Police not guilty of assault on 92-year-old amputee
Two police officers have been found not guilty of assault occasioning actual bodily harm after a 92-year-old amputee was pepper-sprayed and Tasered at his care home.
PCs Stephen Smith, 51, and Rachel Comotto, 36, denied using excessive force on Donald Burgess at Park Beck care home in St Leonards-on-Sea, East Sussex.
Jurors returned their unanimous verdicts on both Sussex Police officers at Southwark Crown Court on Wednesday.
They found PC Smith not guilty of two counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm for his use of Pava spray and for using a baton, whilst PC Comotto was found not guilty of one count for deploying her Taser.
The following video contains distressing scenes.
Despite this, Sussex Police Assistant Chief Constable Paul Court said that the officers would still face gross misconduct proceedings.
"Police officers can often find themselves in challenging and unpredictable situations, where they must make split-second decisions to keep the public safe and do so with measure, compassion, and skill," he said.
"We support them to do this and it's what our communities expect.
"Use of force must be reasonable, necessary, and proportionate, and officers know they will be held accountable for their actions every time."
The care home called 999 in June 2022 after Mr Burgess, a single-leg amputee and wheelchair user, reportedly grabbed a knife and threatened to stab staff.
PC Smith sprayed synthetic Pava pepper spray into Mr Burgess's face and used his baton to try to knock the knife out of his hand, with PC Comotto deploying her Taser - all within a minute and 23 seconds of entering the pensioner's room.
Mr Burgess was taken to hospital where he contracted Covid and died 22 days later, but the officers were not being held responsible for his death.
The court previously heard that Mr Burgess' behaviour was "out of character" and that his movements with the knife were "extremely quick", deputy care home manager Donna Gardner said.
Judge Christopher Hehir told jurors: "The reason for his behaviour that day, we now know, is that he was delirious as a result of a urinary tract infection."
Prosecutors had claimed the force used against Mr Burgess, who had been reportedly waving a serrated cutlery knife around and telling staff he would "take pleasure" in murdering them, was "unjustified and unlawful" given his age and physical condition.
The court heard both officers repeatedly asked Mr Burgess to drop the knife, with PC Smith warning him: "Put the knife down mate, or you will be sprayed or tasered. That's up to you."
Footage from body-worn cameras played to the jury during the trial showed PC Smith then directly spraying Mr Burgess's face.
The care home resident then raised the knife a couple of times as PC Smith used his baton to try to get the weapon out of his hand.
When this failed, PC Comotto deployed her Taser.
PC Smith previously told jurors he did not see that Mr Burgess was disabled and using a wheelchair as he was focused on the knife the pensioner was holding in his hand.
During her evidence, PC Comotto said she believed using the Taser was the safest way to "protect" Mr Burgess as she feared her colleague using the baton again would cause more harm.
She explained that she knew from her training the risk of injury to Mr Burgess was higher with a baton than with a Taser.
The officer said: "It was proportionate because other tactics had failed. If I didn't act, something worse could happen."
"I'm not a trigger-happy officer," she added. "It's the first time I've fired my Taser."
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said both officers should face a gross misconduct hearing for potential breaches of the police standards of professional behaviour, with PC Comotto facing a further misconduct allegation relating to comments she made on social media after the incident.
IOPC director Emily Barry said: "We know this case – including the police body-worn footage that was released during the trial – has caused understandable concern in the community.
"It was right that the evidence was put before a jury so the officers could be held accountable and we respect the jury's decision."
Additional reporting by PA Media.
Follow BBC Sussex on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250.
Police officers 'use force first' on amputee, 92
Use of Taser on 92-year-old was viable, court told
Jury deliberate over force used on amputee, 92
Sussex Police
HM Courts & Tribunals Service
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A Harvard acceptance fulfilled a dream for a student in Ethiopia. Trump's order stands in his way
Winning admission to Harvard University fulfilled a longtime goal for Yonas Nuguse, a student in Ethiopia who endured the Tigray conflict, internet and phone shutdowns, and the COVID-19 pandemic — all of which made it impossible to finish high school on time. Now, it's unclear if he will make it this fall to the Ivy League campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts. He and other admitted students around the world are anxiously tracking the school's feud with the Trump administration, which is seeking to keep it from enrolling international students. The war in the country's Tigray region forced schools to close in many parts of the province. Nuguse, 21, took a gap year to study and save money to pay for his TOEFL English proficiency test in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia's capital. 'The war affected me a great deal and when I found out the news that I was accepted to Harvard, I was ecstatic. I knew it was a proud moment for my family, teachers, mentors and friends, who were instrumental in my achievement,' he said. Increasingly, the nation's oldest and best-known university has attracted some of the brightest minds from around the world, with international students accounting for one-quarter of its enrollment. As Harvard's fight with the administration plays out, foreign students are now navigating deep uncertainty and weighing other options. On Wednesday, President Donald Trump signed a directive seeking to block U.S. entry for Harvard's international students. It marked the administration's latest effort to squeeze Harvard's foreign enrollment after a federal judge in Boston blocked the withdrawal of its certification to host students from overseas. 'Harvard will continue to protect its international students,' the university said in a statement. The standoff with Harvard comes as the administration has been tightening scrutiny of student visas nationwide. Thousands of students around the country abruptly lost permission to be in the U.S. this spring before the administration reversed itself, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced last week the U.S. would 'aggressively revoke' visas for students from China. 'It is one blow after another,' said Mike Henniger, CEO of Illume Student Advisory Services, who works with colleges in the U.S., Canada and Europe to recruit international students. 'At this point, international student interest in the U.S. has basically dropped to nil.' The future of Harvard's international students has been hanging in the balance since the Department of Homeland Security first moved to block its foreign enrollment on May 22. For many, the twists and turns have been exhausting. Jing, a 23-year-old master's student, is currently completing an internship in China this summer, and unsure if he can reenter the U.S. for the fall semester. 'It is tiring, we all feel numb now. Trump just makes big news headlines once every few days since he got back to the White House,' said Jing, who agreed to speak under his family name out of concern about retaliation from the Trump administration. Jing said he is going to watch and see what happens for now, in case the move against international students is a negotiating tactic that does not stick. The possibility that Trump could block foreign enrollment at other colleges only raises the uncertainty for students planning to pursue their education overseas, said Craig Riggs, who has been working in international education for about 30 years and is the editor of ICEF Monitor. He said he urges families to consult carefully with advisers and not to overreact to the day's headlines. 'The rules under which students would make this huge decision to devote years of their lives and quite a bit of money to studying at Harvard have been shown to change quite quickly,' Riggs said. An aspiring economist, Nuguse was the only student accepted to Harvard this year from Kalamino Special High School, which caters to gifted students from underprivileged backgrounds from across Tigray. After receiving acceptances also to Columbia University and Amherst College, Nuguse chose Harvard, which he had long dreamed of attending. He said he hopes it will work out to attend Harvard. Nuguse was granted a visa to study at Harvard, and he worries it might be too late to reverse his decision and attend another university anyway. He received an email from Harvard last week, telling him to proceed with his registration and highlighting a judge's order in Harvard's favor in the dispute over foreign enrollment. 'I hope the situation is temporary and I can enroll on time to go on and realize my dream far from reality in Ethiopia,' he said. ___ Associated Press writers Jocelyn Gecker and Cheyanne Mumphrey contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Who's in charge? CDC's leadership 'crisis' apparent amid new COVID-19 vaccine guidance
WASHINGTON (AP) — There was a notable absence last week when U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced in a 58-second video that the government would no longer endorse the COVID-19 vaccine for healthy children or pregnant women. The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — the person who typically signs off on federal vaccine recommendations — was nowhere to be seen. The CDC, a $9.2 billion-a-year agency tasked with reviewing life-saving vaccines, monitoring diseases and watching for budding threats to Americans' health, is without a clear leader. 'I've been disappointed that we haven't had an aggressive director since — February, March, April, May — fighting for the resources that CDC needs,' said Dr. Robert Redfield, who served as CDC director under the first Trump administration and supported Kennedy's nomination as the nation's health secretary. $9.2 billion-a-year agency without leader as nomination awaits The leadership vacuum at a foremost federal public health agency has existed for months, after President Donald Trump suddenly withdrew his first pick for CDC director in March. A hearing for his new nominee — the agency's former acting director Susan Monarez — has not been scheduled because she has not submitted all the paperwork necessary to proceed, according to a spokesman for Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., who will oversee the nomination. HHS did not answer written questions about Monarez's nomination, her current role at the CDC or her salary. An employee directory lists Monarez, a longtime government employee, as a staffer for the NIH under the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health. Instead, a lawyer and political appointee with no medical experience is 'carrying out some of the duties' of director at the agency that for seven decades has been led by someone with a medical degree. Matthew Buzzelli, who is also the chief of staff at the CDC, is 'surrounded by highly qualified medical professionals and advisors to help fulfill these duties as appropriate,' Andrew Nixon, an HHS spokesperson said in a statement. Adding to the confusion was an employee-wide email sent last week that thanked 'new acting directors who shave stepped up to the plate." The email, signed by Monarez, listed her as the acting director. It was was sent just days after Kennedy said at a Senate hearing that Monarez had been replaced by Buzzelli. The lack of a confirmed director will be a problem if a public health emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic or a rapid uptick in measles cases hits, said Michael Osterholm, an epidemiologist at the University of Minnesota. 'CDC is a crisis, waiting for a crisis to happen,' said Osterholm. 'At this point, I couldn't tell you for the life of me who was going to pull what trigger in a crisis situation." An acting director rarely seen, and stalled decisions At CDC headquarters in Atlanta, employees say Monarez was rarely heard from between late January – when she was appointed acting director – and late March, when Trump nominated her. She also has not held any of the 'all hands' meetings that were customary under previous CDC chiefs, according to several staffers. One employee, who insisted on anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media and fears being fired if identified said Monarez has been almost invisible since her nomination, adding that her absence has been cited by other leaders as an excuse for delaying action. The situation already has led to confusion. In April, a 15-member CDC advisory panel of outside experts met to discuss vaccine policy. The panel makes recommendations to the CDC Director, who routinely signs off on them. But it was unclear during the meeting who would be reviewing the panel's recommendations, which included the expansion of RSV vaccinations for adults and a new combination shot as another option to protect teens against meningitis. HHS officials said the recommendations were going to Buzzelli, but then weeks passed with no decision. A month after the meeting ended, the CDC posted on a web site that Kennedy had signed off on recommendations for travelers against chikungunya, a viral disease transmitted to humans by mosquitos. But there continues to be no word about a decision about the other vaccine recommendations. The problem was accentuated again last week, when Kennedy rolled out recommendations for the COVID-19 vaccine saying they were no longer recommended for healthy children or pregnant women, even though expectant mothers are considered a high-risk group if they contract the virus. Kennedy made the surprise announcement without input from the CDC advisory panel that has historically made recommendations on the nation's vaccine schedule. The CDC days later posted revised guidance that said healthy kids and pregnant women may get the shots. Nixon, the HHS spokesman, said CDC staff were consulted on the recommendations, but would not provide staffer's names or titles. He also did not provide the specific data or research that Kennedy reviewed to reach his conclusion on the new COVID-19 recommendations, just weeks after he said that he did not think 'people should be taking medical advice' from him. 'As Secretary Kennedy said, there is a clear lack of data to support the repeat booster strategy in children,' Nixon said in a statement. Research shows that pregnant women are at higher risk of severe illness, mechanical ventilation and death, when they contract COVID-19 infections. During the height of the pandemic, deaths of women during pregnancy or shortly after childbirth soared to their highest level in 50 years. Vaccinations also have been recommended for pregnant women because it passes immunity to newborns who are too young for vaccines and also vulnerable to infections. Nixon did not address a written question about recommendations for pregnant women. Kennedy's decision to bypass the the advisory panel and announce new COVID-19 recommendations on his own prompted a key CDC official who works with the committee – Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos – to announce her resignation last Friday. 'My career in public health and vaccinology started with a deep-seated desire to help the most vulnerable members of our population, and that is not something I am able to continue doing in this role,' she wrote in an email seen by an Associated Press reporter. Signs are mounting that the CDC has been 'sidelined' from key decision-making under Kennedy's watch, said Dr. Anand Parekh, the chief medical adviser for The Bipartisan Policy Center. 'It's difficult to ascertain how we will reverse the chronic disease epidemic or be prepared for myriad public health emergencies without a strong CDC and visible, empowered director,' Parekh said. 'It's also worth noting that every community in the country is served by a local or state public health department that depends on the scientific expertise of the CDC and the leadership of the CDC director.'
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Map of States Trump Won in 2024 Where Unemployment Claims Are Increasing
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Unemployment claims rose by about 8,000 nationally for the last week in May, including in states President Donald Trump won in 2024. Why It Matters Trump successfully ran last election cycle predominantly on issues including the economy and illegal immigration and has said that inflation during President Joe Biden's tenure turned the economy "to hell." Currently, Americans and business owners are bracing for the uncertainty tied to the Trump administration's tariffs on countries like China, and industries including steel and aluminum. What To Know New data published Thursday by the Department of Labor shows a weekly increase of about 8,000 new applications for jobless benefits for the week ending May 31, bringing the total to 247,000. The increase was the highest since October. Weekly applications have typically ranged between 200,000 and 250,000 since layoffs and firings became more routine during the COVID-19 pandemic and global economic turmoil, according to the Associated Press. The biggest changes in week-to-week claims came from Kentucky (3,976), Minnesota (2,377), Tennessee (1,765) and Ohio (1,146). A report from payroll company ADP issued on Wednesday showed 37,000 jobs were added by private employers in May, which was less than expected. Trump has called on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell repeatedly to cut interest rates, as higher rates place pressure on employment by increasing borrowing costs for businesses, potentially limiting investment. But the central bank is tasked with keeping prices stable, and it is wary of the inflationary impact of Trump's tariffs and those imposed on the U.S. in retaliation. Powell has critiqued the tariffs for the potential negative ramifications on inflation and unemployment. In May, the Federal Reserve held its benchmark lending rate at 4.3 percent for the third straight meeting, following three cuts last year. The newest job numbers arrive as Republicans try to push Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" through the Senate. Issues like Medicare and the turbulence of general consumer sentiment because of tariffs have been heavily debated by lawmakers. Job seekers stand in line at the Wyndham Destinations booth during the Mega JobNewsUSA South Florida Job Fair in the Amerant Bank Arena on April 30, 2025, in Sunrise, Florida. Job seekers stand in line at the Wyndham Destinations booth during the Mega JobNewsUSA South Florida Job Fair in the Amerant Bank Arena on April 30, 2025, in Sunrise, Holzer, a public policy professor at Georgetown University and senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, told Newsweek via phone that a country with "enormous uncertainty" economically could result in a reluctance to invest. It can also make more companies than not hesitant to hire new workers. If it looks like there's going to be an economic slowdown, individuals will likely postpone any plans they might have had to open new businesses or to expand existing ones," Holzer said. "It's so hard to answer any questions because we don't know where the tariffs are going to end up. Every day, Trump changes his mind. He pulled way back on those huge China tariffs but then topped the tariffs on aluminum and steel. "Some people say, 'Well, he's just going to use them as leverage to try to cut deals with these different countries.' Other people say, 'No, they should be real and they should last.' It depends where you land and where they land. Personally, I think in the meantime everybody's in a wait-and-see mode." That mode of patience will affect individuals and business owners differently based on sectors and industries, Holzer added. People in the service industry, for example, may not be directly affected by tariffs but might be indirectly affected. What People Are Saying Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, on CBS' Face the Nation: "When we were here in March, you said there was going to be big inflation. There hasn't been any inflation. Actually, the inflation numbers are the best in four years. So why don't we stop trying to say this could happen—wait and see what does happen." Louisiana Senator John Kennedy, a Republican, on MSNBC's Morning Joe on June 5: "We're in uncharted waters here with the tariffs. I think the markets are telling us that. We don't know what impact they're going to have on the economy. But if we don't extend those tax cuts, we're going into a recession, and our economy's going to be on a journey to the center of the Earth." What Happens Next The Federal Open Market Committee is scheduled to meet June 17-18 to set monetary policy.
