
NWSL agrees to pay $5 million to players who suffered abuse in new settlement
The NWSL will create a $5 million player compensation fund as part of a settlement regarding its role in widespread allegations of abuse.
The settlement, announced on Wednesday, ends a joint investigation by the attorneys general of the District of Columbia, Illinois and New York concerning systemic abuse across the league and potential violations of state and local human rights laws.
Advertisement
The three offices, like the investigation by former U.S. Attorney General Sally Yates and the joint investigation by the NWSL and NWSL players association that came before them, focused on 'pervasive sexual harassment and abuse by coaches against players ' and systematic failures by the league to 'exercise adequate insight, institute workplace antidiscrimination policies, or appropriately respond to complaints,' as listed in the settlement agreement.
The three AGs found that 'the NWSL was permeated by a culture of inappropriate and abusive behavior, including sexual harassment and harassment and discrimination based upon gender, race, and sexual orientation.' However, no new revelations came out of their investigation.
In addition to the Players' Restitution Fund, the three offices will have the power to oversee and enforce NWSL policies concerning player safety for the next three years. The league must send compliance and misconduct reports every six months.
'We have worked collaboratively with the NWSLPA and the attorneys general to add greater strength to the programmatic changes we adopted in 2023 in light of the joint investigative reports, and we look forward to supporting the administrator in distributing the Players' Restitution Fund,' NWSL commissioner Jessica Berman said in a statement on Wednesday. 'We will continue to do the work necessary to maintain the trust of our players.'
The attorneys general called the settlement historic. Previous claims of this nature were not handled by state attorneys general but stemmed from criminal or civil complaints — such as USA Gymnastics and the United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee settling with the survivors of Larry Nassar.
'Players suffered in silence — ignored by those in a position to prevent this harm. Only through their bravery — speaking out, demanding change, and refusing to back down — did the full scale of the league's failures come to light,' retired NWSL player and deputy executive director of the NWSL Players Association Tori Huster said in a statement. 'I want to be clear: this was possible because players demanded it.'
Advertisement
The NWSL abuse scandal was on the radar of all three attorneys general going back to the original reporting and investigations. Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul and New York Attorney General Letitia James sent an open letter to the NWSL and U.S. Soccer in December 2022 following the release of the Yates report, in which they expressed their 'alarm' over the findings.
At the same time, the office of the D.C. attorney general had been following the ongoing reports concerning misconduct at the Washington Spirit. When D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb took office at the start of 2023, the three offices joined forces and began working on their investigation into potential violations of state and local human rights laws.
'While NWSL has made critical improvements, the victims never received any compensation for the sexual and emotional abuse they endured on the league's watch,' Schwalb said in a statement released on Wednesday. 'No dollar amount could ever fully address the damage that was inflicted, but now my office, together with New York and Illinois, will have oversight authority to ensure that the league's new safety policies are implemented and that current and future players are protected.'
Wednesday's settlement focuses primarily on summarizing the findings from the two investigations concerning former Chicago Red Stars head coach Rory Dames, former Spirit head coach Richie Burke and former Western New York Flash (then NC Courage) head coach Paul Riley — all three of whom fall under the jurisdiction of the three offices.
The settlement, published Wednesday as an 'assurance of discontinuance' — essentially a promise from the NWSL to follow the rules from now on — cites Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (the same law cited heavily in the USWNT's battle for equal pay and equal conditions), as well as the Human Rights Acts of New York state, New York City, D.C. and Illinois.
Advertisement
The report acknowledges the league has already worked to implement the recommendations from both the Yates report and the joint investigation, as well as the sanctions and corrective actions the league issued in January 2023. The document also notes that there is a new NWSL commissioner in place in Berman, the league's human resources office has grown and the league and players association signed the first collective bargaining agreement in 2022.
GO DEEPER
NWSL bans Paul Riley, more after joint investigation
Wednesday's settlement, however, adds two major additions to those actions: the $5 million restitution fund and active monitoring from the attorneys general.
A press conference is set for Wednesday morning. Erin Simon, whose account of her experience with former Racing Louisville head coach Christy Holly opens the Yates report, has been announced as a speaker. This story will be updated following its conclusion.
The Athletic has reviewed the settlement agreement, as well as the protocol for restitution fund.
The NWSL has to commit $5 million to establish the restitution fund, which will compensate players directly.
The league has to follow a protocol set by the AGs in the settlement, though that protocol was not publicly provided as part of Wednesday's documentation. However, there are some basics outlined in the agreement.
Another part of the new investigation from the AGs was determining what policy changes the NWSL had implemented already in the wake of the two previous investigations, as the league does not publicly publish all of its policies and internal manuals. Their agreement notes that while the NWSL has made changes, there are some new requirements for the league to follow.
The AGs have requested a review of almost every policy change and newly hired human resource and player safety representative, as well as the content of trainings and other materials from the league.
Advertisement
The settlement repeatedly mentions how player surveys, administered by the league starting in 2013, raised concerns about team cultures and allegations of harassment, yet were rarely acted upon by NWSL's leadership, and how they failed to share results with the teams themselves.
The AGs are requiring an opportunity for exit interviews and anonymous feedback; they will review player surveys from past and future years; and the league will have to seek player feedback on counseling services.
Additionally, the NWSL will have to establish a policy that requires teams to consult the players association during the hiring process of any head coach to 'ensure they have an adequate opportunity to raise any concerns about the prospective hire's history or reputation as it relates to player or staff safety and wellbeing.'
The PA will be tasked with providing a list of assistant coaches, player safety officers and head athletic trainers they believe 'present concerns based on history and reputation,' for the league to consult during those hiring processes as well.
Wednesday's agreement includes a four-phased outline of the fund protocol. The first is notification, including emails and certified mail to all potentially eligible players via the NWSLPA.
Players will then have a window of 180 days to file their claims in the second phase. Players will need to provide information, including a description of events that took place, and can provide additional supporting documentation including medical or psychiatric treatment records.
The third phase of this process is an assessment of those claims, which will happen on a rolling basis throughout the 180-day window.
According to the process described in the agreement issued Wednesday, Jones, as the fund's administrator, will do so by 'reviewing the application survey and any supporting documentation, interviewing the claimant (via video conference or in person depending on claimant location and seriousness of allegations), and interviewing or otherwise communicating with corroborating witnesses as necessary.' It also notes Jones may use her discretion if she must interview the 'alleged abuser' to resolve any claim.
Each claim will be ranked by severity. Though Wednesday's agreement notes that categories could change, the AGs anticipate that the most severe claims will include sexual abuse or assault, the next level will include severe harassment, and finally, less severe harassment. The AGs note that if retaliation occurs, it could increase a claim's ranking.
Advertisement
Once all claims have been submitted and ranked, Jones will determine the money that will be issued to players based on the total number of claims — divided by the three different rankings. The money may not be evenly split between each player at each severity level, but instead set on a case-by-case basis based on each player's experience.
Jones has an additional 90 days to determine the final amounts following the assessment period (though she may request an additional 90 days if needed due to the number of claims). Players will need to sign a release form to accept those payments via wire transfer.
If there's any money not distributed to players as part of this process, any remaining funds will be donated to the players association's emergency and charitable fund.
NWSL must ensure the attorneys general are kept informed via mandatory reports every six months for the next three years, which must include two sections: how the league is implementing the required policies and a report of any formal or informal complaints alleging misconduct and any subsequent investigation status.
The three AGs will actively monitor and enforce these changes across the NWSL. While the league has done its share in establishing policies for player health and safety, there was no established external force to do so beyond public sentiment. Three years of oversight with the threat of additional investigations or civil actions helps add teeth to the continued work of improving the league.
The AGs can initiate future investigations, and they have the right to bring civil action against the league in the courts of D.C., Illinois and New York.
There are also three provisions that, if the NWSL fails to meet them, could have additional penalties: if the NWSL fails to pay the players via the $5 million fund; if the league fails to perform any of the 'programmatic relief requirements' (the policy changes, etc.) within a certain timeframe; or if the league is charged by one of the AGs with breaking the laws cited in the agreement (Title VII of the Civil Rights Act or any of the three states' human rights laws). If any of those happen, the AGs can investigate and/or bring a civil action against the league, and issue a $2 million penalty that would be paid out to their three offices.
Advertisement
The oversight agreed to in this settlement cannot be extended past three years. However, any one of the attorneys general could open a new investigation if necessary after the three years end. The offices hope that if anything were to occur after that, players would feel empowered to report misconduct to their offices.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial recap: Ex-girlfriend 'Jane' faces more cross-examination, says she initiated some 'hotel nights'
The trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs continued Wednesday in Manhattan federal court, with 'Jane' — a pseudonym for an alleged victim and ex-girlfriend of Combs — returning to the witness stand for a fifth day of testimony in the high-profile sex trafficking case. Federal prosecutors say that for decades, Combs abused, threatened and coerced women to participate in drug-fueled marathon sexual encounters called 'freak offs' and used his business empire, along with guns, kidnapping and arson, to conceal his crimes. In direct testimony, Jane tearfully recounted the 'freak offs'— which she called 'hotel nights' — telling the court that she felt obligated to 'perform' sex acts for Combs with other men because he was paying her rent. She also testified about a brutal assault she endured before Combs ordered her to cover up her injuries and take ecstasy for an impromptu 'hotel night.' Facing more cross-examination by the defense on Wednesday, Jane told the court that she initiated some of the encounters, including one in which she hired two men. She appeared emotional while reading texts she sent to Combs in 2023, calling him a 'blessing' and saying she was grateful that he was taking care of her financially. Combs's defense team said it will finish Jane's cross-examination Thursday morning. The 55-year-old hip-hop mogul is facing five criminal counts: one count of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. Combs has pleaded not guilty. If convicted, he could face life in prison. Here are some key takeaways from Wednesday's testimony culled from various reporters and news organizations in the courtroom, including CNN, NBC News and the Washington Post. Before Jane's testimony got underway, Judge Arun Subramanian listened to arguments over a prosecution request to dismiss one of the jurors for reasons that have not yet been made public. Prosecutor Maurene Comey told Subramanian that the government was initially reluctant to ask for the removal of juror no. 6, but has since concluded the juror appears to have shown 'a lack of candor with the court that raises serious issues.' Defense attorney Alexandra Shapiro objected, saying it was a 'thinly veiled effort to dismiss a Black juror.' Subramanian said he would handle the issue on Thursday after hearing in writing from both sides. Under cross-examination by the defense, Jane acknowledged that she once threatened to not participate in a 'hotel night' with Combs for Valentine's Day 2022 after she saw social media posts of him on vacation with another woman. She demanded that he leave the vacation a day early and return to her. When he agreed, she planned the 'hotel night,' decorating the room with rose petals and hiring two male entertainers to have sex with her while Combs watched. Jane testified that it was her idea to have the two men in the room with her at the same time. 'Yes, that was my suggestion,' Jane said in court, adding that Combs was 'excited about that.' In late August 2022, Jane testified that she told Combs how much she appreciated the sexual encounters after a hotel night with him and a sex worker named Paul. Jane texted Combs that she's 'having so much fun' and she would 'never take this for granted and will always make sure you are taken care of.' Big picture: The defense is seeking to refute the prosecution's claims that the alleged victims were coerced by Combs into participating in the marathon sexual encounters by showing they were willing participants. Having Jane acknowledge that she arranged a 'hotel night' with two men, and later saying she was having 'fun' is part of that effort. On the witness stand, Jane read text messages she sent to Combs in April 2023 after a hotel night, right around the time she moved into a rented Los Angeles home, which Combs is currently paying for. 'The fact that you are the reason for my child's joy is a feeling inside me that I can't explain,' Jane read, tearing up. 'You are truly a blessing in my life, I have never had a man take care of me like you do,' Jane continued. 'You are my lover, my partner, my boyfriend,' she wrote.


Los Angeles Times
4 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Harvey Weinstein found guilty of sexual assault in New York retrial, aquitted on another charge
Harvey Weinstein, the fallen Hollywood executive whose decades-long history of alleged sexual assault sparked the #MeToo movement and calls against workplace harassment across entertainment and beyond, was found guilty of one 2006 sexual assault but acquitted on another from the same year in the high-profile retrial of his sex crimes case in New York. The majority-female jury handed down its split verdict after a week of deliberation. Weinstein was convicted in February 2020 of rape and a felony sex crime connected to individual allegations from accusers Jessica Mann and Mimi Haley, respectively. He was acquitted at the time on two charges of predatory sexual assault. A month later, he was sentenced to 23 years in prison. A New York appeals court overturned Weinstein's rape conviction in April 2024. On Wednesday, he was convicted of forcing oral sex on Haley and acquitted of the same regarding former model Kaja Sokola. The jury was hung on a third charge of raping Mann in 2013, the Associated Press reported. In closing arguments, which concluded June 4, Weinstein's defense attorney Arthur L. Aidala downplayed his client's alleged assaults as part of a 'courting game' and said they were 'transactional' exchanges of favors. According to Aidala, prosecutors were 'trying to police the bedroom.' Weinstein had become 'the poster boy, the original sinner, for the #MeToo movement,' he added. Prosecutor Nicole Blumberg took a different tone, throwing Aidala's phrases back at the defense: 'This was not a 'courting game,' as Mr. Aidala wants you to believe. This was not a 'transaction.' 'This was never about 'fooling around.' It was about rape,' she said. Weinstein's retrial began April 23 and featured emotional testimony from former Weinstein Co. production assistant Haley and once-aspiring actor Mann, who returned to the stand, plus Sokola, who did not testify against the mogul in the 2020 trial. Judge Curtis Farber oversaw the proceedings. The disgraced Hollywood boss, 73, was tried on the allegations that led to his original rape and felony sex act conviction, plus a new sexual assault charge stemming from Sokola's allegation that he forced oral sex on her in 2006 when she was 19. Weinstein pleaded not guilty to all those charges and his defense maintained the alleged sexual encounters were consensual. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Three Virginia high school students seeking $10M in lawsuit over principal's accusation of ‘racist harassment'
Three Virginia high school students are suing their principal, alleging defamation for being called racist over a birthday card and gift they gave a fellow student they insist is a friend. Three students at Kellam High School in Virginia Beach say Ryan Schubart, the school's principal, 'published materially false and defamatory statements in an email addressed to the entire student body on or about March 13, 2025,' according to reporting from WAVY. The students are seeking $10 million in damages. According to court documents obtained by the outlet, the principal claimed the students engaged in 'racist harassment' and 'will be disciplined to the fullest extent possible.' The plaintiffs were reportedly part of a 'close friend group,' which included a student who was allegedly a victim of racial harassment. Tim Anderson, an attorney representing the students, said: 'They shouldn't have been brought out to the town square and castigated in front of the entire community, with adults weighing in, calling them racist. You don't do that to children. It ruins their lives.' He added that what Schubart wrote in the email was not an accurate reflection of what occurred. Per court records, on March 12, the birthday of the alleged victim, the plaintiffs 'presented the gift recipient with a gift intended as a joke consisting of handwritten notes on a birthday card, a bag of fried chicken, and various candy, which was received in the same spirit as a friendly gift by the recipient.' The entire encounter lasted between two to three minutes, court records state. Security footage of the incident showed 'The plaintiffs, the gift recipient and other students laughing, hugging and engaging in friendly behavior.' In his email, the principal wrote that a staff member intervened after witnessing the exchange, which Anderson disputes. 'The principal said that a teacher had to break up the incident that didn't happen,' he told the TV station. 'We have video evidence [that this] absolutely did not happen.' 'All of these boys were close friends. The Black child, [it] was his birthday,' Anderson said. 'The boys were bringing him a gift for his birthday, a gift that he asked for. The child said that the card that was given to him was funny.' He continued: '[The] principal had all that information, but he omitted it, and he spun it up as this is an incident of racial harassment, racial bullying.' The attorney claims the plaintiffs 'have been threatened and property damage has occurred.' The boys have also been removed from the school. The Independent has emailed Kellam High School for comment.