Germany needs up to 60,000 more troops, says defense chief – DW – 06/05/2025
Germany will need up to 60,000 more service personnel to meet NATO's defense goals, according to the defense minister. The estimate reflects growing military demands amid heightened tensions with Russia.
Germany's military, the Bundeswehr, will require an estimated 50,000 to 60,000 additional troops to meet NATO's updated defense requirements amid the growing threat from Russia, Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said Thursday.
Germany is seeking to adapt its military posture in response to NATO's plans for collective defense, as the alliance continues to shore up its eastern flank after Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
"We assume, but this is only a rough estimate to be clear, that we need around 50,000 to 60,000 more soldiers in the standing armed forces than we have today," Pistorius said at a NATO meeting in Brussels.
How can Germany build up its troop numbers?
Defense Minister Boris Pistorius, a holdover from the Social Democrat-led government of former Chancellor Olaf Scholz, has pushed the idea of building up the armed forces.
He has promoted a model that relies on voluntary service that also allows the country to make conscription compulsory if needed.
Under these terms, all 18-year-olds would be sent a questionnaire about their interest in the army and their physical condition.
While all young men would be obliged to return the questionnaire, it would be voluntary for women.
A number would then be invited to participate in a selection process. Some would be recruited for an initial six-month period, with the option to extend.
Germany had conscription in place for young men until 2011, when the rule was scrapped.
Edited by: Elizabeth Schumacher
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local Germany
4 hours ago
- Local Germany
Germany has three years to overhaul military: official
Defence spending has risen up the political agenda since Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine in 2022, and more recently with the United States pushing NATO members to increase their commitments. "Everything necessary to be fully prepared to defend the country must be acquired by 2028," Annette Lehnigk-Emden, head of the Federal Office for Military Procurement, told Tagesspiegel newspaper. Chief of defence General Carsten Breuer recently warned that Russia could be in a position to "launch a large-scale attack against NATO territory" as early as 2029. He said there was a Russian build-up of ammunition and tanks for a possible attack on NATO's Baltic members. Lehnigk-Emden stressed that Chancellor Friedrich Merz's new government was enabling the upgrade by allocating hundreds of billions of euros for defence. She said the priority would be for heavy equipment such as Skyranger anti-aircraft tanks. Merz has made rearmament a priority of his coalition government to make it "the most powerful conventional army in Europe". Advertisement Rearmament had already begun under the previous government of Olaf Scholz after Russia launched its war in Ukraine. And US President Donald Trump has raised the temperature further this year by pushing NATO members to increase their defence spending to five percent of GDP from the current level of two percent. Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said on Thursday that 50,000 to 60,000 new soldiers would be needed in the coming years to meet the increased defence needs of NATO. Last year, the army had more than 180,000 soldiers and set a goal of exceeding 203,000 by 2031.
Local Germany
9 hours ago
- Local Germany
Inside Germany: How Merz handled his trip to the White House and one last spring holiday
Inside Germany is our weekly look at some of the news, talking points and gossip in Germany that you might've missed. It's published each Saturday and members can receive it directly to their inbox by going to their newsletter preferences or adding their email to the sign-up box in this article. Merz in the White House You've got to wonder how German Chancellor Friedrich Merz was feeling this week after his big day in the spotlight on the international stage was largely eclipsed by news about a falling out between US President Donald Trump and his former right-hand man Elon Musk. Merz did meet the US President in the White House -- first for a televised conversation in which the Chancellor gave Trump a copy of the birth certificate of his grandfather Frederick who was born in Germany in 1869. Merz then suggested that Trump was the "key person in the world" with influence that could be used to end the war in Ukraine. Trump, in turn, made several off-colour remarks: comparing Russia's war of aggression to children fighting, and later, referring to the anniversary of a turning point in the Second World War in Germany, asking, "That was not a pleasant day for you?" To his credit, Merz appeared to play the statesman successfully. It was reported that the German chancellor had studied videos of previous Oval Office ambushes and planned to stay calm and let Trump talk -- and indeed that's mostly what he did. He did correct Trump on a point about Ukraine, and in response to the baffling comment about WWII, he simply said: "This was the liberation of my country from Nazi dictatorship. We know what we owe you." Following the meeting, which also included a private chat over lunch, Merz has said he has "no doubt at all" that the US will stick with NATO going forward. He also voiced optimism about Trump being open to negotiating a deal around US-EU trade, which could potentially mitigate tariffs that are set to increase next month. But whether Merz's optimism is warranted remains to be seen. If Trump were to change his mind about NATO, trade and the war in it wouldn't be the first time. Following his long day with the President, Merz did a series of interviews in English with various media outlets. In one interview with Fox News, he used an uncouth turn of phrase and implied that antisemitism in Germany was primarily a problem imported by the immigrant population . The remark is perhaps a perfect example of Merz's dizzying ability to criticise far-right extremist politics in Germany and parrot its rhetoric in the same breath. Advertisement Germany prepares for the Pfingsten holiday Sunday is Pentecost, or Whit Sun, or sorry... wir sind in Deutschland, es ist Pfingsten. The holiday on Sunday extends into a public holiday on Monday, and plenty of people in Germany surely have plans for what is the last long holiday weekend until reunification day in October. If you haven't made plans yet, you might consider the Meistertrunk Show in Rothernburg, or the Karneval der Kulturen in Berlin, as reporter Tom Pugh suggested in our guide to what's open and closed for the holiday. Or, if you plan to use the extra day to drive elsewhere in Europe, you can save a few euros by checking how fuel prices compare over the border . Advertisement But whatever you do, make sure to stock up on your groceries by Saturday at the latest -- remember that most stores and businesses will be shut on both Sunday and Monday. And with that, we're off for the weekend as well. Enjoy!
DW
a day ago
- DW
NATO likely to hike defense spending despite economic woes – DW – 06/05/2025
The military alliance looks set to satisfy US President Donald Trump's demands to commit to a massive increase in defense spending. Some creative counting proposed by NATO head Mark Rutte could soften the financial blow. A NATO defense ministers' meeting in Brussels on Thursday showed "broad support" for signing off a historic hike in defense spending at a crunch summit later this month. This was their response to the growing threat from Russia and a "more dangerous world" in general, the military alliance's Secretary General Mark Rutte told reporters. "I will propose an overall investment plan that would total 5% of gross domestic product in defense investment," Rutte announced, following months of pressure from US President Donald Trump for allies to more than double the present target. Current NATO guidelines encourage states to spend 2% of their economic output on their militaries. But not all of the alliance's members meet this target, raising questions of how they will reach an even higher spending goal. Splitting the bill In response, NATO chief Rutte has specified a division of the new spending goal that could allow Trump to claim a headline figure, while giving the other 31 nations room to maneuver their national budgets. Thus, of the 5%, 3.5% of national GDP could be allotted to "core defence spending", while the remaining 1.5% could be diverted to "defense- and security-related investment like infrastructure and industry," he said. Allied defense ministers gathered at the NATO headquarters in Brussels Image: Dursun Aydemir/Anadolu/picture alliance Trump has long criticized NATO allies for relying on the US' large military might as a strategy to defend the European continent. In 2023, more than two thirds of the 32 NATO countries' collective $1.3 trillion (€1.14 trillion) military spending came from Washington, according to data compiled by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). On Thursday, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth drove home the message to the rest of the alliance once again. "Every shoulder has to be to the plough. Every country has to contribute at that level of 5% as a recognition of the nature of threat," he said. Leaders of the world's most powerful defense alliance are set to gather in three weeks in the Dutch city The Hague. Topping the agenda will be discussions on the ongoing war in Ukraine, and Russia's resulting massive rearmament drive. It seems likely that NATO members will officially commit to the 5% goal at these upcoming talks. Giving in to pressure Under US pressure, and with Europeans alarmed by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, NATO military spending has already burgeoned in recent years. Most countries now meet the 2% threshold, which was agreed upon 11 years ago. But around one third of the alliance still doesn't, including Portugal, Italy, Canada, Belgium, and Spain. Most NATO states had indicated willingness to spend more, but the 5% goal was considered far-fetched when Trump floated the idea earlier this year. Almost half a year on, the message seems to be resonating with many in the alliance. Earlier this week, 14 NATO states, including the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and the five Nordic states, published a joint statement in which they said they were "moving towards reaching at least 5% of GDP on defense and defense-related investments." Specter of war: Are Europeans really ready to rearm? To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Last month, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadepuhl also indicated Germany could get on board with the goal. Several NATO countries, including Poland, Estonia and Lithuania, have already committed to spending 5% or more in the future. All are former Soviet states, and two of them share a border with Russia. Since taking office in January, the "America-first" president has strained the NATO alliance with threats not to help defend alliance members that didn't meet spending targets should they be attacked. His designs on the semi-autonomous Danish territory Greenland have also alienated allies, as have his attempts at bilateral talks to find an end to Russia's war in Ukraine, which sidelined European partners and left Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy largely marginalized. Questions remain There are still many open questions to be answered, one of them being the timeline. On Thursday, Estonian Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur spoke of committing to reaching 5% within five years. "We don't have time for ten years, we don't even have time for seven years, to be honest," he said. But the official focus at this week's meeting was on working out what exact capabilities NATO would need and may currently be missing to defend itself if a member of the alliance were attacked. After the talks, Rutte spoke of the need to upgrade air defense systems and long-range missiles, among other things. German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said Germany might need as many as 50,000 – 60,000 more troops in its standing forces to meet defense needs in the coming years. Increased spending amid economic downturn While consensus appears to be forming, it is also clear that increasing military spending to 5% of GDP would be an enormous strain on public finances, particularly as Europe's two major economies, Germany and France, face tough times. Paris and Berlin are touting increased defense spending as a chance to fuel economic growth in Europe, but there is a risk of public backlash. In April in Rome, the opposition Five Star Movement led a protest against an EU drive to rearm the bloc — a move supported by the government of far-right Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni — reportedly drawing tens of thousands of people. According to Cullen Hendrix, an expert from the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a US think tank, a 5% spending target would essentially put NATO countries on "war footing." US secretary of State Pete Hegseth was in Brussels for the last NATO gathering before next month's summit Image: Bob Reijnders/Middle East Images/AFP/Getty Images "In 2023, just nine countries spent 5% of GDP or more on defense: Algeria, Armenia, Israel, Lebanon, Oman, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and South Sudan," Hendrix wrote in February. "Most are, or were, at war. Five of these are authoritarian petro-states, unencumbered by competitive elections or the need to tax their populaces to fund this military largesse." There is also a risk that increased spending will make Europe less safe, Hendrix warned. "Increasing military spending to this extent would likely catalyze an arms race with those near-peer competitors." On Thursday in Brussels, Rutte argued there was little choice but to spend significantly more on defense, pointing to recent comments by the German Chief of Defense Carsten Breuer, who posited that Russia would be ready to mount an attack on NATO states by 2029. "We live in a more dangerous world," Rutte said. "We are safe today, but if we don't do this, we are not safe in the foreseeable future." Edited by: Maren Sass
