Drug trends survey paints clearer picture of gangs' place in the market
Just 13 percent of respondents said they purchased cannabis from gangs. File photo.
Photo:
123rf
More New Zealanders are buying and selling drugs online, according to the latest findings of the New Zealand Drug Trends Survey.
Researchers also have a clearer picture of the role gangs play in the drug market across the country, including which types of drugs are most commonly sold by gangs, and which regions have seen gangs monopolise local drug sales.
Nationally, one third of methamphetamine buyers reported purchasing from gangs.
Methamphetamine users in Southland/West Coast, Northland and Tasman/Nelson/Marlborough reported the highest percentage of gang purchases, between 44 percent and 53 percent.
In some regions, such as Gisborne and the Hawke's Bay, nearly 70 percent of respondents said one or two gangs dominated the meth market.
Lead professor Chris Wilkins says that monopolisation of the market was when gang selling became particularly harmful.
Gang involvement in other drugs was far lower, with just 13 percent of respondents saying they purchased cannabis from gangs, 6 percent reporting buying cocaine from gangs, 5 percent and 3 percent of MDMA and LSD users respectively reporting having bought from gang members.
"People talk in general terms about gangs and drugs, but gangs are actually most involved in methamphetamine and a little bit of cannabis - there's a whole lot of drug types where gangs aren't particularly involved."
Packs of methamphetamine seized by customs in March. In some regions, such as Gisborne and the Hawke's Bay, nearly 70 percent of respondents said one or two gangs dominated the meth market.
Photo:
Supplied/NZ Customs
He said there were some historical associations between gangs and methamphetamine, but it was also due to the international methamphetamine supply connections some gangs had developed, and the profitability of methamphetamine.
"The dominance of synthetic drug types, such as methamphetamine and synthetic opioids that means organised crime groups can produce very large quantities at low costs, and can do it anywhere - you don't have to grow opium in Afghanistan or coca in South America."
Local organised crime groups were developing connections all over the world, "not just the traditional South East Asia, but also the Mexican drug cartels who are experts in smuggling and distribution".
Previous modelling found gang selling increased the availability and lowered the price of methampetamine, particularly in small towns and rural areas.
But researchers noted more work was needed to isolate the role of gangs in driving meth use and harm, compared to alternative causes such as economic and social deprivation, unemployment or untreated mental health problems.
Survey findings also showed the rise in the use of social media and messaging apps to purchase drugs, which was consistent with overseas findings pointing to the growing digitalisation of drug markets, Wilkins said.
The use of social media purchasing was seen for all drug types, and had increased across cannabis, meth, MDMA, LSD/psychedelics and cocaine users in recent years, in some cases doubling on 2020 numbers.
The proportion who purchased LSD via social media and messaging apps increased from 9 percent in 2020 to 18 percent in 2024, MDMA purchases increased from 13 percent in 2020 to 24 percent in 2024, and cocaine purchases via apps went from 4 percent to 15 percent.
Wilkins said that while to some extent it was a sign of the digital times, it was also changing the face of the drug market and promoting drug use to a wider audience of young people.
"That's important to get your mind around in terms of drug prevention, help and support, that also now needs to happen online in a big way."
Facebook messenger was the most widely used among social media purchasers, with 54 percent using it in the six months prior, and Snapchat was close behind on 48 percent.
Other apps such as Signal, Whats App and Telegram were used by between 11 percent and 8 percent of social media purchasers, with 5 percent of respondents using dating apps to buy drugs.
Purchases via the darknet hovered around the 2 - 4 percent mark, which researchers described as "a small but influential role", and was largely restricted to stimulants, psychedelics and cannabis.
Despite the small numbers of people using the darknet, studies showed many were purchasing larger wholesale amounts for resale, suggesting a disproportionate impact, researchers concluded.
The NZDTS provides an annual snapshot of drug trends. More than 10,500 people completed the 2024 survey, responding to questions about drug use patterns, drug market prices, views on drug policy, help services, barriers to seeking help and harm reduction initiatives.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
33 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Abuse in care: Cabinet considered limiting gang members' redress
Lead Coordination Minister for the Crown Response Erica Stanford says she sought the advice about gang members on behalf of ministers who wanted to "consider the matter" of limiting redress. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Cabinet sought advice on limiting redress for gang members and serious criminals, but ultimately chose to treat gangs the same as any other survivor and create a new pathway for serious offenders. Information obtained by RNZ reveals the government was advised against a "blanket exclusion" because it risks compromising trust in the integrity of the Crown's response to the Royal Commission into Abuse in care. The advice described any proposal that would deny serious offenders or gang members access to the redress system would run "directly counter" to the Royal Commission's reports. Abuse survivor and former gang member Feke Taito says it is "unconscionable" the government considered leaving them out at all: "It just stunned me, actually." Minister in charge of the Crown's response Erica Stanford announced the coalition's plan for survivor redress last month , specifying a new process for claims from survivors who are also serious sexual and/or violent offenders who have been sentenced to five years or more in prison (high tariff offenders). A spokesperson for Stanford told RNZ she sought the advice about gang members and serious offenders on behalf of ministers who wanted to "consider the matter" of limiting redress. The spokesperson said Stanford accepted findings from the Royal Commission regarding the connection between abuse in care and subsequent gang membership. A briefing paper from the Crown Response to the Abuse in Care inquiry was titled 'Redress options for high tariff offenders and gang members'. It was addressed to Stanford, Lead Coordination Minister for the Crown Response; Simeon Brown, Minister of Health; and Louise Upston, Minister for Social Development and Employment, who also has responsibility for redress decisions under the Children's portfolio (transferred from Karen Chhour). Minister of Justice Paul Goldsmith was also looped in. In November last year, coalition members would not say whether gang members would be excluded or not. The briefing - dated 3 April - said it provided initial advice and options on the "legal and operational implications" of policy changes that would "limit" high tariff offenders' and gang members' entitlement to redress payments under the system. It recommended maintaining the status quo in which state claims agencies treat claimants "equally" and provide redress payments based on the "merits of their claim." "Claimants receive and have free use of any redress payments due to them. An exception is prisoners who do not have an external bank account to be paid into." It specified a "blanket exclusion of high tariff offenders and/or gang members from the state redress system" would likely reduce trust in the integrity of the Crown's response to the Royal Commission and was not recommended by officials. It also noted officials had not been able to identify any options for "imposing controls on access to redress" based only on someone's status as a gang member that were "operationally workable". This was also advised against. It later explained the officials had not been able to identify a "solid basis" for establishing whether someone is a gang member. Corrections holds some information on gang affiliation of the current prison population it said, but noted there would be issues with the comprehensiveness, accuracy and timeliness of that information. It also said the Privacy Commissioner was unlikely to be supportive of new legislation enabling that information to be shared. The briefing explained the Royal Commission had recommended redress should be "open to all survivors" including those in prison or with a criminal record. It stated the Royal Commission had pointed to the "high correlation" between abuse in care and high rates of criminal behaviour, imprisonment and the membership of gangs later on, and recommended that context be considered in the design of any new redress system. "Accordingly, any proposal to deny high tariff offenders or gang members access to the redress system would run directly counter to the Royal Commission's reports," the briefing said. "Moreover, it would likely compromise trust in the integrity of the Crown's response to the Royal Commission and whether the Crown has fully engaged with the Royal Commission's proceedings and the case studies and evidence set out in its reports." The briefing referenced two findings from the Royal Commission, the "Pathways to Prison" and "Pathways to Gang Membership" through State-care. "Previous research has found that one in five, and sometimes as many as one in three, individuals who went through social welfare residences during the Inquiry period went on to serve a criminal custodial sentence later in life," it said, and noted that experience was worse for Māori survivors. "Many Māori survivors shared how their time in care introduced them to gangs and gang life. "Joining was often in response to the violence, isolation and disconnection they experienced in care, including disconnection from their identity, culture, whānau, communities and society." Fa'afete (Feke) Taito is now the chairman of survivor-led organisation Te Rōpu Toiora. He said he was stunned to learn the government had considered excluding gang members, but felt it confirmed what he thought the government was trying to do. "Trying to suppress us at the margins, trying to drive us even further down. "You know, the whole thing to me is unconscionable." He said it read like the government was trying to prevent offenders with criminal records and gang members from receiving any type of redress. "How can they do that? "After they the Royal Commission inquiry clearly states the majority of these offenders and gang members, myself included, we joined and we connected with these gangs because of the abuse we suffered there, in state care, in these boys homes." Taito said it made him distrust the government more, and felt like the government was looking for options of "getting out of having to pay or compensate" survivors the state itself had harmed. He said this, along with the decision not to set up an entirely new system for redress - despite the prime minister promising to do so - showed he could not expect any justice from this government. He was glad the advice from Crown officials told the government it couldn't go ahead with those options, and that the Crown Response Office engaged with survivors. "Because it's nothing about us unless it's from us." The briefing paper said the lead coordination minister for the government's response had commissioned advice on the matter for redress Ministers and the Minister of Justice. A spokesperson for Stanford said gang members weren't treated differently to any other survivor in regard to seeking redress and that will continue to be the case. However, there will be a "new pathway" for new claims from serious violent and/or sexual offenders sentenced to five years or more in prison. That was decided after further advice from officials which highlighted "similar regimes" in Scotland and Australia. That information should be proactively released by Cabinet this week. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
15 hours ago
- RNZ News
Grieving mother calls for Wellington's historic crane's removal after son's death
By Catherine Hutton, Open Justice reporter of Jarreth Colquhoun (inset) died after jumping from the floating crane SS Hikitia on the Wellington waterfront in January 2024. Photo: Mark Mitchell / NZME Grieving mum Sue Colquhoun fears it's only a matter of time until someone else jumps off the historic crane, the SS Hikitia, moored on Wellington's waterfront. Last January, her son Jarreth climbed to the top, waved to a crowd below and jumped feet first into the harbour - the equivalent of falling 12 storeys. It's estimated he was travelling at 98km/h when he hit the water. A coroner has ruled this week that the height of the crane and the speed with which he fell , combined with the effects of acute methamphetamine use and cold water immersion, meant Colquhoun's fall was fatal. She's now made some recommendations in the hope of preventing similar tragedies. But his mum says you can't, and won't, stop young men from doing foolish things, particularly those like Jarreth who viewed the Hikitia as a challenge. Her son had exhibited risky behaviour for years. He was either extremely withdrawn or super hyped up. Twice she'd tried to get a mental health assessment, without success. But she says to people like her son, the Hikitia was a visible challenge and a temptation, that others are going to try. That's why she wants the crane completely removed from the waterfront. She's vowed to keep fighting, saying it's irrelevant if the next fatality is one year or 10 years away: "I was still the one before them who could have made a difference," she said. The 33-year-old's death coincided with the Manu World Champs at the nearby Taranaki St Dive Platform. Sue's in no doubt that her son was spurred on by the competition and a desire to prove he could jump further. She can visualise him on the crane, drawn to the water and waving to the crowds below. But she's disappointed by the coroner's report and feels more could be done between the Maritime Heritage Trust, as the crane's owners, and the Wellington City Council (WCC), which owns the wharves. She says moving the crane further over the boat to deter others from jumping and the extra security measures proposed in the coroner's report aren't enough. Instead, she wants the crane moved away from the wharf, the waterfront, and anywhere there's foot traffic. "They can sink it, for all I care," she said. The only tiny piece of satisfaction she took from the coroner's finding was the council's commitment to include the Hikitia in its safety plan for the next event. But even that wouldn't be necessary if the Hikitia were moved from its current spot, she said. Invited for a tour aboard the Hikitia following Jarreth's death, she said it did little to sway her views. While aboard, she saw the effort volunteers put in to restoring the vessel but to her, she felt there appeared to be little effort being put in to making it safer. The Hikitia floating crane in Wellington. Photo: RNZ / Michael Cropp Any discussions she'd had with the crane's trustees had come from the angle of "we're preserving a piece of history", she said. "That's the least thing on my mind, you've got that history in your books. My history now is death notices and a headstone, that's my history with that boat now, and I don't want to see it." Instead, she wants discussion about why more isn't being done to move the vessel from its current location. She'd also like to hear from other families who've been involved in previous jumping incidents from the crane, including from the family of Jamie Gibbon who died in 2015 and is mentioned in the recent coroner's report. Sue wants people to know that Jarreth was a kind, loyal and loving person to everyone. The last six months of his life, during which he was gripped by methamphetamine addiction, did not accurately reflect the good man and kind father that he was, she said. The trust has expressed its condolences to Jarreth's family for their terrible loss and says his death had a significant impact on their volunteers. In a statement, its chairman Peter McKnight says there are ongoing discussions between the trust and WCC to ensure the Hikitia can remain safely at her existing berth, particularly during waterfront events. The decision to post security guards on the Hikitia during this year's Homegrown music festival was an example of the trust's engagement with the council around event planning and management. While it's always looking to improve safety, it doubted moving the vessel to another berth would change matters. It refers to the coroner's report, which noted that tower cranes are often the target of illegal climbing activities. Wellington's harbourmaster Grant Nalder estimates the Hikitia has been berthed in its present spot since the 1990s. He says any decisions about moving the Hikitia are between the trust and the WCC, but warns it's not as simple as saying, "we'll move it somewhere else". "There is no mythical somewhere else." Also, he points out the vessel is no longer self-propelled, something the volunteers are working to fix, so it can once again operate under its own steam. The trust says given the vessel's significant historical value to global maritime history and engineering, improving public education and outreach about the Hikitia also plays an important part in how the public engages with the vessel. With its centenary celebrations next year, the trust hopes to continue to inspire New Zealand's future sailors, engineers, historians, crane operators, and artists through updated and improved outreach programmes on the Hikitia at Taranaki Wharf. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
Otago Daily Times
16 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Teen behind 'inhumane' hit-and-run death to be deported to NZ
The "inhumane" and "cruel" actions of a young Kiwi who killed a motorcyclist in a fiery hit-and-run have raised concerns for Australian officials and resulted in him being exiled from the country. The New Zealand-born man was 17 when he failed to give way at a Melbourne intersection in a stolen BMW he was driving and collided with a motorcycle. The bike and its rider, Keith Stevens, became trapped under the vehicle but the then-teenager continued to drive, dragging them for 85m. The friction caused the motorcycle to burst into flames, engulfing Stevens and causing burns to 80% of his body. When the driver, who had lived in Australia since he was 1, finally stopped, he reversed off the motorcycle and Stevens then drove off at speed, leaving the 33-year-old father for dead. Australian media reported the teen only paused to dislodge Stevens when his three teenage passengers begged him to do so. Stevens died in hospital the next day after his life support was turned off. Inhumane and cowardly After the November 2017 fatal crash in Mitcham, Melbourne, the car driver, who has not been named because of Australian laws around reporting youth offender matters, was sentenced in the County Court of Victoria to six years' imprisonment, with a minimum non-parole period of four years. In sentencing him, Judge Irene Lawson was brought to tears and needed a moment to compose herself when describing the void left by Stevens' death, according to Australian media. She described the actions of the teenager as inhumane and cowardly. As a result of his offending, his visa was cancelled in 2020 under section 501 of Australia's Migration Act. His plea to have that decision revoked was declined and he then applied to the Administrative Review Tribunal of Australia for a review. The review hearing for the now 25-year-old, who is currently detained in immigration detention, was held last month. Frequent and repeated youth offending According to the decision, he moved to Australia as a 1-year-old with his family in 2001. It stated he had a "difficult upbringing" that had, in part, influenced his offending. He began smoking marijuana at 12, drinking alcohol around 14 and progressed to methamphetamine use at 16. The decision reported he had displayed "anti-social behaviours" that had manifested into violence since he was young. His conviction history showed frequent and repeated offending and that he was on youth parole for offences including burglary when he fatally hit Stevens. Immediately after that collision, the teen ditched the stolen BMW and he and his associates ran up an embankment and jumped over a fence into a property. They tried to kick down a door at the house but a female resident threw her weight against it so they couldn't get in. They gave up but moved on to another home in the street, breaking in and stealing a car, a cellphone and a wallet. That car was later found abandoned and destroyed by fire. At his sentencing, the court heard the teen was egocentric, addicted to meth and had limited capacity for remorse at the time. Australian media reported that he had called a friend in juvenile detention after the crash and said: "Even after the accident, bro, I didn't feel anything. Like, I didn't feel no pain, no emotions about it." His friend then asked him if he cared about the life he had taken. "Yeah, bro, I f***in' murdered a f***in' innocent 33-year-old man," he responded. At the recent appeal, he told the tribunal he had not been remorseful for killing Stevens at the time but now accepted full responsibility and made no attempt to excuse his behaviour or to attribute blame to anyone else. The tribunal accepted that he had matured and was truly remorseful. 'Grave fears' if deported The man attributed several factors to his youth offending, including parental neglect, poor mental health, anti-social peers and drug use, including meth, cannabis and ecstasy. He has family support, is currently abstinent from drugs and alcohol, and has completed some educational and rehabilitative programmes while locked up. But his mental health and emotional and psychological issues have not been professionally addressed and he remains a risk of reoffending. In his plea to remain in Australia, the man said he had no family support in New Zealand and was unfamiliar with the country. His mother had "grave fears" that if deported, and without his Australian support network, he would fall into gang life and drugs and be at risk of serious physical, emotional and mental harm. The tribunal accepted that, because of being incarcerated since he was a teen, he has no experience as an adult in the community and would face difficulties in adjusting to life in New Zealand without family support. But the decision stated he was not unfamiliar with New Zealand, as movement records showed he had travelled to New Zealand 15 times during 2001 and 2015, and had a relative in Wellington. While the tribunal accepted the man has strong and enduring ties to Australia, they were diminished by his extensive criminal record and his "very limited" positive contribution to the community. In declining to revoke the cancellation of the man's visa, the tribunal stated the nature of the offending had raised serious character concerns about the man. "The nature of the applicant's offending and the harm that would result if it were repeated are so serious that the countervailing considerations are insufficient to outweigh considerations of the protection of the Australian community and the expectations of the Australian community so as to justify revoking the cancellation of the applicant's visa." - Tara Shaskey, Open Justice reporter
