Scottish Government responds as Alexander Dennis set to move to England
On Wednesday, Alexander Dennis announced it will look at consolidating its UK bus body manufacturing operations into a single site in Scarborough, England.
The proposal would mean its Scottish-based manufacturing site in Falkirk, which has already been reduced in recent years, would be discontinued and closed.
Around 400 roles in Scotland are at risk of redundancy - approximately 22% of Alexander Dennis' UK workforce.
Around 400 jobs are set to be lost (Image: NQ) The company said the proposed plans were "extremely regrettable" but that "significant action" needed to be taken to drive efficiency.
The Scottish Government has since responded to the announcement, with Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes saying it was "a worrying time" for the staff, their families and the wider community.
READ MORE: Scottish Government rules out reopening national park process
Forbes (below) said: 'In recent weeks, the Scottish Government has engaged extensively with Alexander Dennis and its parent company NFI to understand the issues and ensure that every possible avenue is explored to mitigate the need for redundancies.
'This has included discussions with myself, the First Minister, leadership within Scottish Enterprise and Transport Scotland and the UK Government.
'The Scottish Government will continue to explore any and all options throughout the consultation period to allow the firm to retain their hard-working employees and manufacturing and production facilities at Falkirk and Larbert.
'In the event of any job losses, the Scottish Government will provide support through our Partnership Action for Continuing Employment initiative.'
READ MORE: Scottish Government receives more than 80 Grangemouth projects proposals
Meanwhile, First Minister John Swinney wrote on Twitter/X: "This will be an incredibly worrying time for workers at Alexander Dennis and their families.
"The Scottish Government will leave no stone unturned and explore all options that could protect jobs and manufacturing at Larbert.
"We stand ready to support anyone affected."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
PNC convinces US appeals court to overturn $218 mln USAA patent verdict
June 12 (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Thursday sided with PNC Bank [RIC:RIC: and overturned a $218 million verdict won by financial services provider United Services Automobile Association (USTEX.O), opens new tab in a patent dispute over mobile check-deposit technology. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said, opens new tab that the patents USAA had accused PNC of infringing were invalid. The case is part of a series of patent lawsuits brought by USAA against other financial services providers over its technology. San Antonio-based USAA has settled similar disputes with banks including Wells Fargo and Truist and filed a related ongoing lawsuit against Regions Bank in January. Spokespeople and an attorney for USAA did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the Thursday decision. A PNC spokesperson said the bank appreciates that the court "recognized that USAA's patents should never have been issued." USAA said in its 2020 lawsuit against PNC that its "Deposit@Home" technology was developed to allow military members overseas to deposit checks remotely. It had convinced a Texas jury in 2022 that PNC's mobile deposit feature worked in the same way as its patented technology and owed $218 million for violating its rights. PNC told the Federal Circuit that the 2022 verdict could not stand because the patents were invalid. A three-judge panel agreed with PNC on Thursday, finding that the patents covered "the abstract idea of depositing a check using a mobile device" using "only routine and well-known steps." The case is United Services Automobile Association v. PNC Bank NA, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 23-1778. For USAA: Willy Jay of Goodwin Procter For PNC: Mark Fleming of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr Read more: USAA wins $218 mln verdict from PNC in mobile-deposit tech trial
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Mediobanca great escape has more twists ahead
LONDON, June 12 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Judging by the Mediobanca ( opens new tab stock price, CEO Alberto Nagel has pulled off an M&A defence coup. His move to snap up a rival wealth group has helped boost the 16-billion-euro Italian bank's shares, taking their price above the level of a hostile offer from Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena ( opens new tab (MPS). Yet Nagel can't sit easy: key votes and his own investors complicate matters. After MPS made an unsolicited offer for Mediobanca in January, the Milan-based group's boss put together an alternative path with a 6-billion-euro plan to buy Banca Generali ( opens new tab, a wealth manager owned by insurer Assicurazioni Generali ( opens new tab. By moving to create a large money-management business, Nagel has boosted his stock. Mediobanca now trades around 9% above the value of the all-share MPS offer. One interpretation is that investors are excited about the prospect of an enlarged wealth player if the Banca Generali deal goes through. One complicating factor, however, is that some of Nagel's biggest shareholders are not yet endorsing the Banca Generali purchase, which requires 50% approval at a June 16 Mediobanca shareholder meeting. Billionaire Francesco Gaetano Caltagirone, who owns 10% of Mediobanca and 5% of MPS, has said that Nagel's deal lacks industrial logic. He has also been buying stock ahead of the meeting, which may partly explain why Mediobanca's shares have risen. Then there's Delfin, which owns nearly 20% of Mediobanca and a tenth of MPS. If that vehicle and Caltagirone oppose the Banca Generali acquisition, Nagel would need a minimum 60% vote turnout and the support of most other shareholders to carry the day. He may feel OK about that risk, since other shareholders have backed the deal. But the next question is whether the insurer Assicurazioni Generali, which owns 50% of the similarly named wealth manager, will agree to sell to Mediobanca and at what price. The slim current 9% premium versus Banca Generali's undisturbed price, and the fact that Nagel is offering to pay in kind through Mediobanca's shares in Generali, make the deal vulnerable to a cash counteroffer from a rival suitor. And Generali cannot be seen to give a sweet deal to Mediobanca, its biggest shareholder. The third challenge is MPS itself. True, CEO Luigi Lovaglio seems to be in a tight spot. Just to get its offer up to the current value of Mediobanca, MPS might need to raise its 15-billion-euro bid by over 1 billion euros. Yet by paying much more for his larger rival, Lovaglio risks chasing his tail: his own share price would probably fall, depressing the value of the bid. Yet Lovaglio has other options. He currently wants two-thirds of investors to accept his soon-to-be-launched tender offer, a level that would allow him to merge the two banks and enjoy all the deal benefits. But he could settle for a lower threshold of 50%, or below. And if Delfin and Caltagirone backed him, he would already be at 30%. Such a move would be sub-optimal. With a lower take-up, Lovaglio would be under pressure to buy the rest, and might not get some or even most of the deal's synergies, which include 300 million euros of cost savings as well as tax benefits. Yet he could still exert control over his target. Mediobanca, meanwhile, would get the disruption of a takeover, and a more complex governance. Nagel's great escape is not yet complete. Follow @Unmack1, opens new tab on X
North Wales Chronicle
3 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Government ‘putting its money where its mouth is' with £200m for Acorn scheme
Ministers confirmed they are meeting in full the request for development funding for the Acorn project in Aberdeenshire – the first time a government has provided funding of this scale for such a project to proceed. The scheme, which proposes storing emissions from across Scotland under the North Sea, had previously been overlooked for support despite repeated calls from the Scottish Government and others for it to be backed. With the UK Government also pledging to support the Viking carbon capture and storage (CCS) project in the Humber, Mr Miliband insisted the two schemes will 'support industrial renewal' with 'thousands of highly skilled jobs'. According to the sector, Acorn could support about 15,000 jobs at its peak, with up to 20,000 jobs at the Viking project. As it develops, it is planned the Acorn site will link up with the former oil refinery at Grangemouth via more than 200 miles of pipelines. An existing 175 miles of gas pipes will be repurposed for this, with 35 miles of new pipeline also being built, allowing CO2 from the Grangemouth site to be transported to Acorn's storage facilities under the North Sea. The move is seen by many as being key in securing a future for the facility, where some 400 workers were recently made redundant. Speaking as he visited the site near Peterhead, Aberdeenshire, Mr Miliband said: 'This Government is putting its money where its mouth is and backing the trailblazing Acorn and Viking CCS projects. 'This will support industrial renewal in Scotland and the Humber with thousands of highly-skilled jobs at good wages to build Britain's clean energy future. 'Carbon capture will make working people in Britain's hard-working communities better off, breathing new life into their towns and cities and reindustrialising the country through our Plan for Change.' Mr Miliband visited the site the day after Rachel Reeves promised funding for Acorn in her spending review – although the Chancellor did not put a figure on how much support would be given in her statement to MPs. Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said afterwards: 'The £200 million funding confirmed for the Acorn carbon capture project will help to support the design and preparation as it continues to progress. 'This is about revitalising our industrial communities and creating long-term economic opportunities for Scottish workers.' Tim Stedman, chief executive of Storegga, the lead developer of Acorn, said: 'We warmly welcome the UK Government's support for the Acorn project and the commitment to development funding that will enable the critical work needed to reach final investment decision.' He added the 'milestone' is 'key not only for Acorn but for establishing Scotland's essential CCS infrastructure needed to grow and scale the UK's wider carbon capture and storage industry'. Mr Stedman continued: 'We look forward to working with Government in the months ahead to understand the details of today's commitment, and to ensure the policy, regulatory and funding frameworks are in place to build and grow a world-leading UK CCS sector.' Graeme Davies, executive vice-president at Harbour Energy, which is leading the Viking project, said the commitment in the spending review 'sends a strong signal' that the project is 'an infrastructure-led economic growth priority' for the Parliament. He added: 'We will work with Government on the critical steps needed to progress Viking CCS towards a final investment decision.' However climate campaigners at Friends of the Earth said the money should instead be invested in public transport, energy efficiency and measures to support oil workers to transition to jobs in the renewables sector. Caroline Rance, head of campaigns at Friends of the Earth Scotland, said: 'This is an enormous handout of supposedly scarce public money that will only directly benefit greedy oil and gas companies. 'Politicians are paying hundreds of millions to keep us locked into an unaffordable energy system which is reliant on fossil fuels and is destroying the climate. 'Carbon capture technology has 50 years of failure behind it, so businesses, workers and the public are being sold a lie about its role in their future. 'Building new fossil fuel infrastructure will undermine the energy transition and embolden oil firms to keep on drilling in the North Sea. 'Both the UK and Scottish governments should instead be backing climate solutions that can improve people's lives such as upgrading public transport, ensuring people live in warm homes and creating green jobs for the long-term.'
