
FDA requires Covid vaccine makers to expand warning about risk of rare heart inflammation
The US Food and Drug Administration will now require Covid-19 vaccines from Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna to use expanded warning labels with more information about the risk of a rare heart condition after vaccination.
The vaccines' previous labels warned about the risk of a heart condition called myocarditis, inflammation of the heart muscle, and pericarditis, inflammation of the lining outside the heart, which the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website says is rare but possible after vaccination. The new labels will expand that warning to certain age groups.
Research has consistently shown that the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines are safe and effective, and millions of people have gotten them without serious incident. Some studies have found that Covid-19 infection itself carries a higher risk of myocarditis or pericarditis than the vaccine does.
The CDC last month told its independent vaccine advisers that research showed Covid-19 vaccinations from 2020 through 2022 showed a statistically significant increased risk of myocarditis. The incidents were rare, however, and 'there is no increased risk observed with the doses administered in subsequent years,' the agency said.
In the rare case that someone did develop heart inflammation after vaccination, the CDC told the advisers, acute myocarditis typically resolves quickly.
The vaccines already carried warnings that the highest risk of these heart problems was observed in males between ages 18 and 24 for the Moderna vaccine and 12 to 17 for Pfizer's; the new warnings for both vaccines will be for males age 16 to 25.
In letters to Pfizer and Moderna that were dated April 17 and are now posted online, the agency says analysis of commercial health insurance claims data shows that there were eight cases of myocarditis and/or pericarditis per million vaccine doses given to people ages 6 months through 64 years.
Cases were more common among males ages 16 through 25 within seven days of vaccination, but they were still rare, with about 38 cases of myocarditis and/or pericarditis per million doses among this group.
A spokesperson for the US Department of Health and Human Services said Wednesday that the move was intended to increase 'radical transparency.' Neither Pfizer nor Moderna responded to requests for comment.
The vaccines were developed during the first Trump administration and underwent what the CDC says was 'the most intensive safety analysis in US history,' and the agency continues to monitor vaccine administration data for effectiveness and any potential problems.
US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime anti-vaccine activist, has falsely claimed that the Covid-19 vaccine was 'the deadliest vaccine ever made.'
In a US Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs subcommittee hearing on Wednesday, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisconsin, claimed that the Biden administration downplayed the risks of the vaccine and delayed getting information about those risks to the public.
One witness, Hawaii Gov. Josh Green, a family physician, said in his testimony the US vaccine safety monitoring systems worked 'exactly as intended' by detecting rare cases of myocarditis.
'The data were made public, warnings were updated, and clinical guidance was revised accordingly,' Green said. 'Despite this, some continue to promote misleading interpretations, unverified claims or anecdotes to suggest that vaccines are broadly unsafe.'
The FDA has taken recent steps to limit Covid-19 vaccines for certain groups.
On Tuesday, the FDA said it would change the type of evidence it will accept from vaccine manufacturers to approve updated Covid shots, which may limit who is eligible for updated shots. The vaccines are expected to be be available in the fall, but only for adults 65 and older and people with underlying conditions that put them at a higher risk for severe Covid-19 infection.
In an editorial published in the New England Journal of Medicine, FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary and Dr. Vinay Prasad, the new director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said there's not enough evidence that healthy children and adults get clinically meaningful benefit from regular Covid-19 shots, and officials want to see more placebo-controlled trials, particularly in adults 50 to 64, before recommending the shots for other groups.
On Thursday, the FDA's vaccine advisers – the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee – will meet to discuss the coronavirus strain selection for this fall's Covid-19 vaccines.
CNN's Brenda Goodman contributed to this report.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
22 minutes ago
- CBS News
A woman's heart suddenly stopped. Two passing nurses saved her life.
Merryl Hoffman knew she was taking good care of her heart. The 63-year-old attorney didn't smoke or drink, and she was an avid hiker who used to run marathons and other distance races. In her 40s, she had been diagnosed with a leaky mitral valve and underwent surgery to repair it. Every year since, she has seen a cardiologist to check her heart and its function. The reports always came back clear. When Hoffman left her apartment on Manhattan's Upper East Side on Oct. 23, 2025, her heart was the last thing on her mind. She was saddled with her work bag and purse, hightailing it to the subway station so she could make it to work on time. That's when her memory of the day ends. Shortly into her walk, Hoffman experienced a sudden cardiac arrest. Her heart stopped beating. She collapsed to the ground. Doctors later told her it was a severe arrhythmia that could have been fatal — if not for where Hoffman fell. Hoffman had collapsed outside Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center's Breast and Imaging Center, about two and a half blocks from her subway station. A patient care technician and a passing runner immediately rushed to her aid. Then, Memorial Sloan Kettering nurses Sabrina Castle and Gianna Formisano stumbled upon the scene while walking to work. "We were so shocked. When we were walking up, people were like 'Nurses, nurses!' We didn't know what we were walking into," Formisano said. "People were grabbing our coffee, taking our bags. It was out of a movie, the way that they were like 'Oh, thank God you're here.'" Sabrina Castle and Gianna Formisano outside the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Memorial Sloan Kettering "They absolutely saved my life" Formisano and Castle took over performing CPR, keeping Hoffman's heart manually beating. She didn't have a pulse, and she had hit her head when she collapsed. The nurses also instructed one of the other bystanders to call an ambulance. Early CPR increases survival for patients in cardiac arrest by "at least two or three fold," said Dr. Jessica Hennessey, a cardiologist at NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center. Early CPR means that blood flow to the brain and heart continues, preserving the health of those organs. Bystanders in a medical emergency should call 911 and immediately start CPR, Hennessey advised. CPR can be done with mouth-to-mouth or with just chest compressions, Hennessey said. After five minutes that "felt like forever," the ambulance arrived, Formisano said. Castle and Formisano helped the EMTs load Hoffman into the ambulance. Then, she was taken to NewYork-Presbyterian's cardiac care unit for further treatment. For the small crowd, the day carried on. Castle and Formisano headed to work. After a few hours, they called NewYork-Presbyterian to see if they could find out more about Hoffman's status. They went to the hospital and spoke to a nurse there. "She was like, 'You got her back. She's intubated, she's alive, you saved her life,'" Castle recalled. Hoffman was still unconscious. She told CBS News that she didn't wake up until five days after the collapse. Her family told her that she had been rushed into surgery. Doctors told her that her heart had stopped for several minutes -- and the actions of Castle, Formisano and other bystanders had saved her. "Without them, I was told, there was no doubt I would have died or been brain dead," Hoffman said. "They absolutely saved my life." Hoffman had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placed in her chest to prevent further cardiac arrests. The device shocks the heart if it detects an irregular heartbeat. She also began cardiac rehabilitation. Shortly after, she returned to work. Life began to get back to normal but one question was constantly at the back of her mind: Who had helped save her? A chance reunion While in cardiac rehabilitation, Hoffman found herself telling the story of the strangers who had helped her. A physiologist there overheard her talking about it and thought the story sounded familiar. His girlfriend was friends with two nurses who had helped a woman matching Hoffman's description. After some back and forth, the physiologist connected Hoffman with Castle and Formisano. The trio immediately made plans to get dinner. Hoffman's husband joined them for the meal. There, the nurses were able to fill in the gaps of the October morning when Hoffman collapsed. Sabrina Castle, Merryl Hoffman and Gianna Formisano at the site where Hoffman collapsed. Sabrina Castle and Gianna Formisano "It was very jarring, when they gave my husband and I the blow-by-blow of that morning. There were things we did not know," Hoffman said. "It was pretty incredible." Since that dinner, the women have stayed in touch. Recently, Castle and Formisano even passed Hoffman on the same block where she had collapsed. The three took a photo at the site. "We were like, 'Wow, this is really crazy,'" Formisano said. "'We're running into you on the same spot, on your way to work, on our way to work, but now you're alive and well and in a much different state than when we met you the first time.'"


Gizmodo
28 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Cool Physics Feat Makes a Sphere Roll Down a Vertical Wall
Scientists have discovered that under the right conditions, a gummy bear-like ball can roll down a vertical wall all by itself—upending a core assumption in physics. If you place a rigid sphere on a similarly rigid inclined surface, gravity will cause it to roll down said surface. But what happens if the surface, or plane, is completely vertical? Researchers had previously assumed that, without an initial push, the sphere would simply drop straight to the ground without rolling. New research, however, has just redefined this belief—as well as long-held assumptions in the field of physics. University of Waterloo researchers have revealed the exact scenario necessary to make a sphere roll down a vertical plane without physical intervention. While this niche observation might seem detached from everyday life, it could have useful applications for exploring hard-to-reach areas such as pipes, caves, and even space. 'When we first saw it happening, we were frankly in disbelief,' Sushanta Mitra, executive director of the Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, said in a university statement. The researchers describe their discovery as a challenge to 'our basic understanding of physics.' They 'double-checked everything because it seemed to defy common sense. There was excitement in the lab when we confirmed it wasn't a fluke and that this was real vertical rolling.' Mitra and his colleagues unexpectedly caught the vertical rolling with high-speed cameras, and explained their discovery in a study published in April in the journal Soft Matter. In their experiment, the vertical rolling depended on a precise balance of softness—scientifically defined as elasticity—between a small sphere and a vertical cellphone-sized surface. When the spheres were too solid, they simply fell directly to the ground. On the other hand, when they were too soft, they either slid down without rolling, or stuck to the plane. But a sphere about as soft as a gummy bear spontaneously rolled down a vertical surface equivalent to a spongy mouse pad at a speed of about 0.039 inches (one millimeter) every two seconds, as described in the statement. 'The key is that as it rolls, the sphere slightly changes shape at the contact point,' Mitra explained. 'The front edge acts as a closing zipper, while the back edge acts like opening it. This asymmetry creates just enough torque, or grip, to maintain rolling without either sticking or completely falling off.' The team's findings could have practical implications for the creation of soft robots that can scale vertical walls to explore or monitor inaccessible infrastructure and natural environments both on and off Earth. 'This opens up a whole new way of thinking about movement on vertical surfaces,' Mitra continued. 'Currently, robots and vehicles are limited to horizontal or slightly inclined surfaces. This discovery could change that.'
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rocket Lab Stock Is Soaring Again: Should You Buy It Under $30?
Rocket Lab is gaining a reputation for reliability in the rocket launch and space systems market. The company is building on its capabilities and improving its relationships as a defense contractor. While this young sector shows a lot of great promise, the stock looks overvalued today. 10 stocks we like better than Rocket Lab › Space is the final frontier, and it is now turning into a burgeoning economy. Researchers estimate that the space economy is worth over $500 billion with heavy spending from governments around the world along with private-company partners, and that figure is expected to grow to around $1.8 trillion a year by 2035. This is a huge opportunity for start-ups, perhaps rivaled only by artificial intelligence (AI) over the next decade when it comes to both growth rates and size. One company that dominates (and actually built) the entire space market is SpaceX. It's privately held, but luckily, investors have other space economy stocks that are turning into promising businesses. Enter Rocket Lab (NASDAQ: RKLB), the space flight company increasingly competing with SpaceX and developing promising capabilities to grow its presence in this large market. The stock has begun to soar again and is trading at around $26 as of this writing. Should you buy while shares are still under $30? Rocket Lab began its journey in the space economy with its small Electron rocket. It has now begun to expand and vertically integrate various space economy segments. It just acquired a company called Geost for $275 million. Geost develops optical and infrared capabilities for satellites with a focus on selling to the U.S. government's national security satellites. Rocket Lab is used by the government to launch its payloads into space. Now, it will be helping to build and operate these payloads for customers. It keeps vertically integrating its launch and space systems, which gives it a competitive advantage over other companies that only offer one or the other (SpaceX is the only other vertically integrated player). Rocket Lab offers solar energy, radio systems, and software for companies sending missions operating in space. This is why its backlog was over $1 billion as of the end of last quarter. Electron launch missions will continue throughout 2025, hopefully building on the company's strong safety and reliability record. The next step for the company will be testing and launching its larger Neutron rocket for customers. Testing is underway for this rocket right now with a planned mission for a confidential customer sometime in 2026. Larger rockets mean larger payloads, which means more revenue per launch. It also will give the company more of an opportunity to sell its space systems on these launches. The Neutron is the key for Rocket Lab to take the next step in its capabilities as a space flight company and to grow its backlog and revenue. Defense contracts have been a huge part of Rocket Lab's business. It currently helps with Air Force missions and a hypersonic testing program called HASTE. It was recently added to the National Security Space Launch (NSSL) program for its Neutron rocket, another reason why this new rocket is so important for the company's future. A growing relationship with the U.S. government could not have come at a better time for Rocket Lab. The government is set on spending a ton of money on space solutions as the next frontier in national defense. For example, the proposed Golden Dome missile defense project for the U.S. would cost an estimated $175 billion over three years to build. The company would be a prime candidate to win subcontracts for this ambitious project. As the Neutron comes on line and Rocket Lab builds up its capabilities and reputation in the space economy, we should see its backlog climb higher. This is a key indicator for investors to watch. The current backlog will have around half of its revenue recognized over the next 12 months, and half in later periods. In order to grow revenue over the long term, the company will need to grow its backlog and win more contracts from government and commercial customers. There is a lot of potential with Rocket Lab's business, but it might all be priced into the stock (and more) right now. It has a market cap of $12.3 billion. Revenue was only $466 million over the last 12 months. The company has never generated a profit and continues to lose money. If the company is successful with its ambitions to build a vertically integrated space company, it will eventually generate billions of dollars in revenue -- perhaps tens of billions 15 to 20 years from now. However, that is a long way off, and the stock looks fully priced versus what the company can accomplish in the next few years. For this reason, the stock looks like one to avoid even with the price under $30. The business may be promising, but the market is getting ahead of itself with Rocket Lab at the moment. This is a high-risk stock to keep out of your portfolio right now. Before you buy stock in Rocket Lab, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Rocket Lab wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,538!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $869,841!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 789% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Brett Schafer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Rocket Lab USA. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Rocket Lab Stock Is Soaring Again: Should You Buy It Under $30? was originally published by The Motley Fool