logo
Thune's response to National Guard at LA protests

Thune's response to National Guard at LA protests

Yahooa day ago

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (KELO) – As protests continue in California, some people are questioning the federal government's military response.
Wednesday morning a reporter in Washington D-C asked South Dakota Senator John Thune about the message the president is sending by deploying thousands of National Guard troops to the protests.
'Do you see an inconsistency when the president criticizes and condemns the violent Los Angeles protesters. But then pardoned the violent January 6th protestors?' a reporter asked.
'I mean I think the issue that's in front of us right now is the chaos in LA. And clearly the local officials there, for whatever reason didn't seem up to the task of getting the job done there. And I think that as Senator wicker pointed out, it's kind of a political imperative honestly, because one of the most fundamental questions, most people most folders ask is, is my family. Safe, is my neighborhood safe is my community safe. Is my country safe?' Thune said.
TenHaken wants drivers to 'feel the urge to zipper merge'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge opens hearing in California challenge to Trump over L.A. deployment
Judge opens hearing in California challenge to Trump over L.A. deployment

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Judge opens hearing in California challenge to Trump over L.A. deployment

A critical hearing is underway in federal court over President Trump's deployment of the National Guard and U.S. Marines to Los Angeles. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco is presiding over the case, brought by California against the Trump administration earlier this week after a historic weekend in L.A. County. The state contends that Trump exceeded his authority in an "unprecedented power grab" by federalizing the Guard without the consent of Gov. Gavin Newsom, and by deploying Marines on American soil. 'We expect an order from the court making clear what's lawful and what's unlawful, and part of that is making clear that the deployment of the National Guard by Trump is unlawful,' California's attorney general, Rob Bonta, told The Times on Wednesday. 'He might just strike down that deployment,' Bonta added, 'returning the National Guard to the command of its appropriate commander-in-chief, the governor.' Read more: Trump, pushing bounds of his office with L.A. deployment, faces test in court The Trump administration, on the other hand, argued in a brief to the court that it has no role reviewing the matter. 'Courts did not interfere when President Eisenhower deployed the military to protect school desegregation. Courts did not interfere when President Nixon deployed the military to deliver the mail in the midst of a postal strike. And courts should not interfere here either,' the Justice Department said. Protests emerged across Los Angeles on Friday in response to a series of flash raids by Customs and Border Enforcement agents across the county. A handful of agitators among the protesters committed violence and vandalism, prompting Trump to first threaten, and then quickly deploy, the California National Guard to respond. He added active-duty Marines to the operation on Monday. Protests, and some sporadic violent rioting, have continued since the deployments. This is a breaking news story and will be updated. Wilner reported from Washington, D.C., and Wong from San Francisco. Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter. Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond, in your inbox twice per week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

US lawmakers pass tougher penalties for fentanyl traffickers
US lawmakers pass tougher penalties for fentanyl traffickers

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US lawmakers pass tougher penalties for fentanyl traffickers

The US Congress on Thursday passed a bill imposing harsher penalties on fentanyl traffickers, with lawmakers from both parties anxious to crack down on an opioid that has driven an epidemic of deadly overdoses. The Senate-passed bill -- which delivers on a key election pledge of President Donald Trump to get tough on drug smuggling -- was rubber-stamped by the House on a 321-104 vote, with Democrats providing all but one of the no votes. The Justice Department says 75,000 Americans die each year because of fentanyl, making it the number one cause of death for people between the ages of 18 and 34 in the United States. The synthetic opioid is more potent than heroin and much cheaper to produce. "More Americans die of drug overdoses each year than the number of Americans who died in the entirety of the Vietnam War," Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune said ahead of the vote. The HALT Fentanyl Act places copycat variations of fentanyl -- often sold by traffickers -- on the government's list of most dangerous "Schedule 1" drugs alongside the original substance. Lab-created fentanyl alternatives were reclassified to "Schedule 1" on a temporary basis seven years ago but the vote makes the change permanent. Trump has made halting the flow of fentanyl one of his priorities, even announcing it as a justification for import tariffs on Mexico and Canada. But opponents said the new law -- rather than tackling overdoses -- would simply repeat the mistakes of the so-called "War on Drugs." The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, a coalition of more than 240 US rights organizations, said in a statement the measure would "exacerbate pretrial detention, mass incarceration, and racial disparities in the prison system." "Beginning in the 1980s, draconian drug laws with harsh mandatory minimums and their resulting enforcement under the banner of the 'war on drugs' fueled skyrocketing prison populations," it said. ft/acb

Musk tries to get back into Trump's good graces, one X post at a time
Musk tries to get back into Trump's good graces, one X post at a time

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Musk tries to get back into Trump's good graces, one X post at a time

In the aftermath of a public standoff last week with the president, the richest man in the world is trying to reposition himself and work his way back into Donald Trump's good graces. Billionaire Elon Musk, in a series of re-shares and posts on X over the weekend, expressed support for Trump's actions supporting ICE raids in Los Angeles and the president's attempts to squelch protests by deploying the National Guard. That was in stark contrast to his vocal online criticism of the president that went from professional to personal in a matter of days. Not long after the president's laudatory Oval Office send-off for Musk on May 30, the first buddy-turned-nemesis dueled with his former boss in a spectacular public spat on social media. Musk criticized the president's so-called 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' a tax and policy package making its way through Congress, calling it a "disgusting abomination' that would burden Americans with "crushing debt" and agreeing with a post that called for Trump's impeachment. Then Musk went nuclear. "Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files," he wrote on X on June 5 to his more than 220 million followers. "That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" That Trump had crossed paths with Jeffrey Epstein, a disgraced financier who died while in jail awaiting prosecution on sex trafficking charges, has been public knowledge for years. In 2019, Trump said he'd had a 'falling out' with Epstein, whom he described as a 'Palm Beach fixture,' in the mid-2000s. Now, two days after he'd dropped the bomb, the mercurial billionaire appears to be rethinking those allegations. In less than 48 hours, Musk deleted the Epstein post on X. Then, over the weekend, Musk's reshared post calling for Trump's impeachment disappeared. Instead, Musk highlighted Trump's Truth Social post criticizing California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass for failing to rein in unruly immigration protests in Los Angeles following ICE raids. "Governor Gavin Newscum and Mayor Bass should apologize to the people of Los Angeles for the absolutely horrible job that they have done, and this now includes the ongoing LA riots,' wrote Trump. 'These are not protesters; they are troublemakers and insurrectionists. Remember, No Masks!" While Musk has differences with Trump about the spending bill, he has consistently supported Trump's aggressive push to deport undocumented immigrants. Hours after Trump's controversial decision to deploy California National Guard troops to respond to anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles, Musk posted an image of a man in face paint standing on top of a burning car waving a Mexican flag. 'This is not ok,' Musk said in his post on X. He also reposted Vice President JD Vance's post sharing Trump's Truth Social post saying the "president will not tolerate rioting and violence." The reason for Musk's shift in tone is not clear, although he seemed to voice some regret hours after the big social media fight, after mutual friends of Musk and the president, including hedge fund billionaire Bill Ackman and rapper Kanye West, urged the duo to make peace. "I support @realDonaldTrump and @elonmusk and they should make peace for the benefit of our great country. We are much stronger together than apart," wrote Ackman. Musk responded with a simple: "You're not wrong." Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy is a White House correspondent for USA TODAY. You can follow her on X @SwapnaVenugopal. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Is Musk ready to rekindle his bromance with Trump?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store