
The Population Bust Won't Solve the Climate Crisis
We've all heard that human overpopulation is a crisis. In 2017, Bill Nye warned us about the planet's 'people problem,' and that same decade David Attenborough told us that 'we are a plague on the Earth.' Project Drawdown, an environmental nonprofit, lists slower population growth among its top climate solutions.
And now, fertility rates everywhere are falling.
In most of the world, the birthrate is already below the average of two births per two adults needed to stabilize the population. By the 2080s, according to United Nations projections, the global population will be declining. Then change could come fast: a population that shrinks by two-thirds each century. That's what would happen in a future in which, for every two adults, there were 1.5 kids.
Depopulation might seem welcome. It is true that people caused today's environmental problems. And it is right to prioritize the challenges of climate change, global poverty and inequality. In our careers, we've worked for aggressive decarbonization, reproductive freedom, caste and gender equity and better public health and health care. But falling birthrates are not the answer to our world's problems. Confronting climate change requires that billions of people live differently. It does not require that billions of future people never live.
Over the past few decades, there has been important progress on environmental priorities like particulate air pollution, stratospheric ozone depletion and acid rain. In each case, progress came from ending or changing the destructive activity part of people's destructive activity. Not the people part.
Take China's smog crisis. In 2013, with the country's population growing and economy industrializing, particulate air pollution from fires, coal plants and vehicles darkened the sky. Newspapers around the world called it the 'airpocalypse.' The U.S. Embassy gave the air quality in central Beijing a rating of 755 — on an air quality scale that ran from 0 to 500.
In the decade that followed, China grew by roughly 50 million people — more than the entire population of Canada. But air pollution didn't scale up as the population grew; it declined by half. Leaders and the public in China decided that the smog was unacceptable. The authorities put into effect new regulations and requirements on coal-fired power plants and heavy industry. The government devoted new resources to monitoring and enforcement. Many polluting factories and power plants adopted cleaner technologies already in use elsewhere. Others were shut down.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump Says He's Found a ‘Group of Very Wealthy People' to Buy TikTok and Keep App in U.S.
According to President Donald Trump, the U.S. finally found a buyer for TikTok. While discussing global trade deals with Fox News, Trump pivoted the conversation to TikTok, boasting that he has finally found a buyer who could keep the video-sharing app from being banned in the United States. More from Variety Trump Says He's Ending Canada Trade Talks Over Its 3% Digital Services and Streaming Tax: 'Blatant Attack on Our Country' CNN, New York Times Reject Trump's Demands to Retract 'False' and 'Unpatriotic' Stories About Iran Bombing Raids: 'No Apology Will Be Forthcoming' Trump Angrily Calls for CNN to Fire Reporter Over Story on Iran Nuclear Strikes: She Should Be 'Thrown Out Like a Dog' 'We have a buyer for TikTok, by the way,' Trump said. 'I think I'll need, probably, China's approval, and I think President Xi [Jinping] will probably do it.' Maria Bartiromo then asked Trump, 'Who's the buyer?' Trump responded, 'I'll tell you in about two weeks.' '[They are] very, very wealthy people,' Trump added. 'It's a group of very wealthy people. But what I want to do, and what I will do, sometime prior to the ninth, is we'll send a letter to all these countries. There are 200 countries, you can't talk to all of them, no matter how many people you have.' The future of one of the most globally popular social media platforms has been in peril since Jan. 19, 2025, when it officially became illegal for American companies to host or distribute TikTok in the U.S. while it remained under the control of its Chinese owner, ByteDance. However, Trump has enacted two executive orders in his second term extending the deadline for the ban. On June 17, it was unveiled that Trump planned to extend the life of TikTok in the U.S. again, giving the platform another window to find a buyer. 'As he has said many times, President Trump does not want TikTok to go dark,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to CBS News. 'This extension will last 90 days, which the Administration will spend working to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure.' Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? 25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar

Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Trump continues to project optimism that strikes on Iran ‘obliterated' its nuclear program
President Donald Trump is insisting that his strikes on Iran last week left the country's nuclear program 'obliterated like nobody's ever seen before,' even as the United Nations nuclear watchdog says Tehran could resume uranium enrichment 'in a matter of months.' Trump told Fox News host Maria Bartiromo he doesn't think the satellite images of trucks at two of the nuclear sites later hit by American pilots mean the country smuggled out much of its enriched uranium. 'No, I think,' he told Bartiromo in a pre-recorded interview that aired on 'Sunday Morning Futures.' 'First of all, it's very hard to do, it's very dangerous to do. It's very heavy, very very heavy. It's a very hard thing to do. Plus, we didn't give them much notice because they didn't know we were coming until just, you know, then. And nobody thought we'd go after that site because everybody said that site is impenetrable.' The White House has continued to promote its attacks on Iran's nuclear program as a complete victory. But the administration has not been able to provide convincing evidence, as experts caution that a definitive assessment on the strikes' impact could take weeks or even longer. In an interview that aired Sunday on CBS' 'Face the Nation,' the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said the damage to Iranian facilities wrought by the attacks was 'not total.' And without clarification about the whereabouts of the enriched uranium, 'this will continue to be hanging, you know, over our heads as a potential problem,' he said. But the president is projecting confidence. 'You know what they moved? Themselves,' Trump told Bartiromo. 'They were all trying to live. They didn't move anything. They didn't think it was going to be actually doable, what we did.' And Trump doesn't think Iran has any incentive to rebuild its beleaguered nuclear program as the country contemplates its future following a damaging war with Israel and a tentative ceasefire. 'The last thing they want to do right now is think about nuclear,' he said. 'They have to put themselves back into condition, in shape.' Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has long supported aggressive American action against Iran. But though he called the strikes on Iran 'a tremendous military success,' he said Sunday it was 'too early to tell' if Iran would ultimately abandon its ambitions to become a nuclear power. 'The question for the world: Does the regime still desire to make a nuclear weapon? The answer is yes. Do they still desire to destroy Israel and come after us? The answer is yes,' he said on ABC's 'This Week.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Over a third of people on sinking Tuvalu seek Australia's climate visas
By Kirsty Needham SYDNEY (Reuters) -More than one-third of the people in the tiny Pacific nation of Tuvalu, which scientists predict will be submerged by rising seas, have applied for a landmark climate visa to migrate to Australia, according to official figures. Tuvalu's ambassador to the United Nations, Tapugao Falefou, told Reuters on Sunday he was "startled by the huge number of people vying for this opportunity", and the small community was interested to learn who the first lot of climate migrants would be. Tuvalu, one of the countries at greatest risk from climate change, which experts say is boosting sea levels, has a population of 11,000 on its nine atolls scattered across the Pacific between Australia and Hawaii. Since applications for Australia's visa lottery opened this month, 1,124 people have registered, with family members bringing the total seeking the visa to 4,052 under the bilateral climate and security treaty. Applications close on July 18, with an annual cap of 280 visas designed to ensure migration to Australia does not cause brain drain from Tuvalu, officials said when the treaty was announced in 2023. The visa will allow Tuvalu residents to live, work and study in Australia, accessing health benefits and education on the same basis as Australian citizens. "Moving to Australia under the Falepili Union treaty will in some way provide additional remittance to families staying back," Falefou said. By 2050, NASA scientists project daily tides will submerge half the main atoll of Funafuti, home to 60% of Tuvalu's residents, where villagers cling to a strip of land as narrow as 20 metres (65 feet). That forecast assumes a 1-metre rise in sea levels, while the worst case, double that, would put 90% of Funafuti under water. Tuvalu, whose mean elevation is just 2 metres (6 feet 7 inches), has experienced a sea-level rise of 15 cm (6 inches) over the past three decades, one and a half times the global average. It has built 7 hectares (17 acres) of artificial land, and is planning more, which it hopes will stay above the tides until 2100.