Construction Workers Find 200+ Ancient Species Beneath a High School
A construction project at San Pedro High School in Los Angeles revealed nearly 9-million-year-old sea creature fossils buried under the school.
Scientists believe the area was once fully underwater, which would explain the bounty of marine fossils.
Along with beds of shells and millions of fish bones, researchers discovered the fossil of a prehistoric megalodon.
Most high schoolers only get to study fossils through textbooks and videos. But students at San Pedro High School in Los Angeles got a much more up-close-and-personal experience thanks to the discovery of millions of fossils dated millions of years old underneath their campus.
When a construction project to renovate the school kicked off in 2022, fossils—ranging from a saber-tooth salmon to shorebirds and sea turtles to a prehistoric megalodon—started turning up pretty quickly. 'I thought this stuff was something that never happens, especially around here,' student Taya Olson told KABC. 'It only happens in textbooks.'
And those finds have not slowed. Over the next two years, the fossil finds kept coming, with numbers of bones from sea creatures of all sorts growing into the millions. 'It represents an entire ecology of the ocean nine million years ago,' said Wayne Bischoff, director of cultural resources at Envicom Corporation.
So far, the project has uncovered out over 200 species, but it could take years before experts know the true extent of the find. 'The fact that millions of fossils have been unearthed on this site has led to a new era of concentrative studies that will bring notoriety to this community and this high school,' said Alberto Carvalho, Los Angeles Unified School District superintendent.
Located west of Long Beach on the Palos Verdes Peninsula, the campus was unknowingly sitting atop two different fossil hotspots—a bone bed from the Miocene era (nearly nine million years ago), and a shell bed from the Pleistocene era (roughly 120,000 years old ), according to the Los Angeles Times.
'There's never been this type of density of fossils ever found at a site like this before in California,' Bischoff told the newspaper, adding that the find confirms the existing scientific idea that ancient Los Angeles was once underwater.
The oldest of the fossils were trapped within a fossilized algae known as diatomite.The algae concentration points to a nutrient-rich area that could have fed a variety of marine life—even including dolphins and whales. Bischoff said that the wealth of fossils mixed with shore material has given rise to the theory that a whole prehistoric island once washed onto what is now the L.A. shore.
The fossilized finds are now mostly in the hands of researchers—whether from the school district, the Cabrillo Marine Aquarium, Cal State Channel Islands, or the natural History Museum of Los Angeles County.
Milad Esfahani, a San Pedro High School student, even got in on the research at the Natural History Museum by sorting fossilized shells. 'It was sort of like gold panning,' he told the Times, adding he now hopes to become a marine paleontologist.
Mining the fossilized beds can give researchers an exceptional view into the past. 'It's the entire ecosystem from an age that's gone,' Bischoff told LAist. 'We have all this evidence to help future researchers put together what an entire ecology looked like nine million years ago. That's really rare.'
You Might Also Like
Can Apple Cider Vinegar Lead to Weight Loss?
Bobbi Brown Shares Her Top Face-Transforming Makeup Tips for Women Over 50
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Endangered species deserve a home, too
The elusive Northern Spotted Owl. The majestic Whooping Crane. Charismatic Florida panthers and beloved Monarch butterflies. These and many other endangered species now face even graver threats in the wake of two recent developments in the world of conservation. On Apr. 7, the billion-dollar biotech firm Colossal announced the 'de-extinction' of the dire wolf, a canine species that vanished in the Late Pleistocene (approximately 13,000 years ago). And on Apr. 17, the Trump administration revealed its intention to weaken decades-old endangered species protections by redefining a key word: harm. This narrower definition effectively rescinds protection of an endangered species' habitat, limiting harm to actions that 'directly' harass, injure or kill organisms. What these two developments have in common is a disregard for the vital connection that exists between species and the places they call home. Habitat refers to the place where an organism naturally or normally lives. Removal of habitat protection opens the door to logging, development and extraction of oil and minerals. The proposed definition of harm could convert fragile wetlands into farmland, migration corridors into freeways and nesting sites into beachfront property — and none of this would qualify as harm to the creatures who live there. A habitat includes the specific resources and conditions that a given species needs to survive — the plants or animals it feeds on, and particular features of topography, soil, climate and water. Some species are especially vulnerable to extinction because they require a very rare or specific type of habitat. Others are at risk because they range across several. Many butterfly species, for example, are reliant on a single host plant for every stage of their life cycle — mating, laying eggs and feeding their young. Even plants closely related to the host plant cannot replace these vital functions, however indistinguishable they may appear to the human eye. Migratory creatures, meanwhile, depend upon many habitats in far-flung geographic locations. A recent study found that approximately half of all migratory species are in decline. Annually, billions of migratory birds crisscross state and national boundaries, with varying degrees of legal protections for the places where they nest, feed or rest. Further erosion of habitat protection could be the death knell for these and other vulnerable species. Were species not so intimately tied to their environments, it might make sense to regard lab-created or genetically engineered organisms, like the recently unveiled dire wolves, as suitable replacements for endangered or extinct species. Conservation would be akin to curating museum or zoo specimens, with living representatives of endangered species, or mere samples of their genetic material, maintained in artificial environments. Disregard for the importance of habitat is evident in the fanfare over Colossal's so-called dire wolves — more accurately, grey wolves with dire wolf DNA spliced into their genome. Consider that in their original Pleistocene environments, true dire wolves preyed upon large herbivorous megafauna that are now extinct: sloths, mastodons, giant bison and camels. By contrast, Remus, Romulus and Khaleesi, the telegenic trio of fluffy white wolves created by Colossal, will live their entire lives in a highly secured, undisclosed site, subsisting on a hand-fed diet of ground meats and kibble. In short, the same flawed logic lies behind the dire wolf 'de-extinction' and the Trump proposal to redefine harm: Both treat species as if they live in a vacuum. Doug Burgum, the Trump-appointed secretary of the Interior, exemplified this sort of thinking when he took to social media to hail de-extinction as the 'bedrock' of future conservation, arguing simultaneously for re-think of endangered species protections: 'It has been innovation—not regulation—that has spawned American greatness,' he said. Citing Colossal's breakthrough, Burgum questioned the need for an endangered species list. Ten days later, the administration moved to weaken endangered species regulation by excluding habitat from the definition of harm. Yet, habitat loss remains the primary culprit of species endangerment and extinction. While these losses can occur naturally through periodic events like fires or earthquakes, the vast majority of habitat degradation, fragmentation and loss stems from human activity: land development, deforestation, large-scale agriculture, air and water pollution, and human-caused climate change, among other factors. Even amid intensified political polarization, endangered species protection is wildly popular, with 84 percent of Americans supporting the Endangered Species Act. In the past month, some 350,000 members of the public weighed in to protest changes to the act. Many offered the commonsense argument that destroying the home of any living being, human or nonhuman, clearly constitutes harm, as surely as a gun pointed to the head. Innovation in conservation science, including cutting-edge genetic techniques aimed at saving species on the brink of extinction, is welcome and should be encouraged. But innovation is no substitute for regulation, any more than a laboratory or zoo is a substitute for the places where animals naturally live. Endangered species face a barrage of threats from human activities. We owe them a place to call home. Lisa H. Sideris is a Public Voices fellow of The OpEd Project and the University of California. Santa Barbara, where she is professor and vice-chair of the Environmental Studies Program. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Humans nearly went extinct 1 million years ago, but we don't know why
If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission. A study published in 2023 suggests that nearly 1 million years ago, humanity almost ceased to exist. This potential mass extinction event was discovered by researchers when they began analyzing the genetic data of 3,145 modern humans. The researchers suggest that the ancient population may have been reduced to roughly 1,200 humans. Overall, the researchers believe that there could have been a bottleneck somewhere between 930,000 to 813,000 years ago, which led to a 98.7% reduction of humans on Earth. Unfortunately, narrowing down the exact cause of this bottleneck is still impossible, but it's likely climate changes could have been at the root of the event. Today's Top Deals Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Best Ring Video Doorbell deals Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98 Scientists suspect that when the world transitioned to the middle of the Pleistocene period, and the Earth cooled dramatically, it could have led to prolonged cold periods that killed off most humans. Combine that with droughts and widespread famine, and it would have been a recipe for a mass extinction event capable of wiping out humans. The researchers posit that humans may have been driven into smaller, more isolated communities, where they found themselves competing with each other for survival in the increasingly dangerous and challenging environment. Sadly, fossils from this point in time are scarce, making it hard to uncover information about the event or exactly how close humans came to being extinct. The findings also suggest that around 813,000 years ago, more hospitable climates may have been a big part of what allowed human populations to skyrocket once more. The researchers claim that as the conditions improved, humans may have branched out again, and the bottleneck may have faded. While these findings raise a lot of interesting questions, it's hard to verify all of the claims with the current data that's available. Hopefully new discoveries, like those of extinct human species, will give us more information about that time period and human evolution as a whole. More Top Deals Amazon gift card deals, offers & coupons 2025: Get $2,000+ free See the
Yahoo
26-05-2025
- Yahoo
Study reveals how woolly mammoths adapted to survive ice age
Research has revealed how woolly mammoths and other species adapted to survive the ice age. A team of palaeontologists and palaeogeneticists studied ancient fossil and DNA evidence to understand the changes animals and plants went through in the Northern Hemisphere. They found that cold-adapted animals began to evolve 2.6 million years ago, when permanent ice at the poles became more common. The study showed that many current cold-adapted species, as well as extinct ones like mammoths, evolved around 700,000 years ago, when cold periods doubled in length. READ MORE: Dorset 'war cemetery' not victims of Roman Conquest Research shows Arctic foxes and polar bears arrived later than once thought (Image: Canva) The findings, which offer a greater understanding of how species evolved in the past, were published in the journal Trends in Ecology and Evolution. John Stewart, professor of paleoecology at Bournemouth University, led the study. He said: "The cold-adapted species are among the most vulnerable animals and plants to ongoing climate change. "Therefore, an understanding of how species evolved in the past is essential to help us understand the risks faced by endangered species today." As part of their research, the team compared evidence of evolution in plants and beetles with that for mammals. SEE MORE: Habitat in many estuaries at high risk of being 'squeezed' out by climate change Cold-adapted animals began evolving 2.6 million years ago, researchers find (Image: Canva) They suggested that ideas that some organisms had evolved earlier in the polar regions need to be tested. This means that the way the modern Arctic ecologies assembled needs to be resolved, as it is not clear when and how the animals and plants who live there came together. The study found evidence for early occurrences of true lemmings and reindeer in the Arctic, where they may have evolved as climates cooled in the early Pleistocene period, between one and two million years ago. The polar bear and Arctic fox, on the other hand, may have joined them more recently within the last 700,000 years, colonising from the south. Some of the ice age cold species like the woolly rhino are different and may have evolved in the steppe grasslands to the south, with the earliest occurrences in the Tibetan Plateau. Professor Stewart said: "This is the first concerted effort to compare the evolution of cold-adapted animals and plants since modern methods of palaeogenetics appeared."
