These capuchins are abducting babies from howler monkeys—for fun?
On a tiny island off the coast of Panama called Jicarón, a male capuchin monkey called Joker appears to have started a disturbing trend.
Camera traps caught Joker, nicknamed for the scar on his face, and other male white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus imitator) carrying kidnapped howler monkey infants on their backs. Researchers originally set up the traps in 2017 after a botanist visiting the island had reported the monkeys using stones to process food, which had never been seen before in the more slender kind of capuchin that inhabits Costa Rica and Panama. The cameras did reveal one group of capuchins using stone tools and anvils to crack open seeds, fruits, even crabs and snails.
Yet as the team reports in the journal Current Biology this week, the footage also captured this bizarre baby-snatching fad, something never seen before. 'It was so weird that I went straight to my advisor's office to ask him what it was,' says primatologist Zoë Goldsborough of the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute.
(Capuchins are known for their ingenuity—another species is 3,000 years into its own 'Stone Age'.)
A recording dated January 26, 2022, first documented an unidentified young capuchin male carrying a howler monkey (Alouatta palliata coibensis) infant. The next day Joker was carrying that same infant. And so he did for days on end, at least until February 3. 'Our first thought was that maybe this infant had been abandoned by the howlers, and then adopted,' Goldsborough says.
There was one known case of a marmoset monkey infant being adopted by a different species of capuchin in Brazil. But crucially, that baby was adopted by a female who could nurse it, says Patrícia Izar of the University of São Paulo, who reported that finding in 2006. Capuchin males, on the other hand, don't have a clue what to do. And so the kidnapped howler infant very likely died of starvation.
What's more, the poor infant was making the kind of calls it usually makes when separated from its mom—and later on, some adult howlers called out as well, indicating the infant had not been abandoned, but abducted instead. 'We don't have footage of how the capuchins did this,' says study coauthor Brendan Barrett, a behavioral ecologist at Max Planck. 'But we know they are not afraid to gang up on much larger howlers.'
Things were about to get a whole lot weirder. In April and May, Joker was seen carrying another howler infant, and then another. Footage also showed him dragging a third one, possibly dead, with some other young males tagging along. Then, between September and March, the situation escalated: Four other males were seen carrying live howler infants on their backs or bellies, sometimes for more than a week. Over a span of 15 months, at least 11 infants had been abducted—and few if any are likely to have survived.
While there had been at least one earlier report of a capuchin from a larger species in Brazil stealing a howler monkey infant and carrying it off in its mouth, presumably to eat it, this study is the first to document white-faced capuchins abducting infants in this way—and researchers are especially fascinated that the behavior was subsequently picked up by other individuals, too.
'This observation is particularly intriguing because examples of the social spread of such behaviors with no apparent fitness benefits in animals other than humans are rare,' says Izar. Because there had been camera traps on the island for years before this behavior was ever observed, the researchers probably captured the first time it happened, or at least a very early occurrence.
It is not unusual for young capuchin males to be seen carrying infants of their own species, says Susan Perry of the University of California, Los Angeles, who has studied Costa Rican capuchins at another site for decades, but was not involved in the current study. 'Capuchin males often try to steal capuchin infants, and they seem extremely pleased—as if they've won a prize—when they succeed. Until the infant gets hungry and starts crying for milk.'
At that point, the infants tend to be abandoned. 'Fortunately, the infant's mother or other female relatives are usually lurking nearby to retrieve their infants.' Capuchin males have a preference for male infants, says Perry. 'We think the infants they develop a close relationship with early on will often grow up to become allies with whom they can make the risky move to another group to mate.'
Abducting howler monkeys would obviously be useless in this regard, but perhaps their urge to carry infants is so strong that it sometimes misfires, says Perry. Goldsborough and Barrett agree, but they believe another tendency may be misfiring as well—the desire to do as others do. Perhaps Joker really just wanted to carry an infant, and then the others just wanted to have a go at it as well.
Not that it improved their social standing—young males carrying howler infants appeared to be the target of aggression from other capuchins more often than those that weren't. But for a species in which learning a new technique to get your hands on difficult-to-reach but nutritious foods is an important part of growing up, perhaps the tendency to do as others do pays off often enough to be indiscriminate.
The island environment could be a factor, too, the researchers argue. On the mainland, capuchins usually have to be wary of predators, and foraging takes up more time when you have to be constantly on guard and stay close to the group. On an island with plenty of food and hardly any threats, perhaps young males are just bored. 'Animals living on islands with no predators—or in zoos, were they are also safe and well-fed—have often been found to be more innovative and better at using tools,' says Goldsborough.
In many cases, what bored animals come up with may be useless or even annoying, says Barrett. 'I've seen capuchins groom porcupines and smack cows on the butt. They mess with everything. They're just constantly testing and interacting with the world.' But occasionally, an individual will find that, hey, if you swing a rock at one of these smelly, colorful things on the beach, there's a tasty treat inside. Or that if you hang out with male infants, they'll have your back when they grow up.
Some capuchins also develop strange rituals with no other purpose than strengthening social bonds. It's all in a day's work for this large-brained, hypersocial, tirelessly inventive species that in many ways resembles our own, even though our last common ancestor lived around 38 million years ago.
But what about the poor howlers, an endangered species on Jicarón, whose babies are being abducted? 'It's tragic,' says Goldsborough, 'but as researchers, we don't intend to interfere with natural behavior. I hope the howlers will eventually adapt, for example by keeping a safe distance from this one population of capuchins, or that the capuchins themselves will eventually tire of this. Those howler infants can be quite a handful.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
‘Superorganisms' were just seen in the wild for the first time ever
If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission. For years, scientists have watched nematodes build massive superorganisms in the form of writhing towers. But, they've only seen it happen in the lab. Now, though, researchers write that they've observed these massive, disturbing towers writhing in the wild for the first time ever. Previously, researchers believed that the behavior was meant to be an attempt to escape from the rest of the group. However, new images of the writhing towers appear to suggest they're actually used cooperatively, to benefit many worms instead of just one. Today's Top Deals Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Best Ring Video Doorbell deals Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98 The researchers reported their findings in a report published in Current Biology, writing that these towering superorganisms only existed naturally in their imaginations for the longest of times. Observing the towers also taught researchers quite a bit about how different species of nematode work together. While watching the towers, the scientists note that while many different species crawled through the worm towers, only one species, a tough larval stage known as a dauer, actually participated in building up the writing masses. This specificity in the construction of the tower points to something more than just random cooperation. These towers are truly superorganisms, then, and not just piles of writing worm bodies. This discovery also got researchers thinking: could other worms form writhing towers like this, too? To test that hypothesis, they stuck a toothbrush bristle into a food-free agar plate, then unleashed a bunch of roundworms from the species Caenorhabditis elegans into the structure. Immediately, the worms began to work together and build up a tower. Within two hours, the researchers say the C. elegans had formed a tower using the bristle as its spine. The researchers watched as some worms along the superorganism writhed and acted as exploratory arms. Others acted as bridges between gaps. To see how the superorganism would respond, the researchers tapped the top of the tower with a glass pick. Almost immediately, the worms began to wriggle and move toward the area. This, they say, shows that these towers are always growing and moving toward stimulus. It's an intriguing show of cooperation between the worms, and just one more way that worms continue to astound scientists. It also raises more questions about why these superorganisms form in the first place. Even more interesting, though, is that the roundworms didn't appear to hold any kind of class system in place. Where the nematodes only relied on the larval stage worms to create the tower, all the roundworms chimed in to help build up the mass. Researchers will need to dig deeper to see exactly why worms form these writhing superorganisms. Hopefully other species, like the parasitic hairworm, aren't capable of this same kind of behavior. More Top Deals Amazon gift card deals, offers & coupons 2025: Get $2,000+ free See the
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
This ‘Tower of Worms' Is a Squirming Superorganism
When food runs out, certain tiny roundworms, barely visible to the naked eye, crawl toward one another and build living, wriggling towers that move as one superorganism. For the first time, we've caught them doing that in nature on video. Scientists spent months pointing their digital microscope at rotting apples and pears to finally catch a glimpse of these living towers formed by Caenorhabditis roundworms in an orchard that is just downhill from the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior's location in Konstanz, Germany. 'It wasn't that hard to find. It's just the people didn't have the interest or time or funding for this kind of research,' says biologist Daniela Perez, lead author of the study. Perez and her team at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior then studied this behavior in a laboratory to learn more. To spur the towering, they placed groups of Caenorhabditis elegans in a dish without food, alongside a toothbrush bristle that could work as a scaffold. Dozens of worms quickly climbed on top of the bristle and one another to form a structure that moved in an eerily coordinated manner. The tower responded to the touch of a glass pipe by attempting to latch onto it; it stretched to bridge the gap between the bottom of the dish and its lid; and it even waved its tip around to probe the surrounding environment. The results were published Thursday in Current Biology. [Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter] Researchers had previously observed this towering in the lab but didn't know that it was an actual survival strategy in the wild. 'Discovering [this behavior] in wild populations is really important as it shows this is a part of how these animals live and not just a lab artifact,' says William Schafer, a geneticist at the University of Cambridge, who studies C. elegans and was not involved in the study. Why do the worms do this? The researchers think towering helps worms set out to find richer food sources. When resources are limited, 'it probably makes sense for microscopic organisms to cooperate for dispersing by forming something bigger,' says the study's senior author Serena Ding. The towers could allow some of their members to reach new places or to hitchhike on other organisms such as fruit flies. The bigger question is how the worms communicate within the towers. If the worms on top latch onto a fly, how do those at the bottom know to detach from where they're anchored? They could communicate chemically through pheromones and mechanically through movement patterns, Schafer suggests. Perez says her team plans to test this next. 'Every time we have a meeting, we end up with 10 new project ideas,' she says. 'There are so many directions we can take this.'
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
These worms stack together to form living towers, new study finds
Sign up for CNN's Wonder Theory science newsletter. Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more. Nature seems to offer an escape from the hustle and bustle of city life, but the world at your feet may tell another story. Even in the shade of a fruit tree, you could be surrounded by tiny skyscrapers — not made of steel or concrete, but of microscopic worms wriggling and writhing into the shape of long, vertical towers. Even though these miniature architects, called nematodes, are found all over Earth's surface, scientists in Germany recently witnessed their impressive building techniques in nature for the first time. After months of closely inspecting rotten pears and apples in local orchards, researchers from the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior and the University of Konstanz were able to spot hundreds of the 1-millimeter-long (0.04-inch) worms climbing onto one another, amassing structures up to 10 times their individual size. To learn more about the mysterious physics of the soft, slimy towers, the study team brought samples of nematodes called Caenorhabditis elegans into a lab and analyzed them. There, the scientists noticed the worms could assemble in a matter of hours, with some reaching out from the twisting mass as exploratory 'arms' sensing the environment and building accordingly. But why the worms formed the structures wasn't immediately clear. The team's findings, published Thursday in the journal Current Biology, show that even the smallest animals can prompt big questions about the evolutionary purpose of social behaviors. 'What we got was more than just some worms standing on top of each other,' said senior study author Serena Ding, a Max Planck research group leader of genes and behavior. 'It's a coordinated superorganism, acting and moving as a whole.' To find out what was motivating the nematodes' building behavior, the study team tested the worms' reactions to being poked, prodded and even visited by a fly — all while stacked in a tower formation. 'We saw that they are very reactive to the presence of a stimulus,' said the study's first author, Daniela Perez, who is a postdoctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior. 'They sense it, and then the tower goes towards this stimulus, attaching itself to our metal pick or a fly buzzing around.' This coordinated reaction suggests the hungry nematodes may be joining together to easily hitch a ride on larger animals such as insects that transport them to (not so) greener pastures with more rotten fruit to feast on, Perez said. 'If you think about it, an animal that is 1 millimeter long cannot just crawl all the way to the next fruit 2 meters (6.6 feet) away. It could easily die on the way there, or be eaten by a predator,' Perez explained. Nematodes are capable of hitchhiking solo too, she added, but arriving to a new area in a group may allow them to continue reproducing. The structures themselves may also serve as a mode of transport, as evidenced by how some worms formed bridges across gaps within the petri dishes to get from one surface to another, Perez noted. 'This discovery is really exciting,' said Orit Peleg, an associate professor of computer science who studies living systems at the University of Colorado Boulder's BioFrontiers Institute. 'It's both establishing the ecological function of creating a tower, and it really opens up the door to do more controlled experimentation to try to understand the perceptual world of these organisms, and how they communicate within a large group.' Peleg was not involved in the study. As the next step, Perez said her team would like to learn whether the formation of these structures is a cooperative or competitive behavior. In other words, are the towering nematodes behaving socially to help each other out, or are their towers more akin to a Black Friday sale stampede? Studying the behaviors of other self-assembling creatures could offer clues to the social norms of nematodes and help answer this question, Ding said. Ants, which assemble to form buoyant rafts to survive floodwaters, are among the few creatures known to team up like nematodes, said David Hu, a professor of mechanical engineering and biology at Georgia Tech. Hu was not involved in the study. 'Ants are incredibly sacrificial for one another, and they do not generally fight within the colony,' Hu said. 'That's because of their genetics. They all come from the same queen, so they are like siblings.' Like ants, nematodes didn't appear to display any obvious role differentiation or hierarchy within the tower structures, Perez said. Each worm from the base to the top of the structure was equally mobile and strong, indicating no competition was at play. However, the lab-cultivated worms were basically clones of one another, so it's not clear whether role differentiation occurs more often in nature, where nematode populations could have more genetic differences, she noted. Additionally, socially cooperative creatures tend to use some form of communication, Peleg said. In the case of ants, it may be their pheromone trails, while honeybees rely on their ritual dance routines and slime molds use their pulsing chemical signals. With nematodes, however, it's still not clear how they might communicate — or if they are communicating at all, Ding said. 'The next steps for (the team) are really just choosing the next questions to ask.' Notably, there has been a lot of interest in studying cooperative animal behaviors among the robotics community, Hu said. It's possible that one day, he added, information about the complex sociality of creatures like nematodes could be used to inform how technology, such as computer servers or drone systems, communicates.