logo
How wealthy Londoners are being priced out of the Cotswolds

How wealthy Londoners are being priced out of the Cotswolds

Yahoo11-05-2025

The Cotswolds needs little introduction. With picturesque countryside and honey-coloured villages packed with handsome homes, private members' clubs, celebrities and tourists, it has long been the ultimate place for Londoners to escape to.
But new figures show that the London exodus to this desirable corner of England has shrunk.
People from the capital accounted for 9pc of people looking to buy a property in the Cotswolds last year, down from a peak of 14pc in 2021, according to analysis by Hamptons.
This is because they are being priced out. Average prices in the Cotswolds have risen 56pc since 2014, twice the growth recorded in London (28pc) over the last decade, according to Hamptons' analysis of Land Registry data.
'Londoners haven't had the housing market on their side for the best part of a decade,' says David Fell, of Hamptons.
The pandemic turbo-charged momentum in the Cotswolds. 'There was an influx of London buyers during Covid who were flush with cash. Larger family homes skyrocketed in price because stock levels were low,' says Amelia Craven, of RA Bennett.
By last year, the average property in the Cotswolds cost 18pc less than one in London, a stark contrast with 2016, when the gap was 34pc.
'While the gap between prices in the capital and pretty much everywhere else peaked around 2016, it's been steadily closing since then,' says Fell. 'Today the gap between prices in the capital and the Cotswolds is around £80,000 smaller than it was at its peak. This means the average Londoner gets less house for more money or faces compromising on a picture-postcard location.'
Demand has been dented in part as the life has gone back to pre-pandemic usual. 'There has certainly been a change in working attitudes,' says Paul Houghton-Brown, of Hamptons. 'People need to be back in the office more and they have less time to enjoy a second home. That second home buyer market has dropped away.'
And owning a holiday home has become much more expensive, after council tax for second properties in the local authority was doubled – although very wealthy buyers may well shrug off this increase. The proportion of second home buyers eyeing the Cotswolds has edged down from 5pc during the pandemic years of 2021 and 2022, to 4pc in 2023 and 2024.
Meanwhile, the staycation boom has eased, taking its toll on lettings, suggests Andrew Cronan, of Recoco Property Search. 'A lot of people purchased Cotswolds property to enjoy as a second home and let out to holidaymakers on platforms, such as Airbnb, but that buyer appetite has cooled off dramatically,' Cronan explains.
'You won't see £20,000 to £30,000 annual income that you were almost guaranteed during the pandemic years. A key reason for this is that a lot of people favour holidaying in sunny locations abroad ever since travel restrictions have been lifted.'
For Lindsay Cuthill, of Blue Book Agency, the market had settled into more typical conditions last year following the Covid rush. 'The urgency had faded, and buyers were making more considered decisions rather than panic purchasing,' he says.
Tighter economic conditions have also piled pressure on buyers, with factors ranging from higher mortgage costs, to increasing tax. This includes a hike in the stamp duty surcharge for second home purchases from 3pc to 5pc in last year's Budget.
'Elections, high interest rates, shifting tax policies, and changes to non-dom rules have cast a shadow over the market, dampening activity across the UK,' says Jonathan Harington, of Haringtons UK. 'The Cotswolds – where the upper end of the market is traditionally driven by discretionary purchases – felt this slowdown even more acutely.'
Despite cooling demand from some buyers, the proportion of big-ticket homes changing hands in the Cotswolds has climbed. The percentage of homes sold for £1m or more reached 9.2pc in 2023, the highest figure in Hamptons' research, which stretches back to 2008. The level dipped to 8.7pc last year.
Harry Gladwin, of The Buying Solution, says: 'The £3m to £7m part of the market is still pretty busy. The wealthy view these homes as a long-term lifestyle, not just a financial decision. Quality and privacy are more important than ever.'
In the £2m to £5m price bracket, 'the real quality, timeless, well-located properties are still sought-after and get premiums. The less special properties, which would have been mopped up in a good market, are left on the shelf', he adds.
The Cotswolds has always been popular, reports Giles Lawton, of Strutt & Parker: 'As one US buyer said: 'You find an area as pretty and accessible as the Cotswolds and I'll buy there. But I can't find it.' That popularity has endured and people tend to stay for a while.'
Against this backdrop, sales in the Cotswolds have become increasingly local. The average distance moved last year was 20.6 miles – 57pc lower than in 2022. And nearly a third of buyers moved less than 10 miles last year, up from a low of 10pc in 2022, according to Hamptons.
Mary Hughes and her husband are selling their four-bedroom home in Broadway, through Chartwell Noble, and downsizing within the village. She says: 'We wouldn't dream of going anywhere else.'
'We have been here for more than 40 years. The attraction was the same then as it is now. We have beautiful, hilly surroundings and honey-coloured stone buildings
'There are many clubs and activities, the Royal Shakespeare Company in nearby Stratford-upon-Avon, and fast trains from Moreton-on-Marsh to London. It's very easy to live here.'
Craven has seen more local movement recently: 'During Covid, that was impossible. Stock levels were low and vendors were looking at Londoners or cash buyers who flooded the market, whereas now, the positive growth in house values has meant that those who were already homeowners in the area prior to this period have built equity to allow them to move more freely,' she explains.
Harry Gladwin, of The Buying Solution, says: 'The local buyers I tend to deal with are either people renting while looking for the right house to buy, or those downsizing from a bigger house with land to a village house.
'I have a few younger clients who moved from London to the Cotswolds 'golden triangle' pre-Covid and sold during or post-Covid. They saw huge increases in their property values during that time. They have now moved to less busy areas of the Cotswolds where they get more value for money.'
It's not just local buyers raising their profile. Claire Whisker, of First In the Door, says one of its buying agents has noticed an uptick in overseas buyers recently, particularly expats returning to the UK and second home buyers from Jamaica, UAE and America.
Buyers seeking better value are looking beyond the Cotswolds' golden epicentre for a similar home at a more affordable price.
Gladwin estimates buyers generally get 10pc more value for money in villages to the west of Stow-on-the-Wold, such as Guiting Power, Naunton and those up towards Snowshill, than in the heart of the Cotswolds.
Nicholas Le Ny-Clarke, of Chartwell Noble, says: 'Londoners are starting to look further afield to villages in Warwickshire, such as Whichford, Cherington and Brailes, as well as those closer to Banbury in Oxfordshire.
'They are looking for the same house but more value for money and a real community. They want a proper local pub that they don't have to book months in advance. People tend to live here year-round.
'A house suitable for the Chipping Norton set might be a third cheaper half an hour away into the borders of Warwickshire and Oxfordshire.'
Buyers tend to get even more value towards Cirencester, Gladwin adds. 'There are some areas where you will see 20pc to 30pc more value compared with the 'golden triangle'. These villages are relatively unspoilt and not in the melee of 'Daylesfordshire'.'
This chimes with Samantha Scott-White, of Cotswold Buying Agent, who says: 'The further south you go, the better value you get. The villages around Cirencester are really lovely. If you want more value for money, head further south towards Tetbury, Nailsworth, Wotton-under-Edge and Sherston.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As Pension Funds Buy Bitcoin, A New Path In Its History Is Traced
As Pension Funds Buy Bitcoin, A New Path In Its History Is Traced

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

As Pension Funds Buy Bitcoin, A New Path In Its History Is Traced

We've seen waves of big institutional players adopt Bitcoin - even traditionally conservative players. The talk of the town has been nation-state adoption of Bitcoin, from El Salvador's experiment with Bitcoin as legal tender to recent actions in the United States with the new Administration. Yet pension funds are inching in as well. A reflection of this has been the small but growing number of pension funds that are adopting Bitcoin - a unique phenomenon that marks a unique path in Bitcoin's evolution that has remained understudied - for the moment. The state of Wisconsin's pension fund has adopted Bitcoin through investment in spot Bitcoin ETFs. An unnamed UK pension scheme has made a 3% allocation to Bitcoin working with Cartwright. The State of Michigan Retirement System has made a multi-million dollar investment in Bitcoin ETFs. And while it's small steps at the beginning, as more institutions gather Bitcoin, this is a promising path forward for adoption. Much of the background research and points come out of a conversation with two sources who have vast experience with pension fund adoption - Sam Roberts of Cartwright, which has advised a UK-based pension fund to allocate 3% towards Bitcoin, and Dom Bei of Proof of Workforce which has helped various unions save holdings in Bitcoin. Pension funds aren't just a new player - they are a different type of player - marking a new evolution for Bitcoin as it matures into the gold standard for digital money. For players in the space, especially pension funds, lasting time horizons are essential. They can't just pull their funds out willy-nilly - they need to be invested in something for at least ten years - and sometimes longer. Pension funds see a difference between Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies - a bias that will persist in both legal systems, in the eyes of nation-states, and institutional players with very long time horizons - such as sovereign wealth funds. Pension funds see Bitcoin as the only option in a crowded field - with other cryptocurrencies going extinct fast compared to Bitcoin. When pension funds evaluate Bitcoin, they must remember that it's like any other asset out there - and that its risk/reward profile stands out to carry the day. As Sam from Cartwright points out, the trick is to get pension trustees to look beyond the polarizing debate and simply counsel to evaluate Bitcoin on its merits and the numbers. If you already believe in the staying power of Bitcoin, then once you take a look at the numbers, Bitcoin stands out as the best-performing financial asset of the last decade. Once you anchor to the math and escape the narrative, Bitcoin paradoxically looks better to institutional players like pension funds. Right now, the winning formula for convincing pension funds is starting (and ending) with Bitcoin in a small percent of their allocation - say in the low single digits towards 1-3%. This smaller allocation allows pension funds not to worry about the short-term volatility of Bitcoin and look more towards the long-term horizon. Even a small allocation can produce outsize returns - enough to justify dipping in. This line of reasoning was part of the reason how Cartwright got a UK pension scheme to allocate 3% to Bitcoin. While most pensions are interested in Bitcoin as a store of value (echoing what's happening in cities and states around the world that want to hold Bitcoin on their reserves), small steps are being taken to explore Bitcoin's use as a medium of exchange - for example, payroll services. While store of value is the more obvious case to push forward, it's clear that there's room for pension funds to experiment with Bitcoin beyond just holding it on their balance sheets - with experiments towards Bitcoin salaries among top Bitcoin companies. It's not just regular pension funds - but also pension funds for blue-collar workers that are looking in. There is a broad appeal to saving beyond just general pension funds. Dom Bei has, for example, onboarded several firefighter unions to start investing in Bitcoin. This is a critical step forward even though it's one thing to get a pension fund in and another to get a union. As he puts it: 'Bitcoin adoption among U.S. pension funds remains low, with few holding it, while unions across public and private sectors increasingly add Bitcoin to their balance sheets. Despite their structural differences, unions and pension funds share a core ethos: advocating for workers' present and future. Both should approach Bitcoin similarly—minimizing risk while learning about a tool born from a financial crisis that devastated workers. As a top 10 global asset by market cap, Bitcoin demands exploration by fund managers and union leaders as a network, financial tool, and store of value for wage-earners.' --- Pension funds are traditionally seen as arch-conservative in their investment choices. The fact that a few are dipping their toes into Bitcoin (and Bitcoin only) is worth examining - tracing a new path for Bitcoin as it continues to march ahead of its crypto competitors.

‘Lack of liquidity' the key factor in decline of the LSE
‘Lack of liquidity' the key factor in decline of the LSE

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

‘Lack of liquidity' the key factor in decline of the LSE

A lack of liquidity due to a relatively low appetite for investment in the UK is the main factor behind the decline of the London Stock Exchange (LSE), according to a commercial growth expert. Speaking on an episode of GlobalData's Instant Insights podcast, Carrie Osman, founder and CEO of growth consultancy Cruxy, suggested there are a range of factors behind companies choosing to list elsewhere or delisting, including some structural, but that, in her view, liquidity is the main issue. 'It doesn't have the liquidity, it doesn't have the buoyancy, and it doesn't, quite frankly, attract the most innovative technologies to list in London because of the fact that there doesn't seem to be the appetite from an investment pool to provide the liquidity that obviously some of these founders or private equity firms are looking for,' Osman said. 'Ultimately, you're looking for people to back your concept or idea, and you're looking for them to believe in that with their money to buy shares in your company and say, 'Yes, I believe that you're going to make me a lot of money. Let's go long here.' I was looking at some facts, and I thought it's very interesting that, for example, in the UK, about 23% of adults have stocks and shares. When we compare that to the US, it's 62%.' Osman was speaking following the announcement that Qualcomm has acquired UK-based semiconductor company Alphawave Semi, resulting in another high-profile departure from the LSE. She pointed to that deal as just one example of the challenges facing the LSE but noted that it wasn't just the UK exchange facing such issues. 'When you look at Europe as a whole, I think [there are] 183 European listings, and only about 15% of those are listed in their home turf,' she said. 'So, I think it probably is kind of far and wide when you look at Europe as a whole.' Osman believes the lesser culture for investing in the UK compared to the US – where individuals are exposed to investing through the 401(k) retirement savings plan – is limiting the potential of the LSE. 'How could you encourage people to kind of play an active role in the market?' she said. 'Maybe teach them about the market, teach them about stocks, teach them about trading. And then, of course, maybe there are ways that we could use tax incentives to encourage either companies or, of course, employees to be able to feel like they can invest in the markets without feeling like it's so much of a risk.' 'It always feels like it's less of a risk to just stick your money in an ISA and fingers crossed the Bank of England doesn't reduce the rate too much. That was how I was brought up. I think it would be amazing to think that there's a way to encourage more slight risk taking but with a bit of a support layer there so that people feel they can invest in our country and invest in some of our great assets.' Osman also pointed to the Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System (PISCES) as a means of encouraging investment. Per the UK's Financial Conduct Authority, 'PISCES is a new type of private stock market that will give investors more opportunities to buy stakes in growing companies.' 'If I own shares in a company, I can trade those shares without listing it publicly, so that there'll be these kind of trading windows,' Osman explained. 'So, I can trade those shares, and an asset manager can buy them all. But the thing that concerns me about that is that it's only secondaries, so it's only certain people they decide can do that, who are professional investors, whatever that means. 'And who decides the price? Is this just regulation? All the positive consequences, but it ends up with a lot of regulation on regulation, and it ends up with a lot of complexity? I'm worried that that could end up being a lot of positive intent, but maybe it doesn't lead to that outcome of driving liquidity that they would hope.' "'Lack of liquidity' the key factor in decline of the LSE" was originally created and published by Investment Monitor, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

RCGP Urges Support to Save Declining GP Partnership Model
RCGP Urges Support to Save Declining GP Partnership Model

Medscape

time2 hours ago

  • Medscape

RCGP Urges Support to Save Declining GP Partnership Model

The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) has warned that GP partnerships are under threat, as the number of partners in England has dropped by 25% over the past decade. In a new report, the college urged action to 'break down barriers to partnership' and called for modernisation of the model to make it more attractive to younger doctors. While the RCGP reaffirmed its support for the independent contractor model, it said there was 'room for modernisation and innovation', and backed ' a mixed economy' of contractual models to deliver general practice. Shift in Workforce Between 2015 and 2025, the number of GP partners in England fell from 24,491 to 18,367. Over the same period, the number of salaried GPs rose by 81%, from 10,270 in September 2015 to 18,557 in December 2024. As of June 2024, GP partners were a minority among fully qualified GPs for the first time. The most significant drop in partnership was seen in younger doctors. Among GPs aged 30-34, numbers fell by 72.9%. The only age group to show growth was those aged 60-64, up by 19.5%. Barriers to Partnership Rising workload, administrative burdens, and concerns about financial risk were cited as major deterrents to partnership. Professor Kamila Hawthorne, RCGP chair, said that many GPs were discouraged by the unlimited personal liability that comes with being a partner. She also pointed to the responsibilities of owning or leasing premises and managing staff, especially as patient demand increases. Exploring Alternatives The RCGP report explored alternative business models that could support general practice, including limited companies, limited liability partnerships (LLPs), and community benefit societies. The college maintained that partnerships still offered flexibility and potential for innovation, particularly if financial and workload pressures could be reduced. In 2024, more than half (55%) of RCGP members said they would be more likely to consider partnership if financial risks were lower. A review by Lord Darzi highlighted the financial discipline of GP partnerships, noting that they could not run large deficits like other parts of the NHS. Earlier this year, the Nuffield Trust described the current GP partnership model as 'withering'. The health think tank warned that the government's plans to improve GP access were at risk due to the fall in partner numbers. Thea Stein, chief executive of the Nuffield Trust, told Medscape News UK : 'It is hard to see partnership being the dominant model in the future.' She called for support where the model works well, but said new models must also be explored. Hawthorne maintained that 'there are elements of the traditional GP partnership that can be improved and modernised, while retaining its core strengths'. The GP partnership model has huge benefits for the NHS and for patients, she added. Government Response A Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) spokesperson acknowledged the strengths of the partnership model, including efficiency, innovation, and continuity of care. 'However, we also recognise that this is not the only model delivering general practice,' the spokesperson told Medscape News UK . 'GP practices can choose to organise themselves in different ways and also provide good outcomes in terms of staff engagement and patient experience.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store