Trump looks to end $56 million grant to give Narcan to first responders to help save lives during an overdose
The Trump administration is looking at plans to end a $56 million annual grant program that distributes the overdose-countering medication Narcan to first responders across the country, according to a draft proposal.
A preliminary budget document, obtained by The Washington Post, reportedly calls for deep cuts to federal health programs and targets multiple addiction prevention and treatment programs, including training of community responders to administer Narcan.
Narcan – known generically as naloxone – is a nasal spray that works to reverse the effects of an opioid overdose in two to three minutes. It is widely used to combat overdoses from serious drugs, including fentanyl.
Though state and local governments have alternative resources than federal programs to obtain Narcan, experts are concerned that the axing of the grant may send a message about the government's view on such training.
'Reducing the funding for naloxone and overdose prevention sends the message that we would rather people who use drugs die than get the support they need and deserve,' Dr Melody Glenn, an addiction medicine physician and assistant professor at the University of Arizona, told The New York Times.
The grants were awarded through the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, an agency within the Department of Health and Human Services. The administration would be eliminated under the draft budget proposal, per the Post
'Narcan has been kind of a godsend as far as opioid epidemics are concerned, and we certainly are in the middle of one now with fentanyl,' Donald McNamara of the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department told The Times. 'We need this funding source because it's saving lives every day.'
According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 66,000 police officers, firefighters and other emergency responders were trained in 2024 using the grant money. Over 282,500 Narcan kits were distributed.
The proposal to cut the program and other treatment programs comes in somewhat surprising contrast to the views of newly instated health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has been vocal in his desire to address America's drug crisis.
Last year, during his independent presidential campaign, Kennedy, who has spoken publicly of his own heroin addiction, produced a documentary that outlined addiction support with federal backing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
3 days ago
- Metro
Urgent recall for vitamin gummies over 'life-threatening health risk'
Vitamin gummies have been recalled across the US because they may contain an undeclared allergen – peanuts. Vita Warehouse Corp is recalling a lot of its Welby brand Vitamin B12 Energy Support gummy product 1000 mcg gummies, Berkely Jensen Vitamin B12 1000 mcg Gummies, and VitaGlobe Vitamin B12 Extra Strength Gummies. 'People with an allergy or severe sensitivity to peanuts run the potential risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reactions if they consume these products,' states an advisory published by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Friday. The Webly vitamins came with 140 gummies in a clear bottle with a white cap and a green, red and white label. They have an expiration date of October 2026, the UPC code 4099100290868 and the lot number 248046601 printed at the bottom. Berkley Jensen vitamins under the recall came with 250 gummies in a clear bottle with a white cap and red and pink labels. They have an expiration date of October 2026, the UPC code 888670132487 and the lot number 248046601. The VitaGlobe vitamins came with 60 gummies in a clear bottle with a white cap and green, red and white labels. They have the same expiration date as the other two brands, the UPC code 850005214670 and the lot number 248046601. They were sent to ALDI and BJ's stores nationwide. There have not been any allergic reactions or illnesses linked to the vitamins that have been reported. More Trending Anyone who experiences an allergic reaction should see a doctor right away. Customers who are allergic to peanuts should throw them away immediately or return them for a full refund. 'Vita Warehouse Corp is committed to maintaining the highest product safety and quality standards,' states the FDA notice. It comes a week after Aldi recalled its Casa Mamita Churro Bites Filled with Chocolate Hazelnut Cream because they were found to have an undeclared allergen, milk, that could cause 'a serious or life-threatening allergic reaction'. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Man 'urinates on $10,000 worth of Spam and sausages forcing them to be tossed' MORE: Everything to know about Donald Trump's military parade on his 79th birthday MORE: Lawmaker forcefully removed from Trump secretary's LA protests conference and handcuffed
The Independent
3 days ago
- The Independent
Here's where the national mental health hotline is used the most
The 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline was launched in 2022 to help strengthen crisis response and has received more than 16 million calls, texts, and chats ever since. It is funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and administered by the mental health company Vibrant Emotional Health, connecting Americans with counselors at more than 200 crisis centers who are available 24 hours a day, every day. Now, new data shared by researchers at New York University and Johns Hopkins Medicine reveals the states that have utilized this lifeline the most. 'At the state-level, past-year 988 contact incidence rates ranged from highs of 45.3 and 40.2 per 1,000 population in Alaska and Vermont, respectively, to lows of 12.5 and 14.4 per 1000 population in Delaware and Alabama, respectively,' the authors of the research letter published in the journal JAMA Network Open said. Regionally, the highest number of calls, text messages, and chats was recorded in the West. The lowest volume was in the South, and the same was true for the previous year's estimate. New York and Colorado were also high on the list, according to a map revealing use during that time frame. The authors noted that demographic information was not available when they estimated the 988 use prevalence. 'We then adjusted these prevalence estimates to reflect assumptions about repeat contacts to 988,' the authors wrote. 'Using data on repeat contacts to the Crisis Text Line to inform our assumptions, we adjusted the lifetime prevalence estimate to reflect the assumption that every person who contacted 988 used it a mean of 2.0 times and adjusted the past-year prevalence estimate to reflect the assumption that every person who contacted 988 used it a mean of 1.5 times.' They found that there is still an opportunity to increase use, highlighting that the contact rate is less than half the rate of adult emergency department visits that include a mental health diagnosis. The authors said state variation in use was consistent with state variation in funding and legislative attention. 'Lower rates of 988 use in the South, which is more politically conservative than other regions, is also consistent with prior research showing less favorable attitudes toward 988 among Republicans than Democrats,' they wrote. Notably, funding for the crisis line's specialized services for LGBT+ youth is on the chopping block. Although the Health and Human Services fiscal year 2026 budget proposal maintains funding for the lifeline. Lawmakers have spoken out in opposition to the cuts to the services that they say get an average of 2,100 contacts per day. Some one in four U.S. adults had a mental illness in the past year and nearly three in 10 high school students reported poor mental health, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Reuters
3 days ago
- Reuters
Trump Medicaid cuts could devastate rural health services, hospitals warn
WASHINGTON, June 13 (Reuters) - Rural hospitals are sounding the alarm over proposed healthcare cuts in President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending package, warning the changes could force them to scale back services or close their doors. The bill would reduce federal spending on Medicaid, the health program for low-income Americans, by tightening enrollment standards and limiting federal aid to states. That worries rural providers, who rely heavily on the program to serve a population that tends to be poorer and sicker than the nation as a whole. "We can't sustain serving our community the way we are with additional cuts," said Carrie Lutz, CEO of Holton Community Hospital in Holton, Kansas. The independent nonprofit hospital, which serves a farming community of 13,000, is asking voters for a quarter-cent sales-tax increase to help cover its costs, which outpace annual revenues in many years. Lutz's concerns highlight the delicate balancing act lawmakers face as they try to enact Trump's priorities. Republicans who control both chambers of the U.S. Congress aim to cut Medicaid spending by $785 billion over a decade, to partly offset the cost of extending and adding to the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's signature first-term legislative achievement. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill will add $3 trillion to the $36.2 trillion national debt over the next decade, when interest payments are taken into account. Independent analysts have said the bill will effectively boost incomes for wealthier Americans and reduce incomes for the less affluent, due to cuts to Medicaid and other safety-net programs. Republicans have set a July 4 deadline to pass the bill out of Congress, giving the Senate three weeks to make changes, pass it and send it back to the House of Representatives. No Democrats voted for the bill in the House, and no Democratic supporters for it have emerged in the Senate. So Republicans who hold a slim 53-47 Senate majority must reconcile demands of budget hawks who want deeper spending cuts against concerns of others worried about the toll on rural and working-class voters who helped elect Trump. An internal Republican poll in May found voters in the most competitive congressional districts would be less likely to vote for a Republican who supported cutting Medicaid to pay for tax cuts. The upper chamber's slower pace has given interest groups time to seek changes to the 1,100-page bill. Multinational companies seek to neutralize a retaliatory tax they say could discourage investment in the U.S. Some states are fighting a provision that would prevent them from regulating artificial intelligence. Solar-energy companies warn the bill could devastate their industry by revoking subsidies for green energy. Much opposition has focused on changes to Medicaid, which covers 71 million low-income Americans. The bill would cut spending on Medicaid, which represented about 9% of the $6.8 trillion federal budget last year, by requiring adult recipients to work, excluding non-citizens and limiting an accounting mechanism states use to boost the federal government's contribution. Overall, the bill would leave 10.9 million more people without insurance, CBO estimates. Any cuts to Medicaid would hit hard in rural areas and small towns, where roughly 18% of adults are enrolled in Medicaid compared with 16% for the country as a whole, according to Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. Rural residents tend to be sicker, with higher rates of addiction, mental illness, and mortality from heart disease, cancer and stroke, the center found. The National Rural Health Association said the bill could force providers to cut services or close. Nearly half of rural hospitals currently lose money, and 120 have closed or stopped offering inpatient services over the past decade, the trade group says. The cuts could be especially acute in Kansas. The state recently increased its tax on Medicaid providers from 3% to 6%, an accounting maneuver that would effectively boost the federal government's contribution. The provider tax has been widely criticized as a gimmick or loophole that does not accurately reflect how much money is actually being spent on medical care. The bill would block that increase, freezing the state's provider tax at a lower level than in many other states. Lutz said that would reduce Holton Hospital's $22 million annual revenue by roughly $1 million - a significant hit for an organization that typically spends more money than it takes in each year. Tighter Medicaid enrollment standards, meanwhile, would increase red tape for hospital staff, while the citizenship provisions could exclude the town's Guatemalan immigrants, she said. With those changes, she said, the hospital would have to treat more uninsured patients. At least 41 of the Senate's 53 Republicans represent rural states, and several said they will work to remove the bill's limits on the provider tax. "Leave the provider tax alone. Put the work requirements in and all that kind of stuff. But for God's sakes don't cut into the bone," said Senator Jim Justice of West Virginia. The Senate Finance Committee could unveil changes to the House-passed bill in coming days. Failure to tackle that issue, they say, could leave many of their residents without reliable access to care. "If we don't get it right, doctors do not have to serve Medicaid patients and so in rural areas we could have doctors exit and I don't think our members from rural states would want that," said Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina.
