When is the conclave? The Vatican sets date to elect new head after Pope Francis' death
With the death and funeral of Pope Francis comes the start of a sacred process of determining a successor that dates back many centuries.
The papal conclave is private election held behind closed doors of Vatican City's Sistine Chapel, where 135 cardinals vote on who will serve as the next the head of the Catholic Church.
The Vatican has revealed the date for when Roman Catholic cardinals from across the globe will meet in Rome and begin an election process that has previously lasted from around 25 hours to nearly three years.
Pope Francis, who previously went by Jorge Mario Bergoglio, died on April 21 at 88 following a long respiratory illness.
In March 2013, the Argentina native was elected as the 266th pope after previously serving as a cardinal. On the fifth ballot of his conclave, he received 90 votes out of 115, surpassing the necessary threshold of 77. He soon assumed the role, with his papal reign lasting over 12 years.
With the focus now turning to the selection of his successor, here's what to know about the upcoming conclave.
When does the 2025 conclave start?
The papal conclave is set for May 7, when the cardinals will meet for morning Mass at St. Peter's Basilica with the purpose of praying for the wisdom needed to choose the next pope.
Conclaves are usually held 15 to 20 days after the pope's death.
How long do conclaves last?
There is not set timeline for conclaves. The longest modern conclave lasted over five days when Pope Pius X was elected in 1903.
Where will the conclave take place?
Cardinals leave the basilica after attending the fourth Novemdiales mass held for the late Pope Francis in St. Peters Basilica on April 29, 2025 in Vatican City.
The conclave will take place in the nearby Sistine Chapel, a chapel in Vatican City renowned for its Renaissance art that was closed to the public April 28. It will remain off-limits until the conclave is completed.
How do conclaves work?
The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops spells out in detail the protocols for the election.
Throughout the election process, the cardinal electors must refrain from sending letters or engaging in conversations, including phone calls, except in emergencies. The cardinals will vote by secret ballot, proceeding one by one up to Michelangelo's fresco of the Last Judgment to say a prayer and drop the double-folded ballot into a large chalice.
Four rounds of balloting take place each day until a candidate receives two-thirds of the vote. The result of each ballot are counted out loud and recorded by three cardinals designated as recorders. If no one receives the necessary two-thirds of the vote, the ballots are burned in a stove near the chapel with a mixture of chemicals to produce black smoke.
If the electors fail to reach an agreement on a candidate after three days of inconclusive voting, a break of up to one day is allowed for prayer, free discussion among voters and a "brief spiritual exhortation," according to the Vatican.
When a cardinal receives the necessary two-thirds vote, the dean of the College of Cardinals asks him whether he is willing to serve.
If he is, the new pope chooses a papal name and is dressed in papal vestments. The ballots of the final round are burned with chemicals producing white smoke to signal to the world the election of a new pope.
Is that real smoke? News of new pope delivered by stoves, chemicals and ballots
Who can be pope?
Technically, the cardinals need not choose a fellow cardinal to lead the church. The only actual qualifications are being male and being baptized as a Catholic.
It has been almost 650 years, however, since the last non-cardinal claimed the job. Italian Archbishop Bartolomeo Prignano was unanimously elected in 1378 and became Pope Urban Vl.
His death fueled the Western Schism, a period when a split in the church caused multiple popes to gain election at the same time.
What was the longest conclave ever?
The longest conclave in history took place in the 13th century. The papacy was vacant for nearly three years, or 34 months, until Gregory X was elected in 1271, according to the Catholic news agency EWTN Vatican.
The cardinals had gathered in the city of Viterbo, about 50 miles north of Rome, where Pope Clement IV died in 1268. French cardinals wanted a French pope, and Italian cardinals wanted an Italian to lead the church. Local authorities finally locked the cardinals in a palace to help expedite the process that led to the election of Gregory, a native of Italy with strong ties to France.
Gregory formalized rules for future votes, and the term "conclave" comes from his restructure of the process.
How many popes have there been?
The Roman Catholic Church has seen 266 popes during its nearly 2,000-year history with the first being St. Peter, the apostle of Jesus Christ. Francis was the most recent pope, who was elected following the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI in 2013.
Contributing: Reuters; Marc Ramirez, Marco della Cava, Christopher Cann, USA TODAY
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: When is the 2025 conclave? Election for next to pope to begin in May
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court rules that Catholic groups were unlawfully barred from a religious tax exemption
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled in favor of Catholic Church-affiliated charitable groups, saying they were wrongly denied religious exemptions from a Wisconsin tax that funds unemployment benefits. The justices ruled unanimously that the state's decision unlawfully discriminated against the groups on the basis of religion under the free exercise clause of the Constitution's First Amendment. The court rejected a Wisconsin Supreme Court decision that said that the groups operating under the Catholic Charities Bureau of the Diocese of Superior were not sufficiently religious in purpose. The state already provided exemptions for religious institutions. The First Amendment has long been interpreted to exempt religious entities from taxation. Writing for the court, liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor noted the importance of the government remaining neutral when it comes to different religions. "When the government distinguishes among religions based on theological differences in their provision of services, it imposes a denominational preference that must satisfy the highest level of judicial scrutiny," Sotomayor said. But Wisconsin had "transgressed that principle," she added. The groups involved in the case — Headwaters, Barron County Developmental Services, Diversified Services and Black River Industries — primarily serve developmentally disabled people. Their programs are open to non-Catholics. The Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission had concluded the charitable groups were not 'operated primarily for religious purposes' under state law. The Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2024 upheld the state commission's finding, saying the groups' activities were mostly secular in nature and that they do not 'attempt to imbue program participants with the Catholic faith nor supply any religious materials.' The Wisconsin unemployment compensation system was set up in 1932 to provide a safety net for people who lose their jobs. Similar programs in other states and the Federal Unemployment Tax Act also include religious exemptions. The Catholic groups had strong backing at the Supreme Court from other Christian sects and different religious faiths. This article was originally published on
Chicago Tribune
5 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Pope Leo XIV meets with child protection advisory board amid survivor calls for zero tolerance on abuse
VATICAN CITY — Pope Leo XIV met with members of the Vatican's child protection advisory commission on Thursday for the first time amid questions about his past handling of clergy sex abuse cases and demands from survivors that he enact a true policy of zero tolerance for abuse across the Catholic Church. The Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors, which is made up of religious and lay experts in fighting abuse as well as survivors, called the hourlong audience a 'significant moment of reflection, dialogue, and renewal of the church's unwavering commitment to the safeguarding of children and vulnerable people.' The group said it updated history's first American pope on its activities, including an initiative to help church communities in poorer parts of the world prevent abuse and care for victims. The Vatican did not provide the text of Leo's remarks or make the audio of the audience available to reporters. Pope Francis created the commission early on in his pontificate to advise the church on best practices and placed a trusted official, Boston's then-archbishop, Cardinal Sean O'Malley, in charge. But as the abuse scandal spread globally during Francis' 12-year pontificate, the commission lost its influence its crowning recommendation — the creation of a tribunal to judge bishops who covered up for predator priests — went nowhere. After many years of reform and new members, it has become a place where victims can go to be heard and bishops can get advice on crafting guidelines to fight abuse. O'Malley turned 80 last year and retired as archbishop of Boston, but he remains president of the commission and headed the delegation meeting with Leo in the Apostolic Palace. It has often fallen to O'Malley to speak out on egregious cases that have arrived at the Vatican, including one that remains on Leo's desk: The fate of the ex-Jesuit artist, the Rev. Marko Rupnik, who has been accused by two dozen women of sexual, psychological and spiritual abuse over decades. After coming under criticism that a fellow Jesuit had apparently received preferential treatment, Francis in 2023 ordered the Vatican to waive the statute of limitations on the case and prosecute him canonically. But as recently as March, the Vatican still hadn't found judges to open the trial. Meanwhile, the victims are still waiting for justice and Rupnik continues to minister, with his supporters defending him and denouncing a 'media lynching' campaign against him. Leo, the Chicago-born former Cardinal Robert Prevost, has been credited by victims of helping to dismantle an abusive Catholic movement in Peru, where he served as bishop for many years. But other survivors have asked him to account for other cases while he was a superior in the Augustinian religious order, bishop in Peru and head of the Vatican's bishops' office. The main U.S. survivor group, SNAP, has also called for Leo to adopt the U.S. policy calling for any priest who has been credibly accused of abuse to be permanently removed from ministry.
Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
Supreme Court Expands Tax Exemptions For Religious Charities
The Supreme Court expanded when religious organizations can qualify for tax exemptions as it ruled Thursday in favor of a charity in Wisconsin—potentially setting off a slew of organizations seeking new exemptions, which critics warn could harm federal and state tax revenues. Dan Bezley, 63, of Northville, MI, carries a cedar cross in front of the US Supreme Court in ... More Washington D.C. on Jan. Catholic Charities, a social charity that's part of Roman Catholic dioceses in Wisconsin, asked the state to be exempted from the its unemployment tax under the carveout for religious groups, but the state denied the request because the group's actual activities—providing services to people of all faiths who have disabilities—are not religious. The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled in the state's favor against the organization being granted the exemption, but Catholic Charities argued to the Supreme Court that being denied the exemption violated the First Amendment's prohibition on the government interfering with the free exercise of religion, claiming Wisconsin is trying to 'pick and choose among religious groups.' Justices ruled unanimously in favor of Catholic Charities, finding the Wisconsin Supreme Court's decision violated the First Amendment. This story is breaking and will be updated. While it wasn't a party in the case, the Trump administration filed a brief urging the court to rule in favor of Catholic Charities being granted the tax exemption. The federal government claimed the Wisconsin Supreme Court's ruling was based on a 'misunderstanding' of the law, and the exemption applies for any organization that conducts its activities 'primarily for sincere religious motivations,' even if the activities it conducts aren't directly religious acts like proselytizing. The Trump administration also suggested it has an interest in the case because any ruling could also affect federal rules on tax exemptions for religious groups, noting the language of Wisconsin's law 'mirrors' the Federal Unemployment Tax Act. The Supreme Court's ruling is the latest in a string of decisions the high court has made regarding religious liberty, which have typically come out in favor of broadening parties' religious rights. The 6-3 conservative court has ruled in recent terms to rule in favor of letting religious adoption agencies refuse to work with same-sex couples, a high school football coach who prayed on the field, a Christian group who wanted to fly a flag at Boston City Hall, a web designer who wanted to deny services to same-sex couples and that a state-funded school voucher program in Maine can be used to pay for religious school tuition, among other cases. Justices did issue a notable ruling in May against a proposed religious charter school in Oklahoma, splitting 4-4, which meant the lower court's ruling against the school will stay in place. The court could still take up other cases in the future on religious charter schools, however.
