WHO expert group fails to find a definitive answer for how COVID-19 began
LONDON (AP) — An expert group charged by the World Health Organization to investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic started released its final report Friday, reaching an unsatisfying conclusion: Scientists still aren't sure how the worst health emergency in a century began.
At a press briefing on Friday, Marietjie Venter, the group's chair, said that most scientific data supports the hypothesis that the new coronavirus jumped to humans from animals.
That was also the conclusion drawn by the first WHO expert group that investigated the pandemic's origins in 2021, when scientists concluded the virus likely spread from bats to humans, via another intermediary animal. At the time, WHO said a lab leak was 'extremely unlikely.'
Venter said that after more than three years of work, WHO's expert group was unable to get the necessary data to evaluate whether or not COVID-19 was the result of a lab accident, despite repeated requests for hundreds of genetic sequences and more detailed biosecurity information that were made to the Chinese government.
'Therefore, this hypothesis could not be investigated or excluded,' she said. 'It was deemed to be very speculative, based on political opinions and not backed up by science.' She said that the 27-member group did not reach a consensus; one member resigned earlier this week and three others asked for their names to be removed from the report.
Venter said there was no evidence to prove that COVID-19 had been manipulated in a lab, nor was there any indication that the virus had been spreading before December 2019 anywhere outside of China.
'Until more scientific data becomes available, the origins of how SARS-CoV-2 entered human populations will remain inconclusive,' Venter said, referring to the scientific name for the COVID-19 virus.
WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said it was a 'moral imperative' to determine how COVID began, noting that the virus killed at least 20 million people, wiped at least $10 trillion from the global economy and upended the lives of billions.
Last year, the AP found that the Chinese government froze meaningful domestic and international efforts to trace the virus' origins in the first weeks of the outbreak in 2020 and that WHO itself may have missed early opportunities to investigate how COVID-19 began.
U.S. President Donald Trump has long blamed the emergence of the coronavirus on a laboratory accident in China, while a U.S. intelligence analysis found there was insufficient evidence to prove the theory.
Chinese officials have repeatedly dismissed the idea that the pandemic could have started in a lab, saying that the search for its origins should be conducted in other countries.
Last September, researchers zeroed in on a short list of animals they think might have spread COVID-19 to humans, including racoon dogs, civet cats and bamboo rats.
__
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
FUE Hair Transplant Clinic London Launches New Website to Enhance Patient Experience and Education
London, UK - June 27, 2025 - FUE Hair Transplant Clinic London is pleased to announce the launch of its newly designed website, designed to provide patients with a seamless, informative, and user-friendly experience. The new site reflects the clinic's commitment to delivering high-quality, surgeon-led hair transplant procedures while prioritising education and accessibility for both new and existing patients. The redesigned website ( ) features an intuitive layout, faster navigation, and comprehensive resources about hair restoration treatments, including Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE), one of the most advanced and minimally invasive hair transplant techniques available today. Prospective patients can now easily access detailed guides on the FUE procedure, explore before-and-after galleries, and book confidential consultations directly with leading UK-trained surgeons. The site also features a new blog section, offering expert insights into hair loss, recovery timelines, treatment costs, and the science behind successful transplants. 'Our goal was to create a digital experience that mirrors the quality of care we provide in-clinic,' said the Lead Surgeon at FUE Hair Transplant Clinic London. 'Many of our patients begin their journey online, so it was crucial to build a platform that's educational, trustworthy, and easy to navigate. We want people to feel empowered when making one of the most personal decisions about their appearance.' Visitors can explore real patient stories, understand pricing with no hidden fees, and get clear information about what to expect before, during, and after their procedure. The launch of the new website marks a key step in FUE Hair Transplant Clinic London's mission to make hair restoration more accessible, personalised, and results-driven for individuals experiencing hair loss. Media Contact Company Name: Press featured Contact Person: Maxwell Pierce Email: Send Email Country: United Kingdom Website: Source: Press Featured
Fast Company
2 hours ago
- Fast Company
Your food is full of microplastics—and now we know why
A study published this week delves into the mystery of how the plastic objects we interact with daily shed tiny particles that creep into our bodies, brains and guts. While the scientific focus has long been on how microplastics pollute our environment and impact wildlife, researchers are increasingly raising alarms about how the same contaminants can wreak havoc in the human body. The new research, published in the journal NPJ Science of Food, wove together data from 100 previous papers that studied microplastics, nanoplastics and plastic particles. The results were compiled into an open database published by the Food Packaging Forum, a Swiss nonprofit that examines chemicals in food packaging. Microplastics and nanoplastics are plastic particles in the millimeter to nanometer range, with the latter causing even more concern among scientists because their tiny size makes them able to slip into human cells. 'This is the first systematic evidence map to investigate the role of the normal and intended use of food contact articles in the contamination of foodstuffs with MNPs [microplastics and nanoplastics],' lead author of and Scientific Communication Officer at the Food Packaging Forum Dr. Lisa Zimmermann said. 'Food contact articles are a relevant source of MNPs in foodstuffs; however, their contribution to human MNP exposure is underappreciated.' How we interact with plastic matters The new study looked at a broad range of 'food contact articles' that included water bottles, cutting boards, food processing equipment and packaging ranging from food wrappers to tea bags. Most food packaging contains plastic, even many things that seem like they don't, like the paper that wraps around cold cuts and cheese, cardboard takeout containers and glass bottles and jars, which often have a plastic-coated closure. The authors focused on how everyday objects used as intended can shed microplastics and how that shedding can worsen over the course of repeated interactions. Across 14 different studies, microplastic shedding was found to increase with repeated uses, including screwing a reusable water bottle lid on and off, washing a melamine dish or putting plastic tableware into contact with hot foods 'These findings are relevant for reused plastic [food contact articles] and should be considered when assessing the safety of FCAs across use cycles,' the authors wrote. Based on their research, and its blind spots, they stressed the need for future studies to delve more deeply into how repeated interactions, heating and washing affects how much microplastic is shed by kitchenware and food packaging that most of the world's population might come into contact with countless times each day. The authors also found that the bulk of the research on microplastics focused on only a few kinds of objects that come into contact with food and drinks, like water bottles and tea bags. Similarly, more studies focused on PET and polypropylene over other common plastics, leaving a lot of unknowns about how much plastic is being shed by food packaging made out of other materials. Food and beverage containers can expose the human body to microplastics every time we interact with them but relatively little is still known about how that process works. That mystery is an ominous one considering how ubiquitous plastics are globally in food packaging and preparation and how their presence is increasingly linked to reproductive, digestive and respiratory problems and potentially even colon and lung cancer. Plastics appear to have no trouble finding their way into the human body. Another recent study found that the adult brain can contain a plastic spoon's worth of microplastics and nanoplastics, an amount that's seven to 30 times higher than what might be found in the liver or kidneys. Those kind of findings show that it's imperative for future research to track down how all of that plastic is finding its way into the human body and what exactly it does once it gets there.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Confessions of a Former Nurx Addict
It was the beginning of 2019—I had been working at a new company for almost exactly a year, and I was super stressed about my healthcare situation. No, I didn't have any diseases or serious conditions. I wasn't sick or even worried about the possibility of getting sick (although that joke was on me; I caught COVID-19 four separate times in 2020). But for the first time in my life, I found myself in health insurance hell. To be fair, dealing with any healthcare bureaucracy in America is sure to be frustrating and annoying, and will most likely turn into a Kafkaesque nightmare. But when you're 28 and still in the honeymoon phase of a new-ish relationship, an abrupt cut-off of your birth control—with no warning and no clear path to restart it—starts to feel less like a logistical hiccup and more like an existential crisis. More from Flow Space UPDATE: Your State-by-State Guide to Understanding Menopause Insurance Options See, the OB-GYN I saw once a year was on vacation, then booked for the next seven months straight (not that she was in-network anyway), and WITH INSURANCE, the pharmacy was charging me over $130 for one pack, only one month's worth, of pills. The health insurance at my last two jobs had charged me $0 for birth control. In fact, at that point, I had been taking Lo Loestrin FE regularly for 12 years and had never once paid for it. I was, as the kids say, shook. Thankfully, in the midst trying to figure out what to do, I was in the kitchen with a couple of coworkers, when I overheard them mention Nurx. They were both raving about it, but I couldn't tell if it was a fancy boutique or a new dish at their favorite brunch spot—all I could tell was that they both thought Nurx was great. I was having fun making wild guesses in my head, but I also. didn't want to miss out on something seemingly so delightful, so I finally asked them, 'What's Nurx?' In retrospect, it's a little weird that both ladies were surprised I hadn't heard of it. Because, remember this took place pre-COVID and the ensuing telehealth boom. In fact, in 2019, only 10% of Americans ever participated in a telehealth visit, according to a 2024 survey conducted by hims & hers; the most recent data shows a 440% rise in telehealth adoption with 54% having had a telehealth appointment as of early 2025. While I might have been early to to the telemedicine game compared to the general public, I was late to Nurx, which launched in 2015, as far as my work friends were concerned. And they were right. For the next four years, everything about my birth control was seamless. I paid $15 dollars for an initial consult (I believe that fee has gone up to $28 now for birth control patients), and by some incredible stroke of luck, the same afternoon I learned about Nurx, I received a company-wide email explaining that our health insurance plans were changing slightly. The notice didn't go into much detail other than that our copays would be going up—birth control costs definitely weren't mentioned—but I found out via chat with the Nurx team through their app that my medication cost would be $0. They would send me three packs at a time, refills were automatic and shipping was free. Other than the initial $15, I would only have to pay a $3 service fee each month—meaning one full year of Lo Loestrin FE would come out to approximately $51. Just days prior, the same health insurance company wanted me to pay around $87 more for a single pack of medicine from a pharmacy where I'd have to remember to call in all my own refills, go pick them up every single month, wait in a never-ending line and then have some pharmacy tech tell me 'it's gonna be another 30 minutes,' despite the text on my phone announcing 'my prescription is ready for pick-up.' In all honestly, I had become dependent on the impeccable consistency and convenience of Nurx. It felt like the company had truly taken a necessary task (managing your birth control) off your plate and put it on the the most dependable auto-pilot. At the end of 2019, Nurx sent out an email recapping exciting things that had happened that year, and it mentioned how they had not only launched HPV home testing and STI home testing and treatment, but also how August 2019 marked one year of providing PrEP home test kits for HIV prevention. I remember at some point later down the line, the introduced some prescription skin products, but as long as my birth control was being taken care of, I really wasn't paying attention to Nurx. It was great! Then, on March 20, 2023, I received a message from Nurx stating, 'Lo Loestrin Fe will no longer be stocked at our pharmacy. This means we cannot refill your birth control prescription.' But it went on to offer me options, Nurx could send my prescription to a local pharmacy or I could work with their medical team to find something similar to switch to. Considering that I had noticeably (and quickly) gained weight on three different birth controls my OB-GYN had me try before we landed on Lo Loestrin Fe, the decision was a no-brainer. So I asked them to to send to my local pharmacy, and it was OK for the most part. I missed the convenience of getting my prescription shipped directly to my apartment and I could only get one pack at a time instead of three, but I couldn't really complain. At least not until March 21, 2024. The only reason I know some of these exact dates is because I did complain; I complained via a 1,400-word email with certain sections highlighted yellow and other section written with pink or blue or orange. I utilized the 'bold' function more than was necessary. I must imagine that my email was the most colorful 'angry email' Nurx has ever received. What happened? Well, the only thing that Nurx had figured out how to automate yet was the yearly renewal process. Once a year, you had to go onto their platform to manually renew your prescription. I had done exactly that on February 21, 2024 and immediately received a confirmation that my renewal went through; the next day, I got another message confirming that my prescription had been sent to my pharmacy. I was able to pick up my first pack of birth control (of the 12-mont prescription) on March 21, 2024—but when I tried to put in the next month's refill, the pharmacy said they had no record of me or my Lo Loestrin FE in its system. When I reached out to Nurx, I was told they had already sent all remaining refills to my local pharmacy and suggested I speak to them, clearly forgetting that the pharmacy had insisted I get in touch with Nurx. It was a never-ending circle of not getting my birth control, yet continuing to pay a $3 service fee every month. I tried everything I could think of, but Nurx stopped responding to my messages, including my colorful monster-of an email. Despite the unfortunate ending of my time with Nurx, it was, without-a-doubt, it was still the best and easiest approach to birth control prescriptions that I've ever seen. After my March refill ran out and I was just beginning to step into my drama-filled exit with the telehealth platform, the pharmacist who was telling me I didn't exist in their system ended up giving me a free pack of Lo Loestrin FE. My former OB-GYN had moved away, and so I found a new doctor on ZocDoc and went back to relying on my yearly well-woman exam as a means to procure my birth control. I wasn't overly fond of this physician so when I realized she had only prescribed me six months worth of Lo Loestrin Fe, I decided I wasn't even going to bother calling her office to ask for a refill. It was October 2024 at this point, living in a post-COVID world, I expected to find more than one freshly launched telehealth platform that would surely outrival Nurx. After some research I chose to create an account with Pandia Health, a telehealth platform focused solely on women's hormonal care from birth control to hormone replacement therapy (HRT). I knew that Nurx had been adding treatments here and there, but it wasn't until I started looking into new telehealth options that I realized it had evolved into far more than just a birth control platform. They now offer everything from Ozempic and Wegovy for weight management and prescription anti-aging skin care to minoxidil for women's hair loss and essential everyday care for core gynecological issues. But it's their mental health services that seem to have gained the most traction—now standing alongside birth control as one of Nurx's primary offerings. I was surprised to find a number of online reviews comparing Nurx to Brightside Health, a subscription-based online psychiatry and therapy platform that I also happen to use; I started on Brightside in 2020 and remain a member to this day. I only have great things about my experience with Brightside but, for me, comparing the two is an apples-oranges situation. And through writing this piece, it seems somewhat obvious to me that Nurx was going through some massive changes at the time of my issue with them. And considering how disastrous Pandia Health turned out to be—every single month you're expected to fill out and submit a form consenting to your prescription, and since it can take up to 10 days to arrive (if it ever actually does), you're constantly inundated with 'refill reminder' and 'refill consent confirmation reminder' emails—Nurx is still easily the best way I've ever received birth control. When it was working, it was the gold standard. I can only hope that any of the kinks I experienced were from its growth spurt into a fully fledged online clinic for women's health and that the shortcomings I encountered have all been worked out by now. As for me, after Pandia failed to deliver my birth control twice, I stopped using them. I then embarked upon an exhaustive, all-night search for a platform that met, what I thought was, some simple criteria—it needed to either be cheap or take my insurance, carry Lo Loestrin FE, able to send three packs at the same time and actually send them to directly to me through the mail. I finally decided two out of four wasn't that bad. I signed up with an online medical consultation service called Dr.B, which was very simple and very cheap (a consultation is $15, then medication costs are handled by your insurance). But I had to have them send the prescription to a local New York pharmacy and I only get one pack at a time. I thought after such a struggle, I was finally in OK place with my birth control. Do I have to physically drag myself to a pharmacy? Yes, but at least Dr.B doesn't clog up my inbox by sending emails every other day. I actually picked up my first packet of Lo Loestrin Fe placed through Dr.B last Friday. The pharmacist called to let me know it was ready and then said, 'Can you come pick it up ASAP? I told her I'd come in after work. She responded with, 'OK, like you really need to come get it though because we're closing down. Closing down for good.' 'When exactly?' I asked. Her answer? Monday. So that's a new birth control thing to worry about. I'm honestly considering restarting my subscription with Nurx.
