Florida Legislature passes bill regulating construction cranes during hurricanes
Politics Florida Legislature passes bill regulating construction cranes during hurricanes
Workers are seen in a basket suspended near part of a crane that sits atop 490 First Ave. S. building Wednesday, Oct. 23, 2024 in St. Petersburg. The crane broke off and landed on the building during the high winds of Hurricane Milton.
TNS
After Hurricane Milton's winds brought part of a crane crashing into an office building in downtown St. Petersburg, new regulations could soon be required for construction managers during storms.
Lawmakers near-unanimously passed a bill last week that requires all hoisting equipment for a construction project be secured no later than 24 hours before a hurricane's impacts.
The move comes after a Times investigation last year revealed significant gaps in oversight for heavy equipment like cranes. Florida lawmakers more than a decade ago passed a law that prevented local governments from writing regulations for cranes, including measures regarding 'hurricane preparedness or public safety.'
When it came to hurricane crane safety, there were 'really no requirements for crane operators to have a plan in place or anything to do with hurricane preparedness,' said Sen. Nick DiCeglie, R-Indian Rocks Beach.
He and Rep. Fiona McFarland, R-Sarasota, championed SB 180, which also deals more broadly with hurricane relief and emergency preparedness. The bill passed on the final day of the regular legislative session.
The legislation would leave in place the law that stops local governments from setting their own crane regulations. It instead creates new statewide requirements for crane safety.
That includes ensuring that booms on hydraulic cranes are retracted, tower cranes are set in a weathervane position and all power at the base of cranes is disconnected ahead of a storm.
Anyone who intentionally violates the law could be subject to administrative discipline, including having their business license suspended.
Worksites also must have a hurricane preparedness plan for their crane available for inspection.
The bill also requires the Florida Building Commission to put together a report on the best practices for using cranes during hurricane season by the end of 2026.
The section of tower crane that toppled from The Residences at 400 Central in October pulverized a building on First Avenue South that housed the Tampa Bay Times, a law office and other businesses. The building still has a gaping hole.
Gov. Ron DeSantis has yet to sign the bill. Shortly after the crane in St. Petersburg toppled, DeSantis held a news conference near the wreckage where he dismissed the need for additional oversight, saying, 'Do we have to regulate everything?'
DiCeglie said it was important to strike a balance with the crane language because some regulation is the responsibility of the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
In 2008, a group of contractors sued to challenge a local ordinance in Miami-Dade that regulated cranes, including regulations for hurricane preparedness.
A federal judge sided with the contractors, who argued the ordinance was inappropriate because regulation belonged in OSHA's hands.
But the court made clear that OSHA doesn't regulate storm requirements, said Carol Bowen, the chief lobbyist for the Associated Builders and Contractors of Florida, who was involved in the lawsuit.
A few years after that decision, though, state lawmakers passed a bill banning local governments from creating their own safety rules for cranes, including for hurricanes.
Two St. Petersburg Democrats this year tried to remove that preemption language, but their idea got little traction.
Rep. Lindsay Cross, D-St. Petersburg, said she knew removing the local preemption wouldn't be popular with the construction industry. But she said, 'Sometimes you put something out there and use it to start the conversation.'
Cross said she worked with McFarland's staff on the final bill and said the language was 'getting closer to where we need to be.'
The Associated Builders and Contractors of Florida opposed removing the preemption because they want a uniform crane standard throughout the state, Bowen said.
But she said the organization 'signed off 100%' on the final crane requirements. She said she thinks it's a great addition to the law.
David Thompson, St. Petersburg's director of government affairs, on Friday told city council members that the bill's language was 'a vital first step in making our community safer' and said the city would keep trying to get 'stronger language' in the law.
Tampa Bay Times reporter Colleen Wright contributed to this report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's team reportedly pushes Texas Republicans to rig voting maps ahead of 2026 election
The Trump administration's open disregard for voting rights protections and its open support for voter suppression measures raise serious concerns over the fairness of next year's elections. And fresh reporting from The New York Times further underscores the issue. Trump administration officials have been pushing Texas Republicans to initiate steps to gerrymander the state's districts — even more than they already are — in ways that will increase Republicans' chances at retaining their U.S. House majority, the Times reported earlier this week. According to the Times: President Trump's political team is encouraging Republican leaders in Texas to examine how House district lines in the state could be redrawn ahead of next year's midterm elections to try to save the party's endangered majority, according to people in Texas and Washington who are familiar with the effort. The Times report highlights a meeting Texas congressional Republicans held in the U.S. Capitol earlier this week, in which they discussed redistricting at the administration's behest. And Rep. Pete Sessions told the outlet that Texas Republicans committed to 'bone up' on the proposal and its potential impact on the state's congressional delegation. Some Texas Republicans have expressed skepticism at the plan, according to the Times: The push from Washington has unnerved some Texas Republicans, who worry that reworking the boundaries of Texas House seats to turn Democratic districts red by adding reliably Republican voters from neighboring Republican districts could backfire in an election that is already expected to favor Democrats. Texas is already facing a lawsuit that alleges maps drawn by state Republicans in 2021 violate the Voting Rights Act. And the federal government had been part of that lawsuit against Texas until this year, when the Justice Department under Trump dropped the government's claims. An attempt to redraw districts in the middle of a decade — rather than the beginning of a decade, as is usual — is certain to face legal challenges. The Times was the first to report on Team Trump's push to redistrict. Multiple outlets, including ABC News, have since confirmed the efforts. The White House did not respond to requests for comment from the Times and ABC News. The president of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, John Bisognano, said in a statement Tuesday that the details laid out in the Times report mark 'yet another example of Trump trying to suppress votes in order to hold onto power.' 'Texas's congressional map is already being sued for violating the Voting Rights Act because it diminishes the voting power of the state's fast-growing Latino population,' he said. 'To draw an even more extreme gerrymander would only assure that the barrage of legal challenges against Texas will continue.' This desperate push to tip the scales in Republicans' favor using illiberal machinations tracks with recent reporting — in Politico, for example — about Trump and his administration's obsession with helping Republicans retain the House to avoid congressional scrutiny of the administration, which could very well come in the form of more impeachments if Democrats win a majority. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Another Billionaire Lining Up to Co-Lead DOGE After Musk's Dramatic Exit
Looks like DOGE is swapping one billionaire for another. Airbnb co-founder Joe Gebbia is expected to be part of a 'small council of advisers' overseeing the Department of Government Efficiency after Elon Musk's dramatic departure late last month, a report said Tuesday. Gebbia, 43, is worth $8.5 billion, according to Forbes, and is a close ally of Musk. He serves on the boards of directors of Tesla, where Musk remains CEO, and Airbnb, but he has not been involved in the latter company's operations since 2022. Sources told The New York Times that Gebbia was 'under consideration to effectively take over Mr. Musk's signature government project' to slash federal spending even before he had a falling out with Trump. However, sources told the paper that 'he was not interested in a role in which he alone would lead DOGE.' Musk, 53, was the face of DOGE in the first four months of Trump's second term, and faced intense criticism for the department's gaffes, like grossly miscalculating savings and accidentally ending Ebola prevention, as well as its attempts to slash the jobs of tens of thousands of federal workers. Tesla stock dropped 15 percent this year, according to the Times. Many of the electric vehicle manufacturer's most significant dips in value came after Musk lashed out publicly or clashed with Trump, all of which stem from his head-first dive into Republican politics last summer. Gebbia wants to avoid a similar fate. The Times wrote that he wishes to be part of a small council 'in part because of the intense scrutiny that would come with a formal role in charge of' DOGE. The tech figure hails from the suburbs of Atlanta, Georgia, but made his billions in Silicon Valley. He has expressed support for Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and indicated he is passionate about the Kennedy scion's 'Make America Healthy Again' movement. Gebbia has worked with DOGE since February, but has approached his work more discreetly than Musk has, though he has made some media appearances. Reports indicate that he has focused on modernizing the retirement process for federal employees, which is among the least controversial missions at DOGE. Another name in contention to be on DOGE's council of leaders is the investment banker Anthony Armstrong, the Times reported. Armstrong is also a Musk ally, having helped him purchase Twitter in 2022 when he worked at Morgan Stanley. Armstrong joined DOGE shortly after Trump's inauguration, the Times reported, but he left that role to work at the Department of Homeland Security in April. ProPublica reported that DOGE is still chock-full of Musk allies, despite the world's richest man no longer leading the department. The nonprofit reported that 'at least 38' of DOGE's remaining staffers work or have worked for businesses run by Musk.
Boston Globe
6 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Fulbright board resigns after accusing Trump aides of interference
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up In addition, the department is reviewing the applications of about 1,200 scholars from other countries who have already been approved by the board to come to the United States, the people said. Those foreign scholars were also supposed to receive acceptance letters around April. Advertisement The memo written by the board says that members are resigning 'rather than endorse unprecedented actions that we believe are impermissible under the law, compromise U.S. national interests and integrity, and undermine the mission and mandates Congress established for the Fulbright program nearly 80 years ago,' according to a copy obtained by the Times. Advertisement The board posted the memo online Wednesday morning, after sending a resignation letter to the White House. The board is also concerned that the budget that Secretary of State Marco Rubio is requesting from Congress for the next fiscal year cuts spending for the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, which includes the Fulbright program, to $50 million from $691 million this fiscal year. The State Department did not reply to a request for comment Wednesday morning. The actions come as President Donald Trump and his top aides seek to bend academic institutions to their ideological beliefs. The State Department's public diplomacy office is run by Darren Beattie, a political appointee who was fired from a job during the first Trump administration after he gave a talk at a conference attended by white nationalists. He has made social media posts on white grievances, including one saying 'competent white men must be in charge if you want things to work' and ones ridiculing Rubio. Darren Beattie during an event in Phoenix on Dec. 19, 2022. REBECCA NOBLE/NYT The administration is trying to withhold federal funding, mainly for science research, from several universities and in some cases is demanding changes to departments. It has tried to stop foreign students and scholars from coming to Harvard University, but a court has temporarily barred the administration from acting on that order. Rubio told the State Department last month to stop taking new appointments for foreign citizens applying for student or exchange visas while the agency expands scrutiny of social media posts by the applicants. American universities rely on tuition payments by foreign students for a major part of their revenue and value the research expertise of those students and visiting scholars. Top Trump administration officials say many American universities are too liberal in their curricula and must insert more conservative ideas into their teaching, research and hiring practices. The administration has also dismantled research institutions established by Congress, including the Wilson Center and the United States Institute of Peace. A federal judge ruled last month that the administration's gutting of USIP was illegal. Advertisement The Fulbright program was established in 1946 after legislation introduced by J. William Fulbright, a Democratic senator from Arkansas. The Fulbright-Hays Act of 1961 formalized legal statutes for the program. It says the selection of scholars, teachers and others falls under the authority of a 12-member board appointed by the president. The nearly 200 scholars who are receiving rejection letters are part of a group of about 900 American scholars approved by the board over the winter. 'The bipartisan Fulbright Board was mandated by Congress to be a check on the executive and to ensure that students, researchers and educators are not subjected to the blatant political favoritism that this administration is known for,' Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said in a statement. 'While I understand and respect the bipartisan Fulbright Board for resigning en masse rather than grant credibility to a politicized and unlawful process,' she added, 'I am painfully aware that today's move will change the quality of Fulbright programming and the independent research that has made our country a leader in so many fields.' Shaheen and the board asserted that the State Department was violating the congressional statute by rejecting or reviewing the scholarship candidates already approved by the board, the people familiar with the issues said. The selection process for the American scholars usually starts with career diplomats in overseas missions and U.S. educational institutions, and proceeds for months until the board gives essentially pro forma approval over the winter. Across Republican and Democratic administrations, the board has generally approved of the candidates submitted by the State Department because of the long and rigorous selection process and to avoid the appearance of political interference. Advertisement The United States has 49 bilateral commissions established by treaties with other nations, many American allies, to help with the selection process and match scholars with institutions. More than 35 countries contribute half or more of the funding for the scholarships. The makeup of the board changes as members finish their three-year terms. The current board members are appointees of President Joe Biden because those who began serving on it during the first Trump administration have rotated out. The nearly 200 American scholars who are receiving rejection letters from the State Department are about a fifth of the total U.S. scholars approved by the board over the winter. Beattie and his aides appear to be rejecting them based on their stated research topics, which include climate change; environmental resilience; migration; gender, race and ethnicity; and homelessness, said the people familiar with the State Department's actions. The topics also include ones in the sciences, such as biology, agriculture and animal studies, according to the board memo. The Fulbright program encompasses about 8,000 scholars, students, teachers and researchers in different categories at any given time. The board sent separate messages last month to Beattie and Christopher Landau, the deputy secretary of state, expressing concern over the undermining of the selection process for the American scholars, the people said. Most of the American and foreign scholars approved by the board had gotten early signals from officials and commissions of their acceptances so they could arrange leaves from their universities and prepare to move overseas for about a year. Advertisement This article originally appeared in
