French Negotiator Says New Caledonia at Risk of Civil War
French Minister for Overseas Manuel Valls arrived in New Caledonia a month ago for the second round of talks between the French government and local Kanak leaders to map out the island's political future.
Last time, he was there between Feb. 22 and March 1, and this time he has vowed to remain until an agreement is reached.
It comes in the wake of the deadly riots in 2024, where roads were blocked and businesses set alight by protesters, and both Kanak rebels and French gendarmes were killed.
During his first visit, Valls managed to get pro- and anti-independence groups to agree to talks, the first time that had happened since 2021.
He then published what he called '
Despite that progress, he repeated that the situation on the ground remained serious.
Related Stories
5/27/2024
5/14/2024
'We are walking on a tightrope above embers,' he told a panel of French journalists before his most recent visit.
While his main concerns are New Caledonia's economic situation, Valls is also worried about the tense atmosphere, a resurgence in 'racism [and] hatred,' the rapid deterioration in public health services, and the rise in poverty caused by an increasing number of jobless.
'All these risks are there, and that is why it is everyone's responsibility to find an agreement,' he said. 'And I will stay as long as needed, and I will put all my energy so that an agreement takes place.
'Not for me, for them.'
He said he hoped a revised version of the draft document, resulting from discussions during his previous visits and new proposals from the French government, would provide an admittedly 'difficult path' that could help reconcile the two sides.
'If there is no agreement, then economic and political uncertainty can lead to a new disaster, to confrontation, and to civil war,' he said.
'That is why I have appealed several times to all political stakeholders, those for and against independence. Everyone must take a step towards each other. An agreement is indispensable.'
Neither Side Appears Willing to Shift
Despite his warning, the pro- and anti-independence movements haven't signalled any shift from their previous, intractable positions.
The pro-independence Kanak and Socialist National Liberation Front (FLNKS) held a convention to decide whether to attend the second round of talks.
They eventually agreed but did not refer to the meeting as 'negotiations,' only 'discussions.'
The convention also reaffirmed its demands for a 'Kanaky Agreement' to be signed by Sept. 24, 2025, followed by a five-year transition period. That agreement plots a path toward full sovereignty.
Several groups on the pro-France side point to the three referenda held between 2018 and 2021, all of which rejected full sovereignty, even though the pro-independence camp largely boycotted the last consultation.
That, they say, should be the starting point for any final agreement.
Les Loyalistes Party leader Sonia Backès told a public rally last week that they had refused to talk about a date for yet another referendum.
'A new referendum would mean civil war,' she said. 'And we don't want to fix the date for civil war.' However, she said they 'still want to believe in an agreement.'
'We're part of all discussions on seeking solutions in a constructive and creative spirit.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Israel deports Greta Thunberg, other activists on Gaza aid boat
Israeli forces intercepted the boat, operated by a pro-Palestinian activist group called the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, on Monday. The passengers also included Rima Hassan, a French member of the European Parliament. In February, she was blocked from entering Israel for promoting boycotts of the country. Advertisement At a news conference, Israel's foreign minister, Gideon Sa'ar, described the ship's voyage as a public relations stunt. He said it was Israel's intention to deliver to Gaza 'the tiny amount of aid on the yacht that they did not consume.' The campaigners had said the boat was transporting urgently needed goods, including baby formula, food, and medical supplies, and that they planned to breach Israel's long-standing naval blockade of Gaza. Thunberg has been an outspoken opponent of Israel's blockade on the enclave and its conduct of the war in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Israel recently imposed an 80-day blockade on food and other aid from entering Gaza that it lifted last month. Hunger is now widespread in Gaza, according to international aid organizations, and a new Israeli-backed food distribution system has been marred by chaos. Advertisement 'We are doing this because, no matter what odds we are against, we have to keep trying,' Thunberg said last week. 'Because the moment we stop trying is when we lose our humanity,' she added. Israel says its naval blockade is necessary to prevent Hamas from smuggling weapons into the coastal enclave. Adalah, an Israeli human rights group and legal center that focuses on Palestinian rights, said that the eight activists who had refused to leave would contest their deportation at the tribunal Tuesday. The group added that its lawyers had traveled to Givon Prison in Ramleh, near Ben Gurion Airport, where the eight volunteers were being held, to represent them at the hearings. A spokesperson for Israel's immigration authority, Sabin Hadad, confirmed that four of the activists had waived their right to a hearing and said the other eight had been transferred to Givon Prison for up to 96 hours. The Foreign Ministry later said Thunberg had left Israel on a flight to France and posted photographs on social media that appeared to show her on a plane. The ministry later clarified that Sweden, Thunberg's home country, was her final destination. A spokesperson for the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, Ann Wright, confirmed that Thunberg was on a plane to Paris and then to Stockholm. The coalition 'generally encourages high-profile volunteers to leave as soon as possible to be able to speak directly to the media about their experiences to counter what the Israeli government may be saying,' Wright said. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition leads an international grassroots campaign that opposes Israel's long-standing naval blockade of Gaza by sending ships carrying humanitarian aid to the enclave. The Madleen set sail from Sicily this month. Advertisement Israel vowed to prevent the ship from reaching Gaza, saying its military would use any means to stop it from breaching the blockade. The Foreign Ministry said Monday that the Madleen had been diverted toward Israeli shores. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition said its activists had been 'kidnapped' by the Israeli military. This article originally appeared in
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Europe heaps harsh sanctions on Russia, saying ‘strength is the only language' Moscow understands
The European Union announced a new package of sanctions against Russia on Tuesday, saying that Moscow's daily deadly attacks against Ukraine show that it is not interested in peace – despite recent diplomatic efforts. The new package – the 18th since Russia launched its full-scale unprovoked invasion against its neighbor in 2022 – is designed to further target the Kremlin's ability to make money from its oil and gas production. The proposal includes lowering the price cap on Russian oil exports from $60 to $45 per barrel and introducing a full transaction ban on Russian banks and financial institutions in third countries that help Russia circumvent existing sanctions. The EU said it is also proposing a ban on the use of Russian energy infrastructure, forbidding any EU operator from engaging directly or indirectly in any transactions that involve the Nord Stream pipelines. The new package will need to be approved by the EU's 27 member states. That could be complicated given previous concerns raised by some more pro-Kremlin governments, such as Hungary and Slovakia, about further sanctions targeting Russia. While both those countries have previously threatened to block new rounds of sanctions, so far they have ultimately voted in favor of them. The President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen said the sanctions were necessary 'because strength is the only language that Russia will understand.' 'We want peace for Ukraine. Despite weeks of diplomatic attempts, despite (Ukraine's) President (Volodymyr) Zelensky's offer of an unconditional ceasefire, Russia continues to bring death and destruction to Ukraine. Russia's goal is not peace, it is to impose the rule of might. Therefore, we are ramping up pressure on Russia,' von der Leyen said at a news conference in Brussels. The leaders of Germany, France, the United Kingdom and Poland last month told Russian leader Vladimir Putin to agree to a 30-day ceasefire or face possible 'massive' sanctions. Putin ignored the ultimatum, proposing instead 'direct talks' between Moscow and Kyiv. But two rounds of talks in Istanbul, Turkey, have made it clear Russia is sticking to its maximalist demands that would essentially equate to Ukraine's capitulation. 'Russia's ability to continue the war is equal to its ability to sell their oil and bypass financial barriers,' Zelensky said Tuesday night, calling the European sanctions package 'an important step' and also condemning the lack of similar measures from the United States. 'Russia has been constantly increasing the number of munitions in its strikes. This is a steady trend, and it means that Moscow is not afraid of anyone in the world,' the Ukrainian leader added. 'Putin wants to continue killing and is taking advantage of the fact that he is not getting a strong response. He does not hear Washington. And this speaks volumes to the world, to everyone.' Explaining why the EU has targeted Russia's energy sector, the Commission chief said oil exports still represent one third of Russian government revenues. 'We need to cut this source of revenue,' she said. The oil price cap was introduced by the EU and G7 countries in December 2022. The cap, which applies to Russia's seaborne oil exports, prohibits Western companies from providing shipping, insurance and other services needed to export the fuel unless it is priced below the threshold. By enforcing a price cap, the EU and its allies have tried to diminish a key source of revenue for the Kremlin while still allowing its oil to flow to the global energy market – because cutting Russia's supplies completely could destabilize the market and cause prices to shoot up. Von der Leyen said on Tuesday that the price cap needs lowering because global oil prices had fallen since the cap was first introduced and now trade 'very close' to the $60 level. The price of a barrel of Brent crude, the global oil benchmark, has dropped 18% since the price cap on Russian crude took effect on December 5, 2022. It was trading at almost $68 a barrel late morning Eastern Time (ET) on Tuesday. The bloc also wants to harden sanctions on Russia's banking sector. Shortly after the invasion, the United States, EU, Britain and Canada jointly banned some Russian banks from the SWIFT messaging service – a high-security network connecting thousands of financial institutions around the world. That has made it far more difficult for those banks to send and receive money from abroad. Now, the Commission wants to go a step further and prevent any EU operator, such a a business, from conducting a transaction with a list of sanctioned Russian banks. It also plans to add another 22 of Moscow's banks to that list. Additionally, the bloc wants to extend the transaction ban to financial institutions in third countries that help Russia circumvent existing sanctions. Von der Leyen said the latest package of sanctions will also broaden the current ban on materials and technologies that can be exported to Russia, adding: 'We want to make sure that Russia does not find ways to modernize its weapons with European technologies.' The sanctions will also include new measures against 22 Russian and foreign companies providing direct or indirect support to Russia's military and industrial complex. CNN's Victoria Butenko contributed to this report.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
I didn't think we were heading for civil war. Now I'm not so sure
I used to dismiss fears Britain was headed for open sectarian conflict, possibly even civil war, as overblown. Those expressing such unease were, I suspected, succumbing to their own subconscious cognitive bias and exaggerating the scale of the problem. After all, does the UK really have the ingredients for such internal strife? We live in an inefficient and messed up society, but not a 'failed' one. Taxes are paid, people who want to be are employed, we have abundant food, clothing and energy – at least until Ed Miliband's climate fanaticism catches up with us. We don't have America's gun problem, even if gang violence has become a feature of British life. We have, relative to other developed nations, successfully integrated migrants in large numbers. Now, however, I'm not so sure. The rule-abiding majority are nearing the end of their tether with illegal migration. They cannot tolerate the sheer lawlessness of it, how toddlers can be trampled to death in filthy dinghies only for the French authorities to wave the boats on their way. They are appalled when, on the rare occasion those piloting these boats are arrested, the jail time is just a few months. They are horrified that our shadow economy allows illegal migrants to work here, whilst their own taxes fund 'asylum' hotels at a cost of £5 million every day. And they are tired of being gaslit by our political class, who keenly downplay many of the problems associated with what they deceitfully term 'irregular' migration. Of being labelled as 'bigoted' for wondering if the scale and pace of change is compatible with assimilation and social cohesion. As the state loses control of our borders, with both legal and illegal in-flows reaching objectively unsustainable levels, it is going to ever more desperate lengths to keep the peace. So our officers throw a retired special constable into a police cell over a social media post, though not before sneering at his 'Brexity' bookshelves. Our authorities seem to think that rape gangs need to be covered up to protect 'community cohesion'. I write just days after The Telegraph revealed that concern over mass migration could be deemed a 'terrorist ideology' by the Prevent programme. Wish me luck. But all this just paints over the mould. If the white working-class feel they are constantly being expected to sacrifice their culture, identity, their freedom of speech in order to celebrate and preserve those of immigrants, it may not be long before they revolt. As Prof David Betz of King's College London warns, when 'a formerly dominant social majority fears it is losing that dominance' it doesn't surrender its position quietly. If you want to know how this plays out, glance at events unfolding in Northern Ireland and Los Angeles. Violence has erupted on the streets of Ballymena following the alleged sexual assault of a teenage girl by two 14-year old boys of Romanian descent. Riots have broken out across the city of angels in response to immigration enforcement operations. Some in the Donald Trump-hating media have dismissed the lawlessness as simply 'a bunch of people having fun watching cars burn'. California governor Gavin Newsom somehow blames not the mobs running amok, but rather 'deranged' and 'dictatorial' Trump for what is happening in LA. What we are witnessing in these conflagrations 5,000 miles apart are worrying signs of what could become much more serious confrontations in the future. On the one hand, 'natives' could turn increasingly hostile to migrants. On the other, large migrant communities, now established for two or three generations, could defend newcomers to whom they may be related or with whom they have more in common than with white Brits. To avoid the worst of this, white Brits and affluent migrants could leave cities to become dominated by poorer, more welfare-dependent migrant communities – deepening the rural and urban splits recent election results already tell us are emerging. In London, the White British population declined from 71 per cent in 1991 to 37 per cent in 2021. Birmingham has experienced similar ethnic change. Nigel Farage wants to empower enforcement officers to detain and deport on a regular schedule, using charter flights to get the job done. Yet when Police Scotland attempted to remove two Indian illegal migrants in 2021, protestors surrounded their van, with the men eventually released following a stand-off lasting several hours. If the Government tried something similar in Tower Hamlets, there would be large-scale rioting with the authorities again, eventually, backing down. Reform will need a clear view about who exactly they would try to deport, the size of the problem and the means to do it. Even then, they may not be able to deport more than a few thousand. The situation may seem almost intractable. But the solution cannot be to deny the problem exists. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
