Queen's University Belfast divests from Israeli interests in protest over Gaza conflict
Queen's University
Belfast
has confirmed it has divested from
Israeli
companies and universities.
A representative for the university told The Irish Times on Friday that 'the final research partnership with an Israeli institution came to an end this week'.
The university confirmed it has 'no student exchange programmes with Israel' and 'no direct investment in any Israeli companies'.
In June 2024 Queen's announced it would divest from companies blacklisted by the
United Nations
Human Rights Council, which identifies firms operating in settlements in occupied
Palestinian
territories that it considers illegal under international law.
READ MORE
[
TCD's Israeli boycott draws criticism from Ireland's Jewish community
Opens in new window
]
While the university did not hold any direct investments in Israeli companies on the UN blacklist, it held a number of indirect investments through managed fund products.
In May 2024, pro-Palestine student protesters occupied the main building at Queen's University, calling on the university to 'review all ties' with Israeli institutions and universities.
Four months later, four men were arrested during a pro-Palestinian protest at Queen's during a protest at the visit of former US secretary of state Hillary Clinton.
Kieran Minto, president of university's students' union, told The Irish Times that they welcome the confirmation that the university has fully divested from Israeli companies.
They said the decision was a 'direct result of sustained student organising and advocacy' and they will 'continue to work with Queen's to ensure it upholds its commitments to support scholars and students at risk from the devastation in Gaza'.
In a statement on Instagram, the 'Decolonise, Demilitarise and Democratise Group' led by students at Queen's rejected 'any narrative suggesting the decision was simply a reaction to actions taken at other universities'.
[
Israel confirms it is arming 'clans' in Gaza to combat Hamas
Opens in new window
]
They said the decision to divest was 'the result of more than a year of positioning, manoeuvring and sustained negotiation with the university'.
The board of Trinity College Dublin voted to cut all ties with Israeli universities and institutions on Wednesday.
The decision followed a series of meetings of a taskforce set up between staff and student representatives.
These meetings were arranged as part of an agreement to end a five-day encampment that was set up on the university's campus in May 2024.
Jenny Maguire, outgoing president of Trinity College Dublin Students' Union, called the decision a 'historic win' which 'must be a catalyst for action across this island'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
As Palestinians starve an hour's drive away in Gaza, here in Israel, everyone went to the beach
June is here. Summer has arrived. And the beaches in Tel Aviv are full. Just an hour's drive away, two million Palestinians are on the brink of starvation. The incongruity of those few words and the bizarre contrast of imagery – the busy beach in Tel Aviv, the dystopia in Gaza – are hard to digest, I imagine, for many in Ireland. They are perhaps shocking, incomprehensible, and sickening even. This, however, is the reality of life, and of course death, here in Israel and nearby Gaza. Writing those words does not come with judgment. I am simply observing. I also went to the beach in Tel Aviv last weekend. My photograph accompanies the digital version of this article. I recently returned from a 10-day holiday in Spain with my two young daughters. As we descended into Ben Gurion airport, I was struck by the casual announcement of the El Al air stewardess when she politely requested passengers to donate to the spare change program to support children in need in Israel. I wondered if, when hearing those words, 'children in need in Israel', any of my fellow passengers thought for a moment about the estimated 18,000 Palestinian children dead in Gaza and the hundreds of thousands more on the brink of famine. Israelis find themselves now living between two realities. There is the dystopian reality of Gaza next door, and then there is life in Israel, which has returned to relative normality. Yes, some 23 living hostages remain in Gaza, tens of thousands of reservists have been called up, and every week there are sirens because of incoming missiles from Yemen. But the restaurants are full. Schools are open. Each morning you wake up to make your kids' lunch. The skyline of Tel Aviv is dotted with hundreds of cranes. So how do ordinary Israelis grapple with the dichotomy of a largely known reality of the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza and everyday, often banal life in Israel? A recent opinion piece I wrote in these pages and which I shared on social media – about how the mainstream Israeli media continues to ignore the reality of the truths in Gaza – provoked a critical reaction from some Israeli friends. The conversations I have had over the past week or two largely replicated those I have had with Israelis over the past 18 months of war. READ MORE These difficult conversations illustrate how Israelis justify or internalise the reality of the unfolding horror in Gaza next door to them; how many (not all) refuse to look, or choose not to accept the truths of that horror. There is a clear pattern. At first there's denial, then dismissal and finally, if the discussion continues, disqualification. Denial is essentially an attempt at 'whataboutery' type deflection. There are invariably a few core talking points, each with a kernel of truth. Each is used, I believe, if not to justify Israeli actions in Gaza, but certainly to assuage the conscience of those who voice them. (If there is a risk of sweeping generalisation here, it is a risk I believe is worth taking.) 'There are no innocents in Gaza.' This is repeated ad nauseam. In the context of the deaths of thousands of children, it is particularly egregious to hear. 'Hamas was elected.' Yes, it was. It topped the vote back in 2006 – almost 20 years ago. Opinion polls do, however, continue to show some popular support for Hamas in Gaza. 'Hamas uses civilians as human shields.' This is undeniable. The reality that, in a highly dense urban environment like Gaza, Israeli air strikes will inevitably result in the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent civilians, is often disturbingly shrugged off. [ Seeing Israel use hunger as a weapon of war is monstrous to me as someone with a Holocaust legacy Opens in new window ] 'Hamas brought this upon themselves.' At its crudest, this is the schoolyard retort, the contemporary 'they started it'. Everything apparently began with the savagery of the terrorist attack on the morning of Oct 7th, 2023, when 1,200 Israelis were murdered in a few short hours. The brutality of 50-plus years of occupation is ignored. The second stage is dismissal. Dismissal essentially questions the motives of the person who challenges the Israeli consensus. I have been accused of being 'woke', 'virtue signalling' and a lot worse. In the dismissal stage, the attention switches from a denial of the facts to a focus on the tone or language of the conversation at hand. This is often used to bring admittedly heated conversations to an abrupt end. If the conversation continues, the final and third stage is disqualification. This is the othering phase. You lack the essential rights to criticise. You are delegitimised as not 'Israeli enough', unable to grasp the weight and struggles of Jewish history. The undeniable exponential rise in global anti-Semitism raises its head here. Deflection, dismissal and disqualification can at times follow each other in a matter of very short minutes. I have come to understand that the Israelis who cling to them do so as a personal coping mechanism. To acknowledge or accept that the state they hold so dear, a refuge from the Holocaust, is capable of genocide, of war crimes, of imposing starvation on two million people is emotionally crushing. This is not about media censorship, but self-deception. The truth is simply too difficult to bear. So, a heartfelt message to my fellow Israelis. Outspoken opposition to Binyamin Netanyahu is not enough. Publicly calling for an end to the war is insufficient. It is not necessary to embrace the labels 'war crimes', 'genocide' or 'ethnic cleansing'. It is necessary to recognise the reality of the horror unleashed by the Israeli state on Gaza, to acknowledge the depths and scale of the humanitarian catastrophe. I understand many of my fellow Israelis are psychologically and politically broken following the trauma of October 7th. But claims of deniability of what has happened and is happening in Gaza in our name will not be ignored. Indifference will not be forgiven. Silence will not be forgotten. Paul Kearns is an Irish-born freelance journalist based in Tel Aviv
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Colm Keena takes a closer look at St Stephen Green properties
Palestinian ambassador to the UN Riyad Mansour broke down in tears as he described the suffering of children amid the ongoing war in Gaza. Video: Reuters
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Death In Derry - Martin McGuinness and the Derry IRA's War Against The British: Strong on candour, weak on analysis
Death In Derry: Martin McGuinness and the Derry IRA's War Against The British Author : Jonathan Trigg ISBN-13 : 978-1785375477 Publisher : Merrion Press Guideline Price : €19.99 This book is a valuable contribution to the literature of the Troubles period and the history of the IRA. Jonathan Trigg has secured interviews with several former British soldiers and IRA members, many under pseudonyms. This is new material. The weaknesses in the book are that it is not strong on political analysis and that it accepts simplistic versions of key events such as the Battle of the Bogside and the Falls Road rioting of August 1969. He says, for instance, that the 1971 internment raids were not extended to loyalists because of unionist pressure. Actually, this was on legal advice that such a measure could not be used against a force that did not threaten the state – the same logic by which the Irish government refused to intern IRA members at the same time. READ MORE Trigg is happy to describe the period of violence as a war, accepting terminology favoured by the IRA themselves. He writes of IRA activists in a tone bordering on admiration, apparently as one soldier respecting others. [ A former British army officer and author on former IRA members opening up to him: 'Trust is a huge issue' Opens in new window ] That will grate with some who will prefer a more moralistic approach and will not like to read of murders being described as 'successes'. Trigg is a military historian. His strengths are in understanding military culture and warfare. It is almost endearing how he admits to occasional failings in his research. One IRA man refuses to tell him what he was jailed for and he leaves it at that, when another researcher might have gone into the newspaper archives and found out. He misses some important nuances. In a chapter about the south Derry IRA centred around Bellaghy, he attributes the reduced level of republican militancy in the area to the presence of the literary centre Seamus Heaney HomePlace, and the 'thousands of tourists wandering around with their camera phones'. Clearly he hasn't been to Bellaghy lately. However, he has secured the candour of several former Provos and soldiers, and this factor provides an understanding of their actions and their thinking that earns the book a place on the shelves of any serious future researchers or writers on the period. One amusing detail is that the British army developed a remote control camera system for monitoring suspects but had to scrap it because those suspects would hear the click and the whirr of the film winder. That wouldn't be a problem with the technology of today.
