
OPEC must squeeze US shale much more to win oil price war: Bousso
LONDON, May 29 - Oil drillers in the U.S. shale heartland are slowing down operations, a sign that OPEC's high-stakes price war is starting to pay off, but Saudi Arabia will need to exert a lot more pain to make a lasting impact on market share.
U.S. oil producers upended the global market in the early 2010s, as the innovative 'fracking' drilling technique allowed them to tap vast onshore shale formations. Consequently, the United States, long the world's top oil consumer, became its leading producer as of 2018. It currently pumps around 13.5 million barrels per day, around 13% of world supplies.
The rising tide of U.S. oil has long irked the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, which has seen its market share steadily erode over the past two decades.
Saudi Arabia, OPEC's de-facto leader, in 2014 sought to curb surging U.S. output by flooding the market with cheap oil. This effort bankrupted a number of shale producers, but it only temporarily paused the country's ascent as companies adapted to lower prices and the industry consolidated.
Riyadh and its allies, a group known as OPEC+, are now giving it another go. They surprised the market earlier this year by announcing that they would rapidly unwind 2.2 million bpd of production cuts introduced in 2024. The group is expected to announce further increases in production later this week.
Benchmark U.S. oil prices have dropped by nearly a quarter since January to around $61 a barrel in response to OPEC+'s strategy as well as concerns over U.S. President Donald Trump's trade wars.
At these prices, many shale wells are not profitable, as frackers require an oil price of between $61 and $70 a barrel to expand production, according to a survey conducted by the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank.
And sure enough, nimble frackers have already responded by paring back drilling activities to conserve cash.
The number of U.S. onshore oil drilling rigs dropped by eight to 465 last week, the lowest since November 2021, according to energy services firm Baker Hughes.
Crucially, drillers in the Permian Basin in West Texas and eastern New Mexico, which accounts for nearly half of U.S. production, cut three rigs, bringing the total down to 279, also the lowest since November 2021.
Crude production from new Permian wells, a measure of productivity, slightly improved in April, but that was largely offset by declines in other basins.
And multiple indicators suggest activity is set to decelerate further.
Importantly, Frac Spread Count, which measures the number of crews actively performing hydraulic fracturing, has seen a 28% annual drop to 186, according to energy consultancy Primary Vision, an indication that production could fall sharply in the coming months.
Another measure to watch is drilled but uncompleted wells (DUCs), or partially completed wells that can start production quickly, offering operators flexibility to withhold production until market conditions improve. DUCs have risen by 11% since December 2024 to 975 in the Permian Basin.
While the latest data on shale drilling activity suggests U.S. production will continue to slow, it is far from falling off a cliff.
The U.S. Energy Information Administration reduced in May its forecasts for U.S. production in 2025 and 2026 by around 100,000 bpd to 13.4 million bpd and 13.5 million bpd, respectively, compared with 13.2 million bpd last year.
Production in the Permian Basin is forecast to average 6.51 million bpd in 2025, down from its previous estimate of 6.58 million bpd. But that would still mark a significant increase from 6.3 million bpd in 2024.
OPEC+ may find it even harder to have a sustainable impact now than it did in 2014 as the U.S. shale landscape is significantly different from a decade ago.
True, 15 years of intensive oil and gas drilling have depleted a large chunk of the most profitable shale acreage.
However, shale drillers have in recent years adopted much stricter spending discipline, focusing on returning value to shareholders in contrast with last decade's focus on growing production. Independent U.S. oil and gas producers have so far reduced their planned 2025 spending commitments by an aggregate 4% to $60 billion, while output is expected to remain largely flat, according to consultancy RBN Energy.
Also, production today is concentrated in the hands of far fewer companies, such as Exxon Mobil and Chevron. These energy majors have developed highly efficient drilling techniques and boast strong balance sheets that leave them better equipped to withstand the OPEC assault.
Current oil prices are therefore likely to temporarily curb U.S. production but not lead to the type of sharp deceleration seen in 2014. OPEC+ will therefore need to deepen and extend its price war for many months if it seeks to fundamentally change the oil production balance of power.
Want to receive my column in your inbox every Thursday, along with additional energy insights and trending stories? Sign up for my Power Up newsletter here.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How Britain's most generous rewards scheme fell apart
When Nick Thomas and his wife took out a health and life insurance policy with Vitality four years ago, like millions of others they were drawn to the generous rewards scheme. Unlike a traditional rewards programme where repeated spending eventually leads to a perk, Vitality rewarded members for having healthy lifestyle habits. Walking 7,000 steps a day, going to the gym or completing a Parkrun all earned points offering lucrative rewards for Thomas and his family such as free cinema tickets, an Amazon Prime membership and bags of Caffe Nero coffee. The scheme was a success on both sides. For Vitality, healthier customers claimed less while members benefited from better health and significant savings in the form of numerous perks. Thomas, like countless other members The Telegraph has spoken to, has nothing but praise for Vitality. 'It's been brilliant. I've encouraged other people to sign up because I've been so impressed with it all.' But all of that changed last month when Vitality decided to 'level up' its reward programme. Rather than earning rewards solely for healthy lifestyle choices, the insurance provider introduced a game whereby members would have to find a cartoon dachshund called 'Stanley' hidden behind 16 bushes. The monthly rewards they now earn are dependent on how many 'Stanleys' they find. The disapproval among Vitality's 1.9 million members has been swift. Online message boards reveal an avalanche of complaints about the 'silly game'. Facebook groups show members venting their frustrations and trying to share tips about how to find the hidden dogs. Criticisms range from members saying they feel infantilised to more serious accusations that the game amounts to a form of gambling, and is at odds with the company's aim to reward 'being active, eating healthily and maintaining good mental health'. Vitality strongly disputes the allegation that it amounts to gambling, as members do not stake money while playing. Martyn James, a consumer expert, says while it is not a form of gambling, it is part of a growing trend of 'gamification' – the process of using gameplay to make tasks more attractive and encourage engagement. He says: 'Unless Vitality can demonstrate that the odds show that people are getting the same amount of rewards then it's a smokescreen to hide the fact that benefits have been removed. 'That's before you consider the juvenile factor. It's fine if you are younger and don't mind hunting for a cartoon dog but as a grown adult, I find that quite patronising. I don't mind spinning a wheel every now and then, but you have to question what purpose does this serve?' The Telegraph is aware of numerous members who have written to Vitality to complain, but so far the company has shown no signs of reverting the changes in responses to these letters. Thomas is one such member who has flagged his concerns with Vitality. 'I wondered if it was just me who was getting annoyed but looking online, I thought thank goodness it's not just me. 'My wife and I joined after we sat down with a financial adviser and we were drawn in by a policy that rewarded healthy living. That's why a lot of people join it. 'But with this they have created a childish game which is completely based on luck. There is an unfairness to it all. I can earn 160 points in a month [the maximum] and end up with fewer rewards than someone who has earned 48 points. 'I'd love for them to be transparent. If they need to cut costs and therefore reduce the number of benefits, just be open about that. Equally, if they need to increase costs because of the level of benefits, it's best to be open and transparent with members rather than doing [this] which annoys people.' The changes to the reward programme are complex. Previously, members were able to earn up to 160 points in a month with weekly and monthly rewards available. For example, if members earned 12 points a week, which could be achieved by walking more than 7,000 steps for four days, they could redeem a drink of their choice at Caffe Nero. For 12 points, they could also enjoy a weekly film rental from Rakuten. Earning 48 points in a month unlocked a free cinema ticket at Odeon or Vue, and until January 2024, reaching 160 points every month gave you a free Amazon Prime membership. Under the new system, some health-based points rewards remain. Earning 12 points in a week can be transferred for either a free Caffe Nero drink and 25pc off Itsu food or 50pc off a cinema ticket. But rather than incentivising members to earn as close to the maximum number of points as possible in a month to reach the best rewards, these are all now linked to playing a computer game where luck determines what prizes you earn. As long as a member earns 12 points each week out of a maximum of 40, they are entered into the game where they are shown 16 square tiles known as 'bushes' – behind four of which is a dog. When members open the game, the first bush shakes to reveal where the first dog is hidden. It then leaves members with three chances to find three dogs hidden behind 15 bushes. At the end of the month, if a member finds four dogs, they earn one reward, if they find eight dogs, they earn two prizes and if they find 10 dogs, they earn the maximum of three prizes. David Rowe, a programme manager from Hertfordshire, has reluctantly played the game each week. However, both last month and this month, he has found seven dogs, leaving him one short of collecting two prizes. Márton Balázs, a probability professor at Bristol University, explains there is a good reason why members like Rowe keep falling short of earning two prizes. Balázs has calculated that assuming a member played the game four times in a month and they always find the first dog which the game prompts, they have only got a 13.4pc chance of finding eight dogs. To earn three rewards, equivalent to finding 10 dogs, the odds of winning are even smaller at 0.96pc – giving members a one in 103 chance of winning the maximum prize, although Vitality strongly refutes these calculations. Rowe added: 'I looked up the chances of finding all four dogs and you've got a one in 455 chance. You are almost five times more likely to match three numbers in the National Lottery than find all four dogs in a week on this game,' he says. Rowe, who has been a member for the past eight years and pays £600 annually for his policy, is considering leaving. 'My policy is up for renewal in September. I will investigate changing and see what else is out there. If I can get an insurance policy that is half the price of what I am paying now, I'd think, 'Why would I not do that because that money I'm saving I can just spend on cinema tickets or an Itsu meal instead?'.' Thomas and his wife are also considering the value of their £1,460 annual bill, but he is hopeful that Vitality might yet listen to the rising anger of members. 'I've never questioned leaving before but if things haven't changed by August or September, then I think we'll go elsewhere'. A Vitality spokesman said the scheme continued to offer 'significant value' to consumers. Nick Read, managing director, said: 'The update to the Vitality Programme ensures more customers are taking steps to improve their health, with over 53,000 additional members now more physically active than they previously were. 'The impact of this is transformational – many more people will live in better health for longer. It also continues to offer significant value, over and above the market-leading health and life insurance we provide.'


BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
Gossip: Bayer Leverkusen want £127m for Wirtz
Liverpool have agreed a contract with Germany midfielder Florian Wirtz until 2030, but have yet to agree a fee for the 22-year-old, with Bayer Leverkusen rejecting a 130m euros (£110m) offer from the Reds as they hold out for 150m euros (£127m). (Bild - in German), externalBarcelona have started initial talks with Liverpool winger Luis Diaz, 28, with interest from Saudi Arabia for the Colombian. (Florian Plettenberg), externalWant more transfer stories? Read Tuesday's full gossip columnFollow the gossip column on BBC Sport


The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Government threatens to sue ex-Chelsea owner over frozen £2.5bn
The UK government is threatening legal action against Roman Abramovich to force him to release £2.5 billion from the sale of Chelsea Football Club, which was intended to aid victims of the war in Ukraine. Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Foreign Secretary David Lammy have expressed their frustration with the lack of progress in reaching an agreement with Mr Abramovich regarding the frozen funds. Chelsea was sold in May 2022 after Mr Abramovich, a high-profile oligarch, was sanctioned following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The £2.5 billion in proceeds from the sale have been frozen since, with the intention that they be used to help those affected by the conflict. But an agreement has yet to be reached with Mr Abramovich over the use of the money, which is held in a UK bank account. The money cannot be moved without a licence from the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation. Ms Reeves and Mr Lammy said: 'The Government is determined to see the proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Football Club reach humanitarian causes in Ukraine, following Russia's illegal full-scale invasion. 'We are deeply frustrated that it has not been possible to reach agreement on this with Mr Abramovich so far. 'While the door for negotiations will remain open, we are fully prepared to pursue this through the courts if required, to ensure people suffering in Ukraine can benefit from these proceeds as soon as possible.' In February, a foreign office minister said the Government would look at using properties owned by Mr Abramovich to house Ukrainian refugees. Labour frontbencher Baroness Chapman of Darlington said it was 'an interesting idea' and committed to take it back to her department for it to be explored by civil servants. The suggestion was made after Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the UK and its European allies should move from freezing Russian assets to seizing them, with the proceeds used to assist Ukraine with its war and reconstruction efforts.