Kurdish PKK disbands and ends Turkey insurgency
The Kurdistan Workers Party militant group, which has been locked in bloody conflict with the Turkish state for more than four decades, decided to disband and end its armed struggle, a news agency close to the group reported on Monday.
The decision is set to have far-reaching political and security consequences for the region, including in neighbouring Iraq and also in Syria, where Kurdish forces are allied with US forces.
More than 40,000 people have been killed in the conflict since the PKK launched its insurgency in 1984.
It is designated a terrorist group by Turkey and its Western allies.
"The PKK has completed its historic mission," the group said on Monday, according to the Firat news agency, which published what it said was the closing declaration of a congress that the PKK held last week in northern Iraq where it is based.
The PKK held the congress in response to a call in February from its jailed leader Abdullah Ocalan to disband.
"The PKK 12th Congress decided to dissolve the PKK'S organisational structure, with the practical process to be managed and carried out by Leader Apo, and to end the armed struggle method," the statement said, using Ocalan's nickname.
"The PKK struggle has broken the policy of denial and annihilation of our people and brought the Kurdish issue to a point of solving it through democratic politics."
The PKK's decision will give President Recep Tayyip Erdogan the opportunity to boost development in the mainly Kurdish southeast, where the insurgency has handicapped the regional economy for decades.
Omer Celik, spokesman for Erdogan's ruling AK Party, said the PKK's decision to dissolve was an "an important step toward a terror-free Turkey".
Turkey's foreign ministry did not immediately comment on the announcement, which Ankara had been expecting.
There have been intermittent peace efforts over the years, most notably a ceasefire between 2013 and 2015 that ultimately collapsed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
12 hours ago
- West Australian
China's rare-earth mineral squeeze puts defence giants in the crosshairs
The automotive and robotics industries have been hit particularly hard by China's rare earth export restrictions in recent weeks, but analysts warn Western defence giants will also feel the heat. Top US and Chinese officials are resuming trade talks in London for a second consecutive day on Tuesday, pushing to de-escalate tensions over rare-earth minerals and advanced technology. The White House has signalled a willingness to ease chip export controls if Beijing accelerates rare earth exports, boosting investor hopes of a breakthrough. Both sides have accused each other of reneging on a preliminary trade deal struck in Geneva last month. China's Ministry of Commerce in early April imposed export restrictions on several rare earth elements and magnets widely used in the automotive and defence sectors. The curbs were part of a response to US President Donald Trump's tariff increase on Beijing's exported products. National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett on Monday told CNBC's 'Squawk Box' that he expected a deal on rare earths to be struck quickly. 'So, our expectation is that ... immediately after the handshake any export controls from the US will be eased, and the rare earths will be released in volume, and then we can go back to negotiating smaller matters,' Mr Hassett said. China is the undisputed leader of the critical minerals supply chain, producing roughly 60 per cent of the world's supply of rare earths and processing almost 90 per cent, which means it is importing these materials from other countries and processing them. US officials have previously warned that this dominance poses a strategic challenge amid the pivot to more sustainable energy sources. William Bain, head of trade policy at the British Chambers of Commerce, said it appeared some progress had been made on the first day of US-China trade talks, but it remains 'absolutely vital' to achieve a further breakthrough on rare earth policy. 'We've seen some relaxation over the weekend with licenses granted in sectors connected with robotics and electric vehicles, but if you take, for example, a critical mineral like samarium, within magnets, that's absolutely essential for F-35 fighter jet construction in the US,' Mr Bain told CNBC's 'Europe Early Edition' on Tuesday. 'They can't make them without that. And not having access to that is severely affecting both U.S. construction in that area, but also perhaps its national security if that remains in place,' he added. CNBC has contacted the U.S. Department of Defense and the European Commission, the European Union's executive arm, for comment. The restrictions imposed by China's Ministry of Commerce in early April require firms to apply for a license for the export of rare earths and magnets. Rare earth elements play an integral role in modern defence technologies, according to the SFA-Oxford consultancy, enabling advanced radar and sonar systems, laser guidance and propulsion technologies in combat environments. Automotive industry groups have complained about the cumbersome process of trying to get necessary approvals, warning of increasing production threats as inventories deplete. China nevertheless appeared to offer US and European auto giants something of a reprieve over the weekend. China's Ministry of Commerce on Saturday said it was willing to establish a so-called 'green channel' for eligible export license applications to expedite the approval process to European Union firms. Beijing also granted rare earth licenses to suppliers of US auto giants General Motors, Ford and Jeep-maker Stellantis, Reuters reported on Friday, citing unnamed sources. Gracelin Baskaran, director of the critical minerals security program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington-based think tank, said it was just a matter of time before the defence industry sounds the alarm over a rare earth shortage — noting that many of them have already done so behind closed doors. 'Defense companies are in the front line of impact, given we need thousands of pounds of rare earths in each submarine and fighter jet,' Ms Baskaran told CNBC by email. The US, European Union and Australia must coordinate supply- and demand-side interventions to boost rare earths production, CSIS' Baskaran said, adding that this need arises primarily because of prevailing price dynamics. 'If the price of praseodymium-neodymium (PrNd) oxide—a critical input for rare earth permanent magnets—remains below $60 per kilogram by 2030, nearly half of the projected non-Chinese supply would become financially unviable. On the supply side, this will necessitate measures such as production tax credits and subsidies,' Ms Baskaran said. 'On the demand side, implementing incentives to procure minerals from allied nations—similar to the provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act—will be essential,' she added. Last month, China temporarily paused export restrictions targeting 28 American companies following a trade truce reached between Washington and Beijing in Switzerland. China continued to block exports from that country of seven rare earth metals to the US, however. Many of the 28 American companies given a reprieve on dual-use export restrictions are common targets of Beijing's sanctions because of their activity in the defence sector. Henry Sanderson, associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), a London-based defence and security think tank, said the defence industry hasn't been nearly as vocal as the automotive sector when it comes to concerns over the impact of a rare earth shortage. 'Defense is hard because its less transparent, but they definitely use rare earths and rare earth magnets and especially what's called samarium cobalt magnets, but it's a much smaller demand than EVs or robots or anything like that,' Mr Sanderson told CNBC by phone. 'I'm less clear whether defence is as worried as the civilian industries, but saying that, looking at the level of magnet production in the West, it is very small,' he added.
Sky News AU
18 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Appalling': Defence expert calls out Albanese government for allowing ‘loophole' that saw billions of dollars spent of Russian crude
A leading defence expert has called out the Albanese government for seemingly allowing more to be spent on Russian crude than what Australia sends to assist Ukraine in the wake of damming new research. Amid an ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine, it is estimated that over AU$3.7 billion worth of oil products derived from Russian crude has been imported by Australia, according to data released by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA), while Australia has pledged $1.5 billion in aid to support Ukraine. Australian Strategic Policy Institue (ASPI) senior analyst Malcom Davis has told Sky News that the Albanese government allowing any amount money to be funnelled to the Kremlin is "appalling". "The bottom line is we should not be giving money to Russia, a single cent of money to Russia," Mr Davis told Sky News host Sharri Markson on Wednesday. "It's appalling that this has somehow allowed to happen in the sense that Russia gains funds from Australia which it then uses to essentially buy weapons and military technology to attack Ukraine. "So at some point the government has to say 'this has to stop' and clamp down and make sure that not a single cent goes to Russia." Mr Davis also said he thought it was case of oversight on the Albanese government's behalf for not having already taken action on the importation of Russian crude. "I think it is probably a loophole that they were completely oblivious to, but that's no excuse when you have a situation as dire as the situation in Ukraine," Mr Davis said "So I think that yes it may be a loophole, they may be able to make excuses, but the very first thing they should be doing is shutting down this loophole as fast as possible." The oil Australia has been importing is refined overseas—including at the Jamnagar Refinery in India, which has not sanctioned Russian crude—before being legally imported into the Australian market. This would have handed Russian President Vladimir Putin about AU$1.8 billion in tax revenue, according CREA. CREA's EU Russia Analyst Vaibhav Raghunandan called it 'a significant failing of Western sanctions', exposing a glaring loophole that lets Russia bypass restrictions. 'Refineries in non-sanctioning countries buying Russian oil are… taking comfort in the knowledge that they will face no action from Western countries,' he said. Mr Raghunandan said countries like Australia 'look away and continue to import refined products', indirectly funding Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Sky News AU
a day ago
- Sky News AU
Albanese Government's accused of 'huge inconsistency' over ‘unprecedented' decision to impose sanctions on two Israeli government ministers
The Albanese Government is facing questions over its 'unprecedented' decision to impose sanctions on members of a democratically elected government. Foreign Minister Penny Wong revealed on Tuesday that Australia was one of five Western countries imposing sanctions on Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. The Albanese Government is joining the governments of Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and Norway in using Magnitsky-style laws to freeze the assets of the two MPs, who are accused of encouraging settler violence towards Palestinians in the West Bank. Ben-Gvir and Smotrich represent hardline, pro-settler parties on the fringe of Israeli politics, but they have gained prominent positions in the current coalition government led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Speaking to Sky News Australia on Wednesday, veteran press gallery journalist Chris Uhlmann said the use of the sanctions was 'unprecedented'. Uhlmann said support for Israel's right to defend itself did not mean people had to agree with everything the Netanyahu government does, particularly not the 'most extreme voices' in the government, but that Smotrich and Ben-Gvir were still part of a 'democratically elected government'. 'I don't think that we have ever imposed sanctions on a democratic government's ministers before,' Uhlmann said. 'And it does open this particular problem for our government, which is consistency. 'If this is to be the approach, where are the sanctions against the Chinese ministers who are responsible for the treatment of the Uyghurs in Xinjiang province, where a UN committee decided that that constituted crimes against humanity… people working in slave labour.' 'If you're going to open this door and sanction governments for their treatment, particularly of Muslim populations, where's the consistency and where is the Australian Government's statement on Chinese ministers and sanctions against them? 'There's a huge inconsistency here.' The veteran journalist said the decision also raised questions about how the government could separate the actions of members of Netanyahu's government from Netanyahu himself. 'These ministers support his government - his government would be extremely fragile without them,' he said. 'So how can you separate the leader of the government from his ministers on this and just say, 'Well, no, we're just targeting this part and not the rest'. 'You're opening a very, very wide door now, and it does have consequences.' In announcing the sanctions, Foreign Minister Wong said the two Israeli ministers had 'incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights'. 'Extremist rhetoric advocating the forced displacement of Palestinians and the creation of new Israeli settlements is appalling and dangerous. These actions are not acceptable,' Minister Wong said. The sanctions have been condemned by the United States, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio stating that the sanctions 'do not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home, and end the war.' Magnitsky-style laws – which allow the government to target individual members of foreign governments – were introduced by the previous Coalition government in 2021.
