Starmer pressed in the Commons to secure release of British-Egyptian activist
The Prime Minister has been pressed to secure the release of a jailed British-Egyptian pro-democracy activist, amid concerns over his mother's 'failing' health.
Alaa Abd El-Fattah, 43, has been detained in Egypt since September 29 2019 and, in December 2021, was sentenced to five years in prison after being accused of spreading false news.
His mother, Laila Soueif, who is on hunger strike, was taken to St Thomas' Hospital in central London on Monday evening where she faces an 'immediate risk to life', according to her doctor.
In the Commons, independent MP John McDonnell urged Sir Keir Starmer to contact Egyptian president Abdel Fattah El-Sisi in order to 'save' Mr Abd El-Fattah and his mother's life.
Sir Keir said he would do everything he can to ensure Mr Abd El-Fattah's release, during Prime Minister's Questions.
The Free Alaa campaign had also called on Sir Keir to pick up the phone and call the Egyptian president 'before it's too late'.
Mr McDonnell, MP for Hayes and Harlington, said: 'I thank the Prime Minister and the Foreign Secretary for their efforts to secure the release of Alaa Abd El-Fattah, the human rights campaigner, the British human rights campaigner, who has been imprisoned in Egypt now for over 10 years.
'The Prime Minister will know, because he's met the family, that his mother is on the 150th day of her hunger strike, and her health is failing rapidly.
'Could I ask the Prime Minister to pick up the phone to President Sisi and seek the release of Alaa to save his life, also that of his mother's?'
Sir Keir replied: 'I thank him for raising this really important case, and as he says, I did meet the mother and the family just a few days ago, and it is an incredibly difficult situation for them.
'And I can assure him, I will do everything I can to ensure the release in this case, and that includes phone calls as necessary. I've raised it before, I'll raise it again, we've raised it, and will continue to do so.
'I gave my word to the family that that's what … I will do, and I will.'
Ms Soueif has been subsisting solely on black coffee, restorative salts and herbal tea during her hunger strike and has lost more than 20 kilograms (about three stone) in weight.
On Monday, she was admitted to hospital after her blood sugar levels, blood pressure and sodium levels recorded 'dangerously new lows', the campaign said.
It added that Ms Soueif is not taking glucose treatment as a result of her protest action.
She was put on a saline drip due to the low sodium readings and the hospital is continuing to monitor her.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Seven Church of England clergy to face disciplinary action over Makin review
Seven Church of England clergy, including a bishop, will face disciplinary proceedings over the same abuse report which triggered the resignation of Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby. The Church has confirmed retired former Bishop of Durham Paul Butler, and Sue Colman, wife of Colman's mustard heir Sir Jamie Colman, are among those who could be banned from ministry as a result of the Makin review. Published last year, the review found abuse carried out by Christian camp leader John Smyth was known about by those within the Church, including Welby, and was not acted upon. Welby stepped down in November, and has spoken of feeling a "deep sense of personal failure" about how he handled allegations about the most prolific abuser associated with the Church. After Welby's resignation, the Church's national safeguarding team said they would look into all clergy criticised by the report. The seven facing disciplinary proceedings are: The Makin report concluded Mrs Colman, associate minister at St Leonard's Church in Oakley, Hampshire, was aware of Smyth's abuse before being ordained. It also noted that she and her husband visited Smyth in Africa in the 1990s and funded the Smyths through a personal trust. Around a week after the Makin report was published, the Diocese of Winchester said Mrs Colman had been asked to 'step back from all ministerial duties'. The Church confirmed on Thursday that former Archbishop of Canterbury George Carey, Revd Paul Perkin and Revd Hugh Palmer will face no action. Proceedings under the Clergy Discipline Measure can range from a conditional discharge where no penalty is imposed, to removal from office, resignation by consent and a lifetime ban from ministry. As there is a 12-month time limit on cases being brought, the Church's national safeguarding team had to ask for permission to bring disciplinary action 'out of time'. Permission was granted in only seven of the ten cases and the Church's team said it 'entirely respects' the decision from the 'independent judicial process'. John Smyth was a British barrister who abused more than 100 children and young men in the UK and Africa. He died in South Africa in 2018. Among his victims were a number of pupils at Winchester College in the 1970s and 80s. He chaired Christian charity The Iwerne Trust, which ran religious holiday camps. He is said to have subjected his victims to traumatic physical, sexual, psychological and spiritual attacks. The Church's national safeguarding team said it will make no further comment on the cases while disciplinary proceedings are under way and no timeline has been given for when they might conclude. It said victims, survivors and all those criticised in the Makin review have been informed and have been offered support.
Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
all you need to know and what it means for Brits
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Donald Trump has implemented one of the most extensive travel bans in history. The US President has announced new travel restrictions on 19 countries, which is approximately a tenth of all nations globally. From June 9, nationals from Afghanistan, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen will be prohibited from entering the United States under the new regulations. Citizens from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela will encounter partial restrictions, losing access to all immigrant visas and several non-immigrant travel options, with only a select few on special visas, such as diplomats, permitted entry into the US from these nations. Trump has cited various reasons for imposing these bans, including insufficient traveller screening, "a significant terrorist presence" within these countries, governments that are hesitant to repatriate deported nationals, or citizens who frequently overstay their visas in the US, reports the Mirror. The bans are the latest in a series of anti-immigration moves introduced by Trump, which also include a block on people coming over the southern border to claim asylum and instructing heavily armed ICE immigration officers to make raids across the country. (Image: Getty) Why is the ban happening now? The announcement was made in the days after an Egyptian man in Colorado was arrested and charged with carrying out an attack on a group honouring hostages held in Gaza. The US President directly linked the travel bans to the "recent terror attack", claiming that it "underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted". Trump added: "We don't want them." In reality, the incident provides a convenient political reason to resurrect and expand policies that featured in Trump's first presidency, and comes after several months of build-up. In his first term, Trump was explicit about his desire to ban citizens from countries where Islam is the primary religion. At that time, he ordered a travel ban against people from seven Muslim-majority countries from coming to the US. This set of restrictions has clear echoes of the first. Made louder on Wednesday evening when Trump alluded to migration from Middle Eastern countries to Europe. "We will not let what happened in Europe happen to America," he said. Are there exemptions? Yes. If you are a national from one of the 19 "banned" countries, but have an existing visa to the US, you will be exempt from the ban, the New York Times reports. Green card holders, athletes travelling to the US for the coming World Cup and Olympics, and Afghans eligible for the Special Immigrant Visa program that was introduced following the US's invasion of the country, are also exempt. Those from the "banned" countries seeking visas through connections to US family members can continue to do so. That means those who have trips planned to the US, but already have their paperwork in order, will be able to travel. Whether they want to is a different question. There have been many reports of tourists to the US facing lengthy scrutiny at the US border since Trump's second term began, having their phones combed through and even being placed in detention for days at a time. The cooling effect is already being felt. The United States is on track to lose $12.5bn (£9.4bn) in international travel spending this year, according to a study published on Tuesday by the World Travel and Tourism Council. What if I'm a dual citizen? This is a situation a lot of Brits may find themselves in. If, for example, if you've got dual Somalian and British citizenship, you are exempt from the order. The same goes for all of the 19 countries included on the list. What if I've been to one of the banned countries? This is a little complicated, and the full answer is not yet clear. As things are now, UK passport holders can apply for an Electronic System for Travel Authorisation (ESTA), instead of getting a full visa. If, however, you're British but were in the following countries on or after March 2011, then you can't get an ESTA. The countries include: Iraq Libya North Korea Somalia Sudan Syria Yemen You cannot apply for an ESTA visa waiver if you travelled to or were in Cuba on or after 12 January 2021. However, if you fall into that camp, you can still apply for a visa. That is a lengthier process and the chances of getting rejected are higher. Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox Find out what's happening near you
Leader Live
2 hours ago
- Leader Live
Faro Airport opens e-gates to British travellers in time for summer
Downing Street expects British holidaymakers will be able to use the technology in their 'millions', after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer struck an agreement with EU leaders last month. Cabinet Office minister Nick Thomas-Symonds, whose brief includes EU relations, said at the despatch box on Thursday that the deal 'makes life easier for holidaymakers'. The Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'Yesterday, Portugal opened e-gates at Faro Airport to British citizens, which will mean millions more Brits going to the Algarve will be able to use e-gates in time for the summer holidays.' He added: 'We're obviously continuing to work with other countries and other airports to ensure Brits can use more e-gates as soon as possible and that work continues. 'It's obviously good news to see a very significant airport, I think for British holidaymakers, opening e-gates to British citizens yesterday.' When he unveiled the deal last month, Sir Keir said that 'for holidaymakers wanting to get out this summer, they will want to know that they can do so easily and without delay and chaos'. The Prime Minister called on 'all EU members states to help make this a reality without delay'. Since Brexit, UK nationals have been unable to use e-gates in most Schengen area countries. Passengers from the UK face warnings that passport controls on arrival at Portugal 'may take up more time, as the passport will have to be stamped and there are additional questions that may be asked by the border control officers', according to the Faro Airport website. The Government has said the deal will smooth over 'legal barriers to e-gates use for UK nationals', once a new stamp-free biometric Entry/Exit System (EES) launches, due in October this year. Taking a question about steps 'to improve relations with the EU', Mr Thomas–Symonds told the Commons: 'The historic deal that we signed with the EU on May 19 is in our national interests – good for bills, borders and jobs. 'It slashes red tape and bureaucracy, boosts British exporters and makes life easier for holidaymakers. 'Indeed, I'm delighted to confirm this morning that Faro Airport in Portugal will start the rollout of e-gate access to UK arrivals this week.'
