How Trump's team squandered a chance to end the Gaza war
The administration of US President Donald Trump appeared close to securing a ceasefire to end the Gaza war, halt the inhumane blockade imposed on its starving people, and ensure the release of all Israeli captives held by Hamas.
Indeed, a preliminary deal was reached in Doha between Hamas and the US administration's interlocutor, Palestinian American Bishara Bahbah. Acting on behalf of Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, Bahbah, who headed an organisation that encouraged Arab Americans to vote for Trump in the last election, had been key to the previous negotiations that secured the release of American Israeli captive Edan Alexander.
Alexander's release paved the way for the subsequent talks. According to an interview with Bahbah on Israel's Channel 12, Witkoff initially suggested that Hamas should release Alexander as a 'gesture of goodwill' towards Trump, who could then use 'his influence for a ceasefire and to allow the aid to come into Gaza that is desperately needed by people'.
But soon after the preliminary ceasefire deal was struck, Witkoff changed course and came up with a modified plan that was accepted by the Israelis, thus tossing the ball back into Hamas's court.
Clearly, Witkoff could not persuade the Israelis to accept what had been agreed with Hamas in Doha, instead adopting as his own Israel's counterproposal - which, to Hamas, seemed nothing short of capitulation.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
The Israelis and their US backers might have concluded that after many months of war, Hamas had been severely battered and was too weak to reject the proposal. This is not the first time they've been proven wrong.
The Americans took the right step by opting to negotiate directly with Hamas. Earlier this year, the first direct talks were led by Trump's hostage envoy, Adam Boehler, who was so confident about his mandate that he publicly responded to Israeli criticism by saying: 'We're not an agent of Israel.'
Talking to 'terrorists'
This was all promising. The cliched notion that 'we don't talk to terrorists' has proven to be little more than a pretext to avoid the responsibility to engage fairly and honestly with all parties.
Since the time of former President Bill Clinton, all US administrations, both Democratic and Republican, have continued designating Hamas as a terrorist organisation. European nations, including the UK, followed suit.
This is despite the fact that Hamas was democratically elected by the Palestinian people in free and fair elections.
Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war
Colonial and oppressive powers have always tended to designate those who resist their tyranny and hegemony as terrorists who should not be spoken with. South Africa's ruling African National Congress (ANC) was once designated a terrorist organisation by the US and UK, with former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher vowing never to meet its leader.
Just a few years later, ANC leader Nelson Mandela was elected head of state in his country, and was subsequently given a hero's welcome when he visited the UK.
War on Gaza: Why forcing Hamas to disarm will not end Israel's genocide Read More »
Indeed, the adage that 'terrorists' should not be spoken with has not held up across history. The Viet Cong, considered by the US to be terrorists, eventually sat around the same negotiating table with the Americans in Paris. More recently, the Taliban, who now rule Afghanistan, have held talks with the US in Doha.
Interestingly, in both cases, it was not negotiations that ended the conflicts, but the humiliating defeat and withdrawal of American troops.
When Trump authorised direct talks with Hamas, it was seen as a step in the right direction. Many observers thought it indicated that Trump was serious about stopping the war. Subsequent developments, however, have dashed these hopes and infuriated some of Washington's regional Arab allies.
In short, the Trump administration appears to have wasted a historic opportunity - a chance to play a more constructive and less biased role in the Middle East. Trump himself has stated repeatedly that he wants to end wars.
Here was a real chance for his administration to show the world that it would no longer be a party to Israel's genocide in Gaza and its war crimes across occupied Palestine. Instead, Trump's team once again revealed itself to be untrustworthy and incapable of controlling Israel, even as the latter relies almost entirely on US military, financial and diplomatic support.
What a missed opportunity.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu faces biggest government crisis yet
In only a matter of days it has become clear that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 's far-right government is the closest it has come to collapse. It is not because of the catastrophic security failure of the October 7 attacks; the Israeli hostages still languishing in Gaza; nor the unprecedented international isolation facing Israel as anger mounts over its war in the strip. Instead, Israel could be on the cusp of new elections because of an internal dispute tearing apart Mr Netanyahu's coalition, which turns on its failure to exempt ultra-Orthodox young men from being conscripted into the military. Passing such a law is a priority of certain parties, and a demand they made of Mr Netanyahu when joining his coalition. The army is viewed as a melting pot of secular and religious, men and women, in which young ultra-Orthodox men are highly likely to drift from the conservative ways. Many ultra-Orthodox people are ambivalent about nationalism and the state of Israel, some even anti-Zionist, viewing the state as a man-made enterprise and not the true Israel to be brought about only by God. The crisis is hardly a surprise. How ultra-Orthodox Israelis interact with wider national life is a question that has dogged the country for decades. The community's leaders try guard their people from anything that might interrupt their secluded, strict way of life. That mission is becoming harder to pull off as the group's numbers have grown by more than 500 per cent since 1979, according to a 2023 report by the Haredi Policy Research Institute. While the question of military service was always a part of the debate, it also extended to issues like participation (particularly by men) in the general workforce, how the community educates its children, and the subsidies it receives. But with the Israeli military suffering a manpower shortage during the Gaza war, new security problems on the horizon and major fatigue in reservist troops, the ultra-Orthodox absence from duty is enraging all other Israelis, from left to right. How did the crisis begin? Last week, United Torah Judaism, one of the two ultra-Orthodox parties in Mr Netanyahu's coalition, backed dissolving the Knesset to pave the way for elections. On Monday, the other party, Shas, announced that it backed the same. Shas's involvement means that Mr Netanyahu would no longer have a majority in the Knesset, a devastating blow as opposition parties would easily have the numbers to topple the government. A way out of the crisis could lie with the ultra-Orthodox parties and Yuli Edelstein, chairman of the Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defence Committee, who have not been able to find a compromise, despite last-ditch talks. Mr Edelstein, a member of Mr Netanyahu's Likud party, previously vowed to find a solution that 'significantly increases [the military's] conscription base,' echoing frustration by many in the ultranationalist, hawkish coalition at the ultra-Orthodox refusal to serve. Last week a spiritual leader in the Shas party said Mr Edelstein's 'soul is an abomination'. Is there room for compromise? An enlistment bill being drafted by Mr Edelstein's committee reportedly includes major financial sanctions against ultra-Orthodox men who ignore draft orders, including the loss of tax benefits and subsidies. There are even reports that the sanctions would prevent dodgers from travelling abroad. While it is possible some of these sanctions could be negotiated on, the main disagreement about whether the community should be drafted at all appears insurmountable. 'I don't see that they'll find a compromise regarding the scope of sanctions,' said Aviv Bushinsky, a former spokesman for Mr Netanyahu. 'What they want to do is to find a way that the sanctions will be implemented not immediately but within a year from now … but again you hear the spiritual leaders say no way by all means,' he added. What could happen next? Opponents of Mr Netanyahu now have to decide how to best approach a possible bill to dissolve parliament. Such a bill would have to pass a preliminary vote and then three readings. If it does not compete these steps then there is a delay until the same bill can be voted on again, giving Mr Netanyahu months to continue negotiations with coalition partners for a solution. How likely are the ultra-Orthodox parties to topple the government? While the rage of the ultra-Orthodox parties is palpable, many commentators note that they are unlikely after new elections to find a government even close to as sympathetic as Mr Netanyahu's. Emphasising the unjustness of ultra-Orthodox exemptions while sympathising with the sacrifice of soldiers is a crucial tactic of opposition parties, whose voters are unlikely to tolerate supporting a government that gives the ultra-Orthodox leeway on the issue. Despite this, the anger and threats of the community's political and spiritual leaders have never been so strong. It is also uncertain the extent to which the leadership views triggering elections as a matter of worldly tactical politics or God's will. What does this mean for Mr Netanyahu? Mr Netanyahu is by far the most successful politician in Israeli history, serving several terms in office. He is viewed as a truly gifted political survivor and has so far weathered the scandal of the October 7 attacks, despite many believing he would not last six months after at first, and a continuing corruption trial. However, Mr Bushinsky said that his current position is very bad. 'As things are at the moment, Netanyahu is being dragged, not leading, not controlling the situation,' he said. 'His approach now is to hug his allies and say everyone is having good conversations. This is not customary to him. He is usually very aggressive and tries to keep control. 'Netanyahu wants to reach something more tangible – a flag he can wave, be it a strike on Iran, total victory in Gaza. At the moment to go to elections without such tangible successes would be devastating.'
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
UK sanctions Israeli cabinet members and Zohran Mamdani's race for New York
The UK sanctioned two senior members of the Israeli Cabinet. Iran says it could strike back in the event of an Israeli attack. A candidate for New York City mayor could become the first Muslim to hold the office. On today's episode of Trending Middle East: Israeli hardliners Ben-Gvir and Smotrich targeted in UK-led sanctions Iran warns Israel it has intelligence to respond to an attack on nuclear sites Could Zohran Mamdani become New York City's first Muslim mayor? This episode features Thomas Harding, Security and Policy Editor; Hadya AlAlawi, Assistant Foreign Editor, and Cody Combs, Technology Policy Editor.
The National
6 hours ago
- The National
Israeli hard-liners Ben-Gvir and Smotrich hit by UK-led sanctions
Two senior Israeli cabinet ministers have had sanctions imposed in a British -led move, leading to a major diplomatic fallout. Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich face travel bans and financial restrictions from the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway. In an official statement, the British government said the pair were 'now sanctioned for their repeated incitement of violence against Palestinian civilians, effective immediately'. We expect the UK government to recognise the state of Palestine. This is good but does not get us to that point Husam Zomlot In a joint statement with foreign ministers from Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: 'Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich have incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights. These actions are not acceptable. This is why we have taken action now – to hold those responsible to account. 'We will strive to achieve an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the immediate release of the remaining hostages by Hamas, which can have no future role in the governance of Gaza, a surge in aid and a path to a two-state solution.' It is a significant escalation in political pressure against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government. The souring of relations with friendly western countries was further cemented after a senior Israeli cabinet minister condemned the sanctions as 'outrageous' and 'unacceptable'. The US State Department also condemned the sanctions against the two Israeli ministers. 'We find that extremely unhelpful,' department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce told reporters. 'It will do nothing to get us closer to a ceasefire in Gaza. 'If our allies want to help, they should focus on supporting special envoy Steve Witkoff's negotiations and back the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation when it comes to food and aid.' Husam Zomlot, the head of the Palestinian m ission to the UK, welcomed the government's response to the ministers repeated incitements of violence against Palestinian communities. Speaking exclusively to The National, he called the move a 'significant step in the right direction'. 'These two ministers have been publicly calling for the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, not only by words but by deeds,' Mr Zomlot said. 'These two ministers have been literally physically arming illegal settlers [who are] going on the rampage, committing all the crimes that the world has been following.' 'Sanctioning these ministers is absolutely the right step in the right direction.' Mr Zomlot called on London to make further changes to its policy in response to developments across the Palestinian territory. 'This is not a substitute for the arms embargo, not a substitute for sanctions on the entire ecosystem of illegality, including settlements, and not a substitute for the recognition of the state of Palestine.' With a French and Saudi-sponsored conference on advancing the two-state solution taking place on June 17 to 20 at UN headquarters, Mr Zomlot said the opportunity was looming for the UK to announce that step. 'We are awaiting that conference next week, we expect the UK government to recognise the state of Palestine. This is good but does not get us to that point.' But Israel's renewed Gaza offensive, which has seen the death toll of Palestinians increase to 55,700, has turned international opinion against Israel. British MPs from all parties have in recent weeks become angry at Israel's actions and condemn the UK government's failure to impose sanctions or recognise the Palestinian state. Mr Lammy and Middle East Minister Hamish Falconer have faced accusations of Israeli killings and inhumane treatment of Palestinians. From January last year to April this year extremist settlers have carried out more than 1,900 attacks against Palestinian civilians, the UK government said. The diplomatic fallout began even before the sanctions were officially announced with Israel's government reacting furiously after Minister of Foreign Affairs Gideon Saar condemned the 'British sanctions list'. 'It is outrageous that elected representatives and members of the government are subjected to these kind of measures.' Mr Netanyahu will hold a special government meeting early next week 'to decide on our response to this unacceptable decision', he added. Mr Ben-Gvir posted a message on X, saying: 'We survived Pharaoh, we will also survive Keir Starmer. I will continue to work for Israel and the people of Israel without fear or intimidation.' In further retaliation to the sanctions Mr Smotrich allegedly threatened to stop transferring funds to the Palestinian Authority. Even the pair's political foe, Benny Gantz, said that while he 'deeply' disagreed with their views, the sanctions were a 'profound moral failure and a bad message to the entire world' that he claimed would 'fuel global terrorism'. Tuesday's action could have a unifying effect on the Israeli government, which is comprised of a fragile coalition that includes hard-right and ultra-Orthodox figures. This has allowed Mr Smotrich to approve the expansion of illegal West Bank settlements while he has also vigorously campaigned against allowing humanitarian aid into Gaza, He caused outrage after stating that he would allow 'not even a grain of wheat' to enter the territory and only last month stated that Gaza would be 'entirely destroyed'. He also referred to ethnic cleansing by suggesting that Palestinians should 'leave in great numbers to third countries'. His colleague Mr Ben-Gvir, who was convicted of incitement to racism in 2007, has also stoked fires by advocating the replacement of the Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem with a synagogue. He has also called for Palestinians to be expelled from Gaza and stated that 'there is no need to bring in aid, they have enough'. Among senior MPs who have called for stronger action against the pair has been Emily Thornberry, chairwoman of the foreign affairs committee. 'I and others have been calling for sanctions on these extremist Israeli ministers for the better part of a year,' she posted on X. 'The government is finally doing the right thing.' In reference to the summit jointly hosted by France and Saudi Arabia, she argued that the sanctions 'must be a precursor to recognising a Palestinian state next week – not an alternative to it'.
