Japan and China trade blame over Chinese fighter jets flying close to Japanese planes
TOKYO (AP) — Japan and China blamed each other on Thursday after Tokyo raised concern that a Chinese fighter jet came dangerously close to Japanese reconnaissance planes.
The Chinese fighter jets took off from one of two Chinese aircraft carriers that were operating together for the first time in the Pacific, Japan's Defense Ministry said.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi told reporters that Japan conveyed its 'serious concern' to China that such close encounters could cause accidental collisions.
According to Japan, a Chinese J-15 fighter jet took off from the Shandong aircraft carrier on Saturday and chased a Japanese P-3C aircraft on reconnaissance duty, coming within an 'abnormally close distance' of 45 meters (50 yards) for about 40 minutes.
A Chinese jet also crossed 900 meters (980 yards) in front of a Japanese P-3C for about 80 minutes on Sunday, the ministry said.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian defended China's activities as being fully consistent with international law and practices, and blamed Japanese vessels and airplanes for conducting close reconnaissance of China's military activities.
The incidents occurred in the Pacific, where Japan's Self-Defense Force spotted the two carriers, the Shandong and the Liaoning, almost simultaneously operating near southern Japanese islands for the first time.
Aircraft carriers are critical to projecting power at a distance. China routinely sends coast guard vessels, warships and warplanes around disputed East China Sea islands, but now they also reach as far as Guam, a U.S. Pacific territory with military bases.
Both Chinese carriers operated in waters off Iwo Jima, about 1,200 kilometers (750 miles) south of Tokyo. The Liaoning also sailed inside Japan's exclusive economic zone near Minamitorishima, the country's easternmost island, Japan's Defense Minister Gen Nakatani said. There was no violation of Japanese territorial waters, he said.
___
Associated Press writer Christopher Bodeen in Taipei, Taiwan contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Marines will begin guarding federal property in LA today
Marines deployed to Los Angeles will start their mission of guarding federal buildings on Friday. National Guard soldiers who were already in the area will transition to protecting local law enforcement, the commander of the mission announced. 'I would like to emphasize that the soldiers will not participate in law enforcement activities. Rather, they'll be focused on protecting federal law enforcement personnel,' Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, commander of Task Force 51, the name of the military's mission in LA, told reporters Friday. President Donald Trump federalized 2,000 California National Guard soldiers from the 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team on June 7 to protect federal buildings and law enforcement as protests against U.S. Immigration Customs and Enforcement operations erupted in downtown LA last weekend. Two days later, Trump ordered the mobilization of 2,000 more Guardsmen troops, led by the 49th Military Police Brigade, and 700 Marines from 2nd Battalion, 7th Marine Regiment. The Marines arrived at the Wilshire Federal Building in LA on Thursday night where they received 'left seat, right seat leader familiarization training' with the 79th Infantry Brigade soldiers. The Marines will take over building protection operations at noon Pacific time. U.S. Northern Command said that Marines were at the Wilshire Federal Building at Sepulveda and Wilshire boulevards, approximately 13 miles West of the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building in downtown Los Angeles. There are currently 2,000 troops in LA as part of the Task Force 51 mission, Sherman said, but did not specify at the press briefing where the remaining troops are. Sending Marines into a major city like Los Angeles to assist with law enforcement is uncommon. The mission is unusual for Marines, particularly a unit like 2/7, which is known for its combat role, and has raised concerns about their participation in law enforcement and use of force. Marines were last deployed to LA in 1992 to help quell riots that erupted after police were acquitted in the beating of Rodney King. 'The United States Marine Corps, as you know, they're the ones who guard our embassies worldwide, and they are certainly trained on how to defend a federal building,' Sherman said. 'That's the mission that we've really focused on them to do, and that's what they will be doing here. They've already started with the Wilshire building today, and we will progress from there.' Sherman said soldiers or Marines have not been involved in temporary detentions but have 'watched' as federal law enforcement make arrests. While all of the troops are mobilized with their assigned weapons and have crowd control gear, which includes helmets, face shields, shields, batons and gas masks, Sherman said they 'strictly' use it for crowd control and to 'hold people away as the federal agents are doing their job.' Sherman said that Marine Corps lawyers did a 'complete comprehensive' review of the standing rules of force for all of the soldiers and Marines in LA. Service members typically receive this training 'before they ever go on the mission,' which includes de-escalation techniques and the proper use of crowd control, he added. The military is paying money to contract building latrines, showers, hand washing stations, food service, full laundry service, bulk ice and bulk fuel for the troops in LA, Sherman said, adding that they have 'adequate shelter, food and water.' The National Guard Bureau told Task & Purpose that if the mission is over 30 days, the orders that the soldiers will be serving under will include basic allowances for housing and food. A Marine Corps reply-all email apocalypse has an incredible real-life ending Army shuts down its sole active-duty information operations command Army plans to close more than 20 base museums in major reduction Former Green Beret nominated to top Pentagon position to oversee special ops The Navy's new recruiting commercial puts the 'dirt wars' in the past
New York Times
4 hours ago
- New York Times
Trump's Use of National Guard in Limbo After Court Rulings
A federal appeals court in San Francisco has for now paused an order by a judge who ordered President Trump on Thursday to relinquish control of California National Guard troops he had mobilized to protect immigration agents from protesters in Los Angeles. In an extraordinary ruling, the judge, Charles Breyer of the Federal District Court in San Francisco, held that Mr. Trump had illegally seized control of up to 4,000 National Guard troops — hundreds of whom were already deployed in the streets of Los Angeles on his orders — and directed him to return them to the command of Gov. Gavin Newsom of California. But the Trump administration immediately appealed the ruling and asked the appeals court to keep it from taking effect while the litigation continues. In a late-night brief, the Justice Department said Judge Breyer's 'second-guessing of the commander in chief's military judgments is a gross violation of the separation of powers.' The case was assigned to a three-judge panel that consists of two appointees of Mr. Trump and one appointee of President Joseph R. Biden Jr. In a terse late-night order, the panel stayed the order by Judge Breyer, an appointee of President Bill Clinton, 'pending further order,' which means the National Guard forces will stay subject to Mr. Trump's control for now. It also set a swift briefing schedule and a hearing for noon Pacific time on Tuesday. Depending on how the panel eventually rules, either side could ask the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to rehear the matter or could file an emergency appeal directly to the Supreme Court, where Republican appointees hold a six-member supermajority. Lawyers for the state of California and Mr. Newsom filed their own brief opposing the federal government's request for a stay shortly after the court had already granted it. The state argued that pausing Judge Breyer's order would be 'unnecessary and unwarranted in light of the district court's extensive reasoning — in particular, its findings of irreparable harm to the state in the absence of injunctive relief.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
E&E News
5 hours ago
- E&E News
Burgum suggests Interior could terminate more leases
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum declined on Thursday to commit to keeping open a California oil and gas oversight office, telling lawmakers that his agency was looking to save money on real estate. At a House Natural Resources Committee oversight hearing, Rep. Julia Brownley (D-Calif.) pressed Burgum to promise not to close the Pacific regional office for the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), the Interior agency that oversees offshore drilling infrastructure. The office appeared on a 'lease termination list' earlier this year that included dozens of federal offices, many at Interior, that the Trump administration believed were extraneous. Burgum refused to say the office would remain open. Advertisement 'The work they do is crucial. I won't make any commitments about leases,' Burgum told the committee. 'We've got way too much space across Interior.'
