Tesla's Head of Optimus Humanoid Robot Program Exits Company
(Bloomberg) -- The leader of Tesla Inc.'s Optimus program is leaving the company, according to a person familiar with the matter, injecting uncertainty into the humanoid robot effort that Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk sees as a significant part of its future business.
Milan Kovac, the head of engineering for Optimus, informed colleagues on Friday that he is departing effective immediately, said the person, who asked not to be identified discussing private information. Ashok Elluswamy, who leads Tesla's Autopilot teams, will take over responsibility for Optimus, the person said.
Kovac, Elluswamy and Musk didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.
Musk praised Kovac and Elluswamy in a June 2 social media post as two 'key people' in the company's artificial intelligence operations who 'have been there from the beginning.'
Musk is increasingly betting Tesla's future on robotics, along with artificial intelligence and driverless cars, as the traditional electric-vehicle business faces challenges. The automaker's sales have cratered in key markets due to lukewarm demand and a consumer backlash over the CEO's political activity. This week, Musk's relationship with President Donald Trump erupted into a public feud, raising further risks for Tesla on the regulatory front.
Tesla drew attention in October when it used Optimus prototypes to tend bar and interact with guests at a flashy event in the Los Angeles area to generate investor enthusiasm for upcoming products. Bloomberg reported afterward that humans were used to remotely control some capabilities of the robots.
Musk has said Optimus, which would handle many household tasks, could be 'the biggest product ever of any kind.' The robots could eventually be available to consumers for $20,000 to $30,000 each, Musk has said.
The robot's capabilities have long been closely watched by investors, even if the product's launch timing remains uncertain. Observers noted in 2022 when an early prototype had to be carried by people on stage.
On the most recent Tesla earnings call, Musk said he expects to have thousands of Optimus robots working in Tesla's own facilities by the end of this year. He also predicted Tesla will be able to build millions of units per year by the end of the decade.
--With assistance from Kara Carlson.
(Updates with Musk post in fourth paragraph.)
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk deletes post claiming Trump appears in Epstein files amid ongoing feud
Elon Musk on Sunday deleted a controversial post in which he claimed that US President Donald Trump appears in the unreleased Jeffrey Epstein files, a move that may signal a cooling of tensions after days of public sparring between the two billionaires. 'Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk had posted on X, the platform he owns, on Thursday. In a follow-up, he urged followers to 'mark this post for the future' because 'the truth will come out.' Both posts have been deleted. The accusation marked a dramatic escalation in Musk's ongoing feud with Trump, which began over the president's support for a controversial bill dubbed the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Musk, who has slammed the legislation as a 'disgusting abomination,' claimed it was rushed through without proper scrutiny and accused the administration of betraying EV makers like Tesla. Trump, speaking at a press briefing, dismissed Musk's concerns and said: 'Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate, which was a lot of money… I can understand why he's upset.' The feud spiralled after Trump said he was 'disappointed' in Musk. Musk fired back, saying, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51–49 in the Senate… Such ingratitude.' Live Events But hours after the Epstein claim, hedge fund manager Bill Ackman publicly urged Musk to reconcile with Trump. Musk's short reply — 'You're not wrong' — coupled with the deletion of the post, has been interpreted by some as a sign of de-escalation. — elonmusk (@elonmusk) Though Trump's name has appeared in various documents related to Epstein, including flight logs and contact books, no charges have been brought against him. The White House reportedly called Musk's comments 'an unfortunate episode,' while Trump, in a call with Politico , played down the spat, saying, 'It's going very well, never done better.' Musk has not explained why he deleted the post, but the timing suggests an attempt to contain the fallout from a claim that could have far-reaching political consequences.
Mint
42 minutes ago
- Mint
It's the Republicans, not Musk, who are serious about cutting spending
Elon Musk and House Republicans both promised to tackle federal spending. It turns out only one of them was serious, and it wasn't Musk. Musk, who broke with President Trump this week after labeling Republicans' reconciliation bill a 'disgusting abomination," might claim some authority. As leader of the Department of Government Efficiency, he was the public face of Trump's assault on government. Remember him feeding the U.S. Agency for International Development into the wood chipper? Encouraging civil servants to quit or be fired? The chain saw? Musk loves the theatrical: He helped scuttle an omnibus spending bill last year mainly because of its page length. The DOGE cuts thrilled Trump's base, horrified Democrats and traumatized civil servants. But theatrical didn't mean substantive. Fire every civil servant and cut foreign aid to zero and you save about $300 billion. The deficit last year was $1.8 trillion. DOGE claims to have cut spending by $175 billion. But The Wall Street Journal, the New York Times and others found DOGE routinely overstated savings. Federal spending in the current fiscal year is actually up 9% from a year earlier. (Trump sent a slimmed-down budget to Congress last month that seeks to entrench some of DOGE's cuts.) The big money, as everyone except Musk and Trump seem to acknowledge, is in entitlements. Not fraud, waste and abuse, but checks correctly issued to eligible recipients. Such programs, including Social Security, health programs, food stamps and welfare, plus interest on the national debt, equal 73% of spending. Entitlements are infamously difficult to cut. Yet that's what House Republicans propose. Far from being full of 'crazy spending increases," as Musk claims, the bill would reduce spending over the coming decade by $1.3 trillion, relative to current law, and that would be predominantly from entitlements, according to the Congressional Budget Office. So why does the bill add to deficits? Because it reduces revenues even more, by $3.7 trillion, by extending tax cuts enacted in 2017, then adding a bunch more. If Musk is upset about this bill adding to the national debt, it's the tax cuts, not the spending, he should be attacking. Healthcare is the single biggest source of federal spending growth. Since 2000, federal health programs, mainly Medicare, Obamacare, and Medicaid, have grown from 3.1% of gross domestic product to 5.6%. Given the aging of the population and rising medical costs, that is expected to grow. For years, budget hawks have pleaded with Congress to address this. Give Republicans some credit: They have. Past cost-cutting often meant paying providers less, and providers would then change their behavior. It's why so few doctors accept Medicaid. This time, Republicans are going the less popular but potentially more durable route of giving less money to beneficiaries. The Congressional Budget Office estimates policy changes under Trump will mean 16 million fewer people will have health insurance. Is that good or bad? That depends on your politics. Democrats and progressives think it is cruel. Republicans, though, could point out that many of those people entered the U.S. illegally or gained benefits because of discretionary or temporary program changes. For example, nearly a third of that 16 million is because Republicans aren't renewing a temporary expansion of Obamacare subsidies passed by Democrats under Joe Biden, and the Trump administration is tightening up enrollment and eligibility verification. A further half reflects changes to Medicaid eligibility, such as penalizing states that cover certain immigrants, verifying eligibility more often, or ending a loophole through which states and insurers extract more dollars from Washington. Five million people would lose Medicaid because of work requirements on able-bodied adult recipients without dependents. This provision is arguably the harshest: Many of those people can't or won't work because of personal circumstances or age, or can't process the necessary paperwork. There's lots for budget hawks to hate about the Republican bill. It leaves debt on track to hit records. It doesn't touch the big drivers of spending—Social Security and Medicare. It shifts costs, such as for food stamps, to the states. It lards the tax code with breaks that reward Trump's base rather than help economic growth, and sunsets them in 2028 to artificially reduce the cost. It front loads the tax cuts and back loads the spending cuts. Nonetheless, the proposed legislation is superior to anything Musk has done in one crucial respect: It is legislation. The Constitution gives the power of the purse to Congress. DOGE and Trump have largely trampled on that principle, gutting foreign aid, research and countless other programs without authorization or input from the public or their representatives. Republicans in Congress mostly stood by and let this happen. With this bill, they're taking back control of the purse. Perhaps they could make that a habit. Write to Greg Ip at
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
"People Have Spoken": Musk After X Poll On New Party Amid Rift With Trump
Tech billionaire Elon Musk has proposed the formation of a new political party in the US amid his ongoing feud with President Donald Trump. Mr Musk conducted a poll on his social media platform X, which showed 80% of the people were in favour of the idea. "The people have spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80% in the middle! And exactly 80% of people agree. This is fate," he said on X. He later called it "The America Party". The people have spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80% in the middle! And exactly 80% of people agree ???? This is fate. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 6, 2025 Mr Musk had conducted a poll, asking people if it was time to create a new political party. "Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?" he wrote on the micro-blogging site. According to the poll, 80.4% of the people favoured the formation of a new political party in the US. Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle? — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 The poll followed soon after Mr Musk claimed personal credit for Mr Trump's victory in the 2024 presidential election. Once a prominent informal advisor to Mr Trump, the Tesla CEO accused him of ingratitude, saying, "Without me, [Donald] Trump would have lost the election." The 47th President then responded on Truth Social, saying that he believes the government can save billions of dollars by ending the financial support and contracts it provides to Mr Musk's companies, such as Tesla and SpaceX. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," he said. The feud between Mr Trump and Mr Musk arose after the latter publicly criticised the "Big, Beautiful Bill," a massive government spending plan. The bill didn't go well with Mr Musk as it continued to support oil and gas companies but cut back on benefits for clean energy and electric vehicles, which directly affected his companies like Tesla and SpaceX.
