
How Alexander the Great's daddy issues reshaped the world
Alexander had a love-hate relationship with his father, King Philip II of Macedonia. While at times he appeared to be the clear heir, polygamy, exile, and an assassination made Alexander's path to power much more complicated. These busts of Philip II (right, Chiaramonti Museum, Vatican) and Alexander the Great (left, Capitoline Museums, Rome), are Roman copies of Greek originals. ALEXANDER: ALAMY/ CORDON PRESS; PHILIP: ALBUM
Alexander the Great's childhood has often been presented as a time of conflict between his parents, Philip II and Olympias. But this image, so often explored in novels and films, is likely exaggerated. Most of the sources preserved from this period are Athenian; no Macedonian writings have survived. So it was Philip's enemies, with their subjective and even manipulated accounts, who shaped what we know about the intricacies of the Macedonian court. Nevertheless, dynastic tensions evidently ran high at the court of Philip, and one factor that had an impact on family relations was the practice of polygamy.
Marriage in Macedonia was a politically oriented institution, often used to establish diplomatic relations or ensure royal succession. Philip had seven wives but among them they bore him only two sons: Philip III Arrhidaeus and Alexander. Some sources say there was a third, Caranus, who may have died in childhood, although his existence is doubtful.
The lack of a clear system for royal succession and the multitude of wives without any formal hierarchy increased conflict at court. Becoming the best candidate to inherit the throne depended on several factors. Foremost was to be a member of the Argead dynasty, descended from Perdiccas I, who founded the kingdom of Macedonia in the seventh century B.C. Until Alexander's death, all the kings of Macedonia had come from this family.
(Who was Alexander the Great?)
A second determining factor was the political prestige and importance of the maternal family. If the mother belonged to Macedonian nobility, support for an heir among the local aristocracy would be stronger. The sons of foreign women, such as Olympias, who came from Epirus, had in principle, less legitimacy. A third factor was the support a potential heir could muster among different factions within the kingdom.
This was key to ensuring political stability. Although the final decision rested with the monarch, his wives had a role in placing their male offspring in the race for succession. In this context, Alexander had a relatively straightforward path to power. His older half-brother Arrhidaeus was mentally incapacitated. Some sources attribute this to Olympias poisoning him in order to remove him as a candidate for the throne. Alexander, meanwhile, was brought up in a manner befitting a Macedonian prince. His training combined traditional disciplines such as grammar, rhetoric, arithmetic, and geometry with physical activities like hunting and battle training. The most notable of his teachers was Aristotle, to whom Philip entrusted the education of his son for three years. The Shrine of the Nymphs of Mieza, where Aristotle taught the young Alexander, lies near the modern-day city of Naousa, in northern Greece. Smooth sailing, at first
While very young, Alexander was able to put into practice the solid education that his father had so carefully designed. Around 340 B.C., during one of Philip's numerous absences, Alexander had to act as regent at barely 16 years old. The sources describe how he led a successful campaign against the Thracian tribe of the Maedi and went on to establish a military settlement he called Alexandroupolis Maedica, the first of many cities he would found and name after himself. His promising career continued with the Battle of Chaeronea. Gonzaga Cameo, perhaps depicting Olympias and Alexander, whose helmet features a snake. Third century B.C., Hermitage Museum, Russia. THE SOURCES DEPICT Olympias as vengeful and ruthless. However, these accounts should be read critically. The author Plutarch, who lived centuries after her, influenced this extreme characterization and is known for misogynistic accounts and often fabricated anecdotes. Plutarch recorded the infamous story in which Philip finds his wife, Olympias, asleep in bed with a serpent beside her. Perhaps fearing that she is an enchantress, Philip loses interest in her.
The couple would later become yet more estranged after the clash between Alexander and Philip on the eve of Philip's wedding with Cleopatra. Olympias accompanied her son into exile and, according to the third-century A.D. Roman historian Justin, tried to conspire against her husband from Epirus. Some sources depict Olympias as the brains behind the plot to kill Philip and the subsequent brutality to Philip's seventh wife Cleopatra. It is likely that behind the larger-than-life vengefulness attributed to her, a skillful political operator was at work.
His father assigned him to lead the left wing of the Macedonian army to disrupt the advance of the Sacred Band of Thebes. After the victory, it was Alexander who, in the company of the general Antipater, took charge of the subsequent negotiation in Athens—a precursor to the League of Corinth, a coalition of Greek city-states under Philip. The young prince was already shaping up to be a worthy successor to his father. Bulgaria's cultural capital
It seems that up until this moment, Philip, Olympias, and Alexander had a reasonably good relationship. In fact, after the victory of Chaeronea, Philip had a symbolic monument, the Philippeion, built to celebrate the triumph of the Argead dynasty over the Greeks. The circular stone building includes statues of Philip, his parents, Amyntas III and Eurydice I, Alexander, and Olympias. To include a statue of Alexander here was a clear indication that Philip had singled Alexander out as heir to the throne.
(This Wonder of the Ancient World shone brightly for more than a thousand years.) THE LION OF CHAERONEA This monument was erected over the mass grave of the members of the Sacred Band of Thebes, massacred in the charge that Alexander led in 338 B.C., when he was only 18. IN THE SUMMER OF 338 B.C., near the city of Chaeronea, a decisive battle took place between the Macedonian forces and the combined troops of Athens, Thebes, and other Greek cities that opposed Philip's expansionism. Philip, leading the right wing of his army, feigned a retreat that tricked the enemy into opening their ranks. Alexander, in command of the left wing, took advantage to charge against the most powerful enemy unit: the elite corps known as the Sacred Band of Thebes. This unit was formed of 150 pairs of same-sex lovers; most of them perished in the fighting. After the battle, Alexander, who was then just 18 years old, demonstrated his political acumen in addition to his military prowess. Philip sent him to Athens to sign a peace agreement, and Alexander took with him 2,000 freed Athenian prisoners and the ashes of another 1,000 fallen that he delivered to the city. The dramatic gesture, calculated to diminish Athenian humiliation, was well received. The first clash
Shortly after erecting the lavish tribute, Philip made a controversial decision: to marry a young woman from the Macedonian aristocracy called Cleopatra. To date, none of Philip's wives had been Macedonian: Audata was Illyrian, Phila was from Elimea, Philinna and Nicesipolis were from Thessaly, Olympias (Alexander's mother) was a princess of Epirus, and the sixth, Meda, was of Thracian origin. With Cleopatra it was different; Greek writer Athenaeus, notes that Philip was 'violently in love' with her.
(Alexander the Great's warrior mom wielded unprecedented power.) Alexander riding Bucephalus, the horse he rode in all his campaigns until Bucephalus's death at Hydaspes, in 326 B.C. This Roman sculpture is based on a fourth-century b.c. original by Lysippus.
But, as in previous marriages, there was likely a political purpose too. Earlier Philip had shown no interest in marrying into to the Macedonian nobility, but now he considered it necessary in order to garner support before beginning his invasion of Persia. Cleopatra was the niece of Attalus, one of the generals who was to lead the offensive, so this link was key. The decision to marry Cleopatra provoked unease in Alexander's circle, since any future male descendant could jeopardize his succession. Philip built this for the glory of the Argead dynasty, after its decisive victory over Athens and Thebes at Chaeronea in 338 b.c. It is located in the Temple Zeus at Olympia, one of the most important Greek sanctuaries.
The situation exploded during a banquet on the eve of Philip and Cleopatra's wedding. Attalus, Cleopatra's uncle, took advantage of the toast to proclaim his desire for Cleopatra to ensure 'a legitimate heir' for the kingdom. Alexander, who interpreted the statement as a personal attack, lashed out and was publicly reprimanded by Philip, who was perhaps compelled by the norms of hospitality. After this serious disagreement, Alexander went into exile with his mother Olympias, and possibly with his closest friends. First he took refuge at the court of his uncle, Alexander of Epirus, and then he was able to stay with Langarus, king of the Agrianians.
(Were Alexander the Great and Hephaestion more than friends?) ALCOHOL IN ABUNDANCE This 88-pound Derveni Krater, discovered in a tomb, was made in the early fourth century B.C. Most kraters were used at banquets for mixing undiluted wine with water that was then served to guests. PLUTARCH recounts the clash between Alexander and Philip during the banquet marking Philip's marriage to Cleopatra: 'Attalus, now, was the girl's uncle, and called upon the Macedonians to ask of the gods that from Philip and Cleopatra there might be born a legitimate successor... Alexander was exasperated [and cried]... 'Do you take me for a bastard?' [and] threw a cup at him. Then Philip rose up against [Alexander], but, fortunately for both, his anger and his wine made him trip and fall. Then Alexander, mocking over him, said: 'Look now, men! Here is one who was preparing to cross from Europe into Asia [alluding to the invasion of Persia]; and [he has fallen] in trying to cross from couch to couch'.' The second confrontation
It's possible that there were other reasons behind Alexander's exile. It's been suggested that Philip wanted to leave Alexander in charge of Greek affairs during the invasion and that his son had not taken well to this important but secondary role. Whatever the true reasons for the exile, Philip knew he couldn't venture into Asia before putting his own house in order, so he opened the way for Alexander to return. The illustration recreates the city of Halicarnassus, today in western Türkiye (Turkey). Philip attempted to marry his eldest son, the disabled Philip III Arrhidaeus, to the daughter of the Persian-allied ruler of Halicarnassus, Pixodarus. Fearing an erosion of his status, Alexander sabotaged the match. BALAGE BALOGH/SCALA, FLORENCE
Peace was short-lived, however, according to a somewhat confusing account from Plutarch about what happened next: the so-called Pixodarus affair. Although its chronology and veracity are doubtful, the affair points to a growing distrust of Alexander toward his father. According to Plutarch, Philip, eager to establish a foothold in Asia, had arranged to marry his son Arrhidaeus to the daughter of the Persian satrap Pixodarus. Alexander, wary that this marriage would relegate him to second place, interfered in the negotiations by putting himself forward as a potential husband. The interference ruined his father's plans, and he meddled in something that was the exclusive prerogative of the king: to broker marriages for members of the dynasty.
Some researchers have suggested that Philip intended to follow a Macedonian custom and arrange the marriage of his last wife (Cleopatra) to his son (Alexander). This would have sent a clear signal that Philip was passing his kingdom to Alexander and may be why Philip had not thought of Alexander as a suitor.
(These historic Greek sites shed fresh light on Alexander the Great's lost kingdom.) An unexpected death
Soon after, Philip was assassinated in Aigai while celebrating the wedding of his daughter, also named Cleopatra, to her uncle Alexander of Epirus, brother of Olympias. The assassin, Pausanias, was a member of the king's guard. Some accounts state he committed the assassination in revenge, feeling spurned by Philip, whom he loved. Magnificent mosaics still amaze visitors to the ruins of the royal palace of Aigai, in modern-day Vergína, where Philip II was assassinated by a bodyguard in 336 b.c.
What is certain are the consequences of the attack. Alexander was proclaimed king by the army. He eliminated any rivals who could overshadow him, a customary practice to avoid sources of instability. The purge was far-reaching: from Attalus, prominent in Asia, to Amyntas IV, Philip's nephew who had reigned briefly while still a child, with Philip acting as regent. For her part, Olympias (according to the historian Justin) killed Europa, Cleopatra's daughter, and then forced Cleopatra to hang herself in front of her little girl's corpse. The facade of the royal necropolis at the site of Aigai, attributed to Philip II, was found intact, with splendid grave goods, by the archaeologist Manolis Andronikos in 1977. ACCORDING TO ANCIENT SOURCES, Pausanias murdered Philip out of revenge. Pausanias was thought to be the king's former lover, and was jealous of his new relationship with an attendant. After a quarrel between Pausanias and the new lover, the attendant died by suicide. To punish Pausanias for causing the suicide of a friend, Attalus brought in servants to rape him. Pausanias denounced Attalus to Philip, but the king took no action against Attalus, who was his wife Cleopatra's uncle.But did Pausanias act alone? Historians Plutarch and Justin suggest that the instigator was Olympias, as revenge for being spurned by Philip when he married Cleopatra. It would have been in Alexander's interests
to ensure his father didn't have children with Cleopatra, since they would challenge his claim to the throne. Second-century historian Arrian attributes the plot to the Persians, in a bid to stop Philip's planned invasion. Other suspects include Demosthenes (leader of the Athenian resistance); certain nobles of Upper Macedonia; or the Macedonian general Antipater. The incident remains a great historical whodunit.
With the way clear and rivals purged, Alexander ascended the throne. It's hard to gauge how close father and son had truly been but Alexander's achievements and rise to greatness should be seen in the context of his relationship with Philip.
(After Alexander the Great's death, this Indian empire filled the vacuum.) Alexander confronts the mutinous soldiers at the Opis River. There he reproached them for their conduct, reminding them that, thanks to Philip, they had gone from living in poverty to being the conquerors of Asia. Engraving from the 19th century. WHEN ALEXANDER'S TROOPS mutinied at the Opis River in 324 B.C., he made a speech emphasizing the important role his father had played: 'He [Philip] found you wandering about without resources, ... pasturing small flocks in the mountains, [defending them against] the Illyrians, Triballians and neighboring Thracians. He gave you cloaks to wear instead of sheepskins, brought you down from the mountains to the plains, and made you a match in war for the neighboring barbarians ... He made you city dwellers and civilized you with good laws and customs.'
This speech contrasts with the episode some years earlier, when Alexander killed one of his generals, Cleitus the Black, during a banquet. According to first-century Roman historian Quintus Curtius Rufus, Alexander drunkenly boasted that the victory at the Battle of Chaeronea was down to him, but his father had jealously detracted from his glory. Alexander claimed that Philip, wounded on the battlefield, had feigned death and that he had shielded his father's body from attack. Incensed at this slur on the honor of Philip, Cleitus angrily challenged Alexander, who took up a lance and ran him through. Alexander kills Cleitus the Black in 328 B.C., during a banquet in Samarkand. Cleitus was an officer and the brother of the king's nurse, Lanice. He had saved Alexander's life at the Battle of Granicus. Engraving from the 19th century. This story appeared in the May/June 2025 issue of National Geographic History magazine.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Whole Hog Politics: Trump enlists the military for politics
On the menu: Going nuclear; Fore!; Newsom uses Trump to get back in Dems' good graces; Moonbeam to moderate?; Masked bandit America's largest military base has had four names in the past five years. In 2023, the Biden administration rechristened the base in North Carolina as Fort Liberty, replacing the name given to it in 1918 by resentful Southerners in the Army who honored Confederate Gen. Braxton Bragg. In early 2025, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that it would be Fort Bragg again, but with a twist. It would be for Roland Bragg, a hero paratrooper from Maine who served in World War II, rather than the bumbling Confederate general. Then this week, President Trump undid the twist and made it plain that the base, and all the others named for Confederates that had been changed by Trump's predecessor, were going back to their original namesakes. And he did it as part of what could only be described as political speech at Fort Bragg to an audience of soldiers who were screened for their political allegiances and responded with wild cheers for Trump's attacks on his political rivals. It all put me in mind of the Immovable Ladder of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. Acclaimed since at least the fourth century as the site of the tomb of Jesus of Nazareth, the church building has been under the joint governance of Greek, Coptic, Ethiopian and Syriac Orthodox sects, the Armenian Apostolic church and the Roman Catholics since the days of the Ottomans. Outside a window on the second story of the church, there is a rough, wooden ladder that has been there since at least 1721. No one knows when or why the ladder was placed there, but they do know that under the uneasy power-sharing arrangement between the sects, no one has the unilateral authority to move it, nor can anyone obtain the unanimous consent necessary to do so licitly. So fearful are the custodians of the church that any violations of the truce will end in rupture or even violence, that they do nothing. And so, the ladder has sat in the dry desert air for longer than the United States has been a nation. Now, you can't run a nation like a pilgrimage church, and certainly not a nation's military. A lot more than ladders have to get moved to keep the planet's apex power in position. But the ladder does, ahem, lead up to a valuable way of thinking about how to treat even minor issues when tensions and stakes are high. When things can be left alone, it is often wise to leave them be. The re-Confederate-ing of the military bases in the South is a small thing on its own, but so was their vestigial connection to the Confederacy in the first place. Other than Fort Robert E. Lee in Virginia, none of the other namesakes had lingered on in popular memory, except for perhaps Bragg's fellow bungler, George Pickett, most famous for a failed infantry charge. Joe Biden could have left those ladders leaning, but wanted to make a point. Now Trump has made the counterpoint, and we might expect that the next Democratic president may want to make the counter-counterpoint. None of that will make the American military better, but it will make it more political, and that's very bad news. Americans have long been suspicious about the idea of having a large standing army. One of the reasons it took us so long to get into the fray in World War II was that public sentiment demanded a nearly complete demobilization after World War I. For most of American history, the idea that there would be more than a million active-duty troops stationed inside the borders of the United States would have been a very unappealing one. Standing armies are expensive and, as the history of the world shows with crushing frequency, dangerous to the liberty of citizens. And yet, America's military is massively popular. An impressive 79 percent of U.S. adults said in a recent poll that they have confidence in the military to act in the public's best interests. Compare that with just 22 percent for the federal government as a whole, 47 percent for the Supreme Court, 26 percent for the presidency and 9 percent for Congress. It might be said that our military is the only federal institution that is actually succeeding these days, but certainly it is the only part of it that is broadly popular, enjoying strong public support regardless of which party is in power at any given time. That is because in the era of large standing armies since the start of the Cold War and especially since the institution of the all-volunteer force after the Vietnam War, our civilian and military leaders have worked very hard to keep politics out of the military. Even as the greedy goblins of partisanship ripped the wiring out of every other institution that worked, the military has stood apart. Lots of bad things happen in countries when the military is the only stable part of the government, but our highly professional, scrupulously restrained, civilian-controlled military has done an exceptionally good job of staying out of domestic politics. But now, domestic politics has stopped returning the favor. Trump's decision to host a massive military demonstration in the streets of Washington on Saturday would have been a dubious choice under any circumstances. The occasion is the Army's 250th birthday, which also happens to fall on the president's 79th birthday. Trump will review a force of 6,600 troops and 150 vehicles including Abrams tanks, Paladins and Strykers, as well as Black Hawk, Apache and Chinook helicopters overhead as they pass in front of the White House. It's something Trump wanted in his first term, but was refused by military leaders who said it would be too expensive and send the wrong message about the military's relationship to the government. Rolling tanks through the capital city just isn't something Americans typically do, until now. Also in the category of Trump this week realizing unachieved goals from his first term is his mobilization of the military to suppress riots. In the summer of 2020, Trump was stymied in his efforts to use military force to smash the riots that followed in the wake of the George Floyd protests. The protesters in Los Angeles, and the copycats that one assumes will follow at other protests against federal deportation raids, have given Trump the chance to finish another unrealized goal of his first term. You may think what Trump is doing with the protesters and rioters is correct, and it may even end up being considered legal, but the timing sure does stink. Does anyone imagine that, rightly or wrongly, the bipartisan esteem for the military won't take a hit in all this? Setting up clashes between the Marines and Americans at the same time as the president held a political rally for himself at an Army base and just ahead of a massive military parade down Constitution Avenue doesn't exactly reinforce the idea of an apolitical military. Indeed, one of the best reasons to not politicize the military is so that when a commander in chief has to use our forces in controversial ways, it can be free of any taint. If you want to be able to send the Marines to Compton, you'd better pass on the political spectacles. Biden's name games with the bases or the use of the military to advance domestic political issues certainly didn't help. He moved the ladder, and now Trump is picking it up and smashing it through a window. If our political leaders keep at this, we will end up with what Americans for so long feared: a partisan military. No good can ever come of that. Holy croakano! We welcome your feedback, so please email us with your tips, corrections, reactions, amplifications, etc. at WHOLEHOGPOLITICS@ . If you'd like to be considered for publication, please include your real name and hometown. If you don't want your comments to be made public, please specify. NUTRITIONAL INFORMATION Trump Job Performance Average Approval: 42% Average Disapproval: 53.6% Net Score: -11.6 points Change from one week ago: -1.7 points Change from one month ago: -0.4 points [Average includes: Gallup: 43% approve – 53% disapprove; Ipsos/Reuters: 42% approve – 52% disapprove; Marquette: 46% approve – 54% disapprove; ARG: 41% approve – 55% disapprove; Quinnipiac University: 38% approve – 54% disapprove] Americans going nuclear Do you favor or oppose more nuclear power plants to generate electricity? Now Favor: 59%Oppose: 39% Spring of 2021 Favor: 50% Oppose: 47% Spring of 2016 Favor: 43% Oppose: 54% [Pew Research Center surveys] ON THE SIDE: LAYING OUT OF SAM SNEAD'S BUNKER As the most venerable of all American golf tournaments gets underway, writer Brody Miller goes digging for a central piece of lore. The Athletic: 'There's a story about Oakmont Country Club the members love to tell. And they're right to tell it. Because it's the perfect story about the hardest golf course in America, the place just outside of Pittsburgh that is hosting the U.S. Open this week. It's the perfect story about the Fownes family, the father and son who built this course and believed so deeply in the sanctity of par that the famous W.C. Fownes' line goes: 'A shot poorly played should be a shot irrevocably lost.' And this story? The people of Oakmont always believed it to be factual. Until very recently. 'Well …' Oakmont historian David Moore says with a chuckle. 'There's a little debate about that right now.' It goes like this …' PRIME CUTS In Trump showdown, Newsom gets chance to dispel notions of appeasement: NBC News: 'The battle between the president and the governor of the country's largest state instantly turned [Gavin Newsom] into the face of resistance to President Donald Trump's expansive interpretation of the authorities of his office and mass-deportation campaign. Newsom, who is a potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, has been taking heavy criticism from within his own party over his efforts — in part through his new podcast — to cast himself in the role of conciliator. … On Monday, California sued Trump for using emergency powers to deploy National Guard troops to the Los Angeles area over the weekend. Trump, citing a statute that allows the president to activate the guard to repel a foreign invasion or quell a rebellion, accused Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of failing to protect federal agents and property from demonstrators.' Cuomo nabs Bloomberg backing with less than two weeks to go: New York Times: 'Former Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg on Tuesday announced that he was backing former Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo in the New York City mayor's race, giving Mr. Cuomo an endorsement coveted by many of the Democratic candidates in the race. Mr. Bloomberg has a long record of helping Democratic candidates. … But he has mostly avoided endorsing mayoral candidates at the primary level in New York City, making his backing of Mr. Cuomo more notable. … The endorsement may also persuade some undecided voters who have criticisms of Mr. Cuomo's handling of the pandemic or who may have misgivings over his sexual harassment scandal, which led to his resignation as governor of New York in 2021. … Mr. Cuomo has led in polls ahead of the June 24 Democratic primary. But he has faced a surprisingly strong challenge from Zohran Mamdani, a state lawmaker from Queens and a democratic socialist. The endorsement comes two days before the second and final candidate debate on Thursday. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez endorsed Mr. Mamdani last week, and polls show the race narrowing.' Voters don't find beauty in Trump's big bill: The Hill: 'More than half of voters oppose the domestic policy bill that President Trump has pushed Republicans in Congress to pass by July 4, according to a poll released Wednesday. Quinnipiac University's national survey found less than a third of registered voters surveyed support Trump's agenda-setting One Big Beautiful Bill Act, while 53 percent oppose the legislation.' New Jersey gubernatorial race set for Ciattarelli and Sherrill: Associated Press: 'Republican Jack Ciattarelli, who had President Donald Trump's endorsement, and Democratic Rep. Mikie Sherrill won their primary elections in New Jersey's race for governor, setting the stage for a November election, poised to be fought in part over affordability and the president's policies… New Jersey has been reliably Democratic in Senate and presidential contests for decades. But the odd-year races for governor have tended to swing back and forth, and each of the last three GOP governors has won a second term.' SHORT ORDER Daughter of longtime Maine Rep. Chellie Pingree (D) joins crowded Democratic gubernatorial primary—WMTW After Tennessee Rep. Mark Green (R) announces plan to quit, a crowded field forms—Tennessee Lookout Youngkin sets Sept. 9 special election to fill Connolly's seat in Congress—Virginia Mercury Iowa state Sen. Zach Wahls (D) announces challenge to Republican Sen. Joni Ernst—The Hill TABLE TALK 'Gonna be a rumble out on the promenade.' 'The voters know who I am.' — Atlantic City, N.J., Mayor Marty Small Sr. explaining his primary victory in his reelection campaign, despite facing multiple criminal indictments along with his wife, Atlantic City School District Superintendent La'Quetta Small. Mayor Small has been in office since 2019, when his predecessor resigned after pleading guilty to wire fraud. MAILBAG 'Democrats should run the closest carbon copy of former California Gov. Jerry Brown that they can find: if not the 87-year-old man himself. Jerry transformed himself from Governor Moonbeam to a wise, fiscally responsible leader. After seven years in office, Brown turned a $27 million deficit into a $13.8 billion rainy day fund, which [Gov. Gavin Newsom] has quickly blown through, bringing us to a $12 billion deficit. As an American and conservative Republican, I would have no problem voting for a Jerry act-alike.' — Peter S. Krimmell, Glendora, Calif. Mr. Krimmell, I think that is very much what your current governor has in mind! National Republicans scoff and sneer at Newsom's recent reinvention as a foe of the excesses of wokeness and socialism, but he seems very much to have in mind a Brown-like reinvention. It certainly doesn't match with his record, especially on the fiscal matter to which you refer, but he would hardly be the first politician to undergo an ideological overhaul before seeking public office. Newsom's may be jarring to Republicans, but if he could somehow get through a progressive-leaning Democratic primary electorate (a big if), it might be hard to convince persuadable voters that he, a career-long flip-flopper, was actually a true believer in anything. Newsom's career prior to 2018 as member of the board of supervisors and then mayor in San Francisco or as Brown's lieutenant governor all point to a kind of squishy, corporatist, Clintonite Democrat. It seems much more believable that he was faking his radicalism in service of his ambitions within a radicalizing state party than that he had simply been suppressing his inner extremist for the previous 20 years. If the current and no doubt extended showdown with the Trump administration gives Newsom sufficient standing with the left, he might find it possible to shift his policy positions back to the center without disqualifying himself entirely with the Democrats' activist base. Donald Trump's rapid public ideological positioning from moderate Democrat to Reform Party to conservative Republican to pure populism suggests that many voters care little about consistency if they have a strong emotional attachment to the candidate. The more likely outcome is that Newsom will trip on his shoelaces amid all that fancy footwork, but stranger things have happened. All best, c 'I don't always agree with your conclusions but very much appreciate your view of both sides of an issue. Do you ever do personal appearances and public presentations? Also, what is 'Holy Croakano.'' — J. Stan Carpenter, Concord, N.C. Mr. Carpenter, I do get around a good bit for speeches and talks at colleges, etc. I don't know of anything near you or in the Charlotte area anytime soon, but keep a lookout. The more important question, though, is about croakano! I don't have a sufficient etymology for the word — pronounced kind of like volcano: cro-kuh-no. It is an excited utterance or interjection: a mild oath used in place of a more vulgar or blasphemous word. It came to me as a county colloquialism used by my father and, at least, his father before him in Cumberland County, Ill. Did they even have it when my branch of the Stirewalts left North Carolina in the 1820s? Who knows? There was a popular Canadian board game from the 19th century called crokinole, the name for which is thought to be from the French word croquignole, for a small biscuit. How that would have made itself into croakano and gotten to the crossroads town of Timothy, Ill., circa 1900 I couldn't guess, or it may be a false lead altogether. But as always, I invite you and all our readers to share the regional or family linguistic gems that you treasure with us so we can try to keep them alive. Yours in word nerddom, c You should email us! Write to WHOLEHOGPOLITICS@ with your tips, kudos, criticisms, insights, rediscovered words, wonderful names, recipes, and, always, good jokes. Please include your real name—at least first and last—and hometown. Make sure to let us know in the email if you want to keep your submission private. My colleague, the daring Meera Sehgal, and I will look for your emails and then share the most interesting ones and my responses here. Clickety clack! FOR DESSERT Dr. Doolittle, Kentucky style WHAS: 'A man from Murray, Kentucky, was arrested last week after police say he released a raccoon inside a business. This comes just months after the same man was arrested for attempting to evade police officers on a mule. On June 6, 2025, Murray Police Department responded to a call that a person had intentionally released a raccoon into an open business, and that he had fled the scene. Soon after, officers initiated a traffic stop on Jonathan Mason, 40. According to police, he refused to roll down his windows or exit his vehicle. Officers physically removed Mason from the vehicle. Investigators learned the raccoon that was released into the business bit a person, and that Mason was previously warned that he was not allowed on the property of the business.' Chris Stirewalt is the politics editor for The Hill and NewsNation, the host of The Hill Sunday on NewsNation and The CW, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and the author of books on politics and the media. MeeraSehgalcontributed to this report. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
Whole Hog Politics: Trump enlists the military for politics
On the menu: Going nuclear; Fore!; Newsom uses Trump to get back in Dems' good graces; Moonbeam to moderate?; Masked bandit America's largest military base has had four names in the past five years. In 2023, the Biden administration rechristened the base in North Carolina as Fort Liberty, replacing the name given to it in 1918 by resentful Southerners in the Army who honored Confederate Gen. Braxton Bragg. In early 2025, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that it would be Fort Bragg again, but with a twist. It would be for Roland Bragg, a hero paratrooper from Maine who served in World War II, rather than the bumbling Confederate general. Then this week, President Trump undid the twist and made it plain that the base, and all the others named for Confederates that had been changed by Trump's predecessor, were going back to their original namesakes. And he did it as part of what could only be described as political speech at Fort Bragg to an audience of soldiers who were screened for their political allegiances and responded with wild cheers for Trump's attacks on his political rivals. It all put me in mind of the Immovable Ladder of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. Acclaimed since at least the fourth century as the site of the tomb of Jesus of Nazareth, the church building has been under the joint governance of Greek, Coptic, Ethiopian and Syriac Orthodox sects, the Armenian Apostolic church and the Roman Catholics since the days of the Ottomans. Outside a window on the second story of the church, there is a rough, wooden ladder that has been there since at least 1721. No one knows when or why the ladder was placed there, but they do know that under the uneasy power-sharing arrangement between the sects, no one has the unilateral authority to move it, nor can anyone obtain the unanimous consent necessary to do so licitly. So fearful are the custodians of the church that any violations of the truce will end in rupture or even violence, that they do nothing. And so, the ladder has sat in the dry desert air for longer than the United States has been a nation. Now, you can't run a nation like a pilgrimage church, and certainly not a nation's military. A lot more than ladders have to get moved to keep the planet's apex power in position. But the ladder does, ahem, lead up to a valuable way of thinking about how to treat even minor issues when tensions and stakes are high. When things can be left alone, it is often wise to leave them be. The re-Confederate-ing of the military bases in the South is a small thing on its own, but so was their vestigial connection to the Confederacy in the first place. Other than Fort Robert E. Lee in Virginia, none of the other namesakes had lingered on in popular memory, except for perhaps Bragg's fellow bungler, George Pickett, most famous for a failed infantry charge. Joe Biden could have left those ladders leaning, but wanted to make a point. Now Trump has made the counterpoint, and we might expect that the next Democratic president may want to make the counter-counterpoint. None of that will make the American military better, but it will make it more political, and that's very bad news. Americans have long been suspicious about the idea of having a large standing army. One of the reasons it took us so long to get into the fray in World War II was that public sentiment demanded a nearly complete demobilization after World War I. For most of American history, the idea that there would be more than a million active-duty troops stationed inside the borders of the United States would have been a very unappealing one. Standing armies are expensive and, as the history of the world shows with crushing frequency, dangerous to the liberty of citizens. And yet, America's military is massively popular. An impressive 79 percent of U.S. adults said in a recent poll that they have confidence in the military to act in the public's best interests. Compare that with just 22 percent for the federal government as a whole, 47 percent for the Supreme Court, 26 percent for the presidency and 9 percent for Congress. It might be said that our military is the only federal institution that is actually succeeding these days, but certainly it is the only part of it that is broadly popular, enjoying strong public support regardless of which party is in power at any given time. That is because in the era of large standing armies since the start of the Cold War and especially since the institution of the all-volunteer force after the Vietnam War, our civilian and military leaders have worked very hard to keep politics out of the military. Even as the greedy goblins of partisanship ripped the wiring out of every other institution that worked, the military has stood apart. Lots of bad things happen in countries when the military is the only stable part of the government, but our highly professional, scrupulously restrained, civilian-controlled military has done an exceptionally good job of staying out of domestic politics. But now, domestic politics has stopped returning the favor. Trump's decision to host a massive military demonstration in the streets of Washington on Saturday would have been a dubious choice under any circumstances. The occasion is the Army's 250th birthday, which also happens to fall on the president's 79th birthday. Trump will review a force of 6,600 troops and 150 vehicles including Abrams tanks, Paladins and Strykers, as well as Black Hawk, Apache and Chinook helicopters overhead as they pass in front of the White House. It's something Trump wanted in his first term, but was refused by military leaders who said it would be too expensive and send the wrong message about the military's relationship to the government. Rolling tanks through the capital city just isn't something Americans typically do, until now. Also in the category of Trump this week realizing unachieved goals from his first term is his mobilization of the military to suppress riots. In the summer of 2020, Trump was stymied in his efforts to use military force to smash the riots that followed in the wake of the George Floyd protests. The protesters in Los Angeles, and the copycats that one assumes will follow at other protests against federal deportation raids, have given Trump the chance to finish another unrealized goal of his first term. You may think what Trump is doing with the protesters and rioters is correct, and it may even end up being considered legal, but the timing sure does stink. Does anyone imagine that, rightly or wrongly, the bipartisan esteem for the military won't take a hit in all this? Setting up clashes between the Marines and Americans at the same time as the president held a political rally for himself at an Army base and just ahead of a massive military parade down Constitution Avenue doesn't exactly reinforce the idea of an apolitical military. Indeed, one of the best reasons to not politicize the military is so that when a commander in chief has to use our forces in controversial ways, it can be free of any taint. If you want to be able to send the Marines to Compton, you'd better pass on the political spectacles. Biden's name games with the bases or the use of the military to advance domestic political issues certainly didn't help. He moved the ladder, and now Trump is picking it up and smashing it through a window. If our political leaders keep at this, we will end up with what Americans for so long feared: a partisan military. No good can ever come of that. Holy croakano! We welcome your feedback, so please email us with your tips, corrections, reactions, amplifications, etc. at WHOLEHOGPOLITICS@ . If you'd like to be considered for publication, please include your real name and hometown. If you don't want your comments to be made public, please specify. NUTRITIONAL INFORMATION Trump Job Performance Average Approval: 42% Average Disapproval: 53.6% Net Score: -11.6 points Change from one week ago: -1.7 points Change from one month ago: -0.4 points [Average includes: Gallup: 43% approve – 53% disapprove; Ipsos/Reuters: 42% approve – 52% disapprove; Marquette: 46% approve – 54% disapprove; ARG: 41% approve – 55% disapprove; Quinnipiac University: 38% approve – 54% disapprove] Americans going nuclear Do you favor or oppose more nuclear power plants to generate electricity? Now Favor: 59%Oppose: 39% Spring of 2021 Favor: 50% Oppose: 47% Spring of 2016 Favor: 43% Oppose: 54% [Pew Research Center surveys] ON THE SIDE: LAYING OUT OF SAM SNEAD'S BUNKER As the most venerable of all American golf tournaments gets underway, writer Brody Miller goes digging for a central piece of lore. The Athletic: 'There's a story about Oakmont Country Club the members love to tell. And they're right to tell it. Because it's the perfect story about the hardest golf course in America, the place just outside of Pittsburgh that is hosting the U.S. Open this week. It's the perfect story about the Fownes family, the father and son who built this course and believed so deeply in the sanctity of par that the famous W.C. Fownes' line goes: 'A shot poorly played should be a shot irrevocably lost.' And this story? The people of Oakmont always believed it to be factual. Until very recently. 'Well …' Oakmont historian David Moore says with a chuckle. 'There's a little debate about that right now.' It goes like this …' PRIME CUTS In Trump showdown, Newsom gets chance to dispel notions of appeasement: NBC News: 'The battle between the president and the governor of the country's largest state instantly turned [Gavin Newsom] into the face of resistance to President Donald Trump's expansive interpretation of the authorities of his office and mass-deportation campaign. Newsom, who is a potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, has been taking heavy criticism from within his own party over his efforts — in part through his new podcast — to cast himself in the role of conciliator. … On Monday, California sued Trump for using emergency powers to deploy National Guard troops to the Los Angeles area over the weekend. Trump, citing a statute that allows the president to activate the guard to repel a foreign invasion or quell a rebellion, accused Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of failing to protect federal agents and property from demonstrators.' Cuomo nabs Bloomberg backing with less than two weeks to go: New York Times: 'Former Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg on Tuesday announced that he was backing former Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo in the New York City mayor's race, giving Mr. Cuomo an endorsement coveted by many of the Democratic candidates in the race. Mr. Bloomberg has a long record of helping Democratic candidates. … But he has mostly avoided endorsing mayoral candidates at the primary level in New York City, making his backing of Mr. Cuomo more notable. … The endorsement may also persuade some undecided voters who have criticisms of Mr. Cuomo's handling of the pandemic or who may have misgivings over his sexual harassment scandal, which led to his resignation as governor of New York in 2021. … Mr. Cuomo has led in polls ahead of the June 24 Democratic primary. But he has faced a surprisingly strong challenge from Zohran Mamdani, a state lawmaker from Queens and a democratic socialist. The endorsement comes two days before the second and final candidate debate on Thursday. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez endorsed Mr. Mamdani last week, and polls show the race narrowing.' Voters don't find beauty in Trump's big bill: The Hill: 'More than half of voters oppose the domestic policy bill that President Trump has pushed Republicans in Congress to pass by July 4, according to a poll released Wednesday. Quinnipiac University's national survey found less than a third of registered voters surveyed support Trump's agenda-setting One Big Beautiful Bill Act, while 53 percent oppose the legislation.' New Jersey gubernatorial race set for Ciattarelli and Sherrill: Associated Press: 'Republican Jack Ciattarelli, who had President Donald Trump's endorsement, and Democratic Rep. Mikie Sherrill won their primary elections in New Jersey's race for governor, setting the stage for a November election, poised to be fought in part over affordability and the president's policies… New Jersey has been reliably Democratic in Senate and presidential contests for decades. But the odd-year races for governor have tended to swing back and forth, and each of the last three GOP governors has won a second term.' SHORT ORDER Daughter of longtime Maine Rep. Chellie Pingree (D) joins crowded Democratic gubernatorial primary—WMTW After Tennessee Rep. Mark Green (R) announces plan to quit, a crowded field forms—Tennessee Lookout Youngkin sets Sept. 9 special election to fill Connolly's seat in Congress—Virginia Mercury Iowa state Sen. Zach Wahls (D) announces challenge to Republican Sen. Joni Ernst—The Hill TABLE TALK 'Gonna be a rumble out on the promenade.' 'The voters know who I am.' — Atlantic City, N.J., Mayor Marty Small Sr. explaining his primary victory in his reelection campaign, despite facing multiple criminal indictments along with his wife, Atlantic City School District Superintendent La'Quetta Small. Mayor Small has been in office since 2019, when his predecessor resigned after pleading guilty to wire fraud. MAILBAG 'Democrats should run the closest carbon copy of former California Gov. Jerry Brown that they can find: if not the 87-year-old man himself. Jerry transformed himself from Governor Moonbeam to a wise, fiscally responsible leader. After seven years in office, Brown turned a $27 million deficit into a $13.8 billion rainy day fund, which [Gov. Gavin Newsom] has quickly blown through, bringing us to a $12 billion deficit. As an American and conservative Republican, I would have no problem voting for a Jerry act-alike.' — Peter S. Krimmell, Glendora, Calif. Mr. Krimmell, I think that is very much what your current governor has in mind! National Republicans scoff and sneer at Newsom's recent reinvention as a foe of the excesses of wokeness and socialism, but he seems very much to have in mind a Brown-like reinvention. It certainly doesn't match with his record, especially on the fiscal matter to which you refer, but he would hardly be the first politician to undergo an ideological overhaul before seeking public office. Newsom's may be jarring to Republicans, but if he could somehow get through a progressive-leaning Democratic primary electorate (a big if), it might be hard to convince persuadable voters that he, a career-long flip-flopper, was actually a true believer in anything. Newsom's career prior to 2018 as member of the board of supervisors and then mayor in San Francisco or as Brown's lieutenant governor all point to a kind of squishy, corporatist, Clintonite Democrat. It seems much more believable that he was faking his radicalism in service of his ambitions within a radicalizing state party than that he had simply been suppressing his inner extremist for the previous 20 years. If the current and no doubt extended showdown with the Trump administration gives Newsom sufficient standing with the left, he might find it possible to shift his policy positions back to the center without disqualifying himself entirely with the Democrats' activist base. Donald Trump's rapid public ideological positioning from moderate Democrat to Reform Party to conservative Republican to pure populism suggests that many voters care little about consistency if they have a strong emotional attachment to the candidate. The more likely outcome is that Newsom will trip on his shoelaces amid all that fancy footwork, but stranger things have happened. All best, c 'I don't always agree with your conclusions but very much appreciate your view of both sides of an issue. Do you ever do personal appearances and public presentations? Also, what is 'Holy Croakano.'' — J. Stan Carpenter, Concord, N.C. Mr. Carpenter, I do get around a good bit for speeches and talks at colleges, etc. I don't know of anything near you or in the Charlotte area anytime soon, but keep a lookout. The more important question, though, is about croakano! I don't have a sufficient etymology for the word — pronounced kind of like volcano: cro-kuh-no. It is an excited utterance or interjection: a mild oath used in place of a more vulgar or blasphemous word. It came to me as a county colloquialism used by my father and, at least, his father before him in Cumberland County, Ill. Did they even have it when my branch of the Stirewalts left North Carolina in the 1820s? Who knows? There was a popular Canadian board game from the 19th century called crokinole, the name for which is thought to be from the French word croquignole, for a small biscuit. How that would have made itself into croakano and gotten to the crossroads town of Timothy, Ill., circa 1900 I couldn't guess, or it may be a false lead altogether. But as always, I invite you and all our readers to share the regional or family linguistic gems that you treasure with us so we can try to keep them alive. Yours in word nerddom, c You should email us! Write to WHOLEHOGPOLITICS@ with your tips, kudos, criticisms, insights, rediscovered words, wonderful names, recipes, and, always, good jokes. Please include your real name—at least first and last—and hometown. Make sure to let us know in the email if you want to keep your submission private. My colleague, the daring Meera Sehgal, and I will look for your emails and then share the most interesting ones and my responses here. Clickety clack! FOR DESSERT Dr. Doolittle, Kentucky style WHAS: 'A man from Murray, Kentucky, was arrested last week after police say he released a raccoon inside a business. This comes just months after the same man was arrested for attempting to evade police officers on a mule. On June 6, 2025, Murray Police Department responded to a call that a person had intentionally released a raccoon into an open business, and that he had fled the scene. Soon after, officers initiated a traffic stop on Jonathan Mason, 40. According to police, he refused to roll down his windows or exit his vehicle. Officers physically removed Mason from the vehicle. Investigators learned the raccoon that was released into the business bit a person, and that Mason was previously warned that he was not allowed on the property of the business.' Chris Stirewalt is the politics editor for The Hill and NewsNation, the host of The Hill Sunday on NewsNation and The CW, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and the author of books on politics and the media. MeeraSehgalcontributed to this report.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Greece, UK urge ships to avoid Red Sea, log Hormuz voyages, documents show
By Jonathan Saul and Renee Maltezou ATHENS (Reuters) -Greece and Britain have advised their merchant shipping fleets to avoid sailing through the Gulf of Aden and to log all voyages through the Straits of Hormuz after Israel's attacks on Iran on Friday, documents seen by Reuters showed . Greek ship owners were urged to send details of their vessels sailing through the Strait of Hormuz to Greece's maritime ministry, according to one of the documents issued by Greece's shipping association, which was sent on Friday. "Due to developments in the Middle East and the escalation of military actions in the wider region, the (Greek) Ministry of Shipping ... urgently calls on shipping companies to send ... the details of Greek-owned ships that are sailing in the maritime area of the Strait of Hormuz," the document said. All UK-flagged vessels, which include the Gibraltar and Bermuda registries, were advised to avoid sailing through the southern Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, a separate document issued by the UK's transport ministry said. If transiting these areas, vessels must adhere to their highest level of security measures and limit the number of crew on deck during transits, said the advisory, seen by Reuters. On Thursday, Greek authorities had also warned of increased tensions in the region due to military activity, adding that the duration of the risk period could not be determined, a separate communication said.