USCIS Assists in Investigation Leading to Conviction of Indian Citizen for Submitting Fraudulent Immigration Application
BURLINGTON, Vt. – U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services provided valuable assistance to the investigation that led to the conviction of an Indian citizen for submitting a fraudulent immigration application.
The U.S Attorney's Office in Vermont announced the conviction and sentencing of Nasir Hussain for submitting a false statement of material fact on an immigration application, specifically an I-360 Violence Against Women Act ('VAWA') self-petition. Immediately following his conviction at trial, Hussain was sentenced to time-served.
According to court records and evidence presented at trial, Hussain traveled to Connecticut in October of 2021 for the purpose of entering a sham marriage to a U.S. citizen. Hussain never saw the woman prior to or after the date of the wedding. Hussain then paid for insurance policies in the name of his 'wife,' subscribed to magazines in her name, and ordered merchandise in her name, all to manufacture evidence that Hussain and his 'wife' were living together at his Orlando residence. After manufacturing this evidence, Hussain went to an urgent care facility, and falsely claimed he was abused by his 'wife.' Hussain submitted the manufactured evidence and medical records to USCIS in support of an I-360 VAWA self-petition, claiming he was the spouse of an abusive U.S. citizen with whom he had been living in an Orlando apartment. Evidence at trial, including testimony of his 'wife' and former roommates, established beyond a reasonable doubt that Hussain's 'wife' never lived in Florida, and therefore could never have abused him as he alleged. Had Hussain's immigration petition been successful, he would have been awarded a VAWA visa and potentially lawful permanent residence status in the United States.
Hussain has been in federal custody since his arrest in May of 2023 on a wire fraud conspiracy charge. The wire fraud case went to trial in October 2024, resulted in a jury verdict of guilty, which was subsequently set aside by the court via a judgment of acquittal. The United States has entered a notice of appeal of the judgment of acquittal that remains pending.
This investigation was conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation with valuable support provided by USCIS.
To report suspected immigration benefit fraud or abuse to USCIS, please use the USCIS Tip Form.
For more information on USCIS and its programs, please visit uscis.gov or follow us on X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, YouTube, Facebook and LinkedIn.
READ SOURCE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Houston U.S. Army member plans move to Honduras after wife's deportation
The Brief Aysaac Correa, a U.S. Army member, plans to move to Honduras to reunite with his wife, Shirly Guardado, who was deported after being in federal custody for over two months. Correa expressed disappointment in the Trump administration, feeling betrayed after voting for him and serving the country, as he believed only violent criminals would be targeted. While Guardado has the option to return to the U.S. legally, the process will take time, and the couple has already started working on it. HOUSTON - Aysaac Correa, an active-duty U.S. Army member, is preparing to leave the country to reunite with his wife, Shirly Guardado, who was deported to Honduras. What they're saying Aysaac Correa is counting down the days until June 16, when he plans to sell all his belongings and move to Honduras to be with his wife and their one-year-old son. Guardado was in federal custody for over two months before her deportation. "It was a chill that came down my spine," Correa said. "It felt almost as bad as finding out that she got taken in by ICE, but at the same time, I have the possibility of going to see her again." Guardado described her difficult journey via Facetime, recounting her experience of being taken from the Montgomery Processing Center in Conroe. She was shackled on a plane with mostly men, traveling through Louisiana and Texas before reaching Honduras. "This administration, they're being heartless," Correa said. "They're targeting people coming out of their cases, their hearings. They're out of control." Correa expressed disappointment in President Donald Trump, whom he voted for, believing he would target only violent criminals. As a U.S. Army member, Correa feels betrayed by the administration's actions. "It is exhausting. Putting my life on the line for this country wasn't an easy decision. Honestly, I just feel betrayed," he said. A video captured the moment Guardado arrived in Honduras. While she is now free, Correa can only communicate with her through video calls until they reunite. What's next Guardado still has the option to return to the United States legally, but the process will take time. The couple has already begun working on it. Correa has put in a transfer to the Soto Cano Air Base, which is a part of the Joint Task Force-Bravo, a military base in Honduras. The backstory Shirly entered the U.S. illegally in 2014 at age 16 and was issued an expedited removal order, later released under supervision. She has consistently reported to immigration authorities, graduated from high school, and married Asyaac, an active-duty U.S. Army service member, in 2022. In 2023, U.S. Customs and Immigration Services (USCIS) approved Asyaac's petition for Shirly, making her arrest unexpected. Dig deeper When a petition is approved by USCIS, it means they have determined the petitioner meets the requirements for the requested immigration benefit and has approved the petition. This approval is typically followed by an official notice, such as Form I-797 Notice of Action, which can be used as evidence of the approval. Correa filed Shirly's petition, and it was approved on November 18, 2023, and is sponsoring her request for Military Parole in Place – which the couple were waiting for. Military Parole in Place (PIP) is a program that allows certain family members of U.S. military personnel, veterans, or reservists who entered the U.S. without authorization to remain in the country for a specified period. It provides temporary legal status to these family members, enabling them to stay while addressing their immigration status and potentially applying for permanent residency. Timeline FOX 26 news reporter Jonathan Mejia first reported the story before it gained national attention. March 15, 2025: Houston family faces separation after ICE arrests Honduran mother despite documentation May 2, 2025: Houston father and son celebrate birthday amid mother's ICE detention June 6, 2025:Houston U.S. Army member plans move to Honduras after wife's deportation The other side On Friday night, ICE sent FOX 26 Houston a statement: STATEMENT: Shirley Daniela Guardado-Funez, a 27-year-old alien from Honduras, illegally entered the United States on or around Feb. 22, 2014, and was immediately apprehended by the U.S. Border Patrol. Guardado was processed as an expedited removal and released on an order of supervision based on the immigration enforcement priorities at that time. Guardado filed a request for parole in place with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Dec. 14, 2023. However, that request was denied May 29, 2024. As an alien in expedited removal proceedings, Guardado is not entitled to an immigration hearing or eligible to adjust her status and is subject to mandatory detention. To ensure compliance with the law, ICE took her into custody March 13, 2025, and she was taken to the Montgomery Processing Center in Conroe, Texas. On May 30, ICE removed Guardado-Funez to Honduras. ON BACKGROUND: On Jan. 21, 2025, the Department of Homeland Security published a notice in the Federal Register titled Designating Aliens for Expedited Removal that restored the scope of expedited removal to the fullest extent authorized by Congress under section 235(b)(1)(A)(iii) of the INA. Aliens in expedited removal proceedings – who have not expressed an intent to apply for asylum or a fear of persecution or torture should they be returned to their country of origin – are not entitled to an immigration hearing before an immigration judge or to appeal the expedited removal order to the Board of Immigration Appeals. Aliens who are subject to expedited removal are not entitled to adjust their status. Military parole in place allows certain alien family members of U.S. military personnel, veterans, and enlistees to remain in the United States legally. It is granted on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit, allowing individuals who entered the U.S. without authorization to stay for a certain period of time. ICE's detention authority is based on the furtherance of an alien's immigration proceedings, and if so ordered, their removal from the country. Federal immigration laws mandate the detention of certain categories of aliens, including terrorist aliens, aliens with certain criminal convictions, arriving aliens, and aliens in the expedited removal process. Aliens who have been authorized to work in the U.S. (work permits) are not conferred any form of lawful status and can be placed in immigration proceedings or detained at any time. The Source FOX 26's Jonathan Mejia spoke with Aysaac Correa and his wife, Shirly Guardado.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Alaska state judge dismisses murder case, citing widespread misconduct by local police
The Southeast Alaska village of Metlakatla is seen in an undated photo. (Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities photo) In an extraordinary order, a Ketchikan Superior Court judge has dismissed murder charges against a Metlakatla man, citing a lengthy series of errors, lies and evidence concealed from defense attorneys by the Metlakatla Police Department. The errors, Judge Daniel Doty said last week in an order, were so severe that defendant Isaac Henderson cannot be guaranteed a fair trial. The order dismisses the charges against Henderson with prejudice, meaning that they cannot be brought again. The dismissal was first reported by the Ketchikan Daily News. 'The record in this case established a unique and egregious pattern of discovery violations and misrepresentations about discovery,' Doty wrote. 'No remedy short of dismissal with prejudice would remedy the prejudice to Mr. Henderson or deter similar violations in the future,' he said. Prosecutors with the Alaska Department of Law have filed a motion asking the judge to reconsider his dismissal. Meanwhile, Angie Kemp, director of the department's criminal division since 2022, said on Friday that her division has suspended all work with the Metlakatla Police Department until the department undergoes reforms. That extreme — possibly unprecedented — act means state attorneys will not prosecute criminal cases coming from Metlakatla's police department unless they involve particularly serious crimes. 'It's an extreme remedy, but one that's necessary,' Kemp said by phone on Friday. Metlakatla is located at the tip of southern Southeast Alaska, on the Annette Island Reserve, Alaska's only Indian reservation. Bruce Janes, a member of the local police department for 31 years and chief for eight, is no longer working there, Kemp said. She's since spoken with Desmond King, chief of Metlakatla's fire department and now its interim police chief, requesting changes to police department procedures. 'And I've explained to him that until those steps are taken, the Department of Law can't continue to prosecute cases, absent extreme circumstances, out of Metlakatla where those cases involve Metlakatla Police Department officers,' Kemp said. Metlakatla Mayor Albert Smith was out of the office and unavailable to talk by phone, town staff said on Friday. A message left on his cellphone was not returned. King, speaking by phone, said that in addition to acting as fire chief and interim police chief, he's also the town's deputy police commissioner. 'I actually carry a few hats right now, while we're in the rebuilding stage. … We're in a very stressful situation,' he said. Asked about Kemp's decision to temporarily stop work with Metlakatla's police, he said he was familiar with it. 'I totally understand that,' King said. 'That's what I would expect them to do, because it was some internal issues that we have to fix, and we're really going to be at Ground Zero. It's all about building everything as fast as we can, but as responsible as we can.' Smith declined extensive comment, citing the mayor's unavailability on Friday, but said that officials in Metlakatla are aware of the department's problems and the need to fix them. 'It's going to be a long, long-term project, but there's a lot of of the infrastructure and smaller things that we can take care of immediately and be very proactive in re-establishing all the relationships we have with the DA's office, working with the Alaska Police Standards Council, (Bureau of Indian Affairs) Justice System, they're involved now. We have a lot of support. We definitely don't feel alone,' he said. The turmoil surrounding the Metlakatla Police Department stems from the 2021 shooting death of Tyler Henderson. After an investigation by local police and Alaska State Troopers, the Department of Law charged Henderson's brother, Isaac, with his murder. The case was frequently delayed, and Isaac Henderson's defense was repeatedly reassigned to five different public defenders who apparently took little action on the issue as it lingered in court. Four years on, it remains unclear whether the shooting was accidental, an act of self-defense — as Isaac Henderson claimed — or murder. As Henderson's trial approached, his attorneys — John Phillips and Julia Graves — began challenging some of the evidence that prosecutors planned to present. Neither attorney answered phone calls Friday seeking comment. During a series of evidentiary hearings in April, former Metlakatla police officer Austin McKeehan said that he falsified evidence reports. Former police chief Janes, under questioning, said he had made false statements to the grand jury that indicted Henderson, falsely claiming that he submitted a piece of evidence to the state crime lab. At the hearing, Janes admitted that the investigation was 'very sloppy' and 'probably the worst I've ever done.' In another hearing, Janes testified that the department routinely destroys evidence logs every year, making it impossible to guarantee that evidence is properly stored and not tampered with. On May 5, at a hearing the judge called 'shocking,' Janes revealed previously undisclosed witness interviews to both prosecutors and defense. During a trial's 'discovery' process, prosecutors are required to share possible evidence with defense attorneys. Janes, at this point in the case, produced several pieces of hard-copy evidence from within the case file that had not been shared with either prosecutors or the defense. 'If the prosecutor did review the file, the prosecutor saw a number of items that he had not seen before but failed to disclose those documents or identify them during the discovery hearing. If the prosecutor did not review the file, the failure to do so is inexplicable,' Doty wrote in his order. Before another hearing, Janes provided several hard drives to the prosecutor. Those contained possible evidence. The state contends that there was no time to share them with the defense before the hearing; the defense argued that withholding them until the hearing was part of a continued pattern. Under normal circumstances, it would be appropriate for a judge to postpone the case until everyone is certain that all evidence has been fairly shared. In this case, Doty said, he doesn't have confidence that will ever occur. 'Police officers knowingly completed inaccurate chain of custody logs, destroyed chain of custody logs, made contradictory and irreconcilable statements under oath about what physical evidence had been collected or tested, and stated — repeatedly and falsely — that they had provided all the available evidence in the case,' Doty wrote in his order. 'More importantly, though, the evidence here raised serious and substantial questions about whether the state has committed additional discovery violations that have not yet come to light,' he said, using 'state' to refer to both police and prosecutors. Given that doubt, he said, it is appropriate to dismiss the case. 'In short, the police misrepresented or forgot so many facts about discovery that it is impossible to determine, and will likely not be possible to ever determine, whether the state complied with its discovery obligations in this case.' In court, the Hendersons' mother, Naomi Leask, said she and other members of her family moved from Metlakatla to Ketchikan in order to stay with Isaac Henderson and secure his bail. Speaking to Doty, she said that regardless of how the case is resolved, they do not expect to ever return to Metlakatla. In town, said King, the interim police chief, there's work to be done. 'The temperature of our community, it feels a little off, the anguish and stuff that people feel,' he said. 'But you know, it's improving from this day, moving forward. We have to make sure we do it right and do it right by our people.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
2nd man convicted of human smuggling after family froze to death at Manitoba border files notice of appeal
Both men convicted of human smuggling following a trial last year have now filed notices of appeal, in a case where a family of four from India froze to death as they tried to walk across the international border from Manitoba in blizzard conditions in 2022. A lawyer for Harshkumar Patel filed the notice in United States District Court in the District of Minnesota on Friday, after lawyers for co-accused Steve Shand filed his notice of appeal on Wednesday. The notice said Patel plans to appeal both his conviction and sentence, and that he intends to challenge the constitutionality and application of sentencing guidelines in the case. Last week, Patel and Shand were sentenced in a Minnesota courtroom to lengthy prison terms for their roles in carrying out a scheme to bring Indian migrants into the U.S. from Canada. Patel, an Indian national arrested in Chicago last year, was sentenced to just over 10 years in prison for co-ordinating the smuggling operation and hiring Shand, a Florida resident, to drive the migrants once they walked over the border into the U.S. Shand was arrested near the border the night the family died. He was found, along with other Indian nationals, in a van stuck in the snow on the Minnesota side of the border that night. Last week, he was handed a sentence of six and a half years in prison to be followed by a period of supervised release. The two men were tried and convicted in the federal courthouse in Fergus Falls, Minn., last November, after a jury deliberated for less than 90 minutes before returning with guilty verdicts on all four charges each of the men faced related to bringing unauthorized people into the U.S., transporting them and profiting from it. The men's notices of appeal come more than three years after four members of the Patel family (who were not related to Harshkumar Patel) died while trying to walk across the border. The frozen bodies of 39-year-old Jagdish Patel, his 37-year-old wife, Vaishali, their 11-year-old daughter, Vihangi and their three-year-old son, Dharmik, were found in a snow-drifted Manitoba field about 12 metres from the U.S. border on Jan. 19, 2022. The temperature that day was –23 C, but the wind chill made it feel like the –35 to –38 range. U.S. federal prosecutors had recommended sentences of nearly 20 years for Patel, and nearly 11 years for Shand. Both men's lawyers had asked for lower sentences than what prosecutors were seeking. Patel's lawyers argued at trial he was wrongfully accused in the case, while Shand's described their client as an unsuspecting cab driver duped by Patel into shuttling migrants into the U.S. after they walked across the international border illegally. Court heard Patel, who appeared at his May 28 sentencing in an orange uniform and handcuffed, is likely to be deported to his native India after completing his sentence. Shand left the courthouse with his lawyers, and will be taken into custody at a later date. In April, a judge rejected requests to acquit or order new trials for the men, whose lawyers had argued the evidence against their clients was insufficient. To date, no one in Canada is facing charges in the case. RCMP previously said the investigation was ongoing, and did not respond to a request for an update last week.
