
Murdered teenager Daniel McAnaspie ‘could have been saved' with secure care, inquest hears
Daniel McAnaspie 'could have been saved' if he had been provided secure care, an inquest heard on Tuesday.
Aileen Dunne, who was Daniel's guardian ad litem when he was murdered, said it was 'unfathomable' that a special care committee in the
HSE
had turned down four social-worker applications in 2009 for secure care for him.
[
Teenager Daniel McAnespie had begged social workers to 'have him locked up', inquest hears
]
A young person who is deemed to be at such risk to themselves or others so as to need therapeutic residential care may be detained in secure care by the High Court following an application by childcare services.
The 17-year-old, originally from Finglas, north Dublin, was murdered while in care in 2010. He had had more than 20 care placements in the 15 months before he died as his life became increasingly chaotic.
READ MORE
These included the now-disused out-of-hours service where young people in care, without a long-term placement, presented at a Garda station at midnight for a bed in a hostel.
Daniel, who had been known to care services from birth and was in state care from aged 10, was stabbed to death on February 26th, 2010, at Tolka Valley Park, Dublin 11. His badly decomposed remains were found in a drainage ditch in Co Meath by a farmer almost three months later.
Richard Dekker, from Blanchardstown, was sentenced to life in 2017 for his murder. Trevor Noone, then 29 and also from Blanchardstown, was
imprisoned for 13 years for manslaughter in 2017
. In July 2022, Dekker, then in his mid-30s,
lost his appeal against his conviction
. Both were older than Daniel.
The inquest, scheduled to run for a week, marks the end of a 15-year legal process for the McAnaspie family. Daniel was the fourth of six children whose father died in December 1996 and mother died in September 2007.
Ms Dunne told Meath coroner's court in Trim how in the absence of a secure care placement she had recommended he be sent for therapeutic secure care at Hassela Gotland in Sweden.
She said Daniel and his family were in favour of this, but it was opposed by the HSE.
'This boy was running out of options and getting more and more at risk,' Ms Dunne said. 'It was actually frightening to meet him and see the upset, the distress.' He had drug debts and 'seemed to under so much pressure all the time'.
'I don't want any child in this country locked [up], but I do believe in Daniel's head he knew he needed that ... He had this level of impulsivity that he was not able to regulate and he knew that ... He wanted to be contained. He needed someone to keep him safe,' she told the six-person jury.
'At that time, had we secured a placement for him ... it could have saved him. That is the tragedy of it.'
Avril Connolly, Daniel's social worker at the time of his death, described efforts 'to keep Daniel safe' from March 2009. Describing him as 'very lost soul, a lost orphaned soul', she said Daniel had 'wit and empathy, sincere love for his family and simple wishes for his future'.
Her work with him involved 'considerable firefighting and emergency responding to crisis events' including placement breakdowns, bringing him to hospital and multiple applications for secure care, which he needed 'urgently', she said.
She opposed Ms Dunne's recommendation at a District Court hearing in 2009 that Daniel be placed in Hassela Gotland.
She said on Tuesday she was not confident it would meet his needs and was concerned about removing him from Ireland and his family.
Ms Dunne, describing this as a 'professional difference of opinion', said: 'Daniel was saying: 'I'll give it a go'. It is his voice I am here for.'
The hearing continues.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Nine e-scooters seized as gardaí use new safety technology in Dublin
Gardaí have begun trialling new safety devices that can measure the speed of e-scooters and e-bikes. The portable devices, called mobile dynamometers, can determine the maximum speed that the vehicles are capable of. New laws governing the use of e-scooters were introduced in May 2024 and include limiting their maximum speed to 20km/h. They must also meet lighting and braking standards. The use of such vehicles by those under the age of 16 was also banned. READ MORE Any e-scooters that do not comply with these requirements can be seized by gardaí and a fixed charge notice can be issued to the user. In a post on X, the Garda said checks were carried out using the new dynamometer technology in Dublin on Thursday. Nine e-scooters were seized for a range of offences, including speeding and exceeding the maximum rated power output. [ E-scooters perceived as most dangerous form of transport in Ireland, report finds Opens in new window ] Fine Gael councillor for Dublin's north inner city Ray McAdam welcomed the new technology. 'We see e-scooters and similar machines travelling at speeds much greater than 20km/h across our city streets'. 'Those that ride those machines, I believe, are at risk because of the speeds they travel at, but they're also a huge risk to other road users and other pedestrians in the city centre'. Janet Horner, a Green Party councillor in the same district, said that while the speed enforcement is generally positive, 'it will also exasperate some road safety campaigners who have been calling for more enforcement on cars and other vehicles in the city. 'There is widespread and blatant flouting of the current speed limits around the city by all vehicles and we urgently need more enforcement mechanisms, including speed cameras, red light cameras and more visible traffic policing.'


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Jury being picked in trial of Dublin firefighter accused of rape in US over St Patrick's weekend
Jury selection has begun in a Boston court in the case against a Dublin firefighter charged with raping a woman in a hotel during St Patrick's Day weekend in 2024. Opening statements are expected on Monday at the Suffolk Superior Courthouse in the trial of Terence Crosbie (38). Mr Crosbie faces up to 20 years in prison if found guilty over the alleged assault of a 28-year-old woman in a Boston hotel room. He has pleaded not guilty and denied having 'any sort of sexual contact whatsoever' with the woman, his attorney Daniel C Reilly told the court. READ MORE He is accused of assaulting the woman after his colleague Liam O'Brien met her at a nearby bar and brought her back to the men's shared hotel room. Mr O'Brien is one of more than two dozen witnesses expected to testify, the court heard on Thursday morning. Potential jurors were informed that detectives, crime lab specialists and Boston area residents were also expected to testify, in addition to Aer Lingus staff. Mr Crosbie flew into Boston on Thursday, March 14th, 2024 with his colleagues to take part in the city's St Patrick's Day celebrations. On Thursday, Judge Sarah Ellis asked potential jurors if the defendant's nationality 'or the fact that he speaks with an accent' would make it difficult for them to be fair and impartial. She also asked them about their personal histories with sexual assault, alcohol consumption and other potential biases. US assistant district attorney Erin Murphy previously told the court that the accuser and Mr O'Brien met at The Black Rose, a downtown bar, and left together for the Omni Parker House, a historic hotel in Boston, at about 11.30pm. It is claimed that the complainant then had consensual sex with Mr O'Brien before falling asleep. According to Ms Murphy, Mr Crosbie entered the hotel room at 1.55am and the accuser woke up to find Mr Crosbie 'actively raping her.' The complainant allegedly asked Mr Crosbie to stop and he did not. Instead, he is alleged to have said he 'knew that she wanted this' and that it was 'pathetic' that his colleague was asleep. The complainant reported the alleged assault to police the following morning. After being questioned by Boston police about the alleged assault, Mr Crosbie attempted to leave the country on an early flight home. Mr Crosbie has been held in the Nashua Street jail in Boston since his arrest. His attorney previously claimed he was unable to make bail.


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Keelings worker fired over claims regarding dead co-workers
The Keelings fruit and vegetable group sacked a warehouse worker after deciding he had brought the company into disrepute with 'false' posts on social media claiming excessive night work hours contributed to the deaths of two of his colleagues in 2013, a tribunal has heard. The worker, Rudolf Csikos, lost his job of 16 years with the north Co Dublin produce firm last December, and is pursuing a number of employment rights complaints against Keelings Logistics Solutions. The company maintains it was justified in dismissing him on the grounds of gross misconduct after an investigation which concluded he had 'acted recklessly by publishing false and misleading information' implying that Keelings was 'responsible for the deaths of two colleagues as a result of excessive working hours'. The LinkedIn posts were made amid a long-running legal row between Mr Csikos and his employer over alleged breaches of working time legislation. READ MORE A statutory complaint under the Organisation of Working Time Act originally filed in late 2019 by Mr Csikos remains live over five years later. Having been rejected as 'vexatious' by the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), that ruling was quashed by the Labour Court on appeal and referred back to the WRC. In addition to a dispute over the payment of a Sunday premium, which Keelings maintains is covered by a collective agreement, Mr Csikos has alleged the company failed to comply with its legal obligations on the employment of night workers such as himself. 'The night working hours was breached by the company, and that's why it caused the people to die,' Mr Csikos said via a Hungarian-language interpreter at an initial hearing last week. When adjudicator Brian Dalton pointed out that Mr Csikos was not medically qualified and there was no medical evidence before him, Mr Csikos said his assertion was that there was a 'possibility'. The company's representative, Emily Maverley of the Irish Business and Employers' Confederation (Ibec), said the Keelings workers referred to by Mr Csikos in his posts 'passed away, unfortunately, in 2013', some 11 years before the posts. Giving evidence last week, company disciplinary officer Alan Morrissey said the posts were 'damaging to the Keelings name, and our customers and other stakeholders'. 'There was no going back. I asked Rudolf did he think he made a mistake. He was quite happy in what he said and did,' he said. Asked whether he was aware of the allegations Mr Csikos had aired about his working hours, Mr Morrissey said he didn't 'get into it', but said he believed Mr Csikos had referred to the posts as a protected disclosure. Lauren O'Brien, head of people for Keelings Logistics, said at an earlier hearing in the case last week that she was 'concerned' after seeing the first post, which the tribunal heard Mr Csikos posted on LinkedIn at the end of October 2024. 'It was seriously defamatory to several ex-colleagues, accusing us of being responsible for the deaths of two colleagues,' Ms O'Brien said. At a hearing on Thursday, the company investigation officer, Damien O'Brien, noted in his report that Mr Csikos continued to allege Keelings had broken the law and maintained his comments 'were not false' when they met on an unspecified date last year. He quoted Mr Csikos as saying: 'How many more people need to die?' and said Mr Csikos was 'consistent that his beliefs are honestly held' and that it was 'not the first time he has raised these concerns'. Mr Csikos, cross-examining Mr O'Brien, asked: 'Why did he not say that Keelings is keeping according to the law and is making progress to keep the law and do things according to the regulations?' Mr O'Brien replied: 'My objective was to investigate the two posts.' Mr Dalton said: '[Mr Csikos] is claiming two workers died. That's not something [the witness] could exercise any role in.' Mr Csikos said: 'In my opinion, it was that if the working hours are breached and the health and safety regulations are breached, we can draw a conclusion.' 'We have no conclusion on that, and that doesn't follow, because [Mr Csikos] is not medically qualified. We have no evidence that there's a correlation between the [alleged] breach and what he says has happened. He may speculate, and he may have an opinion. He cannot use this forum as an opportunity to make outlandish allegations,' Mr Dalton said. Mr Dalton said the matter was at an 'impasse' without further submissions being made to him about the company's working time records. He adjourned the matter and said he would seek a further hearing date in July. In addition to the original Organisation of Working Time Act claim, Mr Csikos's further complaints are under the Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Act 1973, the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 and the Protected Disclosures Act 2014 against the company, arising from his dismissal.