logo
RFK Jr and Dr Oz announce insurers' ‘pledge' to reform prior authorization

RFK Jr and Dr Oz announce insurers' ‘pledge' to reform prior authorization

Yahoo4 hours ago

The US health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr and Dr Mehmet Oz announced a voluntary agreement with insurance companies to change prior authorization practices – where private health insurers require patients to ask for permission before they can receive medical treatment.
The majority of Americans get health insurance through a private company, whether through an employer, or a privatization of public health insurance programs, such as Medicare Advantage.
Prior authorization is an insurance company practice that is both common and abhorred. There are whole social media accounts devoted to egregious examples of it, campaigns for change built around it, and, in Oz's words, there is 'violence in the streets' over prior authorization – an allusion to the broad daylight killing of an insurance company CEO.
Oz said repeatedly in a press conference on Monday that 85% of Americans or their loved ones had experienced a delay or denial of care thanks to prior authorization.
Related: Key RFK Jr advisers stand to profit from a new federal health initiative
'The pledge is not a mandate, this is not a bill or rule – this is an opportunity for industry to show itself,' said Oz, who heads the enormous federal health insurance bureaucracy, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS). CMS oversees the health insurance of about 68 million seniors through Medicare and about 71 million low-income and disabled Americans through Medicaid.
'It's a good start,' said Oz, 'and the response has been overwhelming.'
Kennedy called the agreement 'momentous' and said it would help make the health system, 'work to make our country healthy again'.
The announcement of voluntary measures echoed one made earlier in the year by Kennedy, who announced the administration had an 'understanding' with food companies to phase out synthetic dyes. Food companies later told reporters there was no agreement.
Concurrently, Republicans are working to push a bill through Congress that is expected to result in at least 16 million Americans losing health insurance in the next decade. The bill would add red tape to Medicaid and, advocates say, 'punish' states that expanded care to the low-income.
With Biblical references and a bullet point chart, Trump administration officials, two Republican members of Congress and even an actor who played a doctor on TV – Eric Dane of Grey's Anatomy – laid out their hopes for insurers to implement this voluntary agreement that they said covered 275 million Americans.
Should they do so, insurers would work to standardize the prior authorization approval and deliver decisions faster and near real-time (not over the course of, say, weeks). Additionally, insurers would reduce the number of procedures and drugs subject to prior authorization, honor existing prior authorization approvals in the event a patient switches insurers in the course of care and build a 'public dashboard' of how the industry is doing which would allow 'medical professionals' to review every denial.
Notably, insurance companies made a similar pledge to doctors, hospitals and Americans in 2018, during the first Trump administration. In a press release announcing that agreement, insurers pledged to work with doctors and hospitals to 'eliminate' prior authorization for some procedures, 'minimize care delays' and 'protect continuity of care for patients'.
By 2022, the American Medical Association (AMA), which signed onto that agreement, was arguing publicly that insurers failed to live up to their end of the bargain. A 2023 survey by the AMA of 1,000 doctors found 7% of physicians had a prior authorization lead to 'a patient's disability or permanent bodily damage, congenital anomaly or birth defect or death'.
Trump administration officials did acknowledge that the practice could be egregious and warranted change. 'A vaginal delivery,' often requires prior authorization, said the Trump administration Medicare director Chris Klomp, 'Why is that a question mark in this day and age?'
The insurance industry often argues insurers 'target its use' to prevent wasteful testing by doctors. However, prior authorization is known to be incredibly widespread: in 2023, a spokesperson for a lobbying group told FierceHealthcare that 93% of beneficiaries were in plans that required prior authorization for nearly a quarter of services.
Beneficiaries of the federal privatization program Medicare Advantage, which allows private health insurers to manage beneficiaries of the public program Medicare (and is widely regarded as more expensive for taxpayers), issued about two prior authorization requests for every one of its 32 million beneficiaries in 2023, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.
The practice has even spawned cottage industries: a ProPublica investigation found one company contracted by major insurers sold a product called 'the dial' that used an algorithm backed by artificial intelligence to control denial rates.
Unlike the federal government, some states have found the nerve to legislate. In just one example, New Jersey required insurers to turn decisions around faster, required peer-to-peer conversations between doctors about the insurers' decision and required insurers to share denial rates and reasons – at least some of which one Republican congressman at the dais said he wanted, but was not in the agreement.
'I will say this being a surgeon: I'm a skeptic, the proof is going to be in the pudding,' said Dr Greg Murphy, a Republican from North Carolina, who added that he would be open to regulations, but questioned whether insurers would abide by the agreement: 'Are they doing something to placate an audience?'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stock Market News Review: SPY, QQQ Rise on ‘Weak' Iran Retaliation, July Rate Cut Odds Jump
Stock Market News Review: SPY, QQQ Rise on ‘Weak' Iran Retaliation, July Rate Cut Odds Jump

Business Insider

time17 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Stock Market News Review: SPY, QQQ Rise on ‘Weak' Iran Retaliation, July Rate Cut Odds Jump

Both the S&P 500 (SPX) and the Nasdaq 100 (NDX) closed higher following Iran's missile strike on a U.S. military base in Qatar. The attack was Iran's response to U.S. strikes on three of its nuclear sites over the weekend. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Despite Iran's retaliation, the market remained strong while oil prices dropped. That's because the attack resulted in zero casualties and didn't disrupt any oil infrastructure or supply chain locations. In addition, Qatar was able to intercept all of the missiles and was informed by Iran of the strikes before they actually occurred. As a result, it appears that Iran's retaliation was more symbolic than aggressive, signaling that the country is closer to taking a seat at the negotiation table. President Trump called the move 'a very weak response.' 'The base that was targeted in the attack by the powerful Iranian forces was far from urban facilities and residential areas in Qatar,' said Iran's Supreme National Security Council. However, oil prices still remain elevated compared to the start of the war on June 13. 'To The Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!' said Trump in a Truth Social post this morning, encouraging domestic oil production. Meanwhile, Americans have expressed their discomfort with the war by dropping President Trump's approval rating to 41%, a term-low and down from 47% in January. The poll, conducted by Reuters and research firm Ipsos, showed that 84% of respondents were concerned about the war while 79% were worried that Americans could be attacked following the U.S. missile attack on Iran. In interest rate news, a second Fed member has voiced support for a July rate cut, sending the odds of a 25 basis points reduction to 22.7% compared to 14.5% yesterday on CME's FedWatch tool. Fed Governor Michelle Bowman said that she would support lowering rates as soon as July if inflation remains low. Last week, Fed Governor Christopher Waller said that the central bank is in a good position to cut rates as early as July. The S&P 500 finished with a 0.96% gain while the Nasdaq 100 returned 1.06%.

Media Matters sues FTC over ‘retaliatory' investigation
Media Matters sues FTC over ‘retaliatory' investigation

Politico

time24 minutes ago

  • Politico

Media Matters sues FTC over ‘retaliatory' investigation

A liberal media watchdog group has filed suit against the Federal Trade Commission, saying it was placed under investigation in retaliation for its reporting about extremist content on the social media site X. Media Matters said in the suit filed Monday in federal court in Washington that White House appointees in the FTC were seeking to punish the organization on behalf of Elon Musk, the billionaire owner of X who until recently had a prominent role in the Trump administration. The FTC notified Media Matters last month that it was investigating the organization over whether its reporting on X amounted to illegal collusion with advertisers. 'The Court should put an end to the latest effort by the Trump Administration and Elon Musk's government allies to punish, intimidate, and harass Media Matters for publishing reporting they do not like,' it said. In November 2023, Media Matters reported that ads were appearing next to pro-Nazi posts on X. Musk, the lawsuit said, 'promised a 'thermonuclear' lawsuit against Media Matters—and his supporters in government were quick to pile on.' Two subsequent investigations from attorneys general in Missouri and Texas, which Media Matters asserts were both also retaliatory, were later dismissed by federal judges on First Amendment grounds. Neither the White House nor the FTC responded immediately to requests for comment from POLITICO. Media Matters said the federal investigation is part of a broader politicization of the agency under the administration. 'The Trump Administration has opened investigations into former officials who were critical of the President,' the lawsuit said. 'And it has targeted swaths of civil society deemed to be disloyal: universities, cultural institutions, public radio, and other media outlets.' Trump in March fired the FTC's two Democratic members, Alvaro Bedoya and Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, overturning decades of precedent. The agency now has three commissioners, all Republicans. Several key leaders at the agency have previously spoken out against both Media Matters and advertiser boycotts like the one that affected X, the lawsuit said. Those named in the complaint include FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson and commissioners Mark Meador and Melissa Ann Holyoak. The organization also wrote that the administration's investigation has cast a chill on its reporting, preventing staff from covering Musk's relationship with Trump and connections between right-wing media and the FTC. 'This is a significant free speech issue, and Media Matters will not back down from this fight,' Angelo Carusone, chair and president of the nonprofit, said in a statement. 'If the Trump administration is allowed to use this unlawful investigation to punish legitimate reporting on behalf of a political ally, then there is nothing to stop it from targeting anyone who stands up and exercises their rights.'

Thomas Massie Jokes He'd Like Ceasefire With Trump After Iran Rift
Thomas Massie Jokes He'd Like Ceasefire With Trump After Iran Rift

Newsweek

time39 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Thomas Massie Jokes He'd Like Ceasefire With Trump After Iran Rift

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. After President Donald Trump announced on Monday that Iran and Israel had agreed to a "complete and total ceasefire," a Republican congressman who was at odds with Trump over U.S. involvement in the conflict joked that he would also like a ceasefire with the president. Newsweek reached out to the White House for comment via email on Monday. The Context Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky skewered Trump after the president authorized U.S. strikes against Iranian nuclear sites without congressional approval. Trump's decision to launch the strikes came after Israel sparked a war with Iran on June 13 with a series of missile strikes that decimated Iran's military chain-of-command and nuclear infrastructure. Israel's strikes threw a wrench into Iran-U.S. diplomatic efforts toward reaching a new nuclear deal. On Saturday, the U.S. entered the conflict by dropping 14 Massive Ordinance Penetrator (MOP) bombs, known as "bunker buster" bombs, and more than two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles at three Iranian nuclear sites. Trump administration officials said the strikes "obliterated" Iran's nuclear infrastructure, but the full extent of the damage is not known. Representative Thomas Massie exits a meeting of the House Republican Conference in the U.S. Capitol on June 4. Representative Thomas Massie exits a meeting of the House Republican Conference in the U.S. Capitol on June 4. Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP Images What To Know Trump on Monday evening announced that Iran and Israel had come to a ceasefire agreement that would go into effect early Tuesday, though the formal terms of the agreement have not been released. CNN's Manu Raju asked Massie after the announcement whether Trump deserves credit for it, to which Massie replied that it's "too soon to say." "There was another way to do this where you could still get credit, where you do it constitutionally," the Kentucky Republican said. He then quipped: "I'd like a ceasefire between me and President Trump, if I can get the same deal after his bunker busters he dropped on me." Massie has long been a thorn in Trump's side, but tensions between the two men ratcheted up this year, when Massie lambasted the Trump-backed "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" working its way through Congress and slammed Trump over his decision to go around lawmakers to bomb Iran. Trump railed against Massie over the weekend, calling the Kentucky Republican a "simple-minded 'grandstander,'" a "pathetic LOSER" and a "BUM." The president and his team have also made clear that they want Massie out of Congress. "He should be a Democrat because he is more aligned with them than with the Republican Party," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News on Monday. Trump's senior political advisers, Tony Fabrizio and Chris LaCivita, also launched a political action committee (PAC) dedicated to unseating Massie, Axios reported. The Kentucky lawmaker told CNN on Monday that he can hold his own against a Trump-backed Republican primary opponent. Trump's "endorsement's worth about 10 points and I can sustain that," he told Raju. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store