SLO's street signs are infamous now — but they haven't always been. See how they looked before
Having been to a few civic-decision-making meetings over the decades, there are often two major impulses — often at odds.
One idea is be conservative with public funds. Every dollar spent needs to be justified. The least spent is always the best choice.
The other thought is if the wallet is being opened, people deserve something nice that they would find useful or like. And spending a little on prevention could save in the long run.
The classic example of false economy in the city of San Luis Obispo was the 1938 fire that lead to the demolition of the classic 1879 city hall and fire station.
The city's budget had been run on a shoestring for decades. There wasn't much money flowing into the region during the Great Depression, and the county had never experienced boom times like other regions of the state.
But in retrospect, a series of preventable funding fiascoes lead to disaster — including not upgrading the building's faulty wiring or replacing worn-out fire hoses that burst three times.
That story was covered in a 2019 Photos From the Vault column.
Another example of debate over funding something that ultimately gets mixed reviews is street signage.
A recent Tribune story outlined how San Luis Obispo got signs that look like the calligraphy on a J.R.R. Tolkien map.
What did the signs look like before that?
The previous generation of signs were brown enamel with white lettering and a no-nonsense highway-sign-ready, Series E font.
What it lacked in personality, it made up for in quick readability.
Prior to that, the street signs were also a block letter design, and the color scheme was a simple black-and-white.
In the 1940s, the city had few street signs. The town wasn't that big and as mentioned earlier — it was cheap. Also keep in mind there wasn't any GPS navigation at the time.
In May 1941, the city proposed buying 112 signs from the Lyle Sign Company in Minneapolis. If that did not satisfy residents who wanted additional signs, they were invited to put them up at their own expense. Price was $3.95 for a two-wing unit.
The complete sign assembly consisted of a steel pole painted silver, topped with a white porcelain sign with black letters. Orange paint accented a steeple.
The city splurged and bought an additional six signs more than the original proposal, according to a story in September of that year.
The program would be shut down when the United States entered World War II in December and steel became a critical war resource.
After the war was over, the city slowly began to fix the shortage of signs.
A Dec. 8, 1948, editorial in the Telegram-Tribune, likely written by editor Robert W. Goodell, read:
'The proposal being considered by the City Council to install new street signs throughout San Luis Obispo is a timely move that will meet with general approval.
Not only are many street signs in a state of disrepair but the recent annexation movements have added two large areas to the city, which call for expanded street markings. Within the city there are also many streets which were comparatively uninhabited at the time the last signs were put up but which now need additional direction finders for the convenience of a much larger population.
San Luis Obispo streets are not the easiest in the world to locate in any case. The founders of this pleasantly informal community had no great regard for geometrical design. Not only do San Luis Obispo streets wander casually cross country but subdividers and real estate men of past eras have tucked in little streets here and there with numerous dead ends and twists and turns.
It will be a hospitable and helpful gesture for the city to bring our street signs up to date.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Why both the Left and the Right are failing American workers
Working-class voters had high hopes that Donald Trump would help them out economically: Inflation and the economy were top priorities for Trump voters in 2024. These voters have seen the fading of the American Dream first-hand: Over 90% of Americans did better than their parents in the decades after World War II, but only half born in 1980 will. Why? A major reason is that employers pocketed workers' fair share of productivity increases. Wages used to rise when productivity did; if that had continued, workers' wages would be 43% higher than they are today. 6 Only half of Americans born in 1980 are doing better than their parents, with the root causes far harder to solve than mere DOGE-style cost cuts by President Trump and Elon Musk. FRANCIS CHUNG/POOL/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock You won't hear about this from President Trump. Instead, his villain is foreign trade, and his solution is to use tariffs to bring back blue-collar jobs. But tariffs won't work quickly, because onshoring means building new factories, which takes years. And it may never happen. Meanwhile, tariffs threaten to take away the only real benefit workers got from globalization: cheap Nikes, T-shirts, and party favors. To add to that, the Trump administration is DOGE-ing away stability at the Veterans Administration and Medicaid, which middle-class and rural Americans rely on. In short, the right isn't doing right by Lunchpail Joe and Jane. But neither is the left. Instead, it's obsessing nonstop about Trump's flouting of democratic norms — that's all progressives want to talk about. Defense of democracy was a top priority for those who voted for Kamala Harris, but way, way down for those who voted for Trump. The left also wants to talk about how DOGE is firing government workers, making professionals' jobs unstable and nerve-wracking. 6 Attacks on Obama-era healthcare initiatives are another reason American workers are feeling the pinch, some critics claim.. Getty Images Welcome to our world, say non-college voters. Thirty years ago, sales personnel at Macy's had full-time jobs with benefits. Today, associates worry constantly about whether they will accrue enough hours to pay the rent, in jobs that typically lack health insurance. As a result, many workers without degrees are working all kinds of hours. A 38-year-old construction worker described the impact on family life: 'People can't get or stay married because it takes so much effort to survive. My ex-fiancée said, 'You're never around.' But I was working to get a better life for us. No one has time for their kids. It's the American Nightmare.' 6 Today, associates worry constantly about whether they will accrue enough hours to pay the rent, in jobs that typically lack health insurance. Bloomberg via Getty Images DOGE is placing college-educated professionals where workers without degrees have been for decades — worried sick about how they're going to support their families. Don't expect workers to care. In earlier eras, the left was focused on good jobs for blue-collar workers and universal programs to ensure stability for the middle class, like Social Security, Medicare, and VA home loans and college benefits. In the 1970s, the focus changed to prioritize issues of greater concern to liberal college grads: environmentalism, racism, and sexism. As political priorities changed, so did 'feeling rules' that set the parameters of our heartstrings. A good lefty should feel angst about climate change, the poor, LGBTQ+, racism, and immigrants. But blue-collar Americans who vote for Trump? They're deplorable. If you care deeply about people disadvantaged by race, gender, and country of origin — but ignore class disadvantage — then people disadvantaged by class will seek solace by flocking to those who channel their anger. In both Europe and the US, those who flock to the far right are middle-status voters in routine jobs, holding on for dear life and just waiting for the other shoe to drop. A reality check: Democrats have generally done better for working people than Republicans. Obamacare is only the most recent example. The Trump administration has cut funding to programs that underlie the stability of middle-class Americans, like the VA and Social Security, creating overly lengthy wait times. 6 'Out-classed: How the Left Lost the Working Class and How to Win Them Back' by Joan C. Williams. 6 Author Joan C. Williams. This is what the left should be focusing on, not the defense of democracy. Americans who feel they've been screwed for the last 40 years feel democratic institutions haven't delivered for them. If Democrats are seen as defending the status quo, they won't win over non-college voters who feel like the status quo isn't working for them. And nearly two-thirds of Americans lack college degrees. Without them, Democrats can't win elections. Here's the bottom line. My message for Republican powers-that-be is a question: Does the current business climate, rife with chaos, instability, and the corrosion of both democratic norms and the US credit rating, really work for you? If you'd prefer a more orderly political and business climate, you need to deliver a stable, middle-class future for Americans without college degrees. 6 The Trump administration is DOGE-ing away stability at the Veterans Administration and Medicaid, which middle-class and rural Americans rely on. Getty Images My message for Democratic powers-that-be is also a question: Do you want to win elections? If you do, you need to change policies and feeling rules to deliver both economic stability and respect for non-college voters. Because if you don't, what you now see is what you'll get. There's your coalition out of this mess. Joan C. Williams is director of the Equality Action Center at UC Law San Francisco and the author of 'OUTCLASSED: How the Left Lost the Working Class and How to Win Them Back.'
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Is your money safe in a bank during a recession?
As scary as they can be, recessions are normal — and temporary. But that doesn't make them any less painful. With the possibility of a recession dominating headlines in recent months, it's no surprise if you're concerned about the security of your money. You may even wonder if your money is safe in a bank during a recession. Two pieces of good news may help calm your fears: First, according to JPMorgan Research, the likelihood of a recession has dropped from 60% to 40% in recent weeks. Second, even if a recession does happen, your money is safe in a bank. Continue reading to learn how banks protect your cash, what happens when they fail, and how you can keep your money safe during a recession. Banks are generally safe at any time, including during a recession. In 1933, following the Great Depression, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was created to promote consumer trust in banks. The FDIC protects insured bank deposits of up to $250,000 per customer, per insured bank, per ownership category, in case of bank failure. FDIC insurance doesn't apply to all account types; it only covers certain deposit accounts, such as savings accounts, checking accounts, money market accounts, and certificates of deposit (CDs). Money invested in stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and other investments isn't covered. Bank failures are unlikely, but they do happen on occasion, and especially during a recession. While there has only been one bank failure in 2025, there were 157 in a single year following the Great Recession. But even when banks fail, FDIC insurance protects bank customers in one of two ways: The FDIC may open a new account for you at an insured bank with a balance equal to your insured balance at the failed bank. The FDIC may send you a check in the amount of your insured balance at the failed bank. According to the FDIC's website, it has historically paid customers within a few days of failed bank closures. And since the creation of the FDIC, no depositor has ever lost insured funds. Credit unions and banks are both safe during a recession, provided they're both federally insured. Like banks, credit unions offer insurance on deposits of up to $250,000. Though FDIC insurance doesn't apply to credit union deposits, credit unions are insured by the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), which provides similar coverage. While banks and credit unions provide the same amount of financial protection during a recession, credit unions have characteristics that may make them feel safer. For example: Credit unions are member-owned. Unlike banks, credit unions are nonprofit organizations and don't have to cater to shareholders. This generally means they put members' needs first and offer highly personalized customer service, which can provide some peace of mind during financially unstable times. Credit unions tend to have fewer fees, more affordable loans, and higher savings rates. Because credit unions are nonprofit entities, they can pass profits on to members in the form of lower fees and higher savings rates. These extra savings can go a long way during a recession, when members may be looking to cut costs wherever they can. Credit unions take less risk compared to banks. Because banks operate for a profit, they're generally willing to take on more risk in the pursuit of bigger returns. For example, the majority of subprime mortgages in 2006 were issued by banks, not credit unions. Credit unions, meanwhile, are more risk-averse, which can provide a sense of stability for their members. You can keep your money safe during a recession by keeping it in the right place. Here are some tips to make sure your cash is secure if and when a recession hits: Make sure you bank with insured institutions. FDIC or NCUA insurance protects your deposits as long as your bank or credit union is backed by one of these organizations. To confirm your bank is FDIC-insured, use the FDIC's BankFind Suite tool. To check a credit union's NCUA status, use the NCUA's Credit Union Locator tool. Get extra FDIC coverage. If you have a lot of money saved, $250,000 worth of insurance may not be enough. Luckily, some banks allow you to insure deposits beyond the standard $250,000 by using something called reciprocal deposits. This system spreads your money between multiple partner banks, each of which can insure up to the standard limit. Alternatively, you can insure funds beyond the $250,000 maximum simply by opening accounts at multiple banks. Build an emergency fund. An emergency fund is always important, but it's particularly crucial during a recession. Having cash on hand in a safe, high-interest account like a high-yield savings account gives you extra comfort and protection if an emergency does happen. Read more: Recession-proof your money: How to protect your savings, investments, mortgage, and more Yes, keeping your money in the bank during a recession is generally a good idea. You can also keep your money in a credit union. As long as your bank or credit union is insured by the FDIC or NCUA, your deposits will be safe up to federal limits. Both banks and credit unions are safe places to keep your money during a recession. Banks are insured by the FDIC, and credit unions are insured by the NCUA. Both types of financial institutions insure up to $250,000 per depositor, per account category. Both banks and credit unions are safer than keeping physical cash, which can get lost, stolen, or damaged. Generally, the government can't take money from your bank account in a crisis. However, it may be able to garnish wages and seize your tax refund if you owe outstanding debt, such as federal student loans.
Miami Herald
a day ago
- Miami Herald
More federal workers are flooding the job market, with worsening prospects
After Matt Minich was fired from his job with the Food and Drug Administration in February, he did what many scientists have done for years after leaving public service. He looked for a position with a university. Minich, 38, was one of thousands swept up in the mass layoffs of probationary workers at the beginning of President Donald Trump's second administration. The shock of those early moves heralded more upheaval to come as the Department of Government Efficiency, led by tech billionaire Elon Musk, raced through agency after agency, slashing staff, freezing spending and ripping up government contracts. In March, about 45 minutes after Minich accepted a job as a scientist in the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, the program lost its federal grant funding. Minich, who had worked on reducing the negative health impacts of tobacco use, observed that he had the special honor of 'being DOGE-ed twice.' 'I'm doubly not needed by the federal government,' he said in an interview. He is still hunting for work. And like hundreds of thousands of other former civil servants forced into an increasingly crowded job market, he is finding that drastic cuts to grants and contracts in academia, consulting and direct services mean even fewer opportunities are available. Some states that were hiring, another avenue for former federal government employees, have pulled back. So, too, have the private contractors typically seen as a landing place. The situation is expected to worsen as more layoffs are announced, voluntary departures mount and workers who were placed on administrative leave see the clock run out. With Musk's time in Washington now done, a fuller picture of just how completely he and Trump have upended the role of government is coming into view. Federal tax dollars underpin entire professions, directly and indirectly, and the cuts led by Musk's operation have left some workers with nowhere to go. In Washington, D.C., and the surrounding area, the disruption has the hallmarks of the collapse of an industrial cluster, not unlike the disappearance of manufacturing jobs in the upper Midwest during the 2000s. Except this time, it is moving at lightning speed. In January, just as Trump was taking office, the civilian federal workforce across the country had reached a post-World War II peak of 2.3 million, not including the Postal Service. Few agencies have publicly stated how many people have been fired or voluntarily resigned, but a rough count shows that federal agencies have lost some 135,000 to firings and voluntary resignation, with another 150,000 in planned reductions. Contracted and grant-funded workers -- which the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta estimated to be as many as 4.6 million people -- are harder to track in official data. The first contractor layoffs began in February with organizations that received funding from the U.S. Agency for International Development, like Chemonics and FHI360. As more grants and contracts that were under review across government are terminated, job cuts have gained steam. Booz Allen Hamilton, a consulting firm based in Northern Virginia that gets 98% of its revenue from the federal government, announced that it was cutting 7% of its 36,000-person staff. Even providers of Head Start, the low-income preschool program, have issued layoff notices because funding has been in doubt. While the national labor market remains stable, job loss is starting to become notable in the capital region. Unemployment rates in the District of Columbia and most of its surrounding counties have been on the rise since December. The number of people receiving unemployment insurance has been elevated in Virginia and D.C. over the past several months. Job postings in Washington have dropped across the board, according to the hiring platform Indeed, including in administrative assistance, human resources and accounting. Local government agencies around Washington are hosting dozens of hiring events, and most of them are packed. Elaine Chalmers of Woodbridge, Virginia, was among 750 people who attended a recent resource fair in Arlington, Virginia, just outside Washington. The event offered free consultation for updating resumes, as well as professional headshots and workshops, including one on managing personal finances during a transition in employment. It was the fourth one she attended in the month since she left the Agriculture Department, where she had worked for 20 years, most recently in the division that ensured equal access to grants for rural communities. She resigned to escape the stress and uncertainty created by new mandates, such as erasing words like 'equity' and 'diversity' from department communications. 'It just became almost a character question for myself,' said Chalmers, 53. 'I couldn't honorably stay.' Like many of the federal workers who chose to take a deferred resignation or early retirement, one of the tools the administration has used to shrink the workforce, she is on leave and will be paid through September. It is a relief, she said, because she is the sole caregiver for her mother and 15-year-old son. But the prospects do not look good. Chalmers said she expected to have to take a pay cut. She said she applied for more than 100 jobs in the week before the job fair and received several automated emails informing her that she did not get the position. For many government workers, career transitions can be especially daunting because their jobs are often extremely specific, performing functions that do not exist in the private sector. 'For a lot of them, it's almost like starting from scratch,' said Laura Moreno-Davis, a spokesperson for WorkSource Montgomery, a workforce agency for Montgomery County, Maryland, just outside D.C. 'If they really have a wealth of experience and knowledge, how can we best use that?' A new group formed by two former federal employees is trying to help people do that. 'How do you translate these skills that you've learned in the federal government that are so complex and seem to be so unique into something that can be communicated easily outside of the federal government?' said Julie Cerqueira, co-founder of the group, FedsForward. Cerqueira's partner, Karen Lee, said that people who worked in federal disaster recovery and resilience jobs, for example, had expertise that could easily transfer to private-sector work in contingency planning and supply chains. But it is not so simple for everyone. Chelsea Van Thof, 33, is a public health veterinarian who focused on diseases that spread from animals to humans, and humans to animals -- a niche job even in government. A few weeks after the inauguration, the contract she worked under at the State Department was placed on hold for a 90-day review and ultimately terminated. Van Thof immediately lost her health insurance and took on a housemate to cover her rent. Plans for the future changed, too, as she had been counting on public-sector loan forgiveness to pay off her $250,000 in veterinary school debt, a prospect that now seems increasingly remote. She sometimes feels as if she is sending resumes into a void. 'I was just thankful when I got a rejection because it meant they saw my application,' she said. Like others in the science field, including Minich, she is looking for jobs outside the country. And in the meantime, she helped form a support group of about 80 wildlife protection conservationists who are in similar predicaments. People working on government contracts are hit especially hard because they are not eligible for the deferred resignation plans available to federal employees and cannot look forward to their pensions. Todd Frank, of Westminster, Maryland, was given just a few minutes' notice before he was laid off as a technical writer on a contract with the Department of Homeland Security's science and technology directorate, helping get the appropriate gear out to military personnel in the field. Frank, 54, is now wrestling with whether to uproot his family to find a new job, which would come with steep trade-offs. His wife runs her own business -- a licensed day care out of their home. His teenage sons do not want to leave their high school, he said. Lately, he is looking at the family's budget for where to make cuts. 'Not being able to buy a suit for prom sounds like rich people problems, but you don't want to turn around and tell your kid, 'You can't do this,' or, 'You can't do that,'' Frank said. Several states had advertised their eagerness to hire people laid off by the federal government in the early days of federal cuts. In March, Gov. Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania said the state would give hiring preference to former federal workers. Since then, the state government has received more than 7,300 applications from people who said they had federal experience, his office said, and so far, state agencies have hired 120 of them. But state jobs have gotten a lot more popular in recent months. Since March, former and current federal employees have sent in nearly 700 applications, California's human resources office said. Some states are having their own budget problems, in part brought on by uncertainty around the continuation of federal funding. Alaska, Massachusetts, Indiana, Louisiana and New Hampshire have implemented hiring freezes. Public health agencies in Ohio and Alaska have laid people off as grants were canceled. And a broad swath of universities have also paused new hires, including the University of California system, the University of Pennsylvania, and Emory University in Georgia. With the Trump administration's firings of scientists and grant cancellations from agencies including the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health, science and consulting have been hit especially hard, according to Indeed. Companies and nonprofits that helped evaluate whether federal programs were working, like American Institutes for Research, have let go up to a quarter of their payroll. Paro Sen, a research scientist in Cincinnati, was laid off in May along with most of the people in her office at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. She worked on industrial hygiene, studying worker exposures that cause chronic health problems, and visited Washington in May with her union to talk to members of Congress about the need to restore these jobs to the federal government. 'This was my dream job that I have been ripped from,' she said in an interview. Sen and her colleagues work in such a specialized field that they are competing for very few available jobs, especially if they want to stay where they are. 'The job market right now is not amazing,' said Sen, 29. 'Cincinnati is not a very big city, and you've got, suddenly, some of the smartest people in this field all applying and competing for the exact same jobs at the same time.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025
