Two charged for instructing foreign workers to hold placards in illegal protests at construction site
SINGAPORE: Two people were charged on Tuesday (May 27) in relation to illegal public assemblies involving foreign workers in October last year.
Rebecca Rubini Ravinthiran, 33, and Vee Derrick Mahendran, 36, both Singaporeans, were also charged for abetting foreign workers to commit offences under the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act (EFMA).
In an earlier joint press release, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) and the police said that Ravinthiran is accused of directing 15 foreign workers under her employment to gather outside two construction sites on Oct 24.
She also instructed the workers to hold placards to demand payments owed to her company.
Mahendran allegedly aided the offence by going to a construction site to "ensure that the foreign workers complied with the woman's instructions".
Ravinthiran faces 17 charges in total while Mahendran has 11.
RAVINTHIRAN'S CHARGES
Two of Ravinthiran's charges are under the Public Order Act, while 15 are under the EFMA.
She is accused of organising a public assembly to demand that Apex Engineering be paid the outstanding payment owed to it by instructing no fewer than nine workers from Apex to gather at a construction site at Block 324A Tengah Garden Walk - Parc Flora @ Tengah - and hold placards. No permit had been granted for the event on Oct 24, 2024, stated the charge sheet.
Separately, at about 11am the same day, Ravinthiran is said to have organised a public assembly to publicise the same cause at a construction site at 91A Jalan Satu - Dakota Breeze.
She allegedly instructed no fewer than six workers from Apex to gather at the site and hold placards. This event similarly had no permit.
Each of Ravinthiran's charges under the EFMA states that she instigated a foreign worker to breach the condition of their work permit, with a total of 15 workers involved.
She is said to have facilitated each worker's contravention by instructing each to be involved in the illegal activity of participating in a public assembly at either work site.
For two of these workers, Ravinthiran allegedly instructed them to prepare and distribute placards and coordinate with other workers to be involved in the public assembly.
MAHENDRAN'S CHARGES
Mahendran's charges comprise two under the Public Order Act and nine under the EFMA.
Mahendran is said to have abetted Ravinthiran by helping organise two public assemblies at the two construction sites to publicise the same cause.
He allegedly helped in the preparation of the placards the day before, and coordinated with Ravinthiran on the gathering of the workers to hold the placards.
He is said to have ensured that no fewer than nine workers from Apex gathered at the Tengah construction site.
As for the charges under the EFMA, Mahendran is said to have helped nine foreign workers contravene the conditions of their work passes by supervising them while they were involved in the illegal public assemblies.
He then allegedly updated Ravinthiran on his observations and conveyed her instructions to the group of workers.
Both cases will return to court on Jun 24.
Last October, MOM said on Facebook that it was aware of a social media post regarding several migrant workers holding placards at a worksite.
MOM said it engaged the workers involved and found that they were not owed salary payments, and did not have any concerns about their well-being.
Then-Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam has also said that MOM was investigating the employer for illegally deploying the workers and abetting the workers to perform illegal acts under the EFMA.
A person convicted of organising a public assembly without a permit can be fined up to S$5,000 (US$3,890).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Independent Singapore
2 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
S$5K bounty offered to find cat killer at Nee Soon; petition for stronger enforcement of animal cruelty laws shared
SINGAPORE: After a second cat was found killed in Nee Soon within a short span of time, a bounty of S$5,000 has been put up in the hopes of finding the person responsible for the deaths, CNA reported on Tuesday (Jun 2). The report says that animal welfare groups believe that a serial cat killer could be on the loose, adding that in addition to the bounty, a private investigator has been hired by the community to help solve the killings, and that the Cat Welfare Society intends to do more house visits to determine if a witness can be found. Early in May, a community cat at Yishun Street 51 named King Kong was found dead. Its killing had been particularly horrific, and photos of the cat were shared online showing that it had been cut open and some of its internal organs had been exposed. Moreover, King Kong was believed to have been tortured, as its eyes had been gouged out. See also Litterbug dumps big pile of old clothes at void deck in Nee Soon Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam, a Member of Parliament for Nee Soon GRC, described the killing of King Kong in a Facebook post as an act of 'appalling cruelty.' 'What kind of person will do this? This is not who we are as a people,' he added. Some days later, a community cat in Punggol named Shere Khan was discovered with severe injuries near Block 326B Sumang Walk. Despite receiving medical care immediately, Shere Khan, fondly known as Papa Cat, died. 'What happened to him was not just cruel — it was unthinkable,' wrote LUNI Singapore, a group that rehomes and cares for street cats, in a Facebook post. Then, on May 24, another community cat was found dead, wrapped in plastic and paper beside a garbage bin at the void deck of Block 897 Tampines Street 81. The cat, named Sunshine, had been cared for by members of the community over the past decade. CNA reported that the second dead cat was discovered in Nee Soon on Sunday morning (Jun 1) with its hind legs 'in an odd position, suggesting an unnatural death' just a short distance from where King Kong's body was discovered. Meanwhile, a petition for a stronger enforcement of animal cruelty laws has been shared on the platform. 'Community cats in Singapore are increasingly becoming victims of abuse, with more reports of physical harm, poisoning, and neglect surfacing in recent months. These animals, who often rely on the care of volunteers and kind-hearted residents, suffer silently with limited protection. Beyond the cats themselves, caregivers and animal welfare groups are also affected emotionally and financially as they scramble to treat injuries, report abuse, and seek justice within a system that often falls short,' it reads. /TISG Read also: Alert issued after 2 community cats at Toa Payoh suspected to be 'captured, beaten, scalded & drowned'
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Yishun, Punggol cat deaths likely caused by vehicle accidents; no evidence of deliberate cruelty: NParks
SINGAPORE: Two community cat deaths in Yishun and Punggol were likely caused by vehicle accidents, and there is no evidence to suggest either was a deliberate act of animal cruelty, the National Parks Board (NParks) said on Tuesday (Jun 3). In making its conclusions, NParks took into account its investigation findings, a postmortem examination for the Yishun case and a report from the veterinary clinic in the Punggol case. It also considered the initial locations where both cats were found, said Ms Jessica Kwok, NParks' group director of enforcement and investigation. She also gave updates on two other cats that were found dead in the past week – a second cat in Yishun and another in Tampines. FIRST CAT IN YISHUN A cat was found dead at Yishun Street 51 and NParks was alerted to a case of suspected animal abuse by the police on May 9. During its investigations, NParks interviewed the person who reported the case, located potential witnesses and reviewed the closed-circuit television (CCTV) footage in the area. "Through our investigation, we confirmed that the cat carcass was initially found on the road by a passer-by, who moved it to a nearby void deck," said Ms Kwok. A postmortem examination was carried out on the cat carcass by the Animal and Veterinary Service (AVS). The overall findings were "compatible" with external blunt force trauma, which resulted in injuries, such as fractures of the bones of the pelvis and sternum. There were also multiple areas of bleeding, and its right eye had fallen partially out of place. There was no evidence of penetrating or sharp force injuries or wounds, said Ms Kwok. "When the injuries are considered as a whole, a vehicular impact is the most likely cause of the blunt force traumatic injuries." CAT FOUND DEAD IN PUNGGOL In its statement on Wednesday, NParks also gave further updates on its investigation into the feline that was found injured at the loading and unloading bay near Block 326B Sumang Walk in Punggol. NParks retrieved the injured cat after being notified on the morning of May 12 and sent it to a private veterinary clinic. After the cat's microchip was traced, NParks informed the community cat's caregiver to contact the clinic. At this point, the case was classified as animal rescue as there was no evidence at the initial stages that the cat was abused, NParks' director for enforcement and investigation Joshua Teoh told reporters on Tuesday. He added that an animal welfare group representative had decided to put down the cat on welfare grounds, and it was not sent for a postmortem examination. The cat's body was subsequently collected by another community cat caregiver and cremated. The report from the private veterinary clinic that treated the injured cat noted the cat's condition and injuries "in detail", which included proptosis - abnormal protrusion of one or both eyes - and lesions on the head. The report included the private vet's professional assessment that the lesions and findings are "usually suggestive of blunt trauma" to the head, with a "possible common cause" being a road traffic accident, said Ms Kwok. NParks began investigating the case on May 13 after receiving feedback that the cat may have been abused. It interviewed the person who first found the injured cat and other potential witnesses. Officers also visited the scene and retrieved CCTV footage from multiple cameras in the area, but the CCTV cameras did not capture any footage of how the cat sustained its injuries. "Based on the investigation findings, including taking into account the initial location where the cat was found, NParks assessed that it is likely that the cat had sustained its injuries due to a vehicular accident, and there was no evidence to suggest a deliberate act of animal cruelty," said Ms Kwok. She added: "NParks understands the concerns on cases of alleged animal cruelty, and we would like to assure the public that we take all feedback received from the public on alleged animal cruelty seriously and will investigate them thoroughly, including looking at any new evidence presented." TWO MORE CASES Ms Kwok also gave updates on two other cats that were found dead in the past week, including a second one at Yishun Street 51 with its legs splayed. She said there were no visible external injuries found, based on the preliminary physical examination, and a postmortem examination is being carried out. In another incident, a feline was found dead at a void deck at Tampines Street 81 on May 24. NParks established that Traffic Police officers had attended to a traffic incident involving a car and a community cat earlier that day. "The (Traffic Police) officers moved the cat's body to the void deck as it was likely to pose a safety hazard to other road users and to prevent other vehicles from running over the cat's body," said Ms Kwok. A member of the public later came across the cat's body and reported the case to NParks. No further action will be taken as the car driver had reported the accident to the police within 24 hours. ABUSE CASES REACH 12-YEAR HIGH Speaking to reporters, Mr Teoh said that NParks has seen a "fairly consistent trend" in cases designated as animal abuse or cruelty over the years. Of these, no more than 6 per cent had evidence pointing to animal cruelty. Among the rest, the majority were public disputes or disamenities caused by pet or community animals, and some of these may not be related to cruelty, Mr Teoh added. Some animals may have underlying conditions and could have died due to natural causes. In 2024, the number of cases involving animal cruelty and welfare in Singapore rose to a 12-year high of 961, according to the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA). A total of 2,190 animals were involved in the cases, with cats forming the majority (1,330). The Animals and Birds Act is currently being reviewed to increase penalties – such as fines, jail terms an disqualification orders – to ensure "effective deterrence" against animal welfare offences.
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
FAQ: All you need to know about the findings of the major East-West Line disruption in Sep 2024
SINGAPORE: Investigation findings for the six-day East-West Line disruption in September last year were released on Tuesday (Jun 3), with the Land Transport Authority (LTA) set to impose a S$3 million fine on train operator SMRT. CNA breaks down the key points of the reports released by the Transport Safety Investigation Bureau as well as LTA. What happened in September? Disruptions started on Sep 25 last year when a defective part known as an axle box on a first-generation KHI train dropped onto the tracks, causing a bogie – or an undercarriage with wheels – to come off the running rail between the Dover and Clementi stations. This resulted in extensive damage to the tracks and other equipment, with a total of 46 rail breaks identified in a 2.55km stretch between Dover station and stretching beyond Clementi station, which took days to repair. An estimated 500,000 out of 2.8 million train journeys were affected each day during the disruption, with train services resuming six days later on Oct 1. How did SMRT respond then? SMRT activated free public bus and bridging shuttle bus services immediately when they understood that the train services would take some time to resume. They also took action to limit the affected sector between Buona Vista station and Jurong East station. Shuttle train services with 10-minute intervals operated between Boon Lay and Jurong East stations, as well as between Buona Vista and Queenstown stations. Station staff members and track repair workers were also reported to have gone above and beyond their call of duty – from providing commuters with directions and assistance to coordinating track repairs round the clock. What did further investigations find? The root cause of how the axle box failed could not be determined because key train components involved were too badly burnt and damaged in the incident, LTA said. These parts were: the axle box itself, which secures the wheels to the axle the axle bearings, which reduce friction so the wheels spin smoothly the chevron springs, which contain rubber to absorb shocks to keep the ride smooth The axle box had dislodged from the third carriage of the train, causing extensive damage to the tracks. Although the root cause could not be determined, the report concluded that the likely cause was degraded grease in the axle box, LTA said. The degraded grease could have increased wear and tear on the axle bearings, eventually causing overheating, potentially burning the rubber of the chevron springs. The chevron springs could have then progressively dropped off and eventually caused the axle box to dislodge, LTA added. The sequence of events was further substantiated by the Hotbox system, which is set up along the tracks on both the East-West Line and North-South Line. The system has been in place since 2014 and consists of a trackside infrared sensor. When a train runs by, the sensor measures the temperature of each axle box. It is an extra monitoring tool put in place by SMRT and not a requirement set by LTA. The system had detected higher temperatures on one of the axle boxes of the affected train before the incident. However, on the incident day, even though a warning was displayed in the maintenance engineering centre, the train identification number or train ID was not detected due to a system error. Instead, a 'Null ID' was indicated. This led the controller monitoring the system to believe the warning was a false one and no follow-up action was taken. How much of a factor was maintenance? The train in the incident was among 66 in SMRT's first-generation KHI fleet that were rolled out in the late 1980s. They are progressively being replaced by new Movia trains. Initially, 66 Movia trains were to be handed over to SMRT by March 2024, with the first fleet in October 2021. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a delay of 1.5 years and the first Movia train was handed over only in May 2023. Upon receiving the first fleet of the new trains, SMRT began decommissioning the KHI trains. In the meantime, SMRT was required to continue carrying out regular maintenance for the KHI trains still in service, including preventive works and overhaul, which refers to a complete tear-down and rebuild to restore trains to a condition "as good as new". By the time of the incident on Sep 25, 18 KHI trains had been overhauled, but the incident train was not among them. The stipulated interval for an overhaul was 500,000km, but SMRT twice extended the interval – first to 575,000km in August 2022 and then to 750,000km in August 2024. At the time of the incident, the train had logged 690,000km since its last overhaul in 2018. The extensions were carried out based on SMRT's internal procedures, LTA said. The authority also noted that since axle-box failures were not common, SMRT did not undertake a detailed engineering risk assessment on extending the overhaul interval for the axle box. Speaking to the media on Tuesday, Mr Lam Sheau Kai who is president of SMRT Trains said the operator's overhaul regime has served it well over the past 38 years. 'What may have caught us off-guard this time was the convergence of factors – delays in new train deliveries due to COVID-19, our efforts to balance and adjust overhaul schedules, and the lag in receiving critical spare parts.' What penalties were imposed? SMRT was fined S$3 million by LTA, an amount that was 'proportionate" to the incident's circumstances, the authority said. In determining the fine, LTA said it took into consideration that SMRT had borne the cost of repairs as well as provided free bridging buses, regular bus services and shuttle train services at the affected stations. SMRT also provided free travel to passengers alighting at Jurong East and Buona Vista stations during the six days of disruption. The total cost of SMRT's service recovery amounted to more than S$10 million. The financial penalty collected by LTA will go to the Public Transport Fund, which helps lower-income families with the spending on public transport fares. SMRT will have the opportunity to appeal the fine to the transport minister. What follow-up actions have SMRT and LTA taken since then? After the incident, SMRT pre-emptively withdrew all KHI trains that had exceeded 500,000km mileage since their last overhaul from service to undergo overhaul activities for axle boxes before they were put back into service. In consultation with LTA, SMRT has also starting using data analytics for earlier detection of abnormal axle-box temperatures, so that pre-emptive action can be taken. SMRT has also worked with the Hotbox system maker to rectify the Null ID indication issue. It now requires its maintenance engineering centre to share system warnings with the operations control centre. SMRT has also instituted that the withdrawal of trains back to the depot under such scenarios should occur at a slower speed of 35kmh to limit the potential damage to the tracks and trackside equipment. LTA was not involved in and did not review SMRT's proposed extensions to the overhaul intervals of the trains. The authority said that as an asset owner, it has since strengthened its oversight of operators' management of assets, including their internal procedures to adjust maintenance schedules. 'LTA and operators will work together for future overhaul decisions,' it added. Mr Lam from SMRT said that for 'rare, black swan events like COVID-19', it is important that SMRT the operator and LTA the asset owner come together to 'reassess collectively'. 'In hindsight, we could perhaps have exercised greater caution in how we managed the transition and decommissioning of the older trains,' he added.
