
Russia ready to strike back with nukes if Ukraine uses dirty bomb, threatens former President
Former Russian President Dmitry
Medvedev
issued another round of nuclear saber-rattling, warning that any use of a 'dirty bomb' by
Ukraine
would trigger a 'mirror response', which will involve
tactical nuclear weapons
from the Russian side. These statement, shared on his Telegram channel, marks Medvedev's latest attempt to raise the stakes as the West remains preoccupied with the escalating Israel-Iran war in the Middle East.
In the post, he mocked Washington's shifting focus, suggesting that the US would now be too consumed with defending Israel to sustain its support for Ukraine.
Also Read:
Bombing Iran might do the opposite of what the west wants, Medvedev warns against forcing Tehran into a corner
His commentary came about President Vladimir Putin's earlier comments at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, where he stated that if Ukraine were to decide to use a "dirty bomb" against the Russian Federation, it would be the last mistake of the Kiev regime.
Live Events
In the same tone, Medvedev warned that Russia has "plenty" of such weapons and is well-prepared for proportional retaliation with a clean bomb, referring to a tactical nuclear weapon.
"That would be, of course, an extraordinarily dangerous provocation that would demand a proportionate response. With what? A clean bomb—a tactical nuclear weapon?" Medvedev wrote.
A dirty bomb, also known as a radiological dispersal device (RDD), is a weapon that combines conventional explosives (such as dynamite) with radioactive material. When detonated, the explosion disperses radioactive material into the surrounding area, contaminating it.
The main goals of a dirty bomb are to cause environmental disruption, economic damage, and psychological terror rather than mass casualties from radiation.
He dismissed the environmental and humanitarian consequences of such a response, only offering a chilling suggestion to Ukrainian leaders: 'Take a stroll through the
Chernobyl exclusion zone
or watch the TV series of the same name to get some inspiration.'
His comments come amid warnings from Russian officials about Ukraine allegedly preparing radioactive provocations, claims that have not been substantiated by international watchdogs but are now being elevated by top Russian leadership.
Earlier this week, the Russian Security Council warned about the "catastrophic consequences" of any Ukrainian use of radiological weapons, referencing intelligence concerns reported by state outlet Izvestia.
But Medvedev didn't stop with Ukraine. Turning to the intensifying Israel-Iran war, he described it bluntly as a 'useful distraction' for Russia, while mocking American geopolitical bandwidth.
Medvedev cynically welcomed the US pivot, suggesting Trump-aligned Republicans were never keen on backing Ukraine in the first place. Yet, he warned that the Israel-Iran standoff risks spiraling into a global conflict, which US President Donald
Trump
himself thinks.
In a final scathing line, Medvedev ridiculed Europe's moral and political standing, calling its leadership a 'freak show,' and mocking French President Emmanuel Macron and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.
It is hard to decipher whether this is strategic posturing or genuine escalation, but Medvedev's unfiltered words sometimes offer a troubling glimpse into the Kremlin's worldview.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Israel was informed of US strikes on Iran ‘in advance: Reports
As the Iran-Israel conflict enters its second week, the US has joined in on the attacks and struck three Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday. Shortly after US' strikes on Iran, Israeli officials told media that Israel was informed of the attacks in advance. US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (REUTERS) As per state broadcaster Kan, Israeli officials stated that Israel wad 'in full coordination' with the US for the strikes on the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites. Follow LIVE updates on the Iran-Israel war here Furthermore, Israeli officials also told Axios that Tel Aviv was aware of the US' plan to strike Iran. Israeli officials have further stated that the US used its B-2 stealth bombers for its attack on Iran. The several B-2 aircraft, known for being capable of delivering huge bunker buster bombs, were deployed in Guam ahead of the strike on Iranian nuclear sites. Also Read: Israel preparing for a 'possible long war' against Iran as tensions escalate in Middle East: Report US strikes Iran US President Donald Trump confirmed that the US struck three nuclear facilities in Iran, marking Washington' s official entry into the Iran-Israel conflict. Taking to Truth Social, the US president stated the US has 'completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. All planes are now outside of Iran air space.' He added, 'A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home." The US president further shared post, claiming that the Fordow nuclear facility 'is gone' after the US strikes. The Iran Israel conflict escalated after Israel's military strikes under 'Operation Rising Lion' on June 13, which targeted Iranian nuclear and military facilities.

New Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Iran-Israei war: US joins Israel's attacks on Iran, bombs three nuclear sites
LIVE LIVE LIVE | Iran-Israei war: US joins Israel's attacks on Iran, bombs three nuclear sites US President Donald Trump has announced that American forces carried out 'very successful' strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, adding that all US aircraft have now exited Iranian airspace.


United News of India
37 minutes ago
- United News of India
Trump criticises Europe's mediation efforts in Israel-Iran conflict
Trenton, June 21 (UNI) US President Donald Trump has heavily criticised Europe's efforts to end the Iran-Israel conflict through diplomatic means, stating 'Europe is not going to help in this.' 'They didn't help. Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this,' Trump claimed, reports Times of Israel. Senior European officials from the UK, France, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, Belgium, and several other EU nations had met Iranian Foreign Minister Abbass Araghchi in Geneva on Friday, hoping to strike an accord. However, the attempts proved fruitless. Trump said he will 'always (be) a peacemaker,' but 'sometimes you need some toughness to make peace.' Answering reporters upon his arrival in New Jersey, Trump, when asked whether the US would intervene militarily, said 'That's the last thing you want to do,' adding that he was giving 'Iran some time', referring to the two weeks he had given Iran to come to deal before Trump seriously considers US military intervention. Asked if US is potentially being dragged into the deadly conflict under false pretexts, Trump said that in the case of the Iraq war over 20 years ago, there were no weapons of mass destruction. In the current scenario, however, Iran has amassed a 'tremendous amount of material' and was 'within a matter of weeks, or certainly within a matter of months (from being) able to have a nuclear weapon.' Talking about US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's March assessment to Congress that Iran had not made a decision to build a nuclear weapon, he contradicted her and said 'She's wrong.' In a subsequent post on X, Gabbard said her testimony was taken out of context 'as a way to manufacture division.' 'America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalise the assembly,' she wrote. 'President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree.' Asked whether he would allow Iran to have a civilian nuclear program in which it could enrich at low, non-weapons grade levels, Trump questioned why Tehran needs such a capacity, given how much oil it has.