Teen whose family fled the Taliban is using art to advocate for women and girls in Afghanistan
When Setayesh Khasheei goes to school, she's reminded of her classmates and family back home in Afghanistan who are unable to get an education, simply because of their gender.
Khasheei, 13, and her family came to Winnipeg in 2021, fleeing their home in Kabul soon after the country's government collapsed and the Taliban seized control.
Khasheei, who was in Grade 3 at the time, remembers how quickly everything changed.
"It was … sad because I had to leave behind my family members, my friends, my classmates, [and] my home," she said.
The Taliban have barred women from most areas of public life and stopped girls from going to school beyond Grade 6 as part of harsh measures they imposed after taking power in 2021 following the withdrawal of U.S. forces.
According to 2023 data from the United Nations, at least 1.4 million Afghan girls have been banned from accessing secondary education since then, while more than 100,000 have been denied access to post-secondary education.
"They're not allowed to go outside … to educate themselves … some of them are not even allowed to … leave the house … and some of them are married off at a young age," she said. "That could have been me."
When Khasheei arrived in Canada she felt a mix of emotions — on one hand she was happy to be safe, but on the other hand she felt guilty she was not able to help those still in Afghanistan.
At the time, because of a language barrier, her only way of expressing herself was through art. It was after a conversation with her father that she realized that's how she could help.
"I want to break the silence because so many … people don't know their stories, they don't know what's going on."
Her paintings portray the point of view of Afghan women and girls, inspired by the stories she hears from her friends back home.
As the school year in Winnipeg comes to an end, Khasheei says she's reminded of how lucky she is.
"So many people in Afghanistan, mostly girls, they don't have that chance," she said.
She has displayed her art work at Canadian Museum for Human Rights and in Ottawa at an event for the Afghanistan Women's Parliamentarian and Leaders Network.
"Half of the society in my home country is women, and if we want to grow the society, if we want to have a very, very good plan for the … country, without the woman and girl, we cannot," said Khasheei's mother, who CBC is not naming as she fears for the safety of her family still in the country.
She describes Afghanistan as a prison, where she says most of the relatives she speaks to have lost hope.
"They cannot do anything, they don't have rights," she said.
When she thinks about what could have happened if her family were still in the country, she's brought to tears, thinking about her two daughters.
"I am thinking, if they [couldn't] continue their education, if they [couldn't] go outside by themselves, if they [couldn't] do anything, they [couldn't] continue their life."
Khasheei's mother says she is grateful they are able to continue their education, and that her eldest is using her voice to spread awareness, but she hopes to return home one day to see women and girls back in classrooms and in public spaces.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Major projects: How Bill C-5 works and why it alarms its critics
OTTAWA — Parliament has passed controversial major projects legislation that Prime Minister Mark Carney says Canada needs to shore up its economy in the face of a trade war with the United States. Bill C-5 gives the federal government sweeping new powers to speed up permitting for what the Liberals call "nation-building projects." The legislation's opponents have attacked the legislation as a massive power grab. Here's what's C-5 does and what people are saying about it. What problem is this trying to solve? Canada has built few large projects over the past decade. That has led Conservatives, some provinces and some industry groups to argue that Ottawa's regulatory burdens are holding back growth. The Liberals tried to streamline project approvals through Bill C-69, an impact assessment law meant to resolve environmental and Indigenous concerns upfront to keep projects from getting tied up in the courts. Critics say the legislation has actually been holding back major infrastructure projects since it became law in 2019. Federal Conservatives have dubbed the law the "No More Pipelines Act" and it's deeply unpopular in Alberta and Saskatchewan. Carney was elected in April with a mandate to diversify Canada's economy and ensure exports can more easily reach countries beyond the U.S. Ottawa has also promised to build up northern infrastructure, in part to meet a NATO military alliance spending target for critical infrastructure. Carney said Bill C-5 "creates the ability to flip … the attitude towards those projects once they are selected, once conditions are put in place — how those projects can move forward, as opposed to why." Which projects could be fast-tracked? We don't know yet. The government has pointed to ports, railways and sometimes pipelines. The Ontario government has suggested a major commuter highway tunnel could qualify as a nation-building project. What are the provinces doing? Some provinces have also passed legislation aimed at speeding up development. Ontario's government has given itself the right through Bill 5 to designate "special economic zones" where it can suspend everything from safety rules to environmental and labour standards, with a focus on mining projects. British Columbia's Bill 15 similarly allows the province to expedite the construction of anything from critical mineral mines to local hospitals. What's in the federal bill? The legislation has two main parts. The first part looks to eliminate barriers to interprovincial trade and labour mobility and work to harmonize various regulations across the country. It also allows Ottawa to decide that goods and services that have met one province's requirements can be deemed to have met "comparable federal requirements" when moving interprovincially. That might involve things like energy efficiency standards on household appliances. The main part of the bill relates to fast-tracking approvals for projects that Ottawa decides are "in the national interest." The government says that decision is meant to be based on five criteria, including whether the project can "strengthen Canada's autonomy, resilience and security," help fight climate change or "advance the interests of Indigenous peoples." Getting that seal of approval would clear all federal approvals for the project — including virtually all environmental laws — while requiring the proponent to fulfil obligations set out by Ottawa. Why the rush? The government fast-tracked Bill C-5 with support from the Conservatives, and the House delivered the bill to the Senate with a programming motion that effectively required the upper chamber to vote on it by Friday. One senator's attempt to split the bill into separate votes was rejected when the Speaker concluded that it wasn't possible at such a late stage. Critics have been calling for a deeper review of the bill, arguing there is no need to rush it through because proposed fast-track projects won't start work before Parliament returns from its summer break. The government also could have had Parliament sit through the summer, instead of sending MPs and senators home for 12 weeks. How do Indigenous Peoples feel? There is widespread opposition to the legislation among First Nations, Inuit and Métis leaders, who argue elements of it could be used to undermine their rights. The Assembly of First Nations says the government's plan to set up advisory councils after the bill becomes law does not give real power to Indigenous communities on the ground, and they're upset that the bill didn't mention a UN declaration Ottawa has endorsed that promises those communities "free, prior and informed consent." Some Indigenous communities have welcomed the legislation, including some Alberta communities with economic stakes in energy projects and the Manitoba Métis Federation. Others say they are ready to undertake widespread, disruptive protests against specific projects. — With files from Kyle Duggan This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 26, 2025. Dylan Robertson, The Canadian Press Sign in to access your portfolio
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Where Was Xi Jinping in Iran's Hour of Need?
Seth Cropsey is right that Israeli strikes on Iran have given the U.S. a strategic opening ('Israel Hands America an Opportunity in the Mideast,' op-ed, June 17). Yet the dividend runs beyond the Gulf. China's crisis response—limited to statements, with no tangible support for Tehran—further exposed the gap between Beijing's great-power rhetoric and its reach, an imbalance Washington should press while the Trump-brokered cease-fire holds. After Beijing and Tehran inked their 2021 'comprehensive partnership,' Iran expected a bulwark. It got a bystander. China's representative to the U.N. called Israel's raid a 'dangerous precedent,' and China Daily—the Communist Party's English-language mouthpiece—referred to the 'reckless actions' of Israel's 'war machine.' But Beijing sent Tehran no drones or missile parts, extended no emergency credit and floated no credible peace plan—proof that its promises vanish when real costs loom.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Justice Dept. Opens Inquiry Into University of California Hiring Practices
The Trump administration on Thursday targeted California's education system for the second time in two days, announcing a new Justice Department investigation into whether a plan to build a university system that more closely reflects the state's racial and ethnic diversity violates civil rights laws against discrimination. The investigation was made public just 24 hours after the U.S. Education Department declared that California was breaking federal law by allowing transgender girls to compete on female sports teams. The federal government gave the state 10 days to reverse its policies or face 'imminent enforcement action.' On Thursday, Harmeet Dhillon, the Justice Department's top civil rights attorney, said in a letter to Michael V. Drake, the president of the University of California system, that she was focused on the 'University of California 2030 Capacity Plan,' which she said might discriminate against some employees, job applicants and training program participants. The government's news release about the inquiry said that the university plan required campuses to meet quotas for race- and sex-based employment. The 44-page plan is a three-year-old planning document aimed at expanding enrollment in the University of California system while also 'reflecting California's diversity.' It makes no specific mention of quotas, but does note that future growth of faculty and students should result in campus populations that 'better reflect and tap the talent of underrepresented populations who represent the majority of Californians.' The plan offers parameters on how to achieve that while also meeting Gov. Gavin Newsom's goal of 70 percent of working-age Californians earning postsecondary degrees or certificates by 2030. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
