'These dogs are trained to kill, or they have learned how to kill,' Pack of feral dogs terrorizing Delaware County
DELAWARE COUNTY – Around 50 Delaware County residents turned out for a community meeting to learn what can be done regarding a pack of feral dogs attacking and killing livestock.
Delaware County Sheriff Ray Thomas appeared at the Lakemont Shores fire station on Tuesday to update the residents.
Lakemont Shores is on the Eucha arm of Grand Lake.
Several residents spoke up about attacks on livestock.
'If the dogs are aggressive and attacking you or your livestock – you can shoot the dog.'
Delaware County Sheriff Ray Thomas
Thomas also warned about shooting dogs irresponsibly.
Delaware County does not have a county-wide animal control unit. He said Grand River Dam Authority helicopters patrol the area during training exercises.
Thomas said he is working with the Delaware County Commissioner on a plan to address the issue.
Hoguen Apperson, Delaware County Cattlemen's Association president, urged residents to contact the Delaware County Sheriff's and make a report when they have an issue with dogs.
'For far too long, livestock owners in Delaware County have known the economic and heartbreaking impact of feral dogs,' Apperson said after the meeting.
John Nielson spoke about how he had to put down his 14-year-old dog, who was attacked by a pack of wild dogs.
The pack of dogs is believed to contain a pit bull, a German Shepherd, a husky, and other mixed breeds, he said.
'These dogs are trained to kill, or they have learned how to kill,' Nielson said.
Nielson said his neighbor told him how she was on her daily walk and was confronted by a pack of wild dogs, and they attacked her.
'These dogs are not scared of people,' Nielson said.
Nielson said the dog pack is killing family pets – dogs and cats – and livestock. He reported to the crowd that 12 cows and eight calves had been attacked.
Nielsen created a text chain for the community members to be aware of the pack of dogs and for better reporting to law enforcement.
Oklahoma Alliance for Animals and Second Chance Pet Rescue offered their help in proposing safe and humane solutions.
'It costs $32,000 a month to run an animal shelter,' said Cassie Owens, Second Chance Pet Rescue of Grand Lake director.
Owens also addressed the crowd, explaining that the Grove facility has a long waiting list for animals but cannot accept 'aggressive' dogs.
The social media posts have spread where people are shooting animals that are in a resident's yard.
'These are pets that are getting shot,' Owens said.
A second community meeting is planned for the Hickory Grove area to tackle similar issues affecting the northern regions of Delaware County.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
With the Karen Read case about to head to the jury, a look at 10 pivotal moments from the trial
Her lawyers say she was framed and that O'Keefe entered the Fairview Road house, owned at the time by a fellow Boston officer, where he was fatally beaten and possibly mauled by a German Shepherd before his body was planted on the front lawn. Advertisement With the verdict watch about to begin, here's a look at 10 key moments from the second trial. Crime scene testimony - 'I hit him, I hit him, I hit him' Katie McLaughlin, a paramedic/firefighter with the Canton Fire Department, points to defendant Karen Read, in Dedham, Mass., on Monday, May 5, 2025. (Pat Greenhouse/The Boston Globe via AP, Pool) Pat Greenhouse/Associated Press Jurors heard testimony from emergency responders and a civilian witness, Read's lawyers said the testimony was false and that one of the first responders, McCabe's disputed dying in cold search Witness Jennifer McCabe continues her cross examination testimony during the Karen Read murder trial in Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Mass., Wednesday, April 30, 2025. (Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool) Greg Derr/Associated Press Jurors also heard testimony from forensic experts regarding a Google search on McCabe's phone for 'hos [sic] long to die in cold,' which was time stamped at 2:27 a.m. on Jan. 29, 2022, nearly two hours after Read allegedly hit O'Keefe with her SUV. Advertisement McCabe had testified that she twice attempted in frigid weather at the crime scene to Google the information at Read's request, and digital forensic experts Barros breaks the Blue Wall Read's lawyers allege that authorities tampered with her taillight when her SUV was brought to a Canton police garage on the evening of Jan. 29, 2022, and later planted pieces of broken taillight at the scene in an effort to frame her. They called Barros was in Dighton with State Police troopers, who seized the vehicle after speaking with Read. 'That taillight is completely smashed out' in the garage photo, Barros said. 'That middle section was intact when I was there.' Barros told prosecutor Hank Brennan on cross-examination that video footage from O'Keefe's driveway at 5:07 a.m. on Jan. 29, 2022, showing a white portion of the right taillight that would be red if the taillight was fully intact was 'consistent' with the damage he later saw in Dighton. Advertisement Higgins appears angry at bar, later visits police station Witness Brian Higgins answers a question from defense attorney Alan Jackson regarding text messages between Higgins and defendant Karen Read, during Read's trial in Norfolk Superior Court, Friday, May 24, 2024, in Dedham, Mass. Charles Krupa/Associated Press Jurors also viewed surveillance footage of ATF agent Brian Higgins that the defense contends is highly suspicious. Higgins had swapped flirtatious texts with Read in the weeks leading up to O'Keefe's death, and he was seen on video footage at the Waterfall, the second bar the group visited on the night in question, gesturing aggressively in O'Keefe's direction as the group prepared to leave around midnight for the afterparty on Fairview. At one point in the clip, another patron seems to restrain Higgins by grabbing his forearm. In addition, the jury saw footage of Higgins briefly entering the Canton police station, where he had an office, around 1:30 a.m., about an hour after Read allegedly struck O'Keefe. He then headed back out to the parking lot, where he retrieved an empty duffel bag from another vehicle amid heavy snowfall. He also retrieved a garden hoe from another part of the lot. Higgins did not testify at the retrial. Former R.I. chief medical examiner testifies Dr. Elizabeth Laposata defines a specific head injury for the defense during the murder retrial of Karen Read in Norfolk Superior Court, Monday, June 9, 2025, in Dedham, Mass. Pat Greenhouse/Associated Press Among the defense witnesses who testified was Lopasata told jurors that O'Keefe's injuries, including a skull fracture, abrasions on his right arm, swelling to his eyes, cuts over his right eye and to his nose, and bruises on his hand and right knee, weren't consistent with a vehicle strike. 'By looking at the body, I could tell that there was no evidence of impact from a vehicle,' she testified. Government expert says otherwise Dr. Judson Welcher, an accident reconstruction expert, testifies, during the murder retrial of Karen Read in Norfolk Superior Court, Thursday, May 29, 2025, in Dedham, Mass. Mark Stockwell/Associated Press Lopasata's opinion was contradicted by Advertisement Welcher also described a test he ran with a replica Lexus SUV in which the right taillight area was painted blue as the vehicle lightly contacted him, leaving blue paint on his arm in the same general area as O'Keefe's wounds. Welcher's colleague also provides key testimony Digital forensics analyst Shanon Burgess testifies during the Karen Read trial Tuesday, May 20, 2025, in Dedham, Mass. Matt Stone The government also called Welcher's colleague, ARCCA reenters the fray Expert Daniel Wolfe returns to the stand in the murder retrial of Karen Read in Norfolk Superior Court, Monday June 9, 2025, in Dedham, Mass. Pat Greenhouse/Associated Press Jurors also heard testimony from The analysts were initially hired by the Justice Department, which launched a federal grand jury probe into state law enforcement's handling of O'Keefe's death, and the defense later retained them separately. No one was charged with any federal crimes in connection with the case, and jurors were barred from learning about that probe at trial. A dog bite expert testifies Dr. Marie Russell, an emergency physician and forensic pathologist, is questioned during Karen Read's murder trial in Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Mass., Tuesday, June 3, 2025. Libby O'Neill/Associated Press Another defense witness was A Boston police officer gives tense testimony Dedham, MA June 2 Boston Police officer Kelly Dever, formerly with Canton Police, testifies. The murder retrial of Karen Read continues in Norfolk Superior Court, in Dedham, MA on Monday June 2, 2025. Pat Greenhouse/Globe Staff The defense also called Boston police o In a tense exchange, Read attorney Alan Jackson asked her about an interview she gave to the FBI in which she said Ken Berkowitz, the Canton police chief at the time, and Higgins were in the police garage for a 'wildly long time' on the afternoon of Jan. 29, 2022. Advertisement Dever said that was her recollection at the time she spoke to the agents. She told Brennan on cross-examination that she knew her shift ended at 3:45 p.m. on Jan. 29, 2022, and that she left then. Dever said the defense later produced a timeline showing the SUV came into the garage after that, 'meaning it is not possible that I saw that.' Dever said it was a 'false memory' that she 'provided in good faith,' which she then 'retracted immediately [upon] being provided evidence that it was not possible.' She said her false memory may have been colored by media reports she saw about the case. Travis Andersen can be reached at
Boston Globe
2 days ago
- Boston Globe
Judge hears arguments over whether to admit presentation into evidence in Karen Read trial. Follow live updates.
With jury gone, lawyers return to court in Read case — 9:25 a.m. .cls-1{clip-path:url(#clippath);}.cls-2,.cls-3{fill:none;}.cls-2,.cls-3,.cls-4{stroke-width:0px;}.cls-5{clip-path:url(#clippath-1);}.cls-3{clip-rule:evenodd;} Link copied By Travis Andersen, Globe Staff Both sides in Karen Read's murder retrial will appear in court Thursday for a hearing before they deliver closing arguments to jurors on Friday. The hearing is known as a charge conference, where the parties hash out instructions the jury will receive before they start deliberating. Jurors won't be present for Thursday's proceedings. The parties are also awaiting a ruling from Judge Beverly J. Cannone on whether the jury can view a PowerPoint presentation from ARCCA, a Philadelphia-based crash reconstruction firm whose experts found the damage to Read's SUV and the injuries to the victim, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, weren't consistent with O'Keefe being struck by the vehicle, a finding at odds with government experts who also testified. Advertisement Read, 45, has pleaded not guilty to second-degree murder and other counts for allegedly backing her Lexus in a drunken rage into O'Keefe, her boyfriend, early on Jan. 29, 2022, after dropping him off outside a Fairview Road home in Canton following a night of bar-hopping. Her lawyers say she was framed and that O'Keefe entered the property, owned at the time by a fellow Boston police officer, where he was fatally beaten and possibly mauled by a German Shepherd before his body was planted on the front lawn. Read's first trial ended in a hung jury and she remains free on bail.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Karen Read trial: Defense rests its case, prepares for closing arguments
Karen Read's defense team rested its case Wednesday in the Massachusetts woman's second murder trial over the death of her Boston police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe, after contentious cross-examination of its final witness. Andrew Rentschler, a biomechanist and accident reconstruction expert, delivered potentially critical testimony about his analysis of O'Keefe's head, brain and body injuries. O'Keefe, he told jurors, didn't appear to have been hit by a car as prosecutors allege. After the defense wrapped up its questioning of Rentschler, Prosecutor Hank Brennan told the judge he did not plan to call any more witnesses, reversing an earlier request to recall a different crash expert. The lawyers agreed to begin their closing arguments at 9 a.m. Friday. They'll then hand the case to the jury. Throughout the eight-week-long trial, jurors have heard from more than 40 witnesses about the days and hours before O'Keefe's body was found lying frozen and unconscious outside the Canton, Massachusetts home of another cop, Brian Albert, on Jan. 29, 2022. More: The dog did it? What to know about the German Shepherd tied to the Karen Read trial Prosecutors have accused Read, 45, of backing into O'Keefe, her boyfriend at the time, with her Lexus SUV while dropping him off at a house party after a night out drinking with friends and then leaving him to die outside in the middle of a historic blizzard. She has been charged with second-degree murder, vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated and leaving the scene of a collision resulting in death. Read's defense team has argued she is the victim of an elaborate police conspiracy. They say law enforcement officers at the party beat O'Keefe, let a dog attack him, threw his body on the front lawn and then used their power to plant evidence and frame Read. Here's what you missed from the last day of witness testimony. Prosecutor Hank Brennan wrapped up his cross-examination of Rentschler by questioning the crash expert about a piece of glass found inside O'Keefe's nose. Rentschler said he considered this evidence as part of his analysis, but it was not mentioned in the report. Under questioning by defense attorney Alan Jackson, Rentschler agreed that plastic shards, drinking straw and other debris found near O'Keefe's body weren't important to his analysis. If there was no collision, he said the items couldn't have been a result of the impact. "In your opinion, were any of the injuries that you saw suffered by John O'Keefe consistent with having been struck by the subject Lexus?" Jackson asked. "No, they are not," Rentschler replied. After a few more questions from Brennan about Canton police's search for evidence and the injuries to the right side of O'Keefe's body, Cannone dismissed Rentschler and the jury for the day. Prosecutor Hank Brennan repeatedly told Rentschler 'facts matter' and 'details matter' during an at times combative cross-examination in which he questioned the foundation of the crash expert's analysis. Brennan said Rentschler had 'no idea where the point of impact' occurred in O'Keefe's alleged collision with Read's car, to which Rentschler replied: 'Nobody does.' Rentschler later confirmed he did not know some of the details of the alleged crash, including the speed of the car and O'Keefe's body position. Rentschler appeared to claim that the lack of evidence fed into his conclusions. 'If you don't know something occurred, how can you conclude it actually occurred,' he asked. 'It scientifically makes no sense.' The prosecutor also suggested Rentschler's report didn't account for potential soft-tissue damage O'Keefe sustained, injuries often not often shown in X-rays. Brennan also took aim at Rentschler's reputation. He asked if Rentschler talked with the defense team about presenting himself as unbiased during Read's first trial and noted that Rentschler once went to lunch with Read's lawyers. "I ate, people were talking, I really didn't talk much at all,' Rentschler said. 'How would I remember a conversation from over a year ago?' Defense attorney Alan Jackson asked Rentschler to critique the methods used by the prosecutor's crash reconstruction expert, Judson Welcher, in an attempt to sow doubt into their case against Read. Rentschler questioned Welcher's use of a 1979 study finding head trauma to be the most common type of car crash injury and argued it was misleading. The more than 40-year-old study published before the first modern SUV was manufactured, making it outdated, Rentschler said. Welcher's technique to determine how O'Keefe obtained his head injury was also 'inconsistent' with how a person would have moved after being hit by an SUV, Rentschler argued. The defense finished questioning Rentschler around 11:30 a.m. Rentschler, a senior biomechanist at the Pennsylvania-based firm ARCCA, told jurors O'Keefe did not have the type of injuries he would expect of a pedestrian car crash victim. Pointing to an autopsy photo, Rentschler said the 36 superficial abrasions on O'Keefe's arm did not look like scrapes from a broken taillight. If the injuries came from Read's vehicle, he suggested O'Keefe's arm would have needed to hit the taillight in 36 separate places. He also said the cuts would have appeared in a different orientation, more parallel to the wrist, if they came from the car. Rentschler also spent several minutes discussing the lack of bruising and fractures on O'Keefe's arm, which he said should have occurred if O'Keefe was hit by a car moving faster than 10 mph. Based on car crash simulations he conducted, Rentschler said he expected to see trauma, fractures, lacerations and bruising on O'Keefe's right hand and arm. The absence of those injuries suggested O'Keefe was not hit, Rentschler said. CourtTV has been covering the case against Read and the criminal investigation since early 2022, when O'Keefe's body was found outside a Massachusetts home. You can watch CourtTV's live feed of the Read trial proceedings from Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Massachusetts. Proceedings began at 9 a.m. ET. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Karen Read trial: Defense rests its case
