London AI firm says Getty copyright case poses ‘overt threat' to industry
A London-based artificial intelligence company, Stability AI, has claimed that a copyright case brought by the global photography agency Getty Images represents an 'overt threat' to the generative AI industry.
Getty's case against Stability AI for copyright and trademark infringement relating to its vast photography archives reached the high court in London on Monday.
Stability allows users to generate images using text prompts, and its directors include James Cameron, the Oscar-winning film director of Avatar and Titanic. But Getty called the people who were training the AI system 'a bunch of tech geeks' and claimed they were indifferent to the problems their innovation might create.
Stability countered by alleging that Getty was using 'fanciful' legal routes and spending approximately £10m to fight a technology it feared was 'an existential threat' to its business.
Related: The 'death of creativity'? AI job fears stalk advertising industry
Getty represents the work of almost 600,000 content creators globally. It alleges Stability trained its image generation model on its vast database of copyrighted photographs. As a result the program, called Stability Diffusion, outputs images with Getty Images watermarks still on them. Getty alleges that Stability was 'completely indifferent to what they fed into the training data'. It told the court the system amounted to 'sticking our trademark on pornography' and 'AI rubbish'.
Lawyers for Getty said the dispute over the unlicensed use of thousands of its photographs, including images of celebrities, politicians and news events, 'is not a battle between creatives and technology, where a win for Getty Images means the end of AI'.
They added: 'The problem is when AI companies such as Stability want to use those works without payment.'
Lindsay Lane KC, representing Getty Images, said: 'This was a bunch of tech geeks who were so excited by AI that they were indifferent to any of the dangers or problems it presents.'
In submissions to the court on Monday Getty claimed Stability had trained its image generation model on databases that contained child sexual abuse material.
Stability is fighting the overall Getty claim and its lawyer said the allegations relating to child sexual abuse material were 'repugnant'.
A spokesperson for Stability AI said it was committed to preventing misuse of its technology, 'particularly in the creation and dissemination of harmful content, including CSAM [child sexual abuse material]'. It said it had robust safeguards 'to enhance our safety standards to protect against bad actors'.
The case comes amid a wider campaign from artists, writers and musicians, including Elton John and Dua Lipa, to protect their copyright from alleged theft by generative AI companies, which then use it to allow their customers to create new pictures, music or text.
The UK parliament is locked in a similar dispute after the government proposed that copyright holders would have to opt out of their material being used to train algorithms and produce AI-generated content, otherwise it would be free to use by tech companies.
'Getty Images, of course, recognises that the AI industry overall may be a force for good, but that doesn't justify allowing those developing AI models to ride roughshod over intellectual property rights,' said Lane.
The trial, which is scheduled to run for several weeks, will focus in part on the use of images by celebrated photographers, including photos of the former Liverpool football coach Jürgen Klopp taken by the award-winning British sports photographer Andrew Livesey; a picture of the Chicago Cubs baseball team by Gregory Shamus, an American sports photographer; a photo of the actor and musician Donald Glover by Alberto Rodriguez; and photos of the actor Eric Dane and film director Christopher Nolan by Andreas Rentz.
Seventy-eight thousand pages of evidence have been disclosed in the case and AI experts are being called to give evidence from the University of California, Berkeley and the University of Freiberg in Germany.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Getty Images Stock Was Soaring This Week
A crucial shareholder vote ratified the company's pending merger. It aims to fuse with Shutterstock in a cash-and-stock deal. 10 stocks we like better than Getty Images › Over the past few days, it hasn't been hard to imagine reaping gains on photography services provider Getty Images (NYSE: GETY). After all, the company's stock was a hot item on the market, thanks to a well-received deal to merge with a peer. According to data compiled by S&P Global Market Intelligence, as of late Thursday afternoon, the shares were up by more than 13% week to date. On Tuesday, photo-sharing site operator Shutterstock announced its shareholders had approved -- by a large majority -- their company's pending merger with Getty Images. The vote was roughly 82% in favor of the move. In its press release, Shutterstock wrote that "The combined company will be well-positioned to meet the ever-changing needs of customers through combined investment in content creation, event coverage, and product and technology innovation." The cash-and-stock deal was originally agreed at the start of this year, and although it's been described as a "merger of equals," the Getty Images name will be retained for the combined entity. Also, current Getty Images stockholders will hold nearly 55% of the new business, according to rough calculations. Not that many investors in either company seem to mind -- Shutterstock's equity also popped on news of that shareholder vote. Subsequent to the Shutterstock poll, several insiders in both companies sold off some equity holdings as if to validate the merger and its price. Among these individuals was Getty Images's senior vice president of e-commerce, Daine Weston, who unloaded some of his company's class A common stock, and Shutterstock director Deirdre Bagley, with a sale of 9,700 restricted stock units. Before you buy stock in Getty Images, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Getty Images wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $657,871!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $875,479!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 998% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Eric Volkman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Shutterstock. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Getty Images Stock Was Soaring This Week was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Poundland moves to new ownership under Gordon Brothers
Pepco Group has finalised the sale of its Poundland business to Gordon Brothers International LLC, marking a significant step in the company's strategy to focus on its higher margin Pepco retail operations. The transaction, completed in June 2025, is expected to simplify Pepco Group's structure and enhance overall profitability. The sale of Poundland, a UK-based discount retailer operating over 800 stores and employing around 16,000 people, aligns with Pepco Group's decision to concentrate on its core Pepco brand, which primarily offers clothing and general merchandise. In the previous financial year, Poundland accounted for about one-third of group revenues but contributed only 5% to earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortisation (EBITDA). The divestment is designed to improve revenue growth, increase margins, and boost cash generation by focusing on the more profitable Pepco operations across Europe. Gordon Brothers is a global advisory, restructuring, and investment firm that specialises in helping businesses with asset management, turnaround, and growth strategies. Established over a century ago, the company works across various industries to manage and revitalise brands and operations. Their acquisition of Poundland fits within their wider approach to investing in retail businesses and supporting their development. Poundland was sold for nominal consideration, with Pepco retaining secured and unsecured loans amounting to £30 million as part of the deal. A restructuring plan involving the transfer of certain financial arrangements is pending approval by the High Court in England. Under the new ownership, Poundland will continue to operate under its established brand in the UK, led by current managing director Barry Williams. Pepco Group expects to retain a minority investment interest, allowing it to maintain some involvement in Poundland's future performance. Both companies have also agreed on transitional service arrangements to support operations during the changeover. This move is part of a broader strategy by Pepco Group to streamline its portfolio and focus on sectors delivering higher returns and stronger growth prospects, moving away from fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) and potentially considering further divestments in related businesses. Several news outlets, including the BBC, have reported that Poundland was sold for approximately £1. However, Pepco's official statement did not disclose a specific sale price, instead referring only to the shares being sold for "nominal consideration," which typically means a very small or symbolic amount. "Poundland moves to new ownership under Gordon Brothers" was originally created and published by Retail Insight Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hamilton Spectator
16 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Defence spending boost can only go so far to lessen U.S. reliance: experts
MONTREAL - In early 2002, Glenn Cowan touched down in Kandahar province as part of the first wave of regular Canadian Army troops deployed to Afghanistan, serving in a U.S.-led brigade combat team. After joining Canada's elite special operations unit Joint Task Force 2 in 2003, he spent the next 13 years collaborating with American soldiers on raids, rescues and reconnaissance missions. 'If you're going to get into a fight with someone, you want the Americans on your side,' said Cowan, founder of ONE9. His Ottawa-based venture capital firm focuses on national security investments. The same might be said of the gear Canadian troops use, and the industry behind it. An infusion of fresh defence funding is poised to flood parts of Canada's aerospace, manufacturing and information technology sectors in a bid to reduce reliance on the United States, but experts say this country will remain firmly fastened to its neighbour as a military-industrial partner by necessity. While not a military powerhouse, Canada has expertise in areas ranging from flight simulation and shipbuilding to armoured vehicles and artificial intelligence. The $9.3-billion in additional defence spending announced by Prime Minister Mark Carney on Monday is poised to boost those sectors, with the goal of greater procurement from domestic companies. 'We're too reliant on the United States,' Carney said. 'We will ensure that every dollar is invested wisely, including by prioritizing made-in-Canada manufacturing and supply chains. We should no longer send three-quarters of our defence capital spending to America.' But a massive cash injection means Canada will have to scale up fast, including via foreign suppliers, said Jim Kilpatrick, in charge of global supply chain and network operations at Deloitte. 'Defence supply chains can often go 10 or 11 tiers deep,' he said, stressing their complex international reach. 'Canada will not be self-sufficient in defence products required by our military.' The country's relatively small production capacity means it will continue to shell out money on American equipment, technology and aircraft, including 88 U.S.-built F-35 fighter jets at a cost of tens of billions of dollars, experts say. However, some of that spending will go to American military giants that have a big presence on Canadian soil, even if the profits end up in pockets south of the border. General Dynamics churns out light armoured vehicles bristelling with turreted mortars and assault guns in London, Ont., as well as tactical communications systems in Ottawa. Lockheed Martin works on 'advanced technology systems' such as naval command software in five provinces. Defence contractor Raytheon counts 8,500 employees and 2,500 suppliers in Canada. 'The wider Canadian economy features a lot of branch plants,' noted David Perry, CEO of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute. While high-tech weapons and machinery come to mind at the mention of defence procurement, much of the extra funding this year may well go to more mundane items. Housing and infrastructure upgrades for Canadian troops make up some of the biggest priorities for Chief of the Defence Staff Gen. Jennie Carignan, she told Quebec radio host Patrick Lagacé on Thursday. Perry also highlighted the ripple effects of that spending for myriad business types beyond the purely military realm. 'Some of it is done through the big stuff — we think about fighter jets. But a lot of it pays for office furniture, software licenses, electricity contracts, snow removal, grass cutting.' Taking a step back, Perry framed defence investment in terms the prime minister, formerly the head of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, could appreciate. 'If you think of our defence relationships as an investment portfolio, the PM is saying we're way over-indexed in the Dow Jones and the S&P,' he said. 'Diversify.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 13, 2025.
