Ohio university displays 'biological' sex bathroom signs in wake of new state law
One of Ohio's largest universities has begun displaying signs limiting restroom use to 'biological men' and 'biological women' following the enactment of a new state law.
The University of Cincinnati began displaying the new signage last week in its residence halls and some other on-campus buildings in response to the passage of a law that restricts bathroom use in public and private K-12 schools and colleges to members of the same 'biological sex.' Signed into law by Republican Gov. Mike DeWine in November, the legislation officially goes into effect Tuesday.
A public institution with more than 50,000 students, the University of Cincinnati appears to be the first Ohio college or university to comply with the new law. A representative for TransOhio, a statewide transgender advocacy group, said the school is the first it is aware of that's 'taking any action in response to the bill.' The law does not specify how exactly it should be enforced, making it unclear how other schools will comply.
At least 15 states restrict which restrooms trans people can use in school settings, but only five have laws that apply to colleges and universities. Of these five, only two — Florida and Ohio — have measures that include private colleges and universities, according to the LGBTQ think tank Movement Advancement Project.
A spokesperson for the University of Cincinnati confirmed there have been 'signage updates in some residence halls and locker rooms' on campus.
'As a public institution, we are following the law and seeking to meet our mission to create an environment where we provide opportunity, develop educated and engaged citizens and enrich our city, state and world,' the spokesperson, M.B. Reilly, said in an email.
News of the college's new signage quickly spread after a photo of one of the signs, which reads 'biological men,' was shared Thursday on the social media platform Reddit, drawing thousands of comments. Multiple school employees and students who spoke with NBC News said they did not receive any communication from the university about the new signage beforehand.
A QR code linking to a list of single-occupancy restrooms across the campus is attached to the new signs, two students said.
Supporters of the law say it is necessary to ensure the safety and privacy of Ohio students. When the bathroom policy was signed into law in November, its chief sponsor, Republican state Sen. Jerry Cirino, called its passage 'common sense' and said the measure 'protects our children and grandchildren in private spaces where they are most vulnerable,' according to The Associated Press.
Several transgender students at the University of Cincinnati told NBC News they expect the new bathroom law will make their daily lives more difficult, forcing them to walk longer distances to find restrooms to use.
'I had a panic attack for the first time in a while,' Corvo Hopkins, a 21-year-old junior who is transgender, said in a phone interview. 'I haven't been able to think about anything else.'
Hopkins added that the new bathroom signs send a message to trans students that 'we're not valued, they don't want us here, and that living on campus, we're not safe.'
Noah Ciolino, an 18-year-old freshman with irritable bowel syndrome, said he moved 10 floors down in his on-campus dormitory building Saturday, because his former suite didn't have a single-occupancy bathroom nearby. In order to 'legally use the right restroom,' he said that he would have had to ride the elevator to a girls floor or take the stairs. He said he worries about what will happen if his current floor's only gender-neutral bathroom is occupied during an emergency situation.
'It's been hard to complete assignments, because I already struggle with depression as it is,' Ciolino said of grappling with the changes on campus. 'Have you ever tried to swim in the opposite direction of where the stream is going? It's like that.'
The new bathroom signs aren't the only changes the university has seen this month. On Friday, the school's president, Neville Pinto, sent a letter to students addressing its rollback of diversity, equity and inclusion policies following an executive order by President Donald Trump mandating the elimination of DEI in higher education.
'Given the extent to which our university, like most educational institutions, relies on federal funding to deliver and sustain our core mission, it is untenable to operate as if noncompliance with these directives is an effective option,' Pinto's letter read. 'Our leaders have begun evaluating jobs and duties related to DEI and examining our DEI programming, initiatives and projects to bring all areas into compliance. In addition, we have begun removing references to DEI principles across university websites, social media and collateral materials.'
On Monday, hundreds of students and staffers gathered on campus to protest the DEI rollback, according to NBC affiliate WLWT of Cincinnati.
'I spent three years on this campus helping make a space where students can feel welcome and feel like they can take that mask down and just can be themselves,' Christian Caffey, a student assistant at the school's LGBTQ Center, told WLWT. 'To have Pinto send out the epitome of the end of office day at 3:45 email, then get out the door and hope everybody cools off over the weekend. That email says, 'Hey, we're going to scrap all the DEI effort as quickly as possible.' That felt like a shot of the heart.'
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
37 minutes ago
- Axios
Congress' "doc fix" spurs value-based care concerns
Physicians are divided over how the massive Republican budget bill moving through Congress would insulate doctors from future Medicare cuts without continuing financial incentives to provide better care through alternative payment models. Why it matters: The "doc fix" championed by the American Medical Association, among other groups, would solve a long-standing complaint about the way Medicare pays physicians. But some physician groups worry it would maintain a system long criticized for tying pay to the volume of procedures delivered and the number of patients seen. State of play: Physician practices that agree to be paid based on patient outcomes get bigger payouts in exchange for taking on the extra financial risk are in line, under current law, for a pay boost through a key adjustment called the conversion factor, starting next year. But the version of the GOP budget bill that passed the House of Representatives would instead create a single conversion factor for all physicians that's updated based on Medicare's measure of inflation. That would leave providers in the performance-based payment models getting higher payments than currently prescribed from 2026 through 2028, but lower payments than outlined in current law after that through 2035, according to an analysis from Berkeley Research Group viewed by Axios. Primary care physicians and providers embracing value-based care worry that removing an incentive for participating in the models will set back efforts to move Medicare toward a more holistic payment system that's meant to improve patient care. "Signals matter in health care," said Shawn Martin, CEO of the American Academy of Family Physicians. "I think it's a signal [to physicians] of an entrenchment back in fee-for-service." The American College of Physicians, the trade group for internal medicine doctors, told lawmakers last month that it's concerned the policy as structured will disincentivize doctors' participation in value-based care. "It's being marketed as a long-term fix," said Mara McDermott, CEO of value-based care advocacy group Accountable for Health. "I don't read it that way. I read it as creating a new cliff." Zoom out: Many provider groups are also concerned that the legislation doesn't fix the 2.83% cut to physicians' Medicare payment that took effect in January. The American College of Surgeons in a May statement praised lawmakers for recognizing that Medicare physician payments have to be adjusted for inflation, but that the legislation's provision "is not sufficient to make up for the 2025 cut, and more work is needed." The other side: The AMA wrote to House leadership last month that it "strongly supports" the provision to consolidate into one conversion factor and tie updates to inflation starting in 2026. Reductions made to the conversion factor over the past half-decade to keep the physician fee schedule budget neutral have made private practice financially impossible for many doctors, the AMA said. "It is absolutely vital that this issue be addressed," the letter to House leaders said. The AMA disagrees that the provision would discourage participation in alternative payment models, it told Axios in an email. Although payment updates to alternative payment model physicians starting in 2029 would be lower than current law provides, those doctors will still get positive payment updates overall, it said. Between the lines: The policy would go into effect as the Trump administration seeks to leverage Medicare alternative payment models to drive HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s priorities of prevention and personal choice in health care. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services told Axios it does not comment on proposed legislation, but said it's continuing to prioritize policies that encourage providers to join payment models that reward high-value and coordinated care. Reality check: Just about all physicians and physician trade organizations agree that stable Medicare payment updates with some link to inflation is necessary to ensure continuous access for Medicare patients, AAFP's Martin said. It's "extraordinarily healthy" for physician advocacy groups to have different opinions on exactly how to reach that conclusion, he added. The Senate is currently debating what to include in its own version of the reconciliation bill.
Newsweek
38 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Mikie Sherrill's Chances of Beating Jack Ciattarelli in New Jersey: Polls
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Democratic New Jersey gubernatorial candidate Mikie Sherrill is set to beat her Republican rival Jack Ciattarelli in the upcoming election for governor, according to a poll. According to a SurveyUSA poll, released the day after Ciattarelli and Sherrill secured their respective nominations on Wednesday, the Democrat led his GOP rival by 13 percentage points. The Context Along with Virginia, New Jersey is one of the two states holding gubernatorial elections this year to replace New Jersey's incumbent Democratic governor, Phil Murphy, who has a term-limit. The Republicans have not won a gubernatorial election in New Jersey since 2013 and has voted for a Democrat in every presidential election since 1988. But the GOP has seen increasing success in the state in recent years, with Trump increasing his vote share by 10 points in 2024. This was the best showing by a GOP presidential nominee in two decades. Split image of Democratic Representative Mikie Sherrill, left, and former Assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli, right, who will face Sherrill in New Jersey's gubernatorial contest. Split image of Democratic Representative Mikie Sherrill, left, and former Assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli, right, who will face Sherrill in New Jersey's gubernatorial contest. AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib, Mike Catalini, file What To Know Ciattarelli is a former New Jersey state representative who has said he would end any sanctuary policies protecting immigrants without permanent legal status. Sherrill is a United States representative who worked in the navy and as a federal prosecutor. According to the SurveyUSA poll of 785 adults, 51 percent of likely voters said they'd support Sherrill in the November general election, compared to 38 percent who said they'd back Ciattarelli. The poll was conducted between May 28 and May 30. However, a previous survey by the same pollster found that 40 percent of Garden State voters have a favorable view of Ciattarelli, while 41 percent had the same view of Sherrill. There was a larger gap between the two candidates when it comes to their negative ratings, with 29 percent of voters having an unfavorable view of Sherrill, compared to 36 percent who have an unfavorable opinion of the Republican. What People Are Saying Micah Rasmussen, director of the Rebovich Institute for New Jersey Politics at Rider University, previously told Newsweek that while Democrats are the majority party in the state. "It is certainly possible that New Jersey could elect a Republican governor in November. [Incumbent] Governor [Phil] Murphy was the first Democrat to be reelected in more than 40 years, and in that same span, three Republican governors were elected and reelected. President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social: "The Great State of New Jersey has a very important Primary coming up on Tuesday. Get Out and Vote for Jack Ciattarelli, who has my Complete and Total Endorsement! His Opponents are going around saying they have my Endorsement, which is not true, I don't even know who they are! We can't play games when it comes to Elections, and New Jersey is a very important State that we must WIN. The whole World is watching. Vote for Jack Ciattarelli to, MAKE NEW JERSEY GREAT AGAIN!" What Happens Next The election takes place on November 4. Five third-party or independent candidates are also running for the seat.
39 minutes ago
Democratic governors Pritzker, Walz, Hochul to testify before House GOP panel about immigration policy
The House Oversight Committee will hear from the high-profile Democratic governors of Illinois, Minnesota and New York on Thursday during a timely hearing about their states' immigration policies that some members of the Republican-led committee call "sanctuary" policies that they claim shield criminal illegal aliens from immigration enforcement. JB Pritzker of Illinois, Tim Walz of Minnesota and Kathy Hochul of New York will appear at the U.S. Capitol for a closely watched hearing that comes as another Democratic-led state -- California -- is grappling with a slew of immigration-related protests that triggered President Donald Trump to deploy U.S. Marines and the National Guard to the area. House Oversight Chair James Comer requested in April that these Democratic governors testify, claiming that the "Trump administration is taking decisive action to deport criminal illegal aliens from our nation, but reckless sanctuary states like Illinois, Minnesota, and New York are actively seeking to obstruct federal immigration enforcement." "The governors of these states must explain why they are prioritizing the protection of criminal illegal aliens over the safety of U.S. citizens, and they must be held accountable," Comer said in a media advisory for the upcoming hearing. Sanctuary states still enforce U.S. federal immigration laws, but the term often refers to a limited collaboration with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement while enacting policies that are more favorable to undocumented people. The Democratic governors have been preparing to testify and getting ready to defend their records on immigration and public safety, according to hearing material reviewed by ABC News. They'll also highlight how their states cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. "Despite the rhetoric of Republicans in Congress, Governor Pritzker will share facts about how this bipartisan public safety law is fully compliant with federal law and ensures law enforcement can focus on doing their jobs well," a spokesperson for the Illinois governor said in a statement ahead of the hearing. Also ahead of the hearing, the state of Illinois retained outside counsel to provide expertise in order to respond to the committee's requests, the spokesperson said, claiming that "congressional Republicans are wasting taxpayer dollars all to find out that Illinois has always followed the law." A spokesperson for the Democratic Governors Association also suggested that their leaders were focused on governing rather than spending time on "political stunts." "While Republicans in D.C. spend their time pulling political stunts, Democratic governors are busy getting real things done for their states, lowering costs, and keeping people safe," Johanna Warshaw, a spokesperson for the group, said in a statement. In March, the Oversight Committee held another newsy hearing with "sanctuary city" mayors including Boston Mayor Michelle Wu, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, Denver Mayor Mike Johnston and New York City Mayor Eric Adams. Those leaders defended their actions on immigration enforcement while Republicans on the committee accused them of increasing crime by defying Trump administration immigration policies. On Wednesday, House Oversight Republicans released a three-minute digital ad to show "how sanctuary polices do not protect Americans," which features buzzy news broadcasts about immigration-adjacent crimes, testimony from mayors earlier this spring at the "sanctuary cities" House hearing and video clips of Pritzker, Walz and Hochul speaking about immigration policy. "Sanctuary governors are shielding CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS, then pretending the consequences don't exist. Tomorrow Hochul, Walz, and Pritzker will be in the hot seat as their policies cause CHAOS in their states. Here's what they don't want you to see," the Committee's official account posted on X.
