
‘I'm sorry': Harvard president apologises over reports on antisemitism and anti-Muslim bias
Harvard University released its long-awaited reports on antisemitism and anti-Muslim bias, presenting a scathing critique of how its students treated each other in the aftermath of the Hamas attack against Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.
'I'm sorry for the moments when we failed to meet the high expectations we rightfully set for our community,' Harvard President Alan Garber said in a letter Tuesday accompanying the reports, which offered recommendations for the university covering admissions, handling complaints and how it teaches.
Garber, who's acknowledged he's recently experienced antisemitism at Harvard, is releasing the studies as the oldest and richest US university faces multiple government probes over its treatment of Jewish students and the role race plays on campus. The reports scrutinize a tumultuous period in the previous school year marked by anti-Israel protests and tent encampments in Harvard Yard, as well as allegations that pro-Zionist groups doxxed demonstrators.
While the federal government slammed Harvard over antisemitism after the Oct. 7 attacks, its critique under the Trump administration has morphed into an attack on the university's governance, its promotion of diversity programs and its perceived liberal bias. On Monday, the government opened another investigation, alleging discrimination at the Harvard Law Review.
The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based school has fired back against the demands, saying they amount to an effort by the administration to exert government control over the school and not to address antisemitism. Harvard sued the government this month, accusing it of unlawfully suspending funding after the university refused to comply with 'unconstitutional demands.'
Garber created the task forces on antisemitism and Islamophobia in January 2024, weeks after he stepped in as interim president following the abrupt resignation of Claudine Gay, the university's first Black president. She was forced out after allegations of plagiarism and criticism of her disastrous response in congressional testimony over whether calling for the genocide of Jews goes against university policy.
Together, the task forces' reports run to more than 500 pages, which at times offered searing accounts of life for Jewish, Israeli, Muslim and Arab students. They were derived from interviews with community members and written by groups of more than a dozen faculty, students and staff.
The Task Force Combating Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias described a campus in which antisemitism has been excluded from forms of prejudice such as racism or xenophobia.
The report included an example of a Jewish student planning to give a speech describing their experiences as a grandchild of a Holocaust survivor. But the student recounted being told, 'I cannot mention my grandfather's rescue mission in my speech because his rescue mission involves Israel. Nowhere does my speech mention the current war or Zionism. It is strictly about the Holocaust.'
The report also described a 'new era' of pro-Palestinian organizing with tactics such as injecting discussions of the Palestinian cause into a wide range of areas in student life and using disruptive tactics at important events including first-year convocation at Harvard College and match day at the medical school.
The task force on antisemitism recommended changes in eight categories, including admissions and discipline. For admissions, it suggested assessing an applicant's aptitude in navigating situations with diverging viewpoints — something Harvard College already did with a new essay question announced last year.
The Task Force on Combating Anti-Muslim, Anti-Arab and Anti-Palestinian Bias said students and other members of the community felt 'abandoned and silenced' during the 2023-24 school year.
Muslim students told the task force they were living in fear. One said peers had lost their jobs for being leaders in Muslim faith groups. They were also concerned about doxxing — the posting of private information about a person without their consent — which they said created a climate of intimidation that was compounded by the perception that the administration's response was inadequate.
The report on anti-Muslim bias suggested seven sets of recommendations, relating to safety, freedom of expression and transparency. Proposals also included increasing courses on Palestinian studies and bolstering cross-cultural understanding.
The authors of the reports said they set out to listen to the concerns of community members and not to verify them.
'The conclusions that emerge from this work are clear,' Garber wrote. 'We need to recognize and act on them and we are doing that.'
He said Harvard has made progress by limiting official statements on public matters unrelated to the school's core mission and reiterating rules on the time and place of protests. The university also pointed to other actions it has taken, including building 'dialogue skills,' offering enhanced kosher options and providing community support during Ramadan.
The reports didn't make recommendations on whether to divest Harvard's $53 billion endowment from Israel or US weapons makers, which was a major demand of many pro-Palestinian demonstrators. Garber has said previously that Harvard's consistent position is that it has no intention of 'divesting from Israel.'
Garber said the school would focus on three areas: nurturing a widespread sense of belonging and promoting respectful dialogue; revising and implementing policies, procedures, and training; and strengthening academic and residential life.
New actions Harvard will take include an initiative to promote viewpoint diversity and further review of disciplinary policies and procedures to assess their effectiveness and efficiency. Harvard will also review the recommendations, some of which can be implemented by the university and some by individual schools, such as admissions.
The institution has spent more than a year emphasizing efforts it's taken to combat antisemitism, including education and safety measures. In recent weeks, the school placed the Harvard Undergraduate Palestine Solidarity Committee on probation and forced the faculty leaders of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies to leave their posts. Harvard also suspended a partnership with Birzeit University in the West Bank.
Harvard said Monday that its diversity, equity and inclusion office would be renamed as Community and Campus Life. That aligns with its current focus on building community, the school said.
First Published: 30 Apr 2025, 11:32 AM IST
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
35 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Eid prayers not allowed at Eidgah ground, Jama Masjid in Srinagar; Mirwaiz alleges house arrest
Eid Mubarak! Yet again, Kashmir wakes up to the sad reality: no Eid prayers at Eidgah, and Jama Masjid locked down — for the 7th straight year. I too have been detained at my home. In a Muslim-majority region, Muslims are deprived of their fundamental right to pray — even on…


Hans India
44 minutes ago
- Hans India
Let go of arrogance, speak Kannada, respect local community: Pai
New Delhi: Joining the ongoing language row, tech investor Mohandas Pai said professionals working in a state like Karnataka must learn the local language and use it, especially in public dealings. Terming the refusal of certain public-dealing officials to learn Kannada as 'arrogance', he said it causes unnecessary tensions, which are easily avoidable. The Kannada language issue in Bengaluru has become a flashpoint in recent months. With the rise of workers to Bengaluru from various states over the years, there have been growing concerns among locals about the perceived erosion of the language in public life. 'Bengaluru is the most welcoming place. The local population speaking Kannada is only 33 per cent. Lot of people have come, they've benefitted, they're doing very well... 'Now, we have small problems because the people who come from outside, many of them become arrogant and refuse to speak a few words of Kannada. Speak a few words of Kannada, show respect to the local community. We must show respect to any community,' Pai, Chairman of Aarin Capital, said in an interview to PTI. Pai said this approach applies everywhere. Whether one is moving to Bengal or Maharashtra, learning a few words of the local language would help outsiders connect with the community. Referring to the recent SBI dispute, wherein a bank manager reportedly refused to speak Kannada with a customer -- a stance that sparked public outrage, protests by pro-Kannada groups, and eventually an official apology from the bank -- Pai said the situation could have been avoided. 'What she could have done is, because she's in a service job, say, sir, I'm sorry, I can't speak the language, I'm learning. I'll ask my colleague to help me out and be respectful. That's all that is required. Nothing else,' he said. Pai stressed that customer service professionals, especially in rural areas, must prioritise the customer's language and cultural context: 'If you happen to be in a rural area, the customer cannot speak Hindi or English. You must speak the local language.'
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Can Musk's businesses afford his breakup with Trump?
Donald Trump and Elon Musk's partnership appears to have reached its end. The US president has threatened to end the tech mogul's government contracts and subsidies for his companies. Tesla is already staring at challenges, with the Thursday spat sending its shares plummeting 14 per cent followed by a recovery later. Will Musk suffer if Trump's ire befalls his businesses? read more US President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference with Elon Musk in the Oval Office of the White House, May 30, 2025, in Washington. File Photo/AP Donald Trump and Elon Musk's public meltdown has glued the world to their phones. Their ugly online brawl seems far from over, with the United States president refusing to speak to the tech billionaire on Friday (June 6). Amid the row, Trump threatened to end Musk's government subsidies and contracts. As the spat escalated on Thursday, Tesla shares went into freefall and Musk's net worth plunged. Once a powerful political alliance, the relationship between Trump and Musk appears to have come to its end. But will the businesses of the world's richest person bear the brunt of the public fallout with the president of the United States? STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Let's take a look. Tesla takes a hit What began as a disagreement over US President Donald Trump's signature spending bill soon turned into an explosive row. The Republican leader and the Tesla CEO traded barbs on their respective social media platforms. As the animosity grew, Trump said the tech billionaire had gone 'crazy' and threatened to cut Musk's government contracts and subsidies for his companies. Musk responded, 'Go ahead, make my day.' The high-profile falling out saw Tesla's shares plummeting 14 per cent on Thursday, losing about $152 billion in market value — the largest single-day plunge in the company's 15-year history on the public market. Tesla's stock rebounded on Friday, rising four per cent after the steep fall. Musk continues to be the world's richest person; however, his net worth declined by $34 billion, as per Bloomberg's Billionaires Index. There are also reports that Trump is mulling selling the Tesla – a red Model S – he purchased in March to show solidarity with Musk amid anti-Tesla protests. A Tesla vehicle is parked on West Executive Avenue near the White House and the Eisenhower Executive Office building in Washington, DC, US, June 5, 2025. Reuters Tesla contributes to most of Musk's wealth. However, the company's shares have been on a rollercoaster this year after the stocks rose about 29 per cent following Trump's US presidential election victory in November. Musk spent nearly $300 million to bring Trump back to the White House. The Republican leader rewarded him by giving him a major role in his administration. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But Tesla suffered because of Musk's actions as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge ). 'Musk hasn't done Tesla any favors by taking extremely unpopular actions in his time at Doge, and globally the business is struggling from other decisions, like focusing on the Cybertruck instead of releasing more new practical models that consumers actually want,' John Helveston, a professor at George Washington University who studies the electric vehicle industry, told NPR. 'In the European Union, sales are down heavily from the political damage, and sales in China are down from intense competition of very competitive Chinese EVs.' Musk's frustration with Trump's 'one, big beautiful bill', which he called a 'disgusting abomination', stems from the legislation's proposal to cut funding for electric vehicles and related technologies, which would hurt the Tesla CEO's businesses. The bill slashes the electric vehicle tax credit and federal funding for charging stations. Tesla is America's biggest electric vehicle company and also controls the country's largest charging network. If Trump's plan to chop subsidies on new electric vehicles is implemented, Tesla's full-year profit could decrease by $1.2 billion, Bloomberg reported, citing JP Morgan analysts. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Speaking to NPR, Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, an associate dean at the Yale School of Management, said further challenges for Tesla could eventually hit Musk's wealth. 'Tesla is hugely reliant on federal largesse for the build-out of EV charging infrastructure, not to mention federal regulatory approval for his continued autonomous driving and robotics experiments,' he said. 'His wealth is highly precarious,' Sonnenfeld said, adding: 'The reality is that Musk's position is far weaker than many realise.' Tesla was already facing challenges before the feud between its CEO and the US president. After the company's stocks peaked at $428 in January, its shares declined by nearly half in March as investors got spooked by Musk's role in the Trump administration. A rift with the Trump administration could affect government support for Tesla as well as tariff exemptions that the company is seeking to buy Chinese parts for its Cybercab robotaxi and Semi electric truck. The 'schoolyard fight' between Trump and Musk underscores how 'Tesla's weak accountability measures and poor governance threaten not only the company's financial stability and shareholder value, but also the future of homegrown EV production,' New York City Comptroller Brad Lander told CNBC in a statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to The Washington Post analysis in February, Musk and his businesses have received at least $38 billion in government contracts, loans, subsidies and tax credits. However, the breakup with US President Trump may not be the end of the road for Musk and his companies. According to Paul Levinson, a professor at Fordham University, there could be more short-term stock market falls for Tesla and a hit to Musk's riches. However, even if some federal funding to the billionaire's businesses stops, it is unlikely to impact the tech billionaire in the long run. 'Musk has ample resources to sustain those losses, reshuffle and rebuild his companies and holdings, and come out ahead and on top,' Levinson said to NPR. 'Bottom line: if all the Trump government does in its feud with Musk is attack his financial interests, Musk is very likely to not only survive but continue to thrive.' SpaceX, Starlink may be safe from spat The US government's space ambitions are intricately linked to Musk's SpaceX. As the public row with Trump escalated on Thursday, the 53-year-old former adviser to the US president threatened to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft. However, Musk soon seemingly backtracked when an X user suggested he 'cool down'. The billionaire wrote, 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD SpaceX's Crew Dragon is currently the only US spacecraft certified to ferry crew to the International Space Station (ISS). The US Defense Department and the Nasa space agency have given more than $22 billion in contracts to SpaceX since 2000. 'While their political partnership appears to be at an end, it is difficult to imagine the government cancelling SpaceX contracts anytime soon,' Dan Grazier, senior fellow and programme director at the Stimson Center think tank, told NPR. 'It will be some time before any of the company's competitors will be able to take up the slack, so it looks like the president and the tech mogul will have to find a way to get along,' he said. SpaceX's Starlink internet satellite company could also be safe from Trump's ire. It is part of the US federal government's effort to provide internet access to underserved parts of the country. So, tearing up Pentagon contracts with Starlink could be a loss for both Musk and Trump. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While they might not like it, the duo have to rely on each other. With inputs from agencies