." "This is all planned," tweeted "Squad" colleague Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich. "Both [U.S. and Israel] are liars." Tlaib then claimed Jerusalem's government is "genocidal" and that "war criminal Netanyahu will do anything to maintain his grip on power." "Squad" member Delia Ramirez, D-Ill., followed by tweeting support for her "Block the Bombs Act" to withhold weapons sales to Israel in response to actions in Gaza. The far-left lawmaker, who took over longtime moderate Democrat Dan Lipinski's district, said that Netanyahu "cannot be trusted with offensive weapons that enable dangerous actions like what we saw last night." Elsewhere on social media, other liberal figures were raging at the Trump administration for other recent developments, like the brief detainment of Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., after he crashed Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's Los Angeles press conference. Col. Alexander Vindman, now retired, but a key figure in the Trump-Ukraine impeachment saga and a twin brother of Rep. Yevgeny "Eugene" Vindman, D-Va., railed against Noem multiple times, calling her a "fascist b---h." "Hey Kristi, f--- off," Vindman wrote. Frequent "Special Report" All-Star panelist Mollie Hemingway responded to Vindman, remarking on how the mainstream media regularly characterized him as a "stable," nonpartisan article source: Lawmakers, media dinged for blaming Trump or ripping Israel on Iran: 'You think Kamala could've stopped them?'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store